[Community-Discuss] Objection to the notice of AFRINIC AGMM 2022
Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
Mon May 16 16:38:14 UTC 2022
Dear Board, Legal Advisors,
I have been informed by several sources (who were not the ones that filed for what I heard exists) that AfriNIC was served papers from the courts in the last 24 hours that ordered them amongst other things to make an announcement by close of business - which has now come and gone.
As such - can AfriNIC please either confirm or deny that the AGMM and election are subject to an injunction - and can AfriNIC please explain - if this information is correct - why they are once again willfully violated a court order instructing an announcement by a certain time - that has not gone out - despite multiple people who are not party to the filing being aware of said filing and informing me of its existence.
I am hoping AfriNIC can state this is simply not true and no such document exists - because the alternative would be very worrying (not that the meeting is subject to injunction - but that AfriNIC would defy court orders again)
From: Rashida Umar via Community-Discuss <community-discuss at afrinic.net>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 9:15:47 AM
To: members-discuss at afrinic.net <members-discuss at afrinic.net>; community-discuss at afrinic.net <community-discuss at afrinic.net>; legal at afrinic.net <legal at afrinic.net>; board at afrinic.net <board at afrinic.net>
Subject: [Community-Discuss] Objection to the notice of AFRINIC AGMM 2022
Good day AFRINIC Board and Legal Adviser to the Board,
We are in receipt of an Annual General Members' Meeting (AGMM) invitation. While the invitation is non-compliant with well-established requirements in several respects, we would like to point the following out to you and to the membership.
1. Resource members pointed out the flaw in the election process as published but the Board in what seems to be a pattern of disdain for the membership, chose not to address the issue. The nominations committee whose lack of neutrality is now very clear, also passed the buck back to you the Board for being a part of the committee and for approving the proposed process.
2. Resource members have also pointed out the extension of director tenures contrary to the mandates that had been given. They have also pointed out a deliberate failure to respect the law that casual vacancies are supposed to be filled until the next AGMM. Members have also pointed out that a vacant seat that should have been put up for election has been deliberately left out to give room for another casual filling of vacancy of a longer term. Reasons for these are of course best known to the board of directors and legal adviser.
3. After the release of a candidate slate as output of a process that we are now aware was used to eliminate certain individuals, resource members have requested to have more details of the process by which the candidates for election were selected. The Board and the Nominations Committee in a show of power abuse has again refused to address this either on the mailing lists or in the "report" attached to the defective meeting notices.
4. If the issues with the current nomination process and the seats up for election are not addressed, it should be noted that by the date of the next valid AGMM (whenever that may be), going by electoral mandate, AFRINIC will have only 2 directors that were placed on the board by mandate of the membership - Subramanian Moonesamy (Seat 3) and Benjamin Eshun (Seat 8). Every other person on the board (with the exception of the board-appointed CEO) would have been selected directly by casual vacancy, self-extension of director term, or by the nominations committee deliberately limiting the choices available to members. This will raise very serious ethical and criminal questions about the Board and the legal team that has allowed or endorsed all of this.
While there are several issues that need to be addressed, we believe that by quickly addressing the fundamental issues of lawfulness, the election process and mandates of the members, the course can still be corrected.
We hereby state categorically that we object to the AGMM proceeding under the current circumstances. A manipulated election process should not be allowed to stand and the bylaws should also be complied with in the conduct of an AGMM.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Community-Discuss