[Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Update on legal case

[Anthony Ubah]

Hi Ali,

Apt. I quite agree with your view on Mauritius legal system.

*Best Regards,*

*Anthony*


On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:50 AM Ali Hussein <ali at hussein.me.ke> wrote:


> I have been following this saga for a few days now and I can't help but

> wonder (And this is aside from discussing the case of Cloud Innovation and

> AfriNIC) I want to address the process of Mauritian law.

>

> How does a court in Mauritius freeze the bank accounts of another company

> through ex parte proceedings? For those who might not understand what I

> mean - *ex parte is **done with respect to or in the interests of one

> side only or of an interested outside party. *This is a basic tenet in

> law. Was Afrinic given an opportunity to defend itself before these orders

> to freeze its accounts were given? Or were summons given and Afrinic

> ignored them?

>

> If the former is true then maybe it's time to address the issue of the

> domicility of Afrinic. Maybe Mauritius is too hostile for a

> Pan-African-based organization. How else do you interpreter this? A court

> giving an unprecedented ex parte ruling against an African Organization in

> favor of a Hongkong-based organization who we are all clear is a purveyor

> of African IP Addresses to organizations outside of Africa as its core

> business model.

>

> Let's put aside all this hullabaloo of ohh...The board didn't do

> this...Oooh the board should have done this! and let's address the elephant

> in the room. Everything else is a sideshow.

>

>

> *Ali Hussein*

>

> Digital Transformation

>

>

> Tel: +254 713 601113

>

> Twitter: @AliHKassim

>

> Skype: abu-jomo

>

> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim

> <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim>

>

>

>

>

> Any information of a personal nature expressed in this email are purely

> mine and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the

> organizations that I work with.

>

>

> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:31 AM Ronald F. Guilmette <

> rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:

>

>> In message <9C433F54-9167-45D9-8B3C-F50998E6E32C at delong.com>,

>> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

>>

>> >> That is certainly NOT a document that I have seen.

>> >

>> >Understandable, since as I stated, it was a private message sent by

>> >Respondent to Petitioner.

>> >

>> >I am seeking approval from our legal team to provide it.

>>

>> Well, no offense Owen, but I also have in my posession a document that

>> definitively proves that you are Satan.  I would like to share that

>> with everyone, but my lawyer won't let me.  Until he does however

>> I think that everyone should just take it on faith, because I'm

>> always right and I never lie.

>> :-)

>>

>>

>> Regards,

>> rfg

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Community-Discuss mailing list

>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>>

> _______________________________________________

> Community-Discuss mailing list

> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20210727/fb187a34/attachment.html>