<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 12 July 2016 at 20:45, Nishal Goburdhan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nishal@controlfreak.co.za" target="_blank">nishal@controlfreak.co.za</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Any other interpretation is disingenuous.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
really omo?   that’s hardly sporting of you. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">because an interpretation does not match your own, does *not* make that interpretation incorrect.<br>
i’m simply giving you (this public list) my interpretation.  which, to me, seems correct from *my* reading of the text.</blockquote></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">sorry but I think what the policy says and intends is pretty obvious</div></div>