[Community-Discuss] ID verification on the Database Working Group mailing list
silber.mike at gmail.com
Mon Jan 24 10:39:07 UTC 2022
> On 24 Jan 2022, at 12:08, Ben Maddison <benm at workonline.africa> wrote:
> Assuming such a disclosure would be self asserted(?), that leaves some open
> - How is that information provided to the reader of a message (perhaps
> auto inserting a link to a disclosure webpage at the foot of each
I think simply having a live disclosure page would be sufficient. No need for inserting a link.
> - How is the provided information maintained to prevent staleness when,
> e.g. a subscriber changes job, accepts a new consulting gig, gets
> elected to a board somewhere?
In the ICANN world the expectation is an annual update, unless actual changes have occurred. WG group members generally are very responsible about updating. I suppose you can find a way to disable posting privileges if not updated every 12 months. Practical implementation is best left to staff.
> - (Most stickily) to what extent is the provided disclosure verified,
> and by whom? This is hard enough in the case of positive assertions,
> and seems near-impossible in the case of omissions.
Agreed - this is where your recommendation to the WG to ignore provocation from posters is useful, as well as guidance to the chairs to consider inputs more carefully when a clear SOI does not indicate a link between a poster’s affiliation and the assertions they make. For example - a poster making assertions about the difficulty of administering an abuse contact, yet the poster’s SOI does not incite any actual role in administering a network would signal that they may simply be a paid and undisclosed shill. They could be asked to update their SOI or have posting privileges removed.
> - Probably others...
More information about the Community-Discuss