<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Can we stay discussion and consensus oriented here instead of “…. I would vote against” ?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">—Alain </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 28, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Andrew Alston <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" class="">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class="">
<meta name="Title" content="" class="">
<meta name="Keywords" content="" class="">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)" class="">
<style class=""><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Courier New";
panose-1:2 7 3 9 2 2 5 2 4 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:36.0pt;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:595.0pt 842.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:454834823;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-1924871076 67698699 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-start-at:197;
mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:1542937334;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:1264346394 67698699 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l1:level1
{mso-level-start-at:197;
mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@list l1:level2
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l1:level3
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1:level4
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level5
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l1:level6
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1:level7
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level8
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l1:level9
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
--></style>
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" class="">
<div class="WordSection1"><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri" class="">Comments below
<o:p class=""></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri" class=""> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri" class="">Please note – I am posting here purely in my capacity as a resource member.<o:p class=""></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri" class=""> </span></div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal">>>>1 ...... but there is a conflict between 7.2(i) and 13.7(i) on whether or not Associate Members may vote in elections forDirectors. This conflict must be resolved one way or another.<br class="">
We need to decide whether or not Associate Members should vote, and modify the Bylaws to give effect to that decision<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
> Just a matter of ambiguity in the statement in 7.2(i) to straighten out. The bylaws are consistent. Registered and Resource members vote. Associate members observe. <o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</div>
<div class=""><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">I tend to agree here and woud be in favour of an amendment to fix the ambiguity<o:p class=""></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div>
</div>
<div class=""><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal">>>>2. Interchangeable use of the terms “Bylaw” or “Bylaws” and “Constitution”:...... Suggest adding a clause 1.3 to clarify that this document may be referred to by the term “Bylaws” or “Constitution”, and is intended to serve the function
of the Constitution in terms of the Companies Act of Mauritius.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br class="">
> Supported<o:p class=""></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Supported as well<o:p class=""></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal">>>4 - Term limits: Consider adding a term limit for elected Board members.<br class="">
>> We need to decide whether or not to add a limit, and what the limit should be.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br class="">
> Proposal : One term and at least an election before another nomination<o:p class=""></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Agree with term limits – would not however support a single term – there has to be some continuity and it takes any director time to get up to speed with everything in the organization as well. Two terms with
a two term break seems far more reasonable to me, and I would support such<o:p class=""></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
>>> 5- Independence of Directors: Consider adding a limit to the number of Directors who may work for the same organisation.<br class="">
<br class="">
>>> We need to decide whether or not to add a limit, and what the limit should be.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br class="">
> We need to keep refreshing the board with independence, expertise and skills so a better managed succession process is a must. I propose with the exclusion of the CEO that we have<br class="">
<br class="">
> - Max 1 per org/company<br class="">
> - Max 1 per country<br class="">
> - Max 2 per region<br class="">
<br class="">
> - Not more than one Director may have employment, consultancy or advisory relationships with the same Company or Organization and/or with one of its Related Companies or Organizations established or not in the > same country.<br class="">
<br class="">
> - not more than one Director may be domiciled in the same country. Should a candidate for a position on the Board of Directors have more than one domicile, one of which involves a presumed incompatibility, in order > to analyze his/her case for usual country
of residence, the country where the company or organization he/she is a part of or works for is established, and/or any other relevant data shall be considered;<br class="">
<br class="">
> - not more than two Directors may be domiciled in the same region. <o:p class=""></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">I do not support this at all and would vote against any such change. I believe that the members are free to nominate who they want, and the vote at the ballot box should be the deciding factor. If the community
wishes to elect a number of people from the same <insert criteria> that is the communities choice, and I don’t think we should be attempting to code in limitations to this. There is however one except, I would support an amendment that says no more than two
directors from the same organization (on a 9 man board, I don’t believe this is a number high enough that 2 people could have any meaningful sway). With regards to the regional and who is domiciled where, I strongly oppose. I point out at under the current
bylaws a director may be domiciled in a particular place when he stands and may relocate during his term (including off the continent) – under this proposal a director who moved to a country where another director was domiciled during his term would have to
forfeit his duly elected seat. Sorry, can’t support that.<o:p class=""></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p class=""> </o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
>>>6- Regional representation: Consider modifying 13.5 to state that Directors must act in the interests of AFRINIC as a whole,regardless of their regional affiliation.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br class="">
> Supported<o:p class=""></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Supported<o:p class=""></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal">>>>7. Conflict of interest: Consider adding a requirement for Directors to disclose any conflict of interest, and to recuse themselves from voting on any matter where they have a conflict of interest.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br class="">
> Supported. In addition, the Board must have a Conflict of Interest Policy and enforce it. <o:p class=""></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Strongly supported and would go so far as to say that a director should sign a conflict of interest register when they accept the position, that clearly states any affiliations they have where such conflict
could arise (Basically any additional board seats, any companies they are renumerated by, and any companies they hold in excess of 5% shareholding in)<o:p class=""></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal">>>> 8- Separation of powers: Consider adding a requirement that no more than one key position (Board Chair, Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer) may be occupied by the same person.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
> Supported <o:p class=""></o:p></div>
<div class=""><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">Supported<o:p class=""></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
>>> 9- Replacement of Directors: The bylaws sections 13.1, 13.8, 13.10, and 13.14 give different methods of replacing Directors for different reasons. Consider harmonising this.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
> Harmonisation supported but the preferred option should be replacement through election at the next AGMM. <o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</div>
<div class=""><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">Supported – though I would add SGM as a possibility for replacement. In the event of losing multiple directors at a single time through some unforeseen event it may become necessary to call an SGM for this purpose and the bylaws need to
allow for it. The risk of tying this to an AGMM is that the board could be down to a skeleton for close to a year if we don’t allow for SGM’s.<o:p class=""></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
>>> 10- Board approval of nominations: The Board can approve or disapprove nominations for Board elections in terms of the Bylaws section 12.14(i). Consider requiring a supermajority of two thirds of the Board to disapprove any nomination<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
> We should remove this approval and strengthen NOMCOM. NOMCOM composition and operation should be reviewed and improved. We can have the legal advisor and past NOMCOM chair as non-voting
<o:p class=""></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">> members and make the appointment of the other members by the board more transparent, fair and unbiased. <o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</div>
<div class=""><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">I agree with the original proposal that states a super majority. I believe that the board should have the right to reject candidates if certain situations.
<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p class=""> </o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal">>>>11- Modification to the Bylaws or Constitution: The Bylaws say how the AFRINIC Members may change the Bylaws, but the Companies Act say that the Registered Members can change it. Consider requiring that the Bylaws/Constitution may
be changed only after a Special Resolution by all AFRINIC Members in terms of Bylaws 7.6(vi),so that the Registered Members (the same nine people as the Directors) cannot act without broader approval.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
> Registered members only MUST never amend the bylaws. Amendment of Bylaws beyond regulatory compliance must require general membership notice and consultation. <o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</div>
<div class=""><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div>
</div>
<div class=""><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">>The proposed amendment should be published not less than 60 days and not more than 90 days before with provisions for members to comment online and in any meeting held during the consultation<o:p class=""></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Am not sure we can legally override the companies act in this regard and would like to see legal opinion on this. In principle I agree that the board should never change the bylaws without a super majority
special resolution of the community at either an SGM or AGMM, I am just not sure we can have the bylaws match the companies act in this regard.
<o:p class=""></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
>>>12- Policies introduced by the Board: In terms of the Bylaws section 11.4, the Board may adopt policy changes that did not go through the normal PDP. Consider giving the community the right to reject such policy changes introduced by the Board.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br class="">
> Section 11.5 seems to give this right to the community but endorsement may be open to misinterpretation so we shall just remove this. In case of emergency, section 8 of PDP on varying the policy process applies.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</div>
<div class=""><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-left:30.0pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite">
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm" class="" type="cite"><div class="MsoNormal">11.5: Any policy adopted by the Board under the provisions of Article 11.4 shall be submitted to the community for endorsement at the next public policy meeting.<o:p class=""></o:p></div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div class=""><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">Agree with the original proposal, the community should have the right to reject policy adopted by the board. I still believe that the board needs the right to adopt emergency policy to protect the organization if it deems necessary, and
have the community reject it at the next meeting if they feel it necessary.<o:p class=""></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">Thanks<o:p class=""></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">Andrew<o:p class=""></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p class=""> </o:p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Community-Discuss mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" class="">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>