[Community-Discuss] Supreme Court Order in Relation to Cloud Innovation v AFRINIC
owen at delong.com
Tue Jul 20 04:50:01 UTC 2021
> On Jul 15, 2021, at 13:33 , Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
> In message <337009E4-C17E-4215-82BD-D9F753831613 at delong.com>,
> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> The "sub judice" rule was temporarily not in effect
>> while the case was dismissed
>> until such time as the appeal was accepted. This created a window during
>> which we could disclose certain factual information.
>> The "sub judice" rule only applies while there is an
>> active case that is actually "sub judice" (which means
>> "under the consideration of the court" basically).
>> When AFRINIC succeeded in getting the case dismissed, it stopped being
>> "sub judice" until such time as the judge ruled to
>> reinstate the injunction pending
>> the appeal.
> That's a very interesting legal theory Owen.
> May I quote you?
That was my understanding from what the lawyers said to us.
If I’m wrong, I guess I’ll have to apologize to the Mauritian courts.
More information about the Community-Discuss