[Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Update on legal case
ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com
Tue Jul 27 11:50:12 UTC 2021
Apt. I quite agree with your view on Mauritius legal system.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:50 AM Ali Hussein <ali at hussein.me.ke> wrote:
> I have been following this saga for a few days now and I can't help but
> wonder (And this is aside from discussing the case of Cloud Innovation and
> AfriNIC) I want to address the process of Mauritian law.
> How does a court in Mauritius freeze the bank accounts of another company
> through ex parte proceedings? For those who might not understand what I
> mean - *ex parte is **done with respect to or in the interests of one
> side only or of an interested outside party. *This is a basic tenet in
> law. Was Afrinic given an opportunity to defend itself before these orders
> to freeze its accounts were given? Or were summons given and Afrinic
> ignored them?
> If the former is true then maybe it's time to address the issue of the
> domicility of Afrinic. Maybe Mauritius is too hostile for a
> Pan-African-based organization. How else do you interpreter this? A court
> giving an unprecedented ex parte ruling against an African Organization in
> favor of a Hongkong-based organization who we are all clear is a purveyor
> of African IP Addresses to organizations outside of Africa as its core
> business model.
> Let's put aside all this hullabaloo of ohh...The board didn't do
> this...Oooh the board should have done this! and let's address the elephant
> in the room. Everything else is a sideshow.
> *Ali Hussein*
> Digital Transformation
> Tel: +254 713 601113
> Twitter: @AliHKassim
> Skype: abu-jomo
> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
> Any information of a personal nature expressed in this email are purely
> mine and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the
> organizations that I work with.
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:31 AM Ronald F. Guilmette <
> rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
>> In message <9C433F54-9167-45D9-8B3C-F50998E6E32C at delong.com>,
>> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> >> That is certainly NOT a document that I have seen.
>> >Understandable, since as I stated, it was a private message sent by
>> >Respondent to Petitioner.
>> >I am seeking approval from our legal team to provide it.
>> Well, no offense Owen, but I also have in my posession a document that
>> definitively proves that you are Satan. I would like to share that
>> with everyone, but my lawyer won't let me. Until he does however
>> I think that everyone should just take it on faith, because I'm
>> always right and I never lie.
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Community-Discuss