[Community-Discuss] Resource Transfer Policy Proposal Is Under Appeals

[sienqle at gmail.com]

Hi Noah , 

I am not sure if maybe we are using the same dictionary for “building” , well otherwise it seems like you are using a different one, surely it extends destruction, instead of construction . Your obsession with LARUS makes you argue everyone whom you believe is associate with LARUS, I mean it surely pushes you to even overlook the most important matters at hands . You don’t seem care much about the improvement and communication of AFRICA . Well if that was the case you’d be obsessed with what is best for African communication infrastructure, instead of always looking for someone to build your argument around . I am convinced you really don’t care about this community , just even the future of AFRICAN communication.

Regards,
Thizwilondi  

Sent from my iPhone


> On 02 Aug 2021, at 20:40, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

> 

> Oga Antony,

> 

> To be honest, I am obsessed with building real networks and systems on the AFRICAN soil because I know the impact that such communication infrastructure have on our people and the digital transformation of Africa. That is my obsessions.

> 

> Producing evidence here is immaterial, as such, I shall keep the evidence so tight for presentation before the Hon.Judge in chamber in defence of my claims.

> 

> Remember, I will then need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that what I stated was based on factual evidence and with (remote) witnesses. 

> 

> Its not wise for a soon-to-be defendant to share evidence with a potential plaintiff.

> 

> That is how we shall role.....

> 

> Cheers

> Noah

> 

> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:44 PM Anthony Ubah <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com> wrote:

>> Hello Noah,

>> 

>> I demand you produce this email, and all evidence surrounding this claim.

>> Your obsession has really come to the edge at this time.

>> You delusion of grandeur constantly pushes you towards aggression and personal attacks while responding to 'every single post' on every mailinglist. Please note that libel has consequences.

>> 

>> 

>> Regards,

>> 

>> Anthony

>> 

>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021, 2:25 AM Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

>>> 

>>> 

>>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2021, 08:53 Brian Sowers, <b.sowers154 at gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> The transfer policy makes sense.

>>> 

>>> 

>>> Not the Larus sponsored RTP which is under PDWG appeal. We got an email from a reliable source about the genesis of the Antony/Taiwo resource transfer policy so I know the motive which is now more clear in light of recent events.

>>> 

>>>> Ratify the existing consensus Resource Transfer Policy.

>>> 

>>> 

>>> I refer you to the below PDWG dispute. 

>>> 

>>> The submitted appeals against that resource transfer proposal remain open pending determination by an Appeal Committee.

>>> 

>>> https://afrinic.net/policy/appeal-committee?lang=en#appeals

>>> 

>>> 1st pending appeal against DPP AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource Transfer Policy)

>>> https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/appeal-consensus-ressource-transfer-policy-updated-20102020.pdf

>>> 

>>> 2nd pending appeal against DPP AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource Transfer Policy)

>>> https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/afrinic-appeal-resource-transfer-policy.pdf

>>> 

>>> The PDP process was not followed and I welcome you to review both appeal documents.

>>> 

>>> Cheers,

>>> Noah

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> Community-Discuss mailing list

>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

> _______________________________________________

> Community-Discuss mailing list

> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20210802/6d95336e/attachment.html>