[Community-Discuss] Small Progress
Arnaud AMELINA
amelnaud at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 12:03:02 UTC 2021
+1 @Noah
Le sam. 2 janv. 2021 à 10:09, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> a écrit :
> Ronald,
>
> Don't mind the sock puppets and trolls, like my good friend Nishal
> indicated after all its often hard to dispute facts because fact are facts.
>
> Noah
> Your apparent sidekick :-)
>
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2021, 04:57 Ronald F. Guilmette, <rfg at tristatelogic.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am pleased to inform you all that there has been at least some minimal
>> progress with respect to AFRINIC wrestling back control of many or most
>> of the legacy IPv4 blocks that were effectively stolen from their
>> rightful owners by Mr. Cohen, Mr. Uerlings, and others.
>>
>> Quietly, and without any public fanfare, it appears that AFRINIC staff,
>> since around December 19th, have been adding annotations to the WHOIS
>> records of many of these stolen blocks to indicate AFRINIC's recognition
>> that these blocks were in fact stolen.
>>
>> For example, the WHOIS record for the 196.16.0.0/14 block which was
>> stolen
>> from the South African national government's in-house IT arm... formerly
>> called "Infoplan" and long ago renamed to "SITA"... now contains the
>> following annotations:
>>
>> remarks: ============REMARK===================
>> remarks: The custodianship of this IP prefix is presently
>> remarks: deemed to be in dispute. Consequently,
>> remarks: no change request pertaining to this particular
>> remarks: prefix will be entertained by AFRINIC until the
>> remarks: issue is finally resolved between the disputants
>> remarks: themselves or by a competent authority.
>> remarks: Further, whilst the current holder of the said prefix
>> remarks: continues to hold same, AFRINIC shall bear no
>> remarks: responsibility whatsoever in relation thereto and
>> remarks: disputants are encouraged to resolve the said
>> remarks: dispute expeditiously.
>> remarks: ============REMARK====================
>>
>> The AFRINIC WHOIS history of this block is shown here:
>>
>> https://pastebin.com/raw/m0LVuppe
>>
>> As anyone can clearly see, the block was originally assigned to "Infoplan"
>> in South Africa, even in the AFRINIC records which, in the case of this
>> specific block, have been partially "disappeared" via a process that
>> AFRINIC has yet to explain.
>>
>> Additional records relating to this same block, and which go back even
>> further in time... all the way back to January 28, 1994... are readily
>> available from ARIN's "WhoWas" historical data service. These even
>> earlier historical records also confirm 100% that this block was formally
>> assigned to Infoplan (now named SITA) in January, 1994.
>>
>> As anyone can also see from the AFRINIC historical records for this block,
>> the contact mailing address for this block was changed, on or about
>> 2015-01-23, to be an address in the Seychelles Islands. So you have to
>> ask yourself: Why would an entity that is part of the South African
>> national government suddely relocate itself to the Seychelles Islands?
>>
>> Obviously, it wouldn't. That is nonsensical on the face of it. So what
>> really happened here?
>>
>> There are only two plausible possibilities: Either (a) the block was
>> simply
>> stolen, by messers Cohen, Uerlings, and Byaruhanga, via some clever and
>> illicit manipluation of the relevant AFRINIC WHOIS records, or else (b)
>> someone within the South African government received some payment in
>> exchange for the legitimate rights to this block... either with or without
>> the knowledge and consent of the South African government itself.
>>
>> Personally, I find the second possibility, (b), to be implausible, not
>> because I believe that South African government officials are universally
>> immune to a little private bribery, but only because I have personally
>> spoken to a number of the other parties and entities that have also and
>> likewise had their legacy AFRINIC IPv4 address blocks stolen out from
>> under them, for example, the South African commercial metals company known
>> as Columbus Stainless (160.115.0.0/16), and also to managers and
>> technical
>> people associated with South Africa's state-owned oil company, Sasol,
>> which also had its 155.237.0.0/16 block "liberated" from their control,
>> temporarily at least, in some still-mysterious way.
>>
>> These are just two examples of the several AFRINIC legacy block holders
>> that have had their stuff stolen, and that I have personally spoken to
>> on multiple occasions. IN ALL CASES, when I was able to make contact
>> with the real and legitimate legacy block owners those legitimate owners
>> universally expressed astonishment when I informed them that they were
>> no longer in control of their own assigned IP address assets. Since my
>> initial contacts with these various victim organizations, several of them,
>> including the two mentioned above, as well as the City of Cape Town and
>> others, have moved swiftly to regain control of what was stolen from them.
>>
>> Were insiders at literally ALL of these commercial companies and
>> government-
>> owned organizations bribed to give up company assets to messers Cohen and
>> Uerlings? I don't think so. That notion really stretches the bounds of
>> credibility.
>>
>> That leaves us with possibility (a) which is just that -somehow- the WHOIS
>> records were illicitly manipulated in some manner, by some party, so as
>> to provide effective control of the blocks to messers Cohen and Uerlings,
>> and also to Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta.
>>
>> Nonetheless, Mr. Cohen has gone to court, ostensibly to reclaim his rights
>> with respect to more than 20 different large AFRINIC legacy blocks, all
>> /16
>> or larger, which he claims to have legitimately paid for.
>>
>> An honest man has nothing to hide, and Mr. Cohen could clear this all up
>> very easily by just showing us all copies of the checks he claims to have
>> written in order to purchase all of these 20 or so AFRINIC legacy blocks.
>>
>> So far he seems entirely reluctant to do that. It doesn't take a genius
>> to figure out why. If he did show us the checks, this entire ludicrous
>> and convoluted theft scheme would come crashing down around him, and he
>> knows it. (He may have written those checks to his cohort in crime, Mr.
>> Uerlings or to one of Mr. Uerlings shell companies, or he may have written
>> the checks to Ernest, or to one of Ernest's shell companies, or he may
>> even have written the checks to some other and different crooked
>> high-level
>> AFRINIC insider who held an even more senior position than Ernest, back in
>> the 201-2015 time frame, but he most certainly DID NOT write those checks
>> to any of the actual and legitimate legacy blocks owners.)
>>
>> Instead of just showing us his payment checks, or even the purchase
>> reciepts
>> for the IP address assets that he claims to have legitimately "bought",
>> Mr. Cohen has instead tried repeatedly and in every way he can think of
>> to simply browbeat, harass, and intimidate AFRINIC into submission. His
>> delusional rantings here got him banned, so now he has invented multiple
>> sock puppet email accounts to circumvent that ban so that he can continue
>> his delusional and fact-free public ranting.... as if anybody is at all
>> likely to believe anything that either he or his multiple sock puppets
>> might say at this point.
>>
>> Unfortunately for Mr. Cohen, none of his rather silly attemps to
>> intimidate
>> AFRINIC are working, and none of them will work, because there are just
>> too
>> many actual and independently verifiable facts on the table at this point.
>> But Mr. Cohen has several million reasons ($$$) to hope against hope that
>> he can somehow still keep his stolen stuff, so he is motivated to keep on
>> trying, even though literally all of the facts are against him. This
>> pitiful public spectacle is sad to watch, but like our Mr. Trump here in
>> the U.S., Mr. Cohen is in denial, and is simply having trouble emotionally
>> processing the fact that he has already lost.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> rfg
>>
>>
>> P.S. I suppose that whoever is administering the AFRINIC mailing lists
>> could be doing a somewhat better job of filtering out posting from Cohen's
>> various sock puppet free email accounts, but I personally don't mind if
>> they don't. Every time he posts to the mailing lists using one of his
>> sock puppet identities he simply adds to the already abundant evidence
>> that he thinks the rules don't apply to him, and he also adds to the
>> equally abundant evidence that he's not an entirely well man.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20210102/949e492a/attachment.html>
More information about the Community-Discuss
mailing list