From mark.tinka at seacom.com Wed Dec 16 09:58:23 2020 From: mark.tinka at seacom.com (Mark Tinka) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:58:23 +0200 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Fwd: [apnic-talk] APRICOT 2021 call for presentations In-Reply-To: <73891b28-1f1c-7568-22fe-7aa7df8aecd4@gmail.com> References: <73891b28-1f1c-7568-22fe-7aa7df8aecd4@gmail.com> Message-ID: <58a5fd46-ecad-09bd-0612-9b1f0797fdfd@seacom.com> FYI. Mark. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [apnic-talk] APRICOT 2021 call for presentations Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:52:26 +1000 From: Philip Smith Organization: PFS Internet Development Pty Ltd To: apnic-talk at lists.apnic.net CC: APRICOT PC Chairs Hi everyone, As I mentioned last week when I sent out the Call for Volunteers for the APRICOT PC, APRICOT 2021 will be online in February next year. Same dates as we had planned for the in-person meeting. I've included the call for presentations below - looking forward to receiving your presentation proposals! Thanks! philip -- CALL FOR PAPERS =============== The APRICOT 2021 Programme Committee is now seeking contributions for Presentations and Tutorials for the APRICOT 2021 Conference. We are looking for presenters who would: - Offer a technical tutorial on an appropriate topic; - Participate in the technical conference sessions as a speaker; - Convene and chair panel sessions of relevant topics; Please submit on-line at: http://papers.apricot.net/user/login.php?event=128 Tutorials will take place during the week of 22nd February. Conference sessions and the Peering Forum will take place on the week of 1st March. All APRICOT 2021 sessions times will be one hour long, with up to four sessions scheduled per day. CONFERENCE MILESTONES --------------------- Call for Papers Opens: Now Draft Program Published: As Papers Confirmed Final Deadline for Submissions: 7 February 2021 Final Program Published: 14 February 2021 Final Slides Received: 21 February 2021 *SLOTS ARE FILLED ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS, REGARDLESS OF PUBLISHED DEADLINES* PROGRAMME CONTENT ----------------- The APRICOT Conference Programme consists of three parts, these being Tutorials, the Peering Forum, and Conference Sessions. Topics proposed must be relevant to Internet Operations and Technologies: - IPv4 / IPv6 Routing and Operations - Internet backbone operations - Peering, Interconnects and IXPs - Network Function Virtualisaton - Network Automation/Programming - Content Distribution Network technology & operations - Research on Internet Operations and Deployment - Network infrastructure security - IPv6 deployment on fixed and Wireless/Cellular networks - DNS / DNSSEC - Access and Transport Technologies, including Cable/DSL, LTE/5G, wireless, metro ethernet, fibre, segment routing - Content & Service Delivery and "Cloud Computing" PEERING FORUM ------------- Due to APRICOT 2021 being held online, the PC will only accept Peering Personals prior to the event starting. Submissions must be of a single slide listing the operator's PeeringDB entry. Please refer to https://tinyurl.com/y46954n5 for how to create a successful Peering Personal presentation. CfP SUBMISSION -------------- Draft slides for both tutorials and conference sessions MUST be provided with CfP submissions otherwise the submission will be rejected immediately. For work in progress, the most current information available at time of submission is acceptable. All draft and complete slides must be submitted in PDF format only. Slides must be of original work, with all company confidential marks removed. Final slides are to be provided by the specified deadline for publication on the APRICOT website. Prospective presenters should note that the majority of speaking slots will be filled well before the final submission deadline. The PC may, at their discretion, retain a limited number of slots up to the final submission deadline for presentations that are exceptionally timely, important, or of critical operational importance. Every year we turn away submissions, due to filling up all available programme slots before the deadline. Presenters should endeavour to get material into the PC sooner rather than later. Any questions or concerns should be addressed to the Programme Committee by e-mail at: pc-chairs at apricot.net We look forward to receiving your presentation proposals. Mark Tinka, Marijana Novakovic & Philip Smith Co-Chairs, APRICOT 2021 Programme Committee -- _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list apnic-talk at lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eddy at afrinic.net Thu Dec 17 13:49:52 2020 From: eddy at afrinic.net (Eddy Kayihura) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:49:52 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Message-ID: <01e101d6d47b$7f2586c0$7d709440$@afrinic.net> Dear Colleagues, It is my hope that you are keeping safe and well. I would like to share some updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 number resources case. You may recall that we undertook to publish a comprehensive report following the completion of our internal audit exercise. I am pleased to inform you that the report is almost complete and is now under legal vetting. A copy thereof will be published once the Board of Directors has taken cognizance of the same. Further, the police inquiry about the misappropriation of IPv4 number resources from AFRINIC's pool is also on-going and further statements may be provided to the police based on the outcome of the aforesaid audit exercise. Concerning the case SC/COM/WRT/000295/2020 (Afri Holdings Ltd, Netstyle A. Ltd & Elad Cohen v/s African Network Information Centre (AfriNIC) LTD), you may note that the matter is still pending before the Hon. Judge in Chambers of the Mauritian Supreme Court as we are still at the stage of exchange of pleadings (i.e. affidavits). Otherwise, AFRINIC stands advised that proceedings before the Judge in Chambers are very confidential in nature and access to the pleadings is limited to parties and of course the judge only. Unfortunately, certain events are beyond our control and we solicit your understanding. Thank you all for your patience. Kind Regards, Eddy Kayihura AFRINIC CEO --- Chers coll?gues, J'esp?re que vous vous portez bien. J'aimerais vous faire part de quelques mises ? jour sur l'affaire concernant la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques IPv4. Vous vous souvenez que nous nous sommes engag?s ? publier un rapport complet ? l'issue de notre exercice d'audit interne. Je suis heureux de vous informer que le rapport est presque termin? et qu'il est maintenant en cours d'examen juridique. Une copie sera publi?e d?s que le conseil d'administration en aura pris connaissance. En outre, l'enqu?te de police concernant la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques IPv4 du pool de l'AFRINIC est ?galement en cours et d'autres d?clarations pourraient ?tre fournies ? la police en fonction des r?sultats de l'exercice d'audit susmentionn?. En ce qui concerne l'affaire SC/COM/WRT/000295/2020 (Afri Holdings Ltd, Netstyle A. Ltd & Elad Cohen c/s African Network Information Centre (AfriNIC) LTD), vous pouvez noter que l'affaire est toujours pendante devant le juge en chambre de la Cour supr?me mauricienne car nous en sommes toujours au stade de l'?change des plaidoiries (c'est-?-dire des d?clarations sous serment). Par ailleurs, AFRINIC est inform?e que les proc?dures devant le juge en chambre sont de nature tr?s confidentielle et que l'acc?s aux plaidoiries est limit? aux parties et, bien entendu, au juge uniquement. Malheureusement, certains ?v?nements ?chappent ? notre contr?le et nous sollicitons votre compr?hension. Nous vous remercions tous de votre patience. Cordialement, Eddy Kayihura AFRINIC CEO -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amelnaud at gmail.com Thu Dec 17 23:13:52 2020 From: amelnaud at gmail.com (Arnaud AMELINA) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 23:13:52 +0000 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: <01e101d6d47b$7f2586c0$7d709440$@afrinic.net> <13573.1608229956@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: English version : Mr Ronald Guilmette, *If everything you report is true, then, on behalf of the entire AFRINIC community, I would like to express our gratitude to you. For all the information provided. We promise to hold accountable the Members of the Board as well as the CEO and his staff of AFRINIC, for the apparent inaction to which you refer. * *In light of what I just read, we understand some knee-jerk reactions from some members of the community, hum! They are just defending themselves. * * We will do what is necessary to ensure that what is for AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC. * * Good evening to all.* *Regards * -- Arnaud Le jeu. 17 d?c. 2020 ? 22:59, Arnaud AMELINA a ?crit : > Monsieur Ronald Guilmette, > > Si tout ce que vous rapportez est av?r?, alors, je voudrais au nom de > toute la Communaut? d'AFRINIC, vous manifester toute notre gratitude. Pour > toutes les informations fournies. Nous vous promettons de demander des > comptes aux Membres du Board ainsi qu'au CEO et son Staff d'AFRINIC, sur > l'apparente inaction ? laquelle vous faites allusion. > > ? la lumi?re de tout ce que je viens de lire, nous comprenons certaines > r?actions ?pidermiques de certains membres de la communaut?, hum ! Ils ne > font que se d?fendre. > > Nous ferons le n?cessaire pour que ce qui est ? AFRINIC, revienne ? > AFRINIC. > > Bonne soir?e ? tous. > > Cordialement > > -- > Arnaud > > Le jeu. 17 d?c. 2020 ? 18:34, Ronald F. Guilmette > a ?crit : > >> I'm sorry friends, but I have to say that this really chaps my hide. >> >> Once again we get an "update" from Eddy in which he says... well... >> absolutely nothing. He apparently writes just to tell the AFRINIC >> community that everything is still cloaked in secrecy, I guess because >> you are all children and can't handle and/or are not entitled to know >> what's really going on. >> >> Unlike Eddy, I certainly have a great many bits of hard-won facts and >> evidence to share with the community, and I would have done so long >> before now if I didn't have a life and other pressing matters to >> attend to, including other Internet-based criminal enterprises that >> I am actively investigating and working with journalists on, even as >> we speak. >> >> For today, I'll just drop a couple of things on you that you all may >> perhaps find new and interesting. >> >> My friend, juornalist Jan Vermeulen has informed me that according to >> his calculations (which were based on numbers given to him by Eddy) >> there are still around one million+ IPv4 addresses that AFRINIC already >> knows were stolen, and that were NOT included in any of the reports >> that Jan has published in mybroadband.co.za. That's one hell of a >> lot of valuable IPv4 real estate! So where is it all and why hasn't >> AFRINIC reclaimed it? (Note: I'm not even talking about the stolen >> legacy blocks, which Eddy and the board are still dragging their feet >> on, and refusing to do anything about, even after a full year of knowing >> about those, and even after seeing the compelling evidence that Cohen >> and Uerlings registered a lot of contact email domains with the clear >> and deliberate intent to cover up their gigantic theft scheme.) >> >> So anyway, I do know where at least some of those other stolen 1 million >> IP addreses have gone, and I'm frankly stunned that neither Eddy nor >> anybody else in the AFRINIC hierarchy have lifted a finger to reclaim >> any of this other IPv4 space that has been stolen. What are they >> waiting for? An engraved invitation? Do they just need to have either >> Jan or myself expose thesse additional thefts first, so as to take any >> possible legal heat off them? >> >> I call your attention to the following listing of the historical >> WHOIS data for the 196.52.0.0/14 block. Please note that the name "ITC", >> under which this block was originally registered is one that I and Jan >> long ago concluded was a totally made-up name for a fake corporate entity >> that never existed anywhere, and one that was invented out of whole cloth >> by Ernest Byaruhanga as a kind of WHOIS cover story for many of his >> thefts... >> thefts which have now been effectively confirmed by virtue of that fact >> that AFRINIC has already reclaimed all of the blocks that were still >> registered to "ITC" as of December of last year. >> >> https://pastebin.com/raw/DW4nGii3 >> >> The bottom line here is clear. The 196.52.0.0/14 block was another one >> of Ernest's thefts from the free pool, and one that was subsequently >> sold or gifted to the proprietor of LogicWeb, Inc. of New York, USA, >> i.e. a certain Mr. Chad Abizeid: >> >> https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_ny/3034414 >> >> It should be noted that some time after he received this large chunk of >> property that was stolen by Ernest from AFRINIC... a chunk of real estate >> worth well over $5 million dollars, USD, at current market prices... Mr. >> Abizeid tried to sell off the entire thing in one big chunk (for one big >> payday): >> >> >> https://www.facebook.com/mailchimp/posts/im-trying-to-get-in-touch-with-whomever-is-in-charge-of-your-ip-addresses-i-own-/10152414268080777/ >> >> I want everyone to note also that, the last time I checked anyway, not >> a single IP address of this huge IPv4 block was being routed to or used >> anywhere even close to the AFRINIC region. >> >> So there are several problems here. >> >> First and foremost, the history indicates quite persuasively that this /14 >> block was stolen by Ernest. >> >> Second, Eddy and the board appear to already have known this to be true >> for some time now, but just as in the case of the legacy blocks, they have >> been dragging their feet and steadfastly AVOIDING doing anything about it, >> simply because this is the path of least resistance for them. It does not >> appear that they care at all about what is right, or about doing what is >> right, >> but they do quite obviously care about minimizing their own hassle factor, >> and they are apparently afraid that if they do the Right Thing and take >> back >> this blatantly stolen block... which was apparently sold by Ernest on the >> black market, that Mr. Abizeid will complain about that, and maybe even >> file suit, as Mr. Cohen has done. So justice and fairness for the rest of >> the AFRINIC members goes out the window, sacrificed for the sake of >> expediency. >> >> Lastly, as I have said, the last time I checked, which was admittedly some >> months ago now, not a single scrap of this /14 IPv4 block was routed to >> anywhere >> within a thousand miles of the AFRINIC region, thus placing this "member" >> in >> clear violation of even the minamalist a and remarkably weak requirements >> of >> the AFRINIC Bylaws which state explicitly that AFRINIC is to serve members >> who provide AT LEAST *some* token level of service to the AFRINIC region. >> >> If Mr. Abizeid is indeed failing to do that, then his resources can and >> should >> be reclaimed just on that basis alone, even if AFRINIC elects to totally >> ignore the even more significant fact that this /14 was quite evidently >> stolen >> by Ernest. >> >> So why hasn't Eddy reclaimed the 196.52.0.0/14 block? It's an utter >> mystery >> to me. But like I said, maybe he has just been waiting for Jan or myself >> to >> break the ice about this, so that he wouldn't have to. Now that this >> theft >> is also out in the open however, he's got no more excuses, and he should >> reclaim this stolen block for the benefit of AFRINIC's legitimate members >> just as he has already done with all of the other Ernest "ITC" stolen >> blocks. >> >> And speaking of which, I encourage you all to take a look also at the >> WHOIS >> history of the 165.231.0.0/16 block, which originally belonged to a >> legitimate Internet Service Provider in Guinea, but which, on 2010-10-08, >> somehow magically also ended up registered to Ernest's fake "ITC" company: >> >> https://pastebin.com/raw/dJjdGYLm >> >> After being registered to Ernest's fake "ITC" company for a couple of >> years, >> on 2012-11-06 this valuable /16 block, itself worth well over $1,3 million >> USD onthe open market, was once again magically reassigned, this time to >> something or someone whose name is allegedly "Fiber Grid Inc." and which >> is allegedly domiciled in the Seychelles Islands. >> >> In this case, the apparent beneficiary of Ernest's corrupt largess was a >> certain Mr. Deepak Mehta, a gentleman apparently of Indian ancestry whose >> current physical location is somewhat uncertain but who appears to have >> incorporated multiple businesses, including one named "Fiber Grid" (as >> well >> as an apparently failed catering business) in the Baltic nation of >> Estonia... >> rather far from the AFRINIC region, I would say. >> >> FIBER GRID O? >> https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12183141-FIBER-GRID-O%C3%9C >> >> Sonjara O? >> https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12626354-Sonjara-O%C3%9C >> >> https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12183141-FIBER-GRID-O%C3%9C >> https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/14097138-O%C3%9C-Asian-Express >> >> I have no idea what other credits he may have to his name, but speaking >> just personally, my only knowledge of this Mr. Deepak Mehta and his >> character has been derived from a public blog post by network security >> journalist Brian Krebs, published back on August 26, 2016, and purporting >> to show Mr. Mehta participating in a multi-party chat session where the >> one and only topic of discussion was the planning for an upcoming >> criminal DDoS attack on the well-known anti-spam outfit Spamhaus: >> >> >> https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/08/inside-the-attack-that-almost-broke-the-internet/ >> >> Note that whereas the evidence indicates, to me anyway, that the >> 165.231.0.0/16 block is yet another block that was purloined from the >> AFRINIC free pool (and thus from the AFRINIC membership) by Ernest. >> After that, the 165.231.0.0/16 block somehow made its way into the >> hands of Mr. Mehta. >> >> Note also however that that one /16 block, valuable and large though >> it may be, is quite certainly not the only valuable AFRINIC IPv4 >> address block currently assigned to Mr. Mehta's apparently Estonia-based >> "Fiber Grid" company. Far from it! Despite neither he nor his company >> being the least bit African, or even within a thousand miles of Africa, >> as far as I can tell, Mr. Mehta, via some process that remains totally >> cloaked in secrecy, has somehow managed to amass a grand total of nearly >> a million (983,040) AFRINIC IPv4 addresses, worth well over $20 milliion >> USD. >> >> The full list of Mr. Mehta's assigned AFRINIC blocks is as follows: >> >> 165.231.0.0/16 >> 196.48.0.0/16 >> 196.56.0.0/16 >> 196.57.0.0/16 >> 196.58.0.0/16 >> 196.59.0.0/16 >> 196.196.0.0/16 >> 196.197.0.0/16 >> 196.198.0.0/16 >> 196.199.0.0/16 >> 196.240.0.0/15 >> 196.242.0.0/15 >> 196.244.0.0/16 >> 196.245.0.0/16 >> 196.247.0.0/16 >> >> How a non-African, such as Mr. Mehta, who, like Mr. Abizeid, appears to >> provide exactly -zero- services to the AFRINIC region, somehow managed to >> be awarded almost a million AFRINIC IPv4 addresses is, quite frankly, more >> than a little puzzling. It is altogether apparent however that it is in >> the interests of AFRINIC staff and board members to keep the entire >> process >> by which such awards were made, and by which such awards are still being >> made, >> entirely hidden from public view. Certainly, Ernest Byaruhanga would not >> now be enjoying a comfortable retirement in his hilltop estate in Uganda >> if >> the process by which AFRINIC IP addresses had been awarded within the >> AFRINIC >> region had been transparent from the beginning. >> >> Nor would Mr. Abzeid and Mr. Mehta still be enjoying -their- apparently >> Ernest-provided AFRINIC blocks if AFRINIC management and the board >> decided, >> even at this late date, to come clean about what they are or, more >> properly, >> are not doing to really clean up the whole mess. >> >> Of course transparency, even at this late date would likely not help the >> interests of Mr. Lu Heng either. Mr. Heng, as at least some of you may >> know, as a 24 year old mainland Chinese kid with no apparent history of >> networking experience whatsoever, somehow managed to be awarded two >> giagantic /12 AFRINIC IPv4 blocks as well as two even more gigantic >> AFRINIC /11 blocks (total current market value, over $150 million USD), >> some of which he has since doled out to the very same people who are >> currently aiding and abetting Mr. Cohen's ongoing misuse of the AFRINIC >> legacy blocks... the very ones which AFRINIC has so far been dragging its >> feet on and refusing to reassigned back to their rightful owners: >> >> https://bgp.he.net/AS18013#_prefixes >> https://bgp.he.net/AS137951#_prefixes >> >> Note that AS18013 - Asline (Hong Kong) and AS137951 - Clayer (Hong Kong) >> are, as we would say here inthe States, effectively "joined at the hip", >> that the latter is routing much stolen AFRINIC legacy space, and that >> the former has leased or purchased quite a lot of IPv4 space from Mr. >> Heng's Cloud Innovation Ltd. >> >> I tried asking Mr. Heng via private email why he would be supporting >> criminals in Hong Kong who are adiding and abetting Mr. Cohen and his >> ongoing thefts from the AFRINIC region, but I guess either my email fell >> into Mr. Heng's spam folder or else he just didn't much feel like >> discussing the matter. In any case, I received no reply from him to my >> recent polite inquiry. >> >> To summarize, there has been one hell of a lot of crooked crap that has >> gone on in AFRINIC, over time, and it isn't even nearly all cleaned up >> yet. Worse, management and the board do not seem to have the will to >> actually and fully clean up the mess, once and for all. This tends to >> cast a certain degree of suspicion on them and their motivations also. >> >> The fundamental problem is and has been the utter and total lack of >> transparency, and neither the current board nor current management has >> lifted a single finger to address that. One might get the impression >> that they really don't want to. >> >> If this is the way you folks who are the dues paying members of AFRINC >> want to run your region, then you can have all of the corruption and >> lethargic and cowardly inaction you want. That's your choice. I just >> wish that you all would stop selling, stealing, or giving away IP >> addresses to Internet criminals who are going to use those addresses >> to spam and DDoS us innocent and law abiding folks in other regions. >> >> >> Regards, >> rfg >> >> >> P.S. After more than a year of trying, I am -still- being stonewalled >> with respect to my request to have access to full historical AFRINIC WHOIS >> data. I can only surmise that the board and/or management really don't >> want me finding any MORE evidence of historical insider corruption, above >> and beyond the gigantic piles of such I have already found and documented. >> >> As I say, it is for you, the dues paying members of AFRINIC, to decide if >> you think this is reasonable or not, and to pro-actively ask that I be >> given >> full access if you think that would be productive. All I can do, as an >> outsider, is to hope that someday either the AFRINIC board or AFRINC >> management >> will stop trying to play "hide the ball" and will allow the full facts to >> come out regarding everything that has gone on. >> >> But that's up to you folks.. the dues paying members... not me. >> >> >> P.P.S. Mr. Abzeid may be perfectly happy to obtain his IPv4 address space >> from the AFRINIC region, but I rather doubt that he would be at all >> amenable >> to having any of the Black residents of the AFRINIC region date his >> daughter. >> You see, Mr. Abzeid has had a longstanding membership on a certain US web >> site >> called Gab.Com, described by Wikipedia as (among other things) a white >> supremacist social networking web site: >> >> https://gab.com/chad_abizeid >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> afnog mailing list >> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfg at tristatelogic.com Fri Dec 18 00:10:47 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:10:47 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <14722.1608250247@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Thank you for your kind words of encouragement Arnaud. Unfortunately, it seems that AFRINIC is still operating in the mode of attempting to suppress evidence, information, and any comments which might be in the least bit ctitical of the current leadership of the organization. Thus, it is a good thing that I elected to cross post my comments also here on the AFNOG mailing list, which is not something that current AFRINIC management can directly and unilaterally censor, I guess. If however one takes a look at the December archives for the AFRINIC community-discuss mailing list, then you will notice that my last message posted here, which was also cross-posted to that very relevant mailing list, has been suppressed and censored by AFRINIC. That is certainly one way to try to prevent the truth and the real bad news from getting out to the AFRINIC membership, but it is ineffective, and only makes the current AFRINIC leadership look that much more inept and/or complicit. And please note that according to what I have read online about AFRINIC history, this is not the first time the management and/or the board have tried to sweep matters under the carpet, and suppress the evidence of their own ineptitude or malfeasance by just unilaterally censoring the AFRINIC mailing lists in whatever way suits them, and their agenda, at the moment. You here have all now read what I wrote, I hope. My message was pointed, direct, and blunt about remaining open issues and remaining apparently stolen AFRINIC blocks, as well as the various specific involved parties. This information and the associated hard evidence on which it is based has not been previously made public and I made it public only as a service to the AFRINIC community. I did not do this because I have any axe to grind. I have -zero- financial involvement with AFRINIC or with AFRINIC number resource assets. My goal from the very beginning of my 18 month AFRINIC investigation was only to try to see to it that AFRINIC number resources do in fact get distributed, as they should be, openly and honestly, to *Africans*, and *not* to modern-day "robber baron" colonialists who only seek to mine valuable assets from the African continent, and leave gaping holes in the ground and impoverished people in their wake. And I have quite certainly been even-handed about this. I don't care if the theives are from India, from China, or from my own country, the United States. I would like to see them all stop victimizing the African people, and I would also like to see the African people stop allowing themselves to be victimized and exploited by these modern 21st century colonialists. So anyway, yes, I often speak frankly and bluntly, and some people may on occasion take offense at that. But other than some over-sensitive hurt feelings, why should the new and never before publicized evidence that I have today presented, about *additional* and never-before-revealed cases of apparently stolen AFRINIC resources be suppressed and censored by AFRINIC? What is AFRINIC's motivation for doing so, and who specifically in the organization decided that my posts should be censored? I leave it to you good people to seek an answer to that question, if any of you have a mind to do so. Regards, rfg From oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng Fri Dec 18 06:08:53 2020 From: oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng (ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 07:08:53 +0100 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: <01e101d6d47b$7f2586c0$7d709440$@afrinic.net> <13573.1608229956@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: Dear Ronald, Thank you for this eyeopener email of yours. AK On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:19 AM Arnaud AMELINA wrote: > English version : > > Mr Ronald Guilmette, > > > *If everything you report is true, then, on behalf of the entire AFRINIC > community, I would like to express our gratitude to you. For all the > information provided. We promise to hold accountable the Members of the > Board as well as the CEO and his staff of AFRINIC, for the apparent > inaction to which you refer. * > > > *In light of what I just read, we understand some knee-jerk reactions from > some members of the community, hum! They are just defending themselves. * > > > * We will do what is necessary to ensure that what is for AFRINIC returns > to AFRINIC. * > > * Good evening to all.* > > *Regards * > > -- > Arnaud > > > > Le jeu. 17 d?c. 2020 ? 22:59, Arnaud AMELINA a > ?crit : > >> Monsieur Ronald Guilmette, >> >> Si tout ce que vous rapportez est av?r?, alors, je voudrais au nom de >> toute la Communaut? d'AFRINIC, vous manifester toute notre gratitude. Pour >> toutes les informations fournies. Nous vous promettons de demander des >> comptes aux Membres du Board ainsi qu'au CEO et son Staff d'AFRINIC, sur >> l'apparente inaction ? laquelle vous faites allusion. >> >> ? la lumi?re de tout ce que je viens de lire, nous comprenons certaines >> r?actions ?pidermiques de certains membres de la communaut?, hum ! Ils ne >> font que se d?fendre. >> >> Nous ferons le n?cessaire pour que ce qui est ? AFRINIC, revienne ? >> AFRINIC. >> >> Bonne soir?e ? tous. >> >> Cordialement >> >> -- >> Arnaud >> >> Le jeu. 17 d?c. 2020 ? 18:34, Ronald F. Guilmette >> a ?crit : >> >>> I'm sorry friends, but I have to say that this really chaps my hide. >>> >>> Once again we get an "update" from Eddy in which he says... well... >>> absolutely nothing. He apparently writes just to tell the AFRINIC >>> community that everything is still cloaked in secrecy, I guess because >>> you are all children and can't handle and/or are not entitled to know >>> what's really going on. >>> >>> Unlike Eddy, I certainly have a great many bits of hard-won facts and >>> evidence to share with the community, and I would have done so long >>> before now if I didn't have a life and other pressing matters to >>> attend to, including other Internet-based criminal enterprises that >>> I am actively investigating and working with journalists on, even as >>> we speak. >>> >>> For today, I'll just drop a couple of things on you that you all may >>> perhaps find new and interesting. >>> >>> My friend, juornalist Jan Vermeulen has informed me that according to >>> his calculations (which were based on numbers given to him by Eddy) >>> there are still around one million+ IPv4 addresses that AFRINIC already >>> knows were stolen, and that were NOT included in any of the reports >>> that Jan has published in mybroadband.co.za. That's one hell of a >>> lot of valuable IPv4 real estate! So where is it all and why hasn't >>> AFRINIC reclaimed it? (Note: I'm not even talking about the stolen >>> legacy blocks, which Eddy and the board are still dragging their feet >>> on, and refusing to do anything about, even after a full year of knowing >>> about those, and even after seeing the compelling evidence that Cohen >>> and Uerlings registered a lot of contact email domains with the clear >>> and deliberate intent to cover up their gigantic theft scheme.) >>> >>> So anyway, I do know where at least some of those other stolen 1 million >>> IP addreses have gone, and I'm frankly stunned that neither Eddy nor >>> anybody else in the AFRINIC hierarchy have lifted a finger to reclaim >>> any of this other IPv4 space that has been stolen. What are they >>> waiting for? An engraved invitation? Do they just need to have either >>> Jan or myself expose thesse additional thefts first, so as to take any >>> possible legal heat off them? >>> >>> I call your attention to the following listing of the historical >>> WHOIS data for the 196.52.0.0/14 block. Please note that the name >>> "ITC", >>> under which this block was originally registered is one that I and Jan >>> long ago concluded was a totally made-up name for a fake corporate entity >>> that never existed anywhere, and one that was invented out of whole cloth >>> by Ernest Byaruhanga as a kind of WHOIS cover story for many of his >>> thefts... >>> thefts which have now been effectively confirmed by virtue of that fact >>> that AFRINIC has already reclaimed all of the blocks that were still >>> registered to "ITC" as of December of last year. >>> >>> https://pastebin.com/raw/DW4nGii3 >>> >>> The bottom line here is clear. The 196.52.0.0/14 block was another one >>> of Ernest's thefts from the free pool, and one that was subsequently >>> sold or gifted to the proprietor of LogicWeb, Inc. of New York, USA, >>> i.e. a certain Mr. Chad Abizeid: >>> >>> https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_ny/3034414 >>> >>> It should be noted that some time after he received this large chunk of >>> property that was stolen by Ernest from AFRINIC... a chunk of real estate >>> worth well over $5 million dollars, USD, at current market prices... Mr. >>> Abizeid tried to sell off the entire thing in one big chunk (for one big >>> payday): >>> >>> >>> https://www.facebook.com/mailchimp/posts/im-trying-to-get-in-touch-with-whomever-is-in-charge-of-your-ip-addresses-i-own-/10152414268080777/ >>> >>> I want everyone to note also that, the last time I checked anyway, not >>> a single IP address of this huge IPv4 block was being routed to or used >>> anywhere even close to the AFRINIC region. >>> >>> So there are several problems here. >>> >>> First and foremost, the history indicates quite persuasively that this >>> /14 >>> block was stolen by Ernest. >>> >>> Second, Eddy and the board appear to already have known this to be true >>> for some time now, but just as in the case of the legacy blocks, they >>> have >>> been dragging their feet and steadfastly AVOIDING doing anything about >>> it, >>> simply because this is the path of least resistance for them. It does >>> not >>> appear that they care at all about what is right, or about doing what is >>> right, >>> but they do quite obviously care about minimizing their own hassle >>> factor, >>> and they are apparently afraid that if they do the Right Thing and take >>> back >>> this blatantly stolen block... which was apparently sold by Ernest on the >>> black market, that Mr. Abizeid will complain about that, and maybe even >>> file suit, as Mr. Cohen has done. So justice and fairness for the rest >>> of >>> the AFRINIC members goes out the window, sacrificed for the sake of >>> expediency. >>> >>> Lastly, as I have said, the last time I checked, which was admittedly >>> some >>> months ago now, not a single scrap of this /14 IPv4 block was routed to >>> anywhere >>> within a thousand miles of the AFRINIC region, thus placing this >>> "member" in >>> clear violation of even the minamalist a and remarkably weak >>> requirements of >>> the AFRINIC Bylaws which state explicitly that AFRINIC is to serve >>> members >>> who provide AT LEAST *some* token level of service to the AFRINIC region. >>> >>> If Mr. Abizeid is indeed failing to do that, then his resources can and >>> should >>> be reclaimed just on that basis alone, even if AFRINIC elects to totally >>> ignore the even more significant fact that this /14 was quite evidently >>> stolen >>> by Ernest. >>> >>> So why hasn't Eddy reclaimed the 196.52.0.0/14 block? It's an utter >>> mystery >>> to me. But like I said, maybe he has just been waiting for Jan or >>> myself to >>> break the ice about this, so that he wouldn't have to. Now that this >>> theft >>> is also out in the open however, he's got no more excuses, and he should >>> reclaim this stolen block for the benefit of AFRINIC's legitimate members >>> just as he has already done with all of the other Ernest "ITC" stolen >>> blocks. >>> >>> And speaking of which, I encourage you all to take a look also at the >>> WHOIS >>> history of the 165.231.0.0/16 block, which originally belonged to a >>> legitimate Internet Service Provider in Guinea, but which, on 2010-10-08, >>> somehow magically also ended up registered to Ernest's fake "ITC" >>> company: >>> >>> https://pastebin.com/raw/dJjdGYLm >>> >>> After being registered to Ernest's fake "ITC" company for a couple of >>> years, >>> on 2012-11-06 this valuable /16 block, itself worth well over $1,3 >>> million >>> USD onthe open market, was once again magically reassigned, this time to >>> something or someone whose name is allegedly "Fiber Grid Inc." and which >>> is allegedly domiciled in the Seychelles Islands. >>> >>> In this case, the apparent beneficiary of Ernest's corrupt largess was a >>> certain Mr. Deepak Mehta, a gentleman apparently of Indian ancestry whose >>> current physical location is somewhat uncertain but who appears to have >>> incorporated multiple businesses, including one named "Fiber Grid" (as >>> well >>> as an apparently failed catering business) in the Baltic nation of >>> Estonia... >>> rather far from the AFRINIC region, I would say. >>> >>> FIBER GRID O? >>> https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12183141-FIBER-GRID-O%C3%9C >>> >>> Sonjara O? >>> https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12626354-Sonjara-O%C3%9C >>> >>> https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12183141-FIBER-GRID-O%C3%9C >>> https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/14097138-O%C3%9C-Asian-Express >>> >>> I have no idea what other credits he may have to his name, but speaking >>> just personally, my only knowledge of this Mr. Deepak Mehta and his >>> character has been derived from a public blog post by network security >>> journalist Brian Krebs, published back on August 26, 2016, and purporting >>> to show Mr. Mehta participating in a multi-party chat session where the >>> one and only topic of discussion was the planning for an upcoming >>> criminal DDoS attack on the well-known anti-spam outfit Spamhaus: >>> >>> >>> https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/08/inside-the-attack-that-almost-broke-the-internet/ >>> >>> Note that whereas the evidence indicates, to me anyway, that the >>> 165.231.0.0/16 block is yet another block that was purloined from the >>> AFRINIC free pool (and thus from the AFRINIC membership) by Ernest. >>> After that, the 165.231.0.0/16 block somehow made its way into the >>> hands of Mr. Mehta. >>> >>> Note also however that that one /16 block, valuable and large though >>> it may be, is quite certainly not the only valuable AFRINIC IPv4 >>> address block currently assigned to Mr. Mehta's apparently Estonia-based >>> "Fiber Grid" company. Far from it! Despite neither he nor his company >>> being the least bit African, or even within a thousand miles of Africa, >>> as far as I can tell, Mr. Mehta, via some process that remains totally >>> cloaked in secrecy, has somehow managed to amass a grand total of nearly >>> a million (983,040) AFRINIC IPv4 addresses, worth well over $20 milliion >>> USD. >>> >>> The full list of Mr. Mehta's assigned AFRINIC blocks is as follows: >>> >>> 165.231.0.0/16 >>> 196.48.0.0/16 >>> 196.56.0.0/16 >>> 196.57.0.0/16 >>> 196.58.0.0/16 >>> 196.59.0.0/16 >>> 196.196.0.0/16 >>> 196.197.0.0/16 >>> 196.198.0.0/16 >>> 196.199.0.0/16 >>> 196.240.0.0/15 >>> 196.242.0.0/15 >>> 196.244.0.0/16 >>> 196.245.0.0/16 >>> 196.247.0.0/16 >>> >>> How a non-African, such as Mr. Mehta, who, like Mr. Abizeid, appears to >>> provide exactly -zero- services to the AFRINIC region, somehow managed to >>> be awarded almost a million AFRINIC IPv4 addresses is, quite frankly, >>> more >>> than a little puzzling. It is altogether apparent however that it is in >>> the interests of AFRINIC staff and board members to keep the entire >>> process >>> by which such awards were made, and by which such awards are still being >>> made, >>> entirely hidden from public view. Certainly, Ernest Byaruhanga would not >>> now be enjoying a comfortable retirement in his hilltop estate in Uganda >>> if >>> the process by which AFRINIC IP addresses had been awarded within the >>> AFRINIC >>> region had been transparent from the beginning. >>> >>> Nor would Mr. Abzeid and Mr. Mehta still be enjoying -their- apparently >>> Ernest-provided AFRINIC blocks if AFRINIC management and the board >>> decided, >>> even at this late date, to come clean about what they are or, more >>> properly, >>> are not doing to really clean up the whole mess. >>> >>> Of course transparency, even at this late date would likely not help the >>> interests of Mr. Lu Heng either. Mr. Heng, as at least some of you may >>> know, as a 24 year old mainland Chinese kid with no apparent history of >>> networking experience whatsoever, somehow managed to be awarded two >>> giagantic /12 AFRINIC IPv4 blocks as well as two even more gigantic >>> AFRINIC /11 blocks (total current market value, over $150 million USD), >>> some of which he has since doled out to the very same people who are >>> currently aiding and abetting Mr. Cohen's ongoing misuse of the AFRINIC >>> legacy blocks... the very ones which AFRINIC has so far been dragging its >>> feet on and refusing to reassigned back to their rightful owners: >>> >>> https://bgp.he.net/AS18013#_prefixes >>> https://bgp.he.net/AS137951#_prefixes >>> >>> Note that AS18013 - Asline (Hong Kong) and AS137951 - Clayer (Hong Kong) >>> are, as we would say here inthe States, effectively "joined at the hip", >>> that the latter is routing much stolen AFRINIC legacy space, and that >>> the former has leased or purchased quite a lot of IPv4 space from Mr. >>> Heng's Cloud Innovation Ltd. >>> >>> I tried asking Mr. Heng via private email why he would be supporting >>> criminals in Hong Kong who are adiding and abetting Mr. Cohen and his >>> ongoing thefts from the AFRINIC region, but I guess either my email fell >>> into Mr. Heng's spam folder or else he just didn't much feel like >>> discussing the matter. In any case, I received no reply from him to my >>> recent polite inquiry. >>> >>> To summarize, there has been one hell of a lot of crooked crap that has >>> gone on in AFRINIC, over time, and it isn't even nearly all cleaned up >>> yet. Worse, management and the board do not seem to have the will to >>> actually and fully clean up the mess, once and for all. This tends to >>> cast a certain degree of suspicion on them and their motivations also. >>> >>> The fundamental problem is and has been the utter and total lack of >>> transparency, and neither the current board nor current management has >>> lifted a single finger to address that. One might get the impression >>> that they really don't want to. >>> >>> If this is the way you folks who are the dues paying members of AFRINC >>> want to run your region, then you can have all of the corruption and >>> lethargic and cowardly inaction you want. That's your choice. I just >>> wish that you all would stop selling, stealing, or giving away IP >>> addresses to Internet criminals who are going to use those addresses >>> to spam and DDoS us innocent and law abiding folks in other regions. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> rfg >>> >>> >>> P.S. After more than a year of trying, I am -still- being stonewalled >>> with respect to my request to have access to full historical AFRINIC >>> WHOIS >>> data. I can only surmise that the board and/or management really don't >>> want me finding any MORE evidence of historical insider corruption, above >>> and beyond the gigantic piles of such I have already found and >>> documented. >>> >>> As I say, it is for you, the dues paying members of AFRINIC, to decide if >>> you think this is reasonable or not, and to pro-actively ask that I be >>> given >>> full access if you think that would be productive. All I can do, as an >>> outsider, is to hope that someday either the AFRINIC board or AFRINC >>> management >>> will stop trying to play "hide the ball" and will allow the full facts to >>> come out regarding everything that has gone on. >>> >>> But that's up to you folks.. the dues paying members... not me. >>> >>> >>> P.P.S. Mr. Abzeid may be perfectly happy to obtain his IPv4 address >>> space >>> from the AFRINIC region, but I rather doubt that he would be at all >>> amenable >>> to having any of the Black residents of the AFRINIC region date his >>> daughter. >>> You see, Mr. Abzeid has had a longstanding membership on a certain US >>> web site >>> called Gab.Com, described by Wikipedia as (among other things) a white >>> supremacist social networking web site: >>> >>> https://gab.com/chad_abizeid >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> afnog mailing list >>> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog >> >> _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > -- Website ,?Weekly Bulletin ?UGPortal PGPortal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Fri Dec 18 12:05:27 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:05:27 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <6EDD85A2-4F2E-472E-B108-45677B8F1375@trouble.is> References: <14722.1608250247@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <5d71b77e-0fa7-a835-781e-9f620d89f8a1@mauigateway.com> <6EDD85A2-4F2E-472E-B108-45677B8F1375@trouble.is> Message-ID: On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 14:51 Philip Paeps, wrote: > On 2020-12-18 17:23:55 (+0800), Bill Woodcock wrote: > > I can just imagine the founders, sitting around a table: ?What name > > shall we choose, to instill confidence in our customers? A name > > anyone will trust? One that embodies sober responsibility? I?ve > > got it?!? > > > > "Midnight Proxies LLC!? > Or better yet "Cloud" ....something something. Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From comms at afrinic.net Fri Dec 18 12:51:57 2020 From: comms at afrinic.net (AFRINIC Communication) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:51:57 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Extension of the deadline for the Call for Volunteers on the NomCom 2021 |28 December 2020 Message-ID: <8BF7BF5E-F114-450F-976C-24F1B663B3C4@afrinic.net> Dear colleagues, Please note that the deadline for the call for volunteers on the Nomination Committee (NomCom) 2021 has been extended to 28 December 2020. If you are interested in serving on the 2021 NomCom, then please send your expression of interest, including a short biography, by email to legal at afrinic dot net by 28 December 2020 (23:59 UTC). AFRINIC Communication ????????????????????????????????????????????????.. [French, Arabic and Portuguese versions below] Dear AFRINIC members and community, The AFRINIC Board is required to appoint a Nomination Committee (NomCom) every year, in terms of article 9 of the Bylaws >>. On behalf of the Board, I hereby call for volunteers from the community to fill three open positions on the 2021 NomCom. If you are interested in serving on the 2021 NomCom, then please send your expression of interest, including a short biography, by email to legal at afrinic dot net by 18 December 2020 (23:59 UTC). However, as per Article 9.1 of the Bylaws, no person domiciled in a region whose Board seat is open for renewal may be a member of the Nomcom. The duties of the NomCom, and the elections to be held are described below. Election process and guidelines The current version of the Board election process and guidelines are published at >>. It provides additional information about NomCom responsibilities, the election process, and timelines. Nomcom Composition and Responsibilities: According to Section 9 of the AFRINIC by-laws, a Nominations Committee (NomCom) appointed by the Board must work to ensure that appropriate candidates are nominated to contest for open seats and that all elections are successfully conducted according to current procedures. The AFRINIC Bylaws state that NomCom must have four members, appointed by the Board. The Board?s practice is to appoint the four members as follows; - One member selected from within the AFRINIC Board; - Three members selected by the AFRINIC Board from the community. In terms of section 9.1 of the Bylaws: - No candidate for election to the Board may be a member of the NomCom; - No person domiciled in a region whose Board seat is open for renewal may be a member of the NomCom; this means that the 2021 NomCom may not include people who reside in the Southern Africa region. Responsibilities of the NomCom are defined in section 9 of the AFRINIC Bylaws and include the following: - Report to the Board and follow guidelines set by the Board; - Call for candidates for all open positions; - Prescribe criteria and qualifications for eligibility to stand for election; - Interview candidates, if appropriate, prior to finalising the slate of candidates; - Finalise the list of candidates for every election; - Supervise the conduct of the polls by the Election Committee on election day. The Board further expects NomCom members to: - be neutral; to have no interest in the results of the elections; - be trusted members of the AFRINIC community; - have good knowledge of the AFRINIC business environment; - preferably possess prior NomCom experience in the I* ecosystem; - do their best to fulfil their responsibilities. NomCom members do not receive any remuneration. AFRINIC staff will provide logistical support to the NomCom throughout their mandate. Such support includes publication of the list of nominees, a compilation of comments, mailing list moderation, website update, communication with nominees and other duties pertaining to the roles and responsibilities of the NomCom. Travel support will be provided for the NomCom Chair to attend the AGMM at which the elections are held. Election to be held at the AGMM 2021: AFRINIC Board of Directors elections: The following Board seat is up for election by the AFRINIC Membership in 2021: ? Seat 5 (Southern Africa), to serve a three-year term from mid-2021 to mid-2024. This seat is currently held by Mr Vika William Mpisane Policy Development Working Group (PDWG): One PDWG co-chair position is up for election by the Policy Development Working Group.The seat is currently filled by Mr Moses Serugo. Terms begin and end during the public policy meeting where the election is held. Governance Committee: One Governance Committee position is up for election by the AFRINIC Membership, to serve a three-year term from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2024. The seat is currently held by Dr Alioune Badara Traore. How to Volunteer: If you are interested in serving on the 2021 NomCom, then please send your expression of interest, including a short biography, by email to legal at afrinic dot net by 18 December 2020 (23:59 UTC). Subramanian Moonesamy AFRINIC Board Chairman ????????????????????????????????????. Chers membres et communaut? AFRINIC, Le conseil d'administration de l'AFRINIC est tenu de nommer chaque ann?e un comit? de nomination (NomCom), conform?ment ? l'article 9 des statuts >>. Au nom du conseil d'administration, je lance un appel ? des volontaires de la communaut? pour remplir trois postes vacants au sein du NomCom 2021. Si vous ?tes int?ress? ? servir au NomCom 2021, veuillez envoyer votre manifestation d'int?r?t, y compris une courte biographie, par courriel ? legal at afrinic dot net au plus tard le 18 d?cembre 2020 (23:59 UTC). Toutefois, conform?ment ? l'article 9.1 des statuts, aucune personne domicili?e dans une r?gion dont le si?ge au conseil d'administration est ouvert au renouvellement ne peut ?tre membre du Nomcom. Les fonctions de la NomCom et les ?lections ? tenir sont d?crites ci-dessous. Processus d'?lection et directives La version actuelle du processus d'?lection du conseil d'administration et les lignes directrices sont publi?es sur >>. Elle fournit des informations suppl?mentaires sur les responsabilit?s du NomCom, le processus d'?lection et les d?lais. Composition et responsabilit?s du NomCom : Conform?ment ? la section 9 des statuts d'AFRINIC, un comit? de nomination (NomCom) nomm? par le conseil d'administration doit veiller ? ce que des candidats appropri?s soient propos?s pour les si?ges vacants et que toutes les ?lections soient men?es ? bien conform?ment aux proc?dures en vigueur. Les statuts de l'AFRINIC stipulent que le NomCom doit ?tre compos? de quatre membres, nomm?s par le Conseil d'administration. La pratique du Conseil d'administration est de nommer les quatre membres comme suit ; - Un membre choisi au sein du conseil d'administration d'AFRINIC ; - Trois membres choisis par le conseil d'administration de l'AFRINIC parmi la communaut?. En vertu de la section 9.1 des statuts : - Aucun candidat ? l'?lection au conseil d'administration ne peut ?tre membre du NomCom ; - Aucune personne domicili?e dans une r?gion dont le si?ge au Conseil d'administration est ouvert au renouvellement ne peut ?tre membre de la NomCom ; cela signifie que la NomCom 2021 ne peut pas inclure des personnes r?sidant dans la r?gion de l'Afrique australe. Les responsabilit?s du NomCom sont d?finies dans la section 9 des statuts de l'AFRINIC et comprennent ce qui suit : - Rendre compte au conseil d'administration et suivre les directives fix?es par ce dernier ; - Lancer un appel ? candidatures pour tous les postes ouverts ; - Prescrire les crit?res et les qualifications pour l'?ligibilit? aux ?lections ; - Interviewer les candidats, le cas ?ch?ant, avant de finaliser la liste des candidats ; - Finaliser la liste des candidats pour chaque ?lection ; - Superviser le d?roulement du scrutin par la commission ?lectorale le jour de l'?lection. Le conseil d'administration attend en outre des membres de la NomCom qu'ils - soient neutres ; n'aient aucun int?r?t dans les r?sultats des ?lections ; - soient des membres de confiance de la communaut? AFRINIC ; - aient une bonne connaissance de l'environnement commercial de l'AFRINIC ; - poss?der de pr?f?rence une exp?rience pr?alable du NomCom dans l'?cosyst?me I* ; - faire de leur mieux pour assumer leurs responsabilit?s. Les membres de la NomCom ne re?oivent aucune r?mun?ration. Le personnel d'AFRINIC fournira un soutien logistique au NomCom tout au long de son mandat. Ce soutien comprend la publication de la liste des candidats, une compilation des commentaires, la mod?ration de la liste de diffusion, la mise ? jour du site web, la communication avec les candidats et d'autres t?ches relatives aux r?les et responsabilit?s du NomCom. Une aide au d?placement sera fournie au pr?sident du NomCom pour lui permettre d'assister ? l'assembl?e g?n?rale annuelle au cours de laquelle les ?lections auront lieu. L'?lection aura lieu lors de l'AGA 2021 : ?lections du conseil d'administration de l'AFRINIC : Les si?ge suivant du Conseil d'administration est ? ?lire par les membres de l'AFRINIC en 2021 : - Si?ge 5 (Afrique australe), pour un mandat de trois ans, de la mi-2021 ? la mi-2024. Ce si?ge est actuellement occup? par M. Vika William Mpisane Groupe de travail sur l'?laboration des politiques (PDWG) : Un poste de copr?sident du PDWG est ? pourvoir par le groupe de travail sur l'?laboration des politiques. Le si?ge est actuellement occup? par M. Moses Serugo.. Les mandats commencent et se terminent pendant la r?union de politique publique o? se tient l'?lection. Comit? de gouvernance : Un poste du Comit? de gouvernance est soumis ? l'?lection des membres de l'AFRINIC, pour un mandat de trois ans, du 1er janvier 2022 au 31 d?cembre 2024. Le si?ge est actuellement occup? par le Dr Alioune Badara Traor?. Comment devenir volontaire : Si vous ?tes int?ress? ? si?ger au NomCom 2021, veuillez envoyer votre manifestation d'int?r?t, accompagn?e d'une courte biographie, par courriel ? legal at afrinic dot net au plus tard le 18 d?cembre 2020 (23:59 UTC). Subramanian Moonesamy AFRINIC Board Chairman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Sat Dec 19 17:04:22 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:04:22 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <66e56954-106b-96a2-1699-90dc3ce9ac4e@brenac.eu> References: <14722.1608250247@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <66e56954-106b-96a2-1699-90dc3ce9ac4e@brenac.eu> Message-ID: On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 14:06 thomas brenac, wrote: > ..and the worse is that with the ongoing Inter-RiR transfer policy plan in > discussion these stolen subnets will be one day transferred / sold at > higher value to another RIR and no one will then be able to do anything. > Thomas, Ooh Yes and that is the strategy with an Inter-RIR transfer policy proposal which intends to ease some businesses around IPv4 addresses with zero role for AFRINIC with: ? Source resource holders subject to receiving RIR policies ? No need based justification ? No checking of valid ? right to use? and no dispute. ? The list is endless The community caught them and is discovering more and more about the actors and their intentions and motivation which are 100% not for the best interests of the AFRICAN region. > my 2 cents > You are spot on. Cheers, Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dc at darwincosta.com Sat Dec 19 19:38:06 2020 From: dc at darwincosta.com (dc at darwincosta.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:38:06 +0100 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > On 19 Dec 2020, at 18:09, Noah wrote: > > ? >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 14:06 thomas brenac, wrote: >> ..and the worse is that with the ongoing Inter-RiR transfer policy plan in discussion these stolen subnets will be one day transferred / sold at higher value to another RIR and no one will then be able to do anything. >> No wonder the urgency in getting the policy ratified ......! > Thomas, > > Ooh Yes and that is the strategy with an Inter-RIR transfer policy proposal which intends to ease some businesses around IPv4 addresses with zero role for AFRINIC with: > > ? Source resource holders subject to receiving RIR policies > ? No need based justification > ? No checking of valid ? right to use? and no dispute. > ? The list is endless > > The community caught them and is discovering more and more about the actors and their intentions and motivation which are 100% not for the best interests of the AFRICAN region. >> my 2 cents >> > > You are spot on. > > Cheers, > Noah > _______________________________________________ > afnog mailing list > https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfg at tristatelogic.com Sun Dec 20 00:20:59 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:20:59 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <9A35CE76-E056-4547-B7FD-52696C5C7604@darwincosta.com> Message-ID: <25280.1608423659@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message <9A35CE76-E056-4547-B7FD-52696C5C7604 at darwincosta.com>, "dc at darwincosta.com" wrote: >@Mr. Ronald I was reading your email and findings over and over again yesterday >night and this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into >our attention and YES - we "will" or "have" >to do whatever it's necessary to revert this situation and to ensure >that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it should be. Thank you for yor support. I suppose that it should be apparent to all that I am upset and angry about many of the things that have gone on within the AFRINIC region. But the various IP block thefts themselves are, to my way of thinking, the least of it all. Quite some time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was going to be performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes, back to the beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret out any -more- instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and beyond those that I and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to light last year (2019). Eddy even said that technical personnel and representatives of one of the more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being brought in to help with this effort. That was many MANY months ago now. (Also, as I'm sure many of you know, Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and management for over an entire calendar year now.) So this raises the obvious question: Why didn't Eddy and the Board already know about the apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4 allocations held by Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my posting the other day about those? And if they did know, then why did they elect to give both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing them both to *keep* the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear to have been provided to them... presumably in fundamentally crooked transactions... by the now disgraced and long ago terminated ex-employee Ernest Byaruhanga? It has to be one or the other. There is no third possibility. Either Eddy & the Board knew, and elected to do nothing and keep silent, or else their much heralded "exhaustive audit" of the history of all AFRINIC allocations was so fundementally flawed and incomplete that it failed to catch obviously questionable allocations of great swaths of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address space, totaling well over a million IPv4 addresses. I'm not sure which of these two possibilities is worse. Either the so-called "audit" was done in a glaringly incompetent manner, or else Eddy and the Board have been complicit in trying to sweep under the carpet the questionable nature of the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. Mehta... neither of whom is either located in the AFRINIC region, and neither of whom, it appears, is providing -any- services whatsoever within the AFRINIC region. I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when they learned about the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for years served to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga. If Eddy and the Board only learned about those connections from my public posting of a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for them to grant me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that I have been repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can perform a proper sort of audit and analysis of those records. On the other hand, if they are none too pleased with me having been able to find and expose the many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already managed to find and expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then I guess they will continue to want to keep me as far away as possible from any historical WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary man-on-the-street netizens are privy to. Regards, rfg P.S. I am more than a little inclined to believe that Eddy and the AFRINIC Board do want to, and have wanted to just sweep these matters under the carpet, as much as possible. My belief is based on the fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made a decision... privately and without even having the courtesy of informing the AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen, to keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to protest. The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only partially set right. The City of Cape Town, the commercial South African firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil company, Sasol, and others have all managed to get their legacy IPv4 blocks back from the clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up to assert their rightful claims. Other legitimate legacy block holders have, unfortunately, been either too lazy, too confused, or too timid to even assert their rights, and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply ignore those rights as a matter of expediency. This is not a shining example of either honor or courage on their part. It is rather a capitulation to criminals, and an abdication of their responsibilities to act in the best interests of the AFRINIC members and community. Giving in to corruption only leads to even more corruption. And frankly, I remain surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood and appreciated through the African continent. Eddy and the Board can and should stop their silent charade, tell the members what they have decided to do, or not do, about the various stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this day remain stolen and in the hands of messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they should be prepared to defend their decisions in an open forum. The global reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated public scandals in recent years. Repairing that global reputation cannot even begin as long as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding their decision making process behind the same closed doors that protected Ernest Byaruhanga and his criminal machinations from public view for so many years. From rfg at tristatelogic.com Sun Dec 20 03:20:49 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:20:49 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. In-Reply-To: <25280.1608423659@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <25847.1608434449@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Included below are summraies of the current routing of the various AFRINIC-assigned blocks belonging to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC (LiquidWeb, Inc.) and also ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC (Fiber Grid, Inc.) I am providing these to the AFRINIC community in support of my prior assertion that no part or portion of the AFRINIC-assigned blocks of these two companies are, at present, being routed to any country within the AFRINIC region, nor to any country or countries that are even adjacent to the AFRINIC region. The routing summaries below were computed based upon raw data specifying the specific ASNs that are routing each of the constituent /24 "C" blocks that make up the totality of the registered AFRINIC blocks currently assigned to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC respectively. That raw data was obtained by me, programatically, via the "RESTful" web interface of the RIPEStat data base. The raw data from which the summaries below were computed may obtained via the following two links, or alternatively, directly fronm RIEPStat, for the benefit of anyone wishing to independently confirm my analysis. ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC: https://pastebin.com/raw/rzWSckCs ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC: https://pastebin.com/raw/sgFGNjwH Additionally, the Perl scripts that I have used to fetch the above raw data from RIPEStat, as well as the scripts I have used to compute from that raw data the routing summary tables shown below are all availiable from me upon request. I would be more than happy to have others independently perform the same routing analysis as I have done with respect to the IPv4 space currently assigned to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC. The routing summary tables below each contain four fields as follows: 1) Number of constituent /24 "C" blocks routed by the given ASN. 2) The AS number. 3) The applicable two-letter ISO 3166 country code. 4) The full name of the ORGanization to which the ASN is registered. Note that a good deal of the IPv4 space registered to ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC is currently being routed by RIPE-issued ASNs registered to "Inter Connects Inc". Upon information and belief, "Inter Connects Inc" is a Delaware (US) corporate entity for which Mr. Deepak Mehta is either a beneficial owner or else possibly THE beneficial owner. Mr. Mehta is of course free to dispute this contention, as and when he sees fit. Please note however that an entity calling itself "Inter Connects Inc" is also currently represented within the RIPE WHOIS data base where it is designated via the handle ORG-DMF2-RIPE and that the RIPE WHOIS history of that organization handle indicates that it was previously associated with "Deepak Mehta FIE": https://pastebin.com/raw/wnF8g2gh Please note that AS393489, which appears in the second table below, is officially a bogon (unassigned) AS number at present. Prior to the reclamation of this ASN by ARIN, this specific ASN was assigned to a U.S. company named "ADT Systems, Inc." and that company appears to still be using AS393489, even though AS393489 is now officially a bogon ASN. Please take note also that the organization to which the RIPE-issued AS58110 is registered (IP Volume LTD - UK) may or may not have any connection whatsoever to the registrant organization for AS202425 (IP Volume, Inc. - Seychelles) which has for some time announced a route to the stolen AFRINIC legacy block 196.16.0.0/14, said block being the rightful property of the South African national government's IT arm, "SITA", accoring to all reliable historical evidence. The country codes listed in the following two summary tables, if accurate, support my view that the AFRINIC-assigned IPv4 address blocks of both ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC are likely not, at present, being routed to any geographical points within the AFRINIC region, thus placing both of these AFRINIC member organizations in clear violation of the legally binding AFRINIC Bylaws. This, of course, is in addition to and on top of the fact that both organizations appear to have obtained some or all of their AFRINIC- assigned IPv4 address space illicitly, most probaby by way of the dismissed and disgraced Ernest Byaruhanga. Current routing summary for ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC: --------------------------------------------- 3795 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 233 58065 UK Packet Exchange Limited 164 41564 UK Packet Exchange Limited 79 57858 US Inter Connects Inc 30 204353 UK Global Offshore Limited 13 63119 US Inter Connects Inc 10 60485 US Inter Connects Inc 8 46805 US Inter Connects Inc 7 48950 UK Global Colocation Limited 6 57972 US Inter Connects Inc 4 37518 SC Fiber Grid INC 2 40676 US Psychz Networks 1 50304 NO Blix Solutions AS Current routing summary for ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC: --------------------------------------------- 280 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 111 12025 US Iron Mountain Data Center 68 3356 US Level 3 Parent, LLC 64 1273 GB Vodafone Group PLC 58 43233 IR Fara Negar Pardaz Noor Khuzestan Co.JSP 49 35554 GB 8K Cloud Ltd 48 53271 US Phenix Cable 36 133847 MY Anpple Tech Enterprise 34 7029 US Windstream Communications LLC 26 36290 KN The Cable of St. Kitts 20 32181 US GigeNET 12 13768 CA Aptum Technologies 12 265515 MX Televera Red S. A. P. I. De C.V. 12 14123 US Midnight Proxies LLC 12 397373 US H4Y Technologies LLC 10 36445 CA Coextro 8 62217 GB VooServers Ltd 8 39535 GB VooServers Ltd 8 14935 US Monticello Networks, Inc. 8 18710 US Gkg.Net, Inc 8 40676 US Psychz Networks 7 209181 GB Zenex 5ive Limited 6 49367 IT Seflow S.N.C. Di Marco Brame' & C. 6 17511 JP OPTAGE Inc. 5 56309 TH Siamdata Communication Co.,ltd. 5 6327 CA Shaw Communications Inc. 5 17676 JP Softbank BB Corp. 5 28458 MX Ientc S De Rl De Cv 4 17941 JP Equinix Jpapan Enterprise K.K. 4 13213 GB UK-2 Limited 4 396356 US Maxihost LLC 4 36217 US NetActuate, Inc 4 137199 AU Emerge Internet Pty Ltd 4 397026 US Wi-Fiber, Inc. 4 54133 CA UnmeteredInternet.com 4 395046 US Sexing Technologies 4 202211 ES Manuel Mariposa Consulting SL 3 174 US Cogent Communications 3 7018 US AT&T Services, Inc. 3 32780 US Hosting Services, Inc. 2 262239 BZ Speednet Communications Limited 2 398252 US Big Red Communications LLC 2 393670 US Southern Fibernet Corporation 2 63073 US The University of Tampa 2 36351 US SoftLayer Technologies Inc. 2 393489 ?? {{unknown organization}} 2 397582 US WOW-World of Wireless 2 62904 US Eonix Corporation 2 26341 US Open Solutions LLC 2 25645 US Momentum Telecom, Inc. 2 63018 US Dedicated.com 2 46562 US Performive LLC 2 397336 US Virtual Sprout 2 23005 US Switch, Ltd 2 54900 US Alianza Inc. 1 28317 CR Boomerang Wireless S.A. 1 133120 AU Hosted Network Pty. Ltd. 1 60781 NL LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V. 1 52356 CR R&H International Telecom Services SA. 1 396459 US County of Venango 1 27362 US Archon Development Corp. 1 26375 US Airespring, Inc. 1 54578 US FiberComm LC 1 131455 AU Onsite Computers 1 59955 LB Advanced Broadband Services S.A.L 1 60257 GB Origin Broadband Limited 1 141158 MY Hiero7 (M) Sdn. Bhd. 1 397256 US Epyon Technologies 1 58110 UK IP Volume LTD 1 20473 US Choopa, LLC 1 14333 US On-Ramp Indiana, Inc. 1 30277 US DFW Datacenter 1 64286 US LogicWeb Inc. From comms at afrinic.net Sun Dec 20 08:05:27 2020 From: comms at afrinic.net (AFRINIC Communication) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:05:27 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <25280.1608423659@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <25280.1608423659@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: [Version en fran?ais au bas] Dear AFRINIC Community, AFRINIC is governed by certain processes, PDP policies and legal frameworks that we need to comply with as an organisation. We can only act within the established framework or the ramifications could be extremely damaging. Access to the bulk whois data is granted once anyone who requires the data fully completes the process published at: https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data We welcome any information provided on the misappropriation of Internet number resources. However, as mentioned above, at this stage, we are unable to comment on what we know or do not know regarding the information shared. We trust that once we are able to publish the audit report, it will bring clarifications to the community's concerns on the misappropriation of Internet number resources. Regards Ashil Oogarah on behalf of AFRINIC Communications and PR Team ??????????????????????.. Ch?re Communaut? d'AFRINIC, AFRINIC est r?gie par certains processus, politiques et cadres juridiques que nous devons respecter en tant qu'organisation. Nous ne pouvons agir dans ce cadre ?tabli, sinon les cons?quences pourraient ?tre extr?mement dommageables. L'acc?s aux donn?es whois est accord? une fois que toute personne ayant besoin de ces donn?es compl?te le processus publi? ? https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data Toute information sur la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques Internet est la bienvenue. Toutefois, comme mentionn? ci-dessus, nous ne sommes pas en mesure, ? ce stade, de faire des commentaires sur ce que nous savons ou ne savons pas concernant les informations partag?es. Nous esp?rons qu'une fois que nous serons en mesure de publier le rapport d'audit, il apportera des ?claircissements sur les pr?occupations de la communaut? concernant la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques internet. Regards Ashil Oogarah au nom de l'?quipe Communications et RP d?AFRINIC > On 20 Dec 2020, at 04:20, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message <9A35CE76-E056-4547-B7FD-52696C5C7604 at darwincosta.com>, > "dc at darwincosta.com" wrote: > >> @Mr. Ronald I was reading your email and findings over and over again yesterday >> night and this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into >> our attention and YES - we "will" or "have" >> to do whatever it's necessary to revert this situation and to ensure >> that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it should be. > > Thank you for yor support. > > I suppose that it should be apparent to all that I am upset and angry > about many of the things that have gone on within the AFRINIC region. > But the various IP block thefts themselves are, to my way of thinking, > the least of it all. > > Quite some time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was > going to be performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes, > back to the beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret > out any -more- instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and > beyond those that I and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to > light last year (2019). Eddy even said that technical personnel and > representatives of one of the more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being > brought in to help with this effort. > > That was many MANY months ago now. (Also, as I'm sure many of you know, > Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and > management for over an entire calendar year now.) > > So this raises the obvious question: Why didn't Eddy and the Board > already know about the apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4 > allocations held by Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my > posting the other day about those? And if they did know, then why did > they elect to give both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing > them both to *keep* the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear > to have been provided to them... presumably in fundamentally crooked > transactions... by the now disgraced and long ago terminated ex-employee > Ernest Byaruhanga? > > It has to be one or the other. There is no third possibility. > > Either Eddy & the Board knew, and elected to do nothing and keep silent, > or else their much heralded "exhaustive audit" of the history of all > AFRINIC allocations was so fundementally flawed and incomplete that > it failed to catch obviously questionable allocations of great swaths > of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address space, totaling well over a million > IPv4 addresses. > > I'm not sure which of these two possibilities is worse. Either the > so-called "audit" was done in a glaringly incompetent manner, or else > Eddy and the Board have been complicit in trying to sweep under the > carpet the questionable nature of the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations > held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. Mehta... neither of whom is either > located in the AFRINIC region, and neither of whom, it appears, is > providing -any- services whatsoever within the AFRINIC region. > > I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when they learned about > the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. Abizeid and > Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for years served > to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga. > > If Eddy and the Board only learned about those connections from my public > posting of a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for > them to grant me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that > I have been repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can > perform a proper sort of audit and analysis of those records. > > On the other hand, if they are none too pleased with me having been able > to find and expose the many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already > managed to find and expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then > I guess they will continue to want to keep me as far away as possible > from any historical WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary > man-on-the-street netizens are privy to. > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. I am more than a little inclined to believe that Eddy and the > AFRINIC Board do want to, and have wanted to just sweep these matters > under the carpet, as much as possible. My belief is based on the > fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made a decision... > privately and without even having the courtesy of informing the > AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen, > to keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had > successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to > protest. > > The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only > partially set right. The City of Cape Town, the commercial South > African firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil > company, Sasol, and others have all managed to get their legacy > IPv4 blocks back from the clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and > Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up to assert their rightful claims. > > Other legitimate legacy block holders have, unfortunately, been either > too lazy, too confused, or too timid to even assert their rights, > and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply ignore those rights > as a matter of expediency. This is not a shining example of either > honor or courage on their part. It is rather a capitulation to criminals, > and an abdication of their responsibilities to act in the best interests > of the AFRINIC members and community. > > Giving in to corruption only leads to even more corruption. And frankly, > I remain surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood > and appreciated through the African continent. > > Eddy and the Board can and should stop their silent charade, tell the > members what they have decided to do, or not do, about the various stolen > AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this day remain stolen and in the hands of > messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they should be prepared to defend their > decisions in an open forum. > > The global reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated > public scandals in recent years. Repairing that global reputation cannot > even begin as long as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding > their decision making process behind the same closed doors that protected > Ernest Byaruhanga and his criminal machinations from public view for so > many years. > > _______________________________________________ > afnog mailing list > https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog From yamadu at ug.edu.gh Sun Dec 20 09:23:22 2020 From: yamadu at ug.edu.gh (yamadu) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 09:23:22 +0000 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Message-ID: i think we should fellow due processes to address issues as a? community. AFRINIC has policies and legal framework that we are aware, so we should comply with when we want to address any concern. My take.Yusif?Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: AFRINIC Communication Date: 20/12/2020 8:05 a.m. (GMT+00:00) To: community-discuss at afrinic.net Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of ? IPv4 resources [Version en fran?ais au bas]Dear AFRINIC Community,AFRINIC is governed by certain processes, PDP policies and legal frameworks that we need to comply with as an organisation. We can only act within the established framework or the ramifications could be extremely damaging. Access to the bulk whois data is granted once anyone who requires the data fully completes the process published at:https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data We welcome any information provided on the misappropriation of Internet number resources. However, as mentioned above, at this stage, we are unable to comment on what we know or do not know regarding the information shared. We trust that once we are able to publish the audit report, it will bring clarifications to the community's concerns on the misappropriation of Internet number resources.RegardsAshil Oogarahon behalf of AFRINIC Communications and PR Team??????????????????????..Ch?re Communaut? d'AFRINIC,AFRINIC est r?gie par certains processus, politiques et cadres juridiques que nous devons respecter en tant qu'organisation. Nous ne pouvons agir dans ce cadre ?tabli, sinon les cons?quences pourraient ?tre extr?mement dommageables. L'acc?s aux donn?es whois est accord? une fois que toute personne ayant besoin de ces donn?es compl?te le processus publi? ?https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data Toute information sur la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques Internet est la bienvenue. Toutefois, comme mentionn? ci-dessus, nous ne sommes pas en mesure, ? ce stade, de faire des commentaires sur ce que nous savons ou ne savons pas concernant les informations partag?es. Nous esp?rons qu'une fois que nous serons en mesure de publier le rapport d'audit, il apportera des ?claircissements sur les pr?occupations de la communaut? concernant la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques internet.RegardsAshil Oogarahau nom de l'?quipe Communications et RP d?AFRINIC> On 20 Dec 2020, at 04:20, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:> > In message <9A35CE76-E056-4547-B7FD-52696C5C7604 at darwincosta.com>, > "dc at darwincosta.com" wrote:> >> @Mr. Ronald I was reading your email and findings over and over again yesterday>> night and this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into>> our attention and YES - we "will" or "have">> to do whatever it's necessary to revert this situation and to ensure>> that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it should be.> > Thank you for yor support.> > I suppose that it should be apparent to all that I am upset and angry> about many of the things that have gone on within the AFRINIC region.> But the various IP block thefts themselves are, to my way of thinking,> the least of it all.> > Quite some time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was> going to be performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes,> back to the beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret> out any -more- instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and> beyond those that I and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to> light last year (2019).? Eddy even said that technical personnel and> representatives of one of the more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being> brought in to help with this effort.> > That was many MANY months ago now.? (Also, as I'm sure many of you know,> Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and> management for over an entire calendar year now.)> > So this raises the obvious question:? Why didn't Eddy and the Board> already know about the apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4> allocations held by Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my> posting the other day about those?? And if they did know, then why did> they elect to give both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing> them both to *keep* the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear> to have been provided to them... presumably in fundamentally crooked> transactions... by the now disgraced and long ago terminated ex-employee> Ernest Byaruhanga?> > It has to be one or the other.? There is no third possibility.> > Either Eddy & the Board knew, and elected to do nothing and keep silent,> or else their much heralded "exhaustive audit" of the history of all> AFRINIC allocations was so fundementally flawed and incomplete that> it failed to catch obviously questionable allocations of great swaths> of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address space, totaling well over a million> IPv4 addresses.> > I'm not sure which of these two possibilities is worse.? Either the> so-called "audit" was done in a glaringly incompetent manner, or else> Eddy and the Board have been complicit in trying to sweep under the> carpet the questionable nature of the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations> held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. Mehta... neither of whom is either> located in the AFRINIC region, and neither of whom, it appears, is> providing -any- services whatsoever within the AFRINIC region.> > I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when they learned about> the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. Abizeid and> Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for years served> to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga.> > If Eddy and the Board only learned about those connections from my public> posting of a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for> them to grant me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that> I have been repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can> perform a proper sort of audit and analysis of those records.> > On the other hand, if they are none too pleased with me having been able> to find and expose the many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already> managed to find and expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then> I guess they will continue to want to keep me as far away as possible> from any historical WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary> man-on-the-street netizens are privy to.> > > Regards,> rfg> > > P.S.? I am more than a little inclined to believe that Eddy and the> AFRINIC Board do want to, and have wanted to just sweep these matters> under the carpet, as much as possible.? My belief is based on the> fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made a decision...> privately and without even having the courtesy of informing the> AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen,> to keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had> successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to> protest.> > The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only> partially set right.? The City of Cape Town, the commercial South> African firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil> company, Sasol, and others have all managed to get their legacy> IPv4 blocks back from the clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and> Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up to assert their rightful claims.> > Other legitimate legacy block holders have, unfortunately, been either> too lazy, too confused, or too timid to even assert their rights,> and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply ignore those rights> as a matter of expediency.? This is not a shining example of either> honor or courage on their part.? It is rather a capitulation to criminals,> and an abdication of their responsibilities to act in the best interests> of the AFRINIC members and community.> > Giving in to corruption only leads to even more corruption.? And frankly,> I remain surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood> and appreciated through the African continent.> > Eddy and the Board can and should stop their silent charade, tell the> members what they have decided to do, or not do, about the various stolen> AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this day remain stolen and in the hands of> messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they should be prepared to defend their> decisions in an open forum.> > The global reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated> public scandals in recent years.? Repairing that global reputation cannot> even begin as long as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding> their decision making process behind the same closed doors that protected> Ernest Byaruhanga and his criminal machinations from public view for so> many years.> > _______________________________________________> afnog mailing list> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog_______________________________________________Community-Discuss mailing listCommunity-Discuss at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From libren at tuta.io Mon Dec 21 12:23:15 2020 From: libren at tuta.io (libren at tuta.io) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:23:15 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: @Ronald F. Guilmette are you LIR or member of Afrinic? Any comment on https://bgp.he.net/AS35916#_prefixes They are announced in USA via Multacom -- Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com Dec 20, 2020, 14:00 by community-discuss-request at afrinic.net: > Send Community-Discuss mailing list submissions to > community-discuss at afrinic.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > community-discuss-request at afrinic.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > community-discuss-owner at afrinic.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Community-Discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources > (Noah) > 2. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources > (dc at darwincosta.com) > 3. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources > (Ronald F. Guilmette) > 4. Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, > Inc. (Ronald F. Guilmette) > 5. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources > (AFRINIC Communication) > 6. Re: [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources > (yamadu) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:04:22 +0300 > From: Noah > To: thomas at brenac.eu > Cc: General Discussions of AFRINIC , > Afnog > Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the > misappropriation of IPv4 resources > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 14:06 thomas brenac, wrote: > >> ..and the worse is that with the ongoing Inter-RiR transfer policy plan in >> discussion these stolen subnets will be one day transferred / sold at >> higher value to another RIR and no one will then be able to do anything. >> > Thomas, > > Ooh Yes and that is the strategy with an Inter-RIR transfer policy proposal > which intends to ease some businesses around IPv4 addresses with zero role > for AFRINIC with: > > ? Source resource holders subject to receiving RIR policies > ? No need based justification > ? No checking of valid ? right to use? and no dispute. > ? The list is endless > > The community caught them and is discovering more and more about the actors > and their intentions and motivation which are 100% not for the best > interests of the AFRICAN region. > >> my 2 cents >> > You are spot on. > > Cheers, > Noah > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:38:06 +0100 > From: "dc at darwincosta.com" > To: Noah , thomas at brenac.eu > Cc: General Discussions of AFRINIC , > Afnog > Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the > misappropriation of IPv4 resources > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > >> On 19 Dec 2020, at 18:09, Noah wrote: >> >> ? >> >>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 14:06 thomas brenac, wrote: >>> ..and the worse is that with the ongoing Inter-RiR transfer policy plan in discussion these stolen subnets will be one day transferred / sold at higher value to another RIR and no one will then be able to do anything. >>> > No wonder the urgency in getting the policy ratified ......! > >> Thomas, >> >> Ooh Yes and that is the strategy with an Inter-RIR transfer policy proposal which intends to ease some businesses around IPv4 addresses with zero role for AFRINIC with: >> >> ? Source resource holders subject to receiving RIR policies >> ? No need based justification >> ? No checking of valid ? right to use? and no dispute. >> ? The list is endless >> >> The community caught them and is discovering more and more about the actors and their intentions and motivation which are 100% not for the best interests of the AFRICAN region. >> >>> my 2 cents >>> >> >> You are spot on. >> >> Cheers, >> Noah >> _______________________________________________ >> afnog mailing list >> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:20:59 -0800 > From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" > To: General Discussions of AFRINIC , > dbwg at afrinic.net, Afnog > Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the > misappropriation of IPv4 resources > Message-ID: <25280.1608423659 at segfault.tristatelogic.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > In message <9A35CE76-E056-4547-B7FD-52696C5C7604 at darwincosta.com>, > "dc at darwincosta.com" wrote: > > >@Mr. Ronald I was reading your email and findings over and over again yesterday > >night and this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into > >our attention and YES - we "will" or "have" > >to do whatever it's necessary to revert this situation and to ensure > >that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it should be. > > Thank you for yor support. > > I suppose that it should be apparent to all that I am upset and angry > about many of the things that have gone on within the AFRINIC region. > But the various IP block thefts themselves are, to my way of thinking, > the least of it all. > > Quite some time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was > going to be performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes, > back to the beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret > out any -more- instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and > beyond those that I and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to > light last year (2019). Eddy even said that technical personnel and > representatives of one of the more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being > brought in to help with this effort. > > That was many MANY months ago now. (Also, as I'm sure many of you know, > Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and > management for over an entire calendar year now.) > > So this raises the obvious question: Why didn't Eddy and the Board > already know about the apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4 > allocations held by Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my > posting the other day about those? And if they did know, then why did > they elect to give both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing > them both to *keep* the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear > to have been provided to them... presumably in fundamentally crooked > transactions... by the now disgraced and long ago terminated ex-employee > Ernest Byaruhanga? > > It has to be one or the other. There is no third possibility. > > Either Eddy & the Board knew, and elected to do nothing and keep silent, > or else their much heralded "exhaustive audit" of the history of all > AFRINIC allocations was so fundementally flawed and incomplete that > it failed to catch obviously questionable allocations of great swaths > of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address space, totaling well over a million > IPv4 addresses. > > I'm not sure which of these two possibilities is worse. Either the > so-called "audit" was done in a glaringly incompetent manner, or else > Eddy and the Board have been complicit in trying to sweep under the > carpet the questionable nature of the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations > held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. Mehta... neither of whom is either > located in the AFRINIC region, and neither of whom, it appears, is > providing -any- services whatsoever within the AFRINIC region. > > I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when they learned about > the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. Abizeid and > Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for years served > to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga. > > If Eddy and the Board only learned about those connections from my public > posting of a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for > them to grant me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that > I have been repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can > perform a proper sort of audit and analysis of those records. > > On the other hand, if they are none too pleased with me having been able > to find and expose the many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already > managed to find and expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then > I guess they will continue to want to keep me as far away as possible > from any historical WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary > man-on-the-street netizens are privy to. > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. I am more than a little inclined to believe that Eddy and the > AFRINIC Board do want to, and have wanted to just sweep these matters > under the carpet, as much as possible. My belief is based on the > fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made a decision... > privately and without even having the courtesy of informing the > AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen, > to keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had > successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to > protest. > > The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only > partially set right. The City of Cape Town, the commercial South > African firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil > company, Sasol, and others have all managed to get their legacy > IPv4 blocks back from the clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and > Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up to assert their rightful claims. > > Other legitimate legacy block holders have, unfortunately, been either > too lazy, too confused, or too timid to even assert their rights, > and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply ignore those rights > as a matter of expediency. This is not a shining example of either > honor or courage on their part. It is rather a capitulation to criminals, > and an abdication of their responsibilities to act in the best interests > of the AFRINIC members and community. > > Giving in to corruption only leads to even more corruption. And frankly, > I remain surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood > and appreciated through the African continent. > > Eddy and the Board can and should stop their silent charade, tell the > members what they have decided to do, or not do, about the various stolen > AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this day remain stolen and in the hands of > messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they should be prepared to defend their > decisions in an open forum. > > The global reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated > public scandals in recent years. Repairing that global reputation cannot > even begin as long as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding > their decision making process behind the same closed doors that protected > Ernest Byaruhanga and his criminal machinations from public view for so > many years. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:20:49 -0800 > From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" > To: General Discussions of AFRINIC , > dbwg at afrinic.net, Afnog > Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, > Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. > Message-ID: <25847.1608434449 at segfault.tristatelogic.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Included below are summraies of the current routing of the various > AFRINIC-assigned blocks belonging to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC (LiquidWeb, Inc.) > and also ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC (Fiber Grid, Inc.) I am providing these to > the AFRINIC community in support of my prior assertion that no part > or portion of the AFRINIC-assigned blocks of these two companies are, > at present, being routed to any country within the AFRINIC region, nor > to any country or countries that are even adjacent to the AFRINIC region. > > The routing summaries below were computed based upon raw data specifying > the specific ASNs that are routing each of the constituent /24 "C" blocks > that make up the totality of the registered AFRINIC blocks currently > assigned to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC respectively. That > raw data was obtained by me, programatically, via the "RESTful" web > interface of the RIPEStat data base. The raw data from which the > summaries below were computed may obtained via the following two links, > or alternatively, directly fronm RIEPStat, for the benefit of anyone > wishing to independently confirm my analysis. > > ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC: > https://pastebin.com/raw/rzWSckCs > > ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC: > https://pastebin.com/raw/sgFGNjwH > > Additionally, the Perl scripts that I have used to fetch the above raw > data from RIPEStat, as well as the scripts I have used to compute from > that raw data the routing summary tables shown below are all availiable > from me upon request. I would be more than happy to have others > independently perform the same routing analysis as I have done with > respect to the IPv4 space currently assigned to ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and > ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC. > > The routing summary tables below each contain four fields as follows: > > 1) Number of constituent /24 "C" blocks routed by the given ASN. > 2) The AS number. > 3) The applicable two-letter ISO 3166 country code. > 4) The full name of the ORGanization to which the ASN is registered. > > Note that a good deal of the IPv4 space registered to ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC > is currently being routed by RIPE-issued ASNs registered to "Inter > Connects Inc". > > Upon information and belief, "Inter Connects Inc" is a Delaware (US) > corporate entity for which Mr. Deepak Mehta is either a beneficial > owner or else possibly THE beneficial owner. Mr. Mehta is of course > free to dispute this contention, as and when he sees fit. Please note > however that an entity calling itself "Inter Connects Inc" is also > currently represented within the RIPE WHOIS data base where it is > designated via the handle ORG-DMF2-RIPE and that the RIPE WHOIS > history of that organization handle indicates that it was previously > associated with "Deepak Mehta FIE": > > https://pastebin.com/raw/wnF8g2gh > > Please note that AS393489, which appears in the second table below, is > officially a bogon (unassigned) AS number at present. Prior to the > reclamation of this ASN by ARIN, this specific ASN was assigned to a > U.S. company named "ADT Systems, Inc." and that company appears to > still be using AS393489, even though AS393489 is now officially a > bogon ASN. > > Please take note also that the organization to which the RIPE-issued > AS58110 is registered (IP Volume LTD - UK) may or may not have any > connection whatsoever to the registrant organization for AS202425 > (IP Volume, Inc. - Seychelles) which has for some time announced a > route to the stolen AFRINIC legacy block 196.16.0.0/14, said block > being the rightful property of the South African national government's > IT arm, "SITA", accoring to all reliable historical evidence. > > The country codes listed in the following two summary tables, if accurate, > support my view that the AFRINIC-assigned IPv4 address blocks of both > ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC and ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC are likely not, at present, being > routed to any geographical points within the AFRINIC region, thus placing > both of these AFRINIC member organizations in clear violation of the > legally binding AFRINIC Bylaws. > > This, of course, is in addition to and on top of the fact that both > organizations appear to have obtained some or all of their AFRINIC- > assigned IPv4 address space illicitly, most probaby by way of the > dismissed and disgraced Ernest Byaruhanga. > > > Current routing summary for ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC: > --------------------------------------------- > 3795 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 233 58065 UK Packet Exchange Limited > 164 41564 UK Packet Exchange Limited > 79 57858 US Inter Connects Inc > 30 204353 UK Global Offshore Limited > 13 63119 US Inter Connects Inc > 10 60485 US Inter Connects Inc > 8 46805 US Inter Connects Inc > 7 48950 UK Global Colocation Limited > 6 57972 US Inter Connects Inc > 4 37518 SC Fiber Grid INC > 2 40676 US Psychz Networks > 1 50304 NO Blix Solutions AS > > Current routing summary for ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC: > --------------------------------------------- > 280 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 111 12025 US Iron Mountain Data Center > 68 3356 US Level 3 Parent, LLC > 64 1273 GB Vodafone Group PLC > 58 43233 IR Fara Negar Pardaz Noor Khuzestan Co.JSP > 49 35554 GB 8K Cloud Ltd > 48 53271 US Phenix Cable > 36 133847 MY Anpple Tech Enterprise > 34 7029 US Windstream Communications LLC > 26 36290 KN The Cable of St. Kitts > 20 32181 US GigeNET > 12 13768 CA Aptum Technologies > 12 265515 MX Televera Red S. A. P. I. De C.V. > 12 14123 US Midnight Proxies LLC > 12 397373 US H4Y Technologies LLC > 10 36445 CA Coextro > 8 62217 GB VooServers Ltd > 8 39535 GB VooServers Ltd > 8 14935 US Monticello Networks, Inc. > 8 18710 US Gkg.Net, Inc > 8 40676 US Psychz Networks > 7 209181 GB Zenex 5ive Limited > 6 49367 IT Seflow S.N.C. Di Marco Brame' & C. > 6 17511 JP OPTAGE Inc. > 5 56309 TH Siamdata Communication Co.,ltd. > 5 6327 CA Shaw Communications Inc. > 5 17676 JP Softbank BB Corp. > 5 28458 MX Ientc S De Rl De Cv > 4 17941 JP Equinix Jpapan Enterprise K.K. > 4 13213 GB UK-2 Limited > 4 396356 US Maxihost LLC > 4 36217 US NetActuate, Inc > 4 137199 AU Emerge Internet Pty Ltd > 4 397026 US Wi-Fiber, Inc. > 4 54133 CA UnmeteredInternet.com > 4 395046 US Sexing Technologies > 4 202211 ES Manuel Mariposa Consulting SL > 3 174 US Cogent Communications > 3 7018 US AT&T Services, Inc. > 3 32780 US Hosting Services, Inc. > 2 262239 BZ Speednet Communications Limited > 2 398252 US Big Red Communications LLC > 2 393670 US Southern Fibernet Corporation > 2 63073 US The University of Tampa > 2 36351 US SoftLayer Technologies Inc. > 2 393489 ?? {{unknown organization}} > 2 397582 US WOW-World of Wireless > 2 62904 US Eonix Corporation > 2 26341 US Open Solutions LLC > 2 25645 US Momentum Telecom, Inc. > 2 63018 US Dedicated.com > 2 46562 US Performive LLC > 2 397336 US Virtual Sprout > 2 23005 US Switch, Ltd > 2 54900 US Alianza Inc. > 1 28317 CR Boomerang Wireless S.A. > 1 133120 AU Hosted Network Pty. Ltd. > 1 60781 NL LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V. > 1 52356 CR R&H International Telecom Services SA. > 1 396459 US County of Venango > 1 27362 US Archon Development Corp. > 1 26375 US Airespring, Inc. > 1 54578 US FiberComm LC > 1 131455 AU Onsite Computers > 1 59955 LB Advanced Broadband Services S.A.L > 1 60257 GB Origin Broadband Limited > 1 141158 MY Hiero7 (M) Sdn. Bhd. > 1 397256 US Epyon Technologies > 1 58110 UK IP Volume LTD > 1 20473 US Choopa, LLC > 1 14333 US On-Ramp Indiana, Inc. > 1 30277 US DFW Datacenter > 1 64286 US LogicWeb Inc. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:05:27 +0400 > From: AFRINIC Communication > To: community-discuss at afrinic.net > Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the > misappropriation of IPv4 resources > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > [Version en fran?ais au bas] > > Dear AFRINIC Community, > > AFRINIC is governed by certain processes, PDP policies and legal frameworks that we need to comply with as an organisation. We can only act within the established framework or the ramifications could be extremely damaging. > > Access to the bulk whois data is granted once anyone who requires the data fully completes the process published at: > > https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data > > We welcome any information provided on the misappropriation of Internet number resources. However, as mentioned above, at this stage, we are unable to comment on what we know or do not know regarding the information shared. > > We trust that once we are able to publish the audit report, it will bring clarifications to the community's concerns on the misappropriation of Internet number resources. > > Regards > > Ashil Oogarah > on behalf of AFRINIC Communications and PR Team > > ??????????????????????.. > > Ch?re Communaut? d'AFRINIC, > > AFRINIC est r?gie par certains processus, politiques et cadres juridiques que nous devons respecter en tant qu'organisation. Nous ne pouvons agir dans ce cadre ?tabli, sinon les cons?quences pourraient ?tre extr?mement dommageables. > > L'acc?s aux donn?es whois est accord? une fois que toute personne ayant besoin de ces donn?es compl?te le processus publi? ? > > https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data > > Toute information sur la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques Internet est la bienvenue. Toutefois, comme mentionn? ci-dessus, nous ne sommes pas en mesure, ? ce stade, de faire des commentaires sur ce que nous savons ou ne savons pas concernant les informations partag?es. > > Nous esp?rons qu'une fois que nous serons en mesure de publier le rapport d'audit, il apportera des ?claircissements sur les pr?occupations de la communaut? concernant la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques internet. > > Regards > > Ashil Oogarah > au nom de l'?quipe Communications et RP d?AFRINIC > > >> On 20 Dec 2020, at 04:20, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> >> In message <9A35CE76-E056-4547-B7FD-52696C5C7604 at darwincosta.com>, >> "dc at darwincosta.com" wrote: >> >>> @Mr. Ronald I was reading your email and findings over and over again yesterday >>> night and this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into >>> our attention and YES - we "will" or "have" >>> to do whatever it's necessary to revert this situation and to ensure >>> that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it should be. >>> >> >> Thank you for yor support. >> >> I suppose that it should be apparent to all that I am upset and angry >> about many of the things that have gone on within the AFRINIC region. >> But the various IP block thefts themselves are, to my way of thinking, >> the least of it all. >> >> Quite some time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was >> going to be performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes, >> back to the beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret >> out any -more- instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and >> beyond those that I and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to >> light last year (2019). Eddy even said that technical personnel and >> representatives of one of the more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being >> brought in to help with this effort. >> >> That was many MANY months ago now. (Also, as I'm sure many of you know, >> Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and >> management for over an entire calendar year now.) >> >> So this raises the obvious question: Why didn't Eddy and the Board >> already know about the apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4 >> allocations held by Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my >> posting the other day about those? And if they did know, then why did >> they elect to give both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing >> them both to *keep* the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear >> to have been provided to them... presumably in fundamentally crooked >> transactions... by the now disgraced and long ago terminated ex-employee >> Ernest Byaruhanga? >> >> It has to be one or the other. There is no third possibility. >> >> Either Eddy & the Board knew, and elected to do nothing and keep silent, >> or else their much heralded "exhaustive audit" of the history of all >> AFRINIC allocations was so fundementally flawed and incomplete that >> it failed to catch obviously questionable allocations of great swaths >> of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address space, totaling well over a million >> IPv4 addresses. >> >> I'm not sure which of these two possibilities is worse. Either the >> so-called "audit" was done in a glaringly incompetent manner, or else >> Eddy and the Board have been complicit in trying to sweep under the >> carpet the questionable nature of the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations >> held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. Mehta... neither of whom is either >> located in the AFRINIC region, and neither of whom, it appears, is >> providing -any- services whatsoever within the AFRINIC region. >> >> I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when they learned about >> the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. Abizeid and >> Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for years served >> to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga. >> >> If Eddy and the Board only learned about those connections from my public >> posting of a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for >> them to grant me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that >> I have been repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can >> perform a proper sort of audit and analysis of those records. >> >> On the other hand, if they are none too pleased with me having been able >> to find and expose the many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already >> managed to find and expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then >> I guess they will continue to want to keep me as far away as possible >> from any historical WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary >> man-on-the-street netizens are privy to. >> >> >> Regards, >> rfg >> >> >> P.S. I am more than a little inclined to believe that Eddy and the >> AFRINIC Board do want to, and have wanted to just sweep these matters >> under the carpet, as much as possible. My belief is based on the >> fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made a decision... >> privately and without even having the courtesy of informing the >> AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen, >> to keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had >> successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to >> protest. >> >> The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only >> partially set right. The City of Cape Town, the commercial South >> African firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil >> company, Sasol, and others have all managed to get their legacy >> IPv4 blocks back from the clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and >> Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up to assert their rightful claims. >> >> Other legitimate legacy block holders have, unfortunately, been either >> too lazy, too confused, or too timid to even assert their rights, >> and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply ignore those rights >> as a matter of expediency. This is not a shining example of either >> honor or courage on their part. It is rather a capitulation to criminals, >> and an abdication of their responsibilities to act in the best interests >> of the AFRINIC members and community. >> >> Giving in to corruption only leads to even more corruption. And frankly, >> I remain surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood >> and appreciated through the African continent. >> >> Eddy and the Board can and should stop their silent charade, tell the >> members what they have decided to do, or not do, about the various stolen >> AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this day remain stolen and in the hands of >> messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they should be prepared to defend their >> decisions in an open forum. >> >> The global reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated >> public scandals in recent years. Repairing that global reputation cannot >> even begin as long as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding >> their decision making process behind the same closed doors that protected >> Ernest Byaruhanga and his criminal machinations from public view for so >> many years. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> afnog mailing list >> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 09:23:22 +0000 > From: yamadu > To: AFRINIC Communication , > community-discuss at afrinic.net > Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the > misappropriation of IPv4 resources > Message-ID: > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > i think we should fellow due processes to address issues as a? community. AFRINIC has policies and legal framework that we are aware, so we should comply with when we want to address any concern. My take.Yusif?Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. > -------- Original message --------From: AFRINIC Communication Date: 20/12/2020 8:05 a.m. (GMT+00:00) To: community-discuss at afrinic.net Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of > ? IPv4 resources [Version en fran?ais au bas]Dear AFRINIC Community,AFRINIC is governed by certain processes, PDP policies and legal frameworks that we need to comply with as an organisation. We can only act within the established framework or the ramifications could be extremely damaging. Access to the bulk whois data is granted once anyone who requires the data fully completes the process published at:https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data We welcome any information provided on the misappropriation of Internet number resources. However, as mentioned above, at this stage, we are unable to comment on what we know or do not know regarding the information shared. We trust that once we are able to publish the audit report, it will bring clarifications to the community's concerns on the misappropriation of Internet number resources.RegardsAshil Oogarahon behalf of AFRINIC Communications and PR Team??????????????????????..Ch?re Communaut? d'AFRINIC,AFRINIC est r?gie par certains processus, politiques et cadres juridiques que nous devons respecter en tant qu'organisation. Nous ne pouvons agir dans ce cadre ?tabli, sinon les cons?quences pourraient ?tre extr?mement dommageables. L'acc?s aux donn?es whois est accord? une fois que toute personne ayant besoin de ces donn?es compl?te le processus publi? ?https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data Toute information sur la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques Internet est la bienvenue. Toutefois, comme mentionn? ci-dessus, nous ne sommes pas en mesure, ? ce stade, de faire des commentaires sur ce que nous savons ou ne savons pas concernant les informations partag?es. Nous esp?rons qu'une fois que nous serons en mesure de publier le rapport d'audit, il apportera des ?claircissements sur les pr?occupations de la communaut? concernant la manipulation non autoris?e des ressources num?riques internet.RegardsAshil Oogarahau nom de l'?quipe Communications et RP d?AFRINIC> On 20 Dec 2020, at 04:20, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:> > In message <9A35CE76-E056-4547-B7FD-52696C5C7604 at darwincosta.com>, > "dc at darwincosta.com" wrote:> >> @Mr. Ronald I was reading your email and findings over and over again yesterday>> night and this morning... Thank you very much for bringing all of this into>> our attention and YES - we "will" or "have">> to do whatever it's necessary to revert this situation and to ensure>> that AFRINIC returns to AFRINIC as it should be.> > Thank you for yor support.> > I suppose that it should be apparent to all that I am upset and angry> about many of the things that have gone on within the AFRINIC region.> But the various IP block thefts themselves are, to my way of thinking,> the least of it all.> > Quite some time ago now, Eddy announced to everyone that AFRINIC was> going to be performing an exhaustive audit of all AFRINIC WHOIS changes,> back to the beginning of time, with the intent obviously being to ferret> out any -more- instances of questionable IPv4 allocations, above and> beyond those that I and journalist Jan Vermeulen already brought to> light last year (2019).? Eddy even said that technical personnel and> representatives of one of the more senior RIRs (APNIC) were being> brought in to help with this effort.> > That was many MANY months ago now.? (Also, as I'm sure many of you know,> Ernest's malfeasance has been known about by the AFRINIC Board and> management for over an entire calendar year now.)> > So this raises the obvious question:? Why didn't Eddy and the Board> already know about the apparent connections bewteen the AFRINIC IPv4> allocations held by Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta long long before my> posting the other day about those?? And if they did know, then why did> they elect to give both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta a pass, allowing> them both to *keep* the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations that appear> to have been provided to them... presumably in fundamentally crooked> transactions... by the now disgraced and long ago terminated ex-employee> Ernest Byaruhanga?> > It has to be one or the other.? There is no third possibility.> > Either Eddy & the Board knew, and elected to do nothing and keep silent,> or else their much heralded "exhaustive audit" of the history of all> AFRINIC allocations was so fundementally flawed and incomplete that> it failed to catch obviously questionable allocations of great swaths> of AFRINIC non-legacy IPv4 address space, totaling well over a million> IPv4 addresses.> > I'm not sure which of these two possibilities is worse.? Either the> so-called "audit" was done in a glaringly incompetent manner, or else> Eddy and the Board have been complicit in trying to sweep under the> carpet the questionable nature of the sizable AFRINIC IPv4 allocations> held by -both- Mr. Abizeid -and- Mr. Mehta... neither of whom is either> located in the AFRINIC region, and neither of whom, it appears, is> providing -any- services whatsoever within the AFRINIC region.> > I look forward to Eddy and the Board clarifying when they learned about> the apparent connections between the IPv4 holdings of Mr. Abizeid and> Mr. Mehta and the fradulent "ITC" fake corporation that for years served> to hide so many of the thefts of Ernest Byaruhanga.> > If Eddy and the Board only learned about those connections from my public> posting of a couple of days ago, then maybe it is time, at long last, for> them to grant me access to the historical AFRINIC WHOIS information that> I have been repeatedly requesting for more than a year now, so that I can> perform a proper sort of audit and analysis of those records.> > On the other hand, if they are none too pleased with me having been able> to find and expose the many AFRINIC WHOIS anomalies that I have already> managed to find and expose... even with very limited WHOIS access... then> I guess they will continue to want to keep me as far away as possible> from any historical WHOIS information, above and beyond what all ordinary> man-on-the-street netizens are privy to.> > > Regards,> rfg> > > P.S.? I am more than a little inclined to believe that Eddy and the> AFRINIC Board do want to, and have wanted to just sweep these matters> under the carpet, as much as possible.? My belief is based on the> fact that Eddy & The Board have quite clearly made a decision...> privately and without even having the courtesy of informing the> AFRINIC membership... to allow the crooks, Mr. Uerlings & Mr. Cohen,> to keep any and all of the legacy IPv4 address blocks that they had> successfully stolen, and for which no rightful owner has showed up to> protest.> > The result has been an inconsistant hodge-podge with things only> partially set right.? The City of Cape Town, the commercial South> African firm Columbus Stainless, the South African state-owned oil> company, Sasol, and others have all managed to get their legacy> IPv4 blocks back from the clutches of the fraudsters, Mr. Cohen and> Mr. Uerlings, simply by showing up to assert their rightful claims.> > Other legitimate legacy block holders have, unfortunately, been either> too lazy, too confused, or too timid to even assert their rights,> and this has allowed Eddy and the Board to simply ignore those rights> as a matter of expediency.? This is not a shining example of either> honor or courage on their part.? It is rather a capitulation to criminals,> and an abdication of their responsibilities to act in the best interests> of the AFRINIC members and community.> > Giving in to corruption only leads to even more corruption.? And frankly,> I remain surprised that this simple fact is not by now better understood> and appreciated through the African continent.> > Eddy and the Board can and should stop their silent charade, tell the> members what they have decided to do, or not do, about the various stolen> AFRINIC legacy blocks that to this day remain stolen and in the hands of> messers Uerlings & Cohen, and they should be prepared to defend their> decisions in an open forum.> > The global reputation of AFRINIC has already been buffeted by repeated> public scandals in recent years.? Repairing that global reputation cannot> even begin as long as the AFRINIC Board and management are still hiding> their decision making process behind the same closed doors that protected> Ernest Byaruhanga and his criminal machinations from public view for so> many years.> > _______________________________________________> afnog mailing list> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog_______________________________________________Community-Discuss mailing listCommunity-Discuss at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Community-Discuss Digest, Vol 698, Issue 1 > ************************************************* > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From libren at tuta.io Mon Dec 21 12:58:41 2020 From: libren at tuta.io (libren at tuta.io) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:58:41 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. Message-ID: @rfg? Routing summaries are of no use now days. Refer Google, Amazon, Microsoft or cloudflare organizations are based in US.? Technically should be allowed to use ARIN ip in its region but they are all over the map. Microsoft cloud in Africa using Arin ip or Google cloud in Middle East using Arin allocated networks. I raised this issue with RIRs and they are aware of this practice and their explanation was reasonable and it is allowed. Can Afrinic stop Microsoft using ARIN ip in its region? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfg at tristatelogic.com Mon Dec 21 23:44:27 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 15:44:27 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <41358.1608594267@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message , libren at tuta.io wrote: >@Ronald F. Guilmette are you LIR or member of Afrinic? No sir, I am neither. >Any comment on >https://bgp.he.net/AS35916#_prefixes >They are announced in USA via Multacom The company Cloud Innovation Ltd has quite a bit of AFRINIC-administered IPv4 address space assigned, and parts of that space are being routed by numerous different networks worldwide (but primarily by ones in Hong Kong). Other than just mentioning the fact that Multacom is not my most favorite company on the Internet, I have no other specific comment to offer regarding Multacom or its routing of various Cloud Innovation Ltd blocks. As I have expressed personally to Mr. Lu Heng, I am far more concered about the apparent use, by some of few of his customers, of the services of two specific networks that appear to be involved with routing blocks of apparently stolen and/or squatted IPv4 address blocks belonging to either (a) AFRINIC legacy holders and/or (b) Iranian holders of RIPE-assigned IPv4 address blocks: Asline/Clayer (Hong Hong / China) https://bgp.he.net/AS18013#_prefixes https://bgp.he.net/AS137951#_prefixes (Note that the second network above, AS137951, is a "leaf" ASN which is connected to the Internet only via the first ASN above, AS18013. In effect, they may be viewed as being just two parts of the same single thing.) DDoSing Network, Inc. (colorado/USA) https://bgp.he.net/AS22769#_prefixes Please note the distinctly funny name of that last one, and also the fact that in addition to announcing many questionable routes for many Iranian blocks, it is currently also routing much of the AFRINIC space which still remains assigned to Mr. Uerlings' "Inspiring Networks, Ltd." company, which is incorporated in the Seychelles Islands.[1] Regards, rfg [1] Mr. Uerlings also maintains corporate entities named "Inspiring Networks B.V." in the Netherlands and "Inspiring Networks, LLC" in Delaware, USA. From rfg at tristatelogic.com Tue Dec 22 00:18:15 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:18:15 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <41501.1608596295@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message , libren at tuta.io wrote: >@rfg Routing summaries are of no use now days. Refer Google, Amazon, >Microsoft or cloudflare organizations are based in US.=C2=A0 Technically sh >ould be allowed to use ARIN ip in its region but they are all over the map. > Microsoft cloud in Africa using Arin ip or Google cloud in Middle East usi >ng Arin allocated networks. I raised this issue with RIRs and they are awar >e of this practice and their explanation was reasonable and it is allowed. >Can Afrinic stop Microsoft using ARIN ip in its region? It is quite alright for a legal entity is region `A' to deploy some, and prehaps even most of its number resources in region `B'. That is quite clear. What you are failing to appreciate is that there exist a set of AFRINIC Bylaws which make it abundantly clear that IN THE ABSENCE OF SPECIFIC AND EXPLICIT APPROVAL BY THE BOARD, each member of AFRINIC is obliged to provide at least -some- service within the AFRINIC geographical region. Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta are NOT doing that, therefore unless there has been an explicit decision by the Board, neither man's corporate entities qualify to be AFRINIC members. If they are not AFRINIC members, then their AFRINIC- issued number resources must be immediately reclaimed intto the AFRINIC free pool. I call your attention specifically to Section 6.1 of the AFRINIC Bylaws: 6.1 Membership shall be open to: (i) any Person who is geographically based within, and providing services in the African region, and who is engaged in the use of, or business of providing, open system protocol network services; or (ii) any other Person who is approved by the Board or the members. Based upon the routing data that I posted here, and which I fully encourage independent investigators to verify to their own satisfaction, the corporate entities belonging to Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta are simply not qualified to be AFRINIC members under the AFRINIC Bylaws as written. More to the point, the historical WHOIS data which I have also posted links to, and which I also encourage other interested parties to independently verify to their own satisfaction, persusasively suggest that the corporate entities belonging to both Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta have received some or all of their AFRINIC-assigned non-legacy IPv4 address blocks via underhanded, unscruplous, illicit, and quite possibly illegal transactions involving the now disgraced AFRINIC ex-employee, Ernest Byaruhanga. So this raises the question: Based upon the available evidence, are Mr. Abizeid and Mr. Mehta simply foreign carpetbaggers... foreign 21st century colonialists, engaging in corrupt transactions with compliant locals and exploiting the natural resources of Africa from afar, while giving precious little in return to the people of Africa? You be the judge. Regards, rfg P.S. Is it possible that either Mr. Abizeid and/or Mr. Mehta received some special dispensation from the AFRINIC Board which would allow them to skirt the normal requireemnts of the AFRINIC Bwlaws, Section 6.1(i) as quoted above? I don't know and it is apparently impossible for any outsider to say, one way or the other, since some of the AFRINIC Board Meeting minutes have been mysteriously and quite deliberately ``disappeared'' from public view. From rfg at tristatelogic.com Tue Dec 22 01:24:51 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:24:51 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <41358.1608594267@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <41948.1608600291@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In a prior message, I quoted section 6.1 of the AFRINIC Bylaws, which I am now obliged to quote yet again: 6.1 Membership shall be open to: (i) any Person who is geographically based within, and providing services in the African region, and who is engaged in the use of, or business of providing, open system protocol network services; or (ii) any other Person who is approved by the Board or the members. The handle ORG-INL3-AFRINIC represents an alleged Seychelles corporate entity, "Inspiring Networks LTD", which appears to be owned and/or controlled by Mr. Maikel Uerlings. The set of AFRINIC-assigned IPv4 address blocks currently associated with ORG-INL3-AFRINIC is as follows: 45.220.64.0/18 196.61.192.0/20 197.231.208.0/22 Analysis of the routes that are currently publicly announced to the global Internet for each of the constituent /24 "C" blocks that compose the above IPv4 blocks provides the following results: Cblocks ASN CC Organization ------------------------------------------- 64 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 16 24567 AU QT Inc. 4 22769 US Ddosing Network Two things are apparent from these reults: 1) Just as in the case of Mr. Abizeid's and Mr. Mehta's corporate entities, it appears that Mr. Uerlings' Seychelles corporate entity, Inspiring Networks Ltd., also does not, at present, qualify, under the AFRINIC Bylaws to be a member of AFRINIC, as exactly -zero- of the company's AFRINIC-assigned IP address space is providing any service whatsoever to any point within the AFRINIC service region. 2) Just as in the case of Mr. Mehta's "Fiber Grid, Inc. (Seychelles) it would appear that Mr. Uerlings' corporate entity is not even using the vast majority of its AFRINIC-assigned IP address space. Rather, it would appear that both Mr. Mehta and Mr. Uerlings are using the great majority of their assigned IP address blocks only as passive investments at the present time. I guess they are both just sitting on these investments, waiting for the prices to go up. In case I have failed to make myself abundantly clear, I am requesting the Board to immediately invoke Sections 8.2(ii) and 8.2(v) of the AFRINIC Bylaws with respect to the corporate entities of Mr. Abizdeid, Mr. Mehta, and Mr. Uerlings. The evidence shows that they all stand in clear violation of Section 6.1(i) of the Bylaws, and have, I believe, for quite some time now. On that basis, their memberships MUST be terminated according to the Bylaws. Regards, rfg CC: board at afrinic.net From libren at tuta.io Tue Dec 22 13:30:15 2020 From: libren at tuta.io (libren at tuta.io) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:30:15 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. Message-ID: BGP any cast is the main reason why ips are announced globally. Cloudflare announce network in all the region so it violates? Question of announcing ip from other region is null and void? and it cannot be challenged. Afrinic bylaws have changed so many times and what matters is signed RSA ?https://www.afrinic.net/ast/pdf/services/afrinic-rsa-en-201801.pdf? ? Only signed agreements are?admissible in court.As per?https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xhtml?most of Afrinic ip are Legacy blocks. Afrinic is not the owner of Ip address but only administering. As we do not know history of legacy blocks and it will be better Afrinic deal with it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From libren at tuta.io Tue Dec 22 13:52:37 2020 From: libren at tuta.io (libren at tuta.io) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:52:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Message-ID: >@Ronald F. Guilmette are you LIR or member of Afrinic? ?>>>No sir, I am neither. Ronald F Guilmette are you a real person or using some fake name?? You are like ghost on internet.Do you have any linkedin profile or company?? I am wondering if you are not LIR or member of Afrinic then why are you even part of this community mailing list or why you are taking so much interest in community mailing list? There are thousands of members in this list you are just spamming everyone with your findings. Who cares who is doing what? This is something between Afrinic and its members.If you want to play good cop then report to Afrinic because spamming community mailing will not do anything You are working as?influence marketer to provoke community and Afrinic by playing divide and rule? Afrinic need new ideas and solutions not problems and no one is interested in your nonsense.? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Tue Dec 22 14:42:31 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:42:31 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 22 Dec 2020, 16:56 Libra via Community-Discuss, < community-discuss at afrinic.net> wrote: > > >*@Ronald F. Guilmette are you LIR or member of Afrinic?* > >>>No sir, I am neither. > Ronald F Guilmette are you a real person or using some fake name? You are > like ghost on internet. > How about you Libra? Are you a real person or a sock puppet? Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From comms at afrinic.net Tue Dec 22 15:02:47 2020 From: comms at afrinic.net (AFRINIC Communication) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:02:47 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] 2020/21 ICANN Board Seat 9 Elections: Comment Phase Open Message-ID: <08539F4D-AB15-4444-9964-7155702E17AC@afrinic.net> [Sent on behalf of the ASO AC] 21 DECEMBER 2020 Dear colleagues, In line with the ICANN Address Supporting Organization (ASO) Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)[1] and the ICANN Bylaws[2], the Address Supporting Organization Address Council (ASO AC) has issued a call for nominations for Seat 9 of the ICANN Board of Directors. The selected candidate will serve for a three-year term, which will begin at the conclusion of the ICANN Annual General Assembly during the ICANN 72 Meeting, scheduled from 23-28 October 2021 in Seattle, USA. Following a call for candidates, the ASO AC is pleased to announce that the following candidates have been nominated (sorted by their first name): Alan Barrett - https://aso.icann.org/alan-barrett-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Johan Helsingius - https://aso.icann.org/johan-helsingius-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Kemly Camacho J?menez - https://aso.icann.org/kemly-camacho-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Margarita Valdes - https://aso.icann.org/margarita-valdes-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Nigel Titley - https://aso.icann.org/nigel-titley-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Patrick W. Gilmore - https://aso.icann.org/patrick-w-gilmore-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Peter Thimmesch - https://aso.icann.org/peter-thimmesch-2021-icann-seat-9-nominee/ Ron da Silva - https://aso.icann.org/ron-da-silva-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Sean Kennedy - https://aso.icann.org/sean-kennedy-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Wafa Zaafouri - https://aso.icann.org/wafa-zaafouri-2021-icann-board-seat-9/ Comment Phase --------------------- The comment phase will begin on 21 December 2020 and will end at 23.59 UTC on 30 March 2021. Comments can be submitted for candidates by clicking on the link next to their name above and adding a comment to their biography. Please note that, as per section 9.4.5 of the ASO AC Operating Procedures [3], all comments will be moderated by the ASO Secretariat prior to being published on the ASO website. For more information on the ICANN Board of Directors Seat 9 election process, please go to https://aso.icann.org/icann-board/icann-board-elections/2021-icann-board-of-directors-seat-9-elections/ [1] ICANN Address Supporting Organization (ASO) MoU https://aso.icann.org/documents/memorandums-of-understanding/ [2] ICANN Bylaws: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en [3] ASO AC Operating Procedures https://aso.icann.org/documents/operational-documents/operating-procedures-of-the-address-council-of-the-address-supporting-organization/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Tue Dec 22 16:37:42 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:37:42 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 22 Dec 2020, 16:56 Libra via Community-Discuss, < community-discuss at afrinic.net> wrote: > > >*@Ronald F. Guilmette are you LIR or member of Afrinic?* > >>>No sir, I am neither. > Ronald F Guilmette are you a real person or using some fake name? You are > like ghost on internet. > How about you Libren? Are you a real person or a coward sock puppet? Do you have any linkedin profile or company? > Do you have one we can look at? I am wondering if you are not LIR or member of Afrinic then why are you > even part of this community mailing list > Is this mailing list for only LIR or members only? Who gives you Libren the right to discriminate against others? The Code of Conduct for this very community list does not allow discretionary remarks like the ones you are parading against Ronald. or why you are taking so much interest in community mailing list? > Why should any sane and ethical member of the internet community not take interest and participate in this forum. Do you Libren have a problem with internet community members participating openly in such a forum. Are you perhaps one of the affected parties of Ronald revelations which are extremely concerning and must be addressed. There are thousands of members in this list you are just spamming everyone > with your findings. > Spamming is that your excuse to divert attention. If you have a problem with Ronald posts, please do yourself a favor and unsubscribe yourself from this list. No one forced you to stay on it. Who cares who is doing what? > I do care and I am involved in running real African network infrastructure that has real impact in AFRICA and I am a real warm blooded person with a heart pumping breath gasping decaying body. This is something between Afrinic and its members. > Well the networks I am invloved with are AFRINIC members and yes everything Ronald has revealed is something that concerns us. If you want to play good cop then report to Afrinic because spamming > community mailing will not do anything > You clearly have a problem with those who attempt to ethically speak out against potential fraud as it shall be revealed in the promised audit report from AFRINIC. Btw, where have you been. Dont you know that Ronalds past revelations on this very mailing list led to the ongoing massive Audit by AFRINIC which as partially reported has led to recovery of millions of misappropriated IPv4 addresses and an ongoing litigation at the Mauritius court. You are working as influence marketer to provoke community and Afrinic by > playing divide and rule? > How has Ronald divided this community. Please share your evidence of your unfounded claims and innuendos others give us a break. Afrinic need new ideas and solutions > Those ideas and solutions can wait. not problems and no one is interested in your nonsense. > What nonsense. AFRINIC needs to clean up the never ending crap. You are calling what seems like fraud and corruption nonsense. You are clearly a very unethical individual. If people made mistakes then they should be held accountable and those mistakes fixed. That is the only sensible achievement we seek. This community is anxiously waiting for the audit report as recently reported by the CEO and AFRINIC communications team. Noah *A real person* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sami.salih at outlook.com Tue Dec 22 17:10:08 2020 From: sami.salih at outlook.com (Sami Salih) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:10:08 +0000 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: I don't have any comment about the content of libren at tuta.io messages, but I'm not comfortable with anonymous posting in our member-based list. I hope we can resolve this issue so anyone is well known to each other's. Sami Salih ________________________________ From: Noah Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 7:37 PM To: libren at tuta.io Cc: Community Discuss Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources On Tue, 22 Dec 2020, 16:56 Libra via Community-Discuss, > wrote: >@Ronald F. Guilmette are you LIR or member of Afrinic? >>>No sir, I am neither. Ronald F Guilmette are you a real person or using some fake name? You are like ghost on internet. How about you Libren? Are you a real person or a coward sock puppet? Do you have any linkedin profile or company? Do you have one we can look at? I am wondering if you are not LIR or member of Afrinic then why are you even part of this community mailing list Is this mailing list for only LIR or members only? Who gives you Libren the right to discriminate against others? The Code of Conduct for this very community list does not allow discretionary remarks like the ones you are parading against Ronald. or why you are taking so much interest in community mailing list? Why should any sane and ethical member of the internet community not take interest and participate in this forum. Do you Libren have a problem with internet community members participating openly in such a forum. Are you perhaps one of the affected parties of Ronald revelations which are extremely concerning and must be addressed. There are thousands of members in this list you are just spamming everyone with your findings. Spamming is that your excuse to divert attention. If you have a problem with Ronald posts, please do yourself a favor and unsubscribe yourself from this list. No one forced you to stay on it. Who cares who is doing what? I do care and I am involved in running real African network infrastructure that has real impact in AFRICA and I am a real warm blooded person with a heart pumping breath gasping decaying body. This is something between Afrinic and its members. Well the networks I am invloved with are AFRINIC members and yes everything Ronald has revealed is something that concerns us. If you want to play good cop then report to Afrinic because spamming community mailing will not do anything You clearly have a problem with those who attempt to ethically speak out against potential fraud as it shall be revealed in the promised audit report from AFRINIC. Btw, where have you been. Dont you know that Ronalds past revelations on this very mailing list led to the ongoing massive Audit by AFRINIC which as partially reported has led to recovery of millions of misappropriated IPv4 addresses and an ongoing litigation at the Mauritius court. You are working as influence marketer to provoke community and Afrinic by playing divide and rule? How has Ronald divided this community. Please share your evidence of your unfounded claims and innuendos others give us a break. Afrinic need new ideas and solutions Those ideas and solutions can wait. not problems and no one is interested in your nonsense. What nonsense. AFRINIC needs to clean up the never ending crap. You are calling what seems like fraud and corruption nonsense. You are clearly a very unethical individual. If people made mistakes then they should be held accountable and those mistakes fixed. That is the only sensible achievement we seek. This community is anxiously waiting for the audit report as recently reported by the CEO and AFRINIC communications team. Noah *A real person* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Tue Dec 22 17:48:15 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 20:48:15 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 22 Dec 2020, 20:10 Sami Salih, wrote: > I'm not comfortable with anonymous posting in our member-based list. > Sami, not so many people can stand tall and speak out their minds here within our region. Majority prefer to whisper and/or speak from behind the curtains even when what is happening affects them dearly. I hope we can resolve this issue so anyone is well known to each other's. > Especially in our region. I know people from outside the region have no problem speaking their minds or calling each others out. Its only within the AFRINIC service region where sock puppets are running rampant and some sock puppet seems like recruitment from outside AFRICAN region. Noah > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Tue Dec 22 18:01:15 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:01:15 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <13573.1608229956@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <01e101d6d47b$7f2586c0$7d709440$@afrinic.net> <13573.1608229956@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: Hi Ronald Thank you for your posts especially the relevant sections that shed light to the misappropriation of AFRINIC number resources both legacy and non-legacy IPv4 address space that belong to the AFRINIC inventory. No name calling please, its been a frustrating 2020 already. Please can you consolidate your very important and yet great research around the individuals Cohen, Uerlings, Abizeid, Deepak Mehta and Lu Heng. The reason I am requesting you to do this is so that we as a community can have one comprehensive piece of information from all the various posts you have made here in the past couple of months and make it easier for all of us to follow through. This will enable us contribute effectively and collaborate with AFRINIC to get all this addressed as resources members whose fees goes into running the Organization. My the gods be with you. Noah On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, 21:37 Ronald F. Guilmette, wrote: > I'm sorry friends, but I have to say that this really chaps my hide. > > Once again we get an "update" from Eddy in which he says... well... > absolutely nothing. He apparently writes just to tell the AFRINIC > community that everything is still cloaked in secrecy, I guess because > you are all children and can't handle and/or are not entitled to know > what's really going on. > > Unlike Eddy, I certainly have a great many bits of hard-won facts and > evidence to share with the community, and I would have done so long > before now if I didn't have a life and other pressing matters to > attend to, including other Internet-based criminal enterprises that > I am actively investigating and working with journalists on, even as > we speak. > > For today, I'll just drop a couple of things on you that you all may > perhaps find new and interesting. > > My friend, juornalist Jan Vermeulen has informed me that according to > his calculations (which were based on numbers given to him by Eddy) > there are still around one million+ IPv4 addresses that AFRINIC already > knows were stolen, and that were NOT included in any of the reports > that Jan has published in mybroadband.co.za. That's one hell of a > lot of valuable IPv4 real estate! So where is it all and why hasn't > AFRINIC reclaimed it? (Note: I'm not even talking about the stolen > legacy blocks, which Eddy and the board are still dragging their feet > on, and refusing to do anything about, even after a full year of knowing > about those, and even after seeing the compelling evidence that Cohen > and Uerlings registered a lot of contact email domains with the clear > and deliberate intent to cover up their gigantic theft scheme.) > > So anyway, I do know where at least some of those other stolen 1 million > IP addreses have gone, and I'm frankly stunned that neither Eddy nor > anybody else in the AFRINIC hierarchy have lifted a finger to reclaim > any of this other IPv4 space that has been stolen. What are they > waiting for? An engraved invitation? Do they just need to have either > Jan or myself expose thesse additional thefts first, so as to take any > possible legal heat off them? > > I call your attention to the following listing of the historical > WHOIS data for the 196.52.0.0/14 block. Please note that the name "ITC", > under which this block was originally registered is one that I and Jan > long ago concluded was a totally made-up name for a fake corporate entity > that never existed anywhere, and one that was invented out of whole cloth > by Ernest Byaruhanga as a kind of WHOIS cover story for many of his > thefts... > thefts which have now been effectively confirmed by virtue of that fact > that AFRINIC has already reclaimed all of the blocks that were still > registered to "ITC" as of December of last year. > > https://pastebin.com/raw/DW4nGii3 > > The bottom line here is clear. The 196.52.0.0/14 block was another one > of Ernest's thefts from the free pool, and one that was subsequently > sold or gifted to the proprietor of LogicWeb, Inc. of New York, USA, > i.e. a certain Mr. Chad Abizeid: > > https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_ny/3034414 > > It should be noted that some time after he received this large chunk of > property that was stolen by Ernest from AFRINIC... a chunk of real estate > worth well over $5 million dollars, USD, at current market prices... Mr. > Abizeid tried to sell off the entire thing in one big chunk (for one big > payday): > > > https://www.facebook.com/mailchimp/posts/im-trying-to-get-in-touch-with-whomever-is-in-charge-of-your-ip-addresses-i-own-/10152414268080777/ > > I want everyone to note also that, the last time I checked anyway, not > a single IP address of this huge IPv4 block was being routed to or used > anywhere even close to the AFRINIC region. > > So there are several problems here. > > First and foremost, the history indicates quite persuasively that this /14 > block was stolen by Ernest. > > Second, Eddy and the board appear to already have known this to be true > for some time now, but just as in the case of the legacy blocks, they have > been dragging their feet and steadfastly AVOIDING doing anything about it, > simply because this is the path of least resistance for them. It does not > appear that they care at all about what is right, or about doing what is > right, > but they do quite obviously care about minimizing their own hassle factor, > and they are apparently afraid that if they do the Right Thing and take > back > this blatantly stolen block... which was apparently sold by Ernest on the > black market, that Mr. Abizeid will complain about that, and maybe even > file suit, as Mr. Cohen has done. So justice and fairness for the rest of > the AFRINIC members goes out the window, sacrificed for the sake of > expediency. > > Lastly, as I have said, the last time I checked, which was admittedly some > months ago now, not a single scrap of this /14 IPv4 block was routed to > anywhere > within a thousand miles of the AFRINIC region, thus placing this "member" > in > clear violation of even the minamalist a and remarkably weak requirements > of > the AFRINIC Bylaws which state explicitly that AFRINIC is to serve members > who provide AT LEAST *some* token level of service to the AFRINIC region. > > If Mr. Abizeid is indeed failing to do that, then his resources can and > should > be reclaimed just on that basis alone, even if AFRINIC elects to totally > ignore the even more significant fact that this /14 was quite evidently > stolen > by Ernest. > > So why hasn't Eddy reclaimed the 196.52.0.0/14 block? It's an utter > mystery > to me. But like I said, maybe he has just been waiting for Jan or myself > to > break the ice about this, so that he wouldn't have to. Now that this theft > is also out in the open however, he's got no more excuses, and he should > reclaim this stolen block for the benefit of AFRINIC's legitimate members > just as he has already done with all of the other Ernest "ITC" stolen > blocks. > > And speaking of which, I encourage you all to take a look also at the WHOIS > history of the 165.231.0.0/16 block, which originally belonged to a > legitimate Internet Service Provider in Guinea, but which, on 2010-10-08, > somehow magically also ended up registered to Ernest's fake "ITC" company: > > https://pastebin.com/raw/dJjdGYLm > > After being registered to Ernest's fake "ITC" company for a couple of > years, > on 2012-11-06 this valuable /16 block, itself worth well over $1,3 million > USD onthe open market, was once again magically reassigned, this time to > something or someone whose name is allegedly "Fiber Grid Inc." and which > is allegedly domiciled in the Seychelles Islands. > > In this case, the apparent beneficiary of Ernest's corrupt largess was a > certain Mr. Deepak Mehta, a gentleman apparently of Indian ancestry whose > current physical location is somewhat uncertain but who appears to have > incorporated multiple businesses, including one named "Fiber Grid" (as well > as an apparently failed catering business) in the Baltic nation of > Estonia... > rather far from the AFRINIC region, I would say. > > FIBER GRID O? > https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12183141-FIBER-GRID-O%C3%9C > > Sonjara O? > https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12626354-Sonjara-O%C3%9C > > https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/12183141-FIBER-GRID-O%C3%9C > https://www.teatmik.ee/en/personlegal/14097138-O%C3%9C-Asian-Express > > I have no idea what other credits he may have to his name, but speaking > just personally, my only knowledge of this Mr. Deepak Mehta and his > character has been derived from a public blog post by network security > journalist Brian Krebs, published back on August 26, 2016, and purporting > to show Mr. Mehta participating in a multi-party chat session where the > one and only topic of discussion was the planning for an upcoming > criminal DDoS attack on the well-known anti-spam outfit Spamhaus: > > > https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/08/inside-the-attack-that-almost-broke-the-internet/ > > Note that whereas the evidence indicates, to me anyway, that the > 165.231.0.0/16 block is yet another block that was purloined from the > AFRINIC free pool (and thus from the AFRINIC membership) by Ernest. > After that, the 165.231.0.0/16 block somehow made its way into the > hands of Mr. Mehta. > > Note also however that that one /16 block, valuable and large though > it may be, is quite certainly not the only valuable AFRINIC IPv4 > address block currently assigned to Mr. Mehta's apparently Estonia-based > "Fiber Grid" company. Far from it! Despite neither he nor his company > being the least bit African, or even within a thousand miles of Africa, > as far as I can tell, Mr. Mehta, via some process that remains totally > cloaked in secrecy, has somehow managed to amass a grand total of nearly > a million (983,040) AFRINIC IPv4 addresses, worth well over $20 milliion > USD. > > The full list of Mr. Mehta's assigned AFRINIC blocks is as follows: > > 165.231.0.0/16 > 196.48.0.0/16 > 196.56.0.0/16 > 196.57.0.0/16 > 196.58.0.0/16 > 196.59.0.0/16 > 196.196.0.0/16 > 196.197.0.0/16 > 196.198.0.0/16 > 196.199.0.0/16 > 196.240.0.0/15 > 196.242.0.0/15 > 196.244.0.0/16 > 196.245.0.0/16 > 196.247.0.0/16 > > How a non-African, such as Mr. Mehta, who, like Mr. Abizeid, appears to > provide exactly -zero- services to the AFRINIC region, somehow managed to > be awarded almost a million AFRINIC IPv4 addresses is, quite frankly, more > than a little puzzling. It is altogether apparent however that it is in > the interests of AFRINIC staff and board members to keep the entire process > by which such awards were made, and by which such awards are still being > made, > entirely hidden from public view. Certainly, Ernest Byaruhanga would not > now be enjoying a comfortable retirement in his hilltop estate in Uganda if > the process by which AFRINIC IP addresses had been awarded within the > AFRINIC > region had been transparent from the beginning. > > Nor would Mr. Abzeid and Mr. Mehta still be enjoying -their- apparently > Ernest-provided AFRINIC blocks if AFRINIC management and the board decided, > even at this late date, to come clean about what they are or, more > properly, > are not doing to really clean up the whole mess. > > Of course transparency, even at this late date would likely not help the > interests of Mr. Lu Heng either. Mr. Heng, as at least some of you may > know, as a 24 year old mainland Chinese kid with no apparent history of > networking experience whatsoever, somehow managed to be awarded two > giagantic /12 AFRINIC IPv4 blocks as well as two even more gigantic > AFRINIC /11 blocks (total current market value, over $150 million USD), > some of which he has since doled out to the very same people who are > currently aiding and abetting Mr. Cohen's ongoing misuse of the AFRINIC > legacy blocks... the very ones which AFRINIC has so far been dragging its > feet on and refusing to reassigned back to their rightful owners: > > https://bgp.he.net/AS18013#_prefixes > https://bgp.he.net/AS137951#_prefixes > > Note that AS18013 - Asline (Hong Kong) and AS137951 - Clayer (Hong Kong) > are, as we would say here inthe States, effectively "joined at the hip", > that the latter is routing much stolen AFRINIC legacy space, and that > the former has leased or purchased quite a lot of IPv4 space from Mr. > Heng's Cloud Innovation Ltd. > > I tried asking Mr. Heng via private email why he would be supporting > criminals in Hong Kong who are adiding and abetting Mr. Cohen and his > ongoing thefts from the AFRINIC region, but I guess either my email fell > into Mr. Heng's spam folder or else he just didn't much feel like > discussing the matter. In any case, I received no reply from him to my > recent polite inquiry. > > To summarize, there has been one hell of a lot of crooked crap that has > gone on in AFRINIC, over time, and it isn't even nearly all cleaned up > yet. Worse, management and the board do not seem to have the will to > actually and fully clean up the mess, once and for all. This tends to > cast a certain degree of suspicion on them and their motivations also. > > The fundamental problem is and has been the utter and total lack of > transparency, and neither the current board nor current management has > lifted a single finger to address that. One might get the impression > that they really don't want to. > > If this is the way you folks who are the dues paying members of AFRINC > want to run your region, then you can have all of the corruption and > lethargic and cowardly inaction you want. That's your choice. I just > wish that you all would stop selling, stealing, or giving away IP > addresses to Internet criminals who are going to use those addresses > to spam and DDoS us innocent and law abiding folks in other regions. > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. After more than a year of trying, I am -still- being stonewalled > with respect to my request to have access to full historical AFRINIC WHOIS > data. I can only surmise that the board and/or management really don't > want me finding any MORE evidence of historical insider corruption, above > and beyond the gigantic piles of such I have already found and documented. > > As I say, it is for you, the dues paying members of AFRINIC, to decide if > you think this is reasonable or not, and to pro-actively ask that I be > given > full access if you think that would be productive. All I can do, as an > outsider, is to hope that someday either the AFRINIC board or AFRINC > management > will stop trying to play "hide the ball" and will allow the full facts to > come out regarding everything that has gone on. > > But that's up to you folks.. the dues paying members... not me. > > > P.P.S. Mr. Abzeid may be perfectly happy to obtain his IPv4 address space > from the AFRINIC region, but I rather doubt that he would be at all > amenable > to having any of the Black residents of the AFRINIC region date his > daughter. > You see, Mr. Abzeid has had a longstanding membership on a certain US web > site > called Gab.Com, described by Wikipedia as (among other things) a white > supremacist social networking web site: > > https://gab.com/chad_abizeid > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network) > > > _______________________________________________ > afnog mailing list > https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfg at tristatelogic.com Wed Dec 23 00:48:32 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:48:32 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <47288.1608684512@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message , libren at tuta.io wrote: >Question of announcing ip from other region is null and void and it >cannot be challenged. >Afrinic bylaws have changed so many times and what matters is signed RSA >https://www.afrinic.net/ast/pdf/services/afrinic-rsa-en-201801.pdf I understand that some, and perhaps even many AFRINIC members, may nowadays wish to profit from the non-legacy IP allocations that were granted to them, by AFRINIC, by deploying these assets without any regards for geography. I understand also that there is thus a desire to look -only- at the RSA as being legally controlling UPON MEMBERS while conveniently ignoring the plain language of the AFRINIC Bylaws and their binding legal effect upon the actions OF AFRINIC. Unfortunately, this preference does not change the fact that if AFRINIC fails to terminate the memberhips of any members that provide exactly and only -zero- services within the AFRINIC region, then AFRINIC is itself in violation of its own legally binding Bylaws. Merely citing the RSA does not solve this legal conundrum. This is especially true, given that AFRINIC is free to modify RSA agreements, at will, and at any time... an act which, it seems, its own Bylaws now compel it to do. I quote from Section 1b of the RSA refrenced above: AFRINIC, in the light of the foregoing, reserves itself the right to amend this agreement partially or otherwise where it is so mandated by its Board after giving notice to its members. You cannot have it both ways. You cannot on the one hand insist that the letter of the RSA agreements, as currently written, must be interpreted strictly, even as, on the other hand, you argue that the AFRINIC Bylaws are legally inconsequential and that they may be, and should be, as easily ignored as the advice given by some crazy uncle. But all of this misses the point anyway. As I understand it, there is now, and always has been some qualification process which is undertaken, by AFRINIC, prior to any legal entity being granted membership in AFRINIC. Also, as I understand it, there is now and always has been some qualification process which is undertaken, by AFRINIC, before any member is granted some requested (non-legacy) AFRINIC number resources. This raises the obvious question: How, when, and by whose authority, exactly, did the companies of Mr. Abizeid, Mr. Mehta, and Mr, Uerlings qualify for membership in AFRINIC? How, when, and by whose authority, exactly, did the companies of Mr. Abizeid, Mr. Mehta, and Mr, Uerlings qualify for the large non-legacy IPv4 allocations that they each have received from AFRINIC? Did each of these three companies qualify (a) for membership and also (b) for large non-legacy IPv4 block assignment simply by bribing Ernest or someone else in AFRINIC management? If so then when will AFRINIC make criminal referrals to the Mauritius police regarding these three companies, just as it has already done for Ernest? Conversely, if these three companies DID NOT obtain their memberships and non-legacy allocations by bribing AFRINIC staff, or the Board, then how exactly did each one qualify, for both memberships and also for big IPv4 allocations, given that none of them seem to have, or to have had, at any time, any real connection to the AFRINIC region whatsoever? We can argue about which takes legal precedent, the RSA or the AFRINIC Bylws, another time. But before we even waste time on THAT, please do explain how Mr. Abizeid, Mr. Mehta, and Mr, Uerlings ever managed to qualify for *anything* in the AFRINIC region in the first place. I'm all ears. This ought to be most enlightening. Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Wed Dec 23 01:21:30 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:21:30 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <47397.1608686490@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message , libren at tuta.io wrote: >Ronald F Guilmette are you a real person or using some fake name? I am a real person and this is my real name. Who are YOU? An what is YOUR real name? >You are like ghost on internet.Do you have any linkedin profile or company? That is correct. I am indeed a "ghost" as regards to social media. And that is certainly by intent. Unlike most people these days, I have always been concerned with my personal privacy, and thus, unlike most people these days, I have elected NOT to splatter out my entire life story onto the Internet for people I don't know to snoop on. If anyone wants to know anything about me, they can ask me. >I am wondering if you are not LIR or member of Afrinic then why are you even >part of this community mailing list or why you are taking so much interest >in community mailing list? I am so glad you asked. Here in the United States, there has been a long running TV ad campaign that promotes tourism to the city of Las Vegas, Nevada. The tag line contained in each of these TV commericals is well known here... "What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas." (The idea being sold is that people can go to Las Vegas, act crazy, and tnen go back to their hometowns without anyone there knowing about their crazy behavior in "Vegas".) Unfortunately, what happens in the African part of the Internet most definitely DOES NOT stay just in the African part of the Internet. It spills out and affects me here, 10,000+ miles and entire oceans away. Such is the nature of the Internet, in case you are not aware. It has REPEATEDLY been the case that stolen or squatted AFRINIC administered IPv4 address blocks have been used, both to spam me and to try to hack me, and also and likewise, probably hundreds of millions more Internet users, all around the world. I am not amused. And thus, whether I like it or not, I have been effectively -foerced- to pay attention to the crap coming out of "African" IP address space. I sincerly wish it were otherwise. And I wish that AFRINIC would clean up all of this crap, once and for all, and stop allowing crooks from Israel, the Netherlands, India, and the U.S. to make Africans all appear to be either corrupt or incompetent or both. (I know this is not the case, but I am still looking for the Africans who will stand up for principal and not allow non-African foreigners to effectively defecate all over AFRINIC and its global reputation.) I started publicly reporting on the skulduggery taking place within the AFRINIC region in the summer of 2016. I have now been waiting for nearly four and half years for someone with guts to step forward, do the Right Thing, and clean up this colossal mess. I am still waiting. >There are thousands of members in this list you are just spamming everyone >with your findings. Others may disagree. >Who cares who is doing what? This is something between Afrinic and its members. See above. It is *not* just between Afrinic and its members. What happens in Africa DOES NOT stay within Africa. The incompetence and corruption within AFRINIC has allowed an entire planet's worth of Internet users... several billion people... to get repeatedly hacked and spammed. And it is still doing so even as we speak. Who exactly has an interest in preserving that unfortnate status quo? You, apparently. Which brings me back to the question I raised above... Who are you really? Regards, rfg From eddy at afrinic.net Wed Dec 23 06:30:35 2020 From: eddy at afrinic.net (Eddy Kayihura) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:30:35 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] December Updates Message-ID: <01c201d6d8f5$1fb6f740$5f24e5c0$@afrinic.net> [French, Arabic, and Portuguese versions below] Dear Colleagues, I hope that you are all keeping well. It is that time that I share with you the monthly updates-the last update of 2020. I wish to take this opportunity to express my gratitude for the continued constructive engagement, support, and contribution that you have made this year that has seen AFRINIC realize yet another year. IP Misappropriation Case Updates I have been keeping you updated on this throughout the year. We, therefore, agreed to publish a comprehensive report following the completion of our internal audit exercise. As notified last week, the report is now at the legal vetting stage. A copy thereof will be published early next year once the Board of Directors has taken cognizance of the same. I shall continue to keep you updated on this as we go along. Review of 2020 Despite the challenges we have faced this year, we have been able to execute our mandate and serve our community and members. As we embark on our new strategic plan 2021 ? 2023, we are determined to build on what we have achieved together and will continue to grow the organisation. We shall highlight more on our achievements in 2020 and 2021 activities plan in our upcoming blogs during the first quarter of 2021. End of year Office closure notice As we move closer to the end of the year, I take this opportunity to inform you that AFRINIC offices will be closing for the Festive season Holidays on the following days: * Thursday 24 December 2020 * Wednesday 30 and Thursday 31 December 2020 * Monday 4 January 2021 We shall resume on Tuesday, 5 January 2021. However, during this time, our teams have done everything possible to ensure all services are accessible and a team will be on standby should there be any emergencies. I take this opportunity to wish you a happy holiday season. 2020 has been a difficult year but we wish you a very healthy and prosperous 2021. I once again thank you for your engagement throughout the year and look forward to your continued trust and support come 2021. Kind Regards, Eddy Kayihura, Chief Executive Officer, African Network Information Centre (AFRINIC). ?????????????. Chers coll?gues, J'esp?re que vous allez tous bien. C'est ? cette p?riode que je partage avec vous les mises ? jour mensuelles -cette fois ci la derni?re mise ? jour de 2020. Je tiens ? saisir cette occasion pour vous exprimer ma gratitude pour l'engagement constructif, le soutien et la contribution que vous avez apport?s cette ann?e qui a vu l'AFRINIC r?aliser encore une autre ann?e. Mises ? jour sur les cas de d?tournement de propri?t? intellectuelle Je vous ai tenu au courant tout au long de l'ann?e. Nous avons donc convenu de publier un rapport complet ? l'issue de notre exercice d'audit interne. Comme nous l'avons notifi? la semaine derni?re, le rapport est maintenant au stade d'examen juridique. Une copie en sera publi?e au d?but de l'ann?e prochaine, d?s que le conseil d'administration en aura pris connaissance. Je continuerai ? vous tenir au courant de l'?volution de la situation. Bilan de l'ann?e 2020 Malgr? les d?fis auxquels nous avons ?t? confront?s cette ann?e, nous avons ?t? en mesure d'ex?cuter notre mandat et de servir notre communaut? et nos membres. Alors que nous nous lan?ons dans notre nouveau plan strat?gique 2021 - 2023, nous sommes d?termin?s ? consolider ce que nous avons r?alis? ensemble et nous continuerons ? b?tir l'organisation. Nous mettrons davantage l'accent sur nos r?alisations en 2020 et sur le plan d'activit?s 2021 dans nos prochains blogs au cours du premier trimestre 2021. Avis de fermeture du bureau en fin d'ann?e Alors que nous approchons de la fin de l'ann?e, je profite de l'occasion pour vous informer que les bureaux de l'AFRINIC fermeront pour les f?tes de fin d'ann?e les jours suivants : Jeudi 24 d?cembre 2020 Mercredi 30 et jeudi 31 d?cembre 2020 Lundi 4 janvier 2021 Nous reprendrons le mardi 5 janvier 2021. Toutefois, pendant cette p?riode, nos ?quipes ont fait tout leur possible pour que tous les services soient accessibles et une ?quipe sera en stand-by en cas d'urgence. Je profite de cette occasion pour vous souhaiter de bonnes f?tes de fin d'ann?e. 2020 a ?t? une ann?e difficile, mais nous vous souhaitons une ann?e 2021 tr?s saine et prosp?re. Je vous remercie encore une fois pour votre engagement tout au long de l'ann?e et je me r?jouis de la confiance et du soutien que vous nous accorderez encore en 2021. Cordialement, Eddy Kayihura, Directeur g?n?ral, AFRINIC ??????????????????.. ?????? ???????? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ????. ??? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????????? ??????? - ??? ????? ???? 2020. ???? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ???? ???????? ??? ????? ????? ???? AFRINIC ???? ??? ???? ??? ????. ??????? ???? ?????? IP ??? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ???? ?????. ???? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ???? ??? ???????? ?? ????? ??????? ???????. ??? ?? ??????? ??????? ?????? ? ??? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ????????. ???? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ??????? ????. ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ???? ?????. ?????? ??? 2020 ??? ????? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ??? ????? ? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ??????? ????????. ????? ???? ????? ???????????? ??????? 2021 - 2023 ? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? ???? ??????? ????? ???????. ????? ????? ???? ??? ????????? ?? ??? ????? 2020 ? 2021 ?? ???????? ??????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??? 2021. ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ???????? ?? ????? ????? ? ????? ??? ?????? ???????? ??? ????? AFRINIC ????? ??????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ?????? ???????: ?????? 24 ?????? 2020 ???????? 30 ??????? 31 ?????? 2020 ??????? 4 ????? 2021 ??????? ??? ???????? 5 ????? 2021. ??? ??? ? ???? ??? ????? ? ???? ????? ?? ?? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ????????? ?? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?????. ????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ????. ??? ??? 2020 ????? ????? ? ????? ????? ?? 2021 ???? ??????? ??????. ????? ??? ???? ??? ??????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ???? ????? ?? ??? 2021. ???? ???????? ???? ???????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ?????? (AFRINIC). ???????????????????? Caros Colegas, Espero que se mantenham todos bem. ? nessa altura que partilho convosco as actualiza??es mensais - a ?ltima actualiza??o de 2020. Gostaria de aproveitar esta oportunidade para expressar a minha gratid?o pelo cont?nuo compromisso construtivo, apoio e contribui??o que deram este ano que viu a AFRINIC realizar mais um ano. Actualiza??es de casos de apropria??o indevida de PI Tenho-vos mantido actualizados sobre isto ao longo do ano. Por conseguinte, concord?mos em publicar um relat?rio abrangente ap?s a conclus?o do nosso exerc?cio de auditoria interna. Tal como notificado na semana passada, o relat?rio encontra-se agora em fase de verifica??o jur?dica. Uma c?pia do mesmo ser? publicada no in?cio do pr?ximo ano, quando o Conselho de Administra??o tiver tomado conhecimento do mesmo. Continuarei a manter-vos actualizados sobre este assunto ? medida que formos avan?ando. Revis?o de 2020 Apesar dos desafios que enfrent?mos este ano, fomos capazes de executar o nosso mandato e servir a nossa comunidade e os nossos membros. Ao embarcarmos no nosso novo plano estrat?gico 2021 - 2023, estamos determinados a construir sobre o que alcan??mos em conjunto e continuaremos a fazer crescer a organiza??o. Destacaremos mais sobre as nossas realiza??es em 2020 e 2021 plano de actividades nos nossos pr?ximos blogs durante o primeiro trimestre de 2021. Aviso de encerramento do escrit?rio no final do ano ? medida que nos aproximamos do final do ano, aproveito esta oportunidade para informar que os escrit?rios da AFRINIC ir?o fechar para as f?rias da ?poca festiva nos dias seguintes: Quinta-feira, 24 de Dezembro de 2020 Quarta-feira 30 e quinta-feira 31 de Dezembro de 2020 Segunda-feira, 4 de Janeiro de 2021 Retomaremos na ter?a-feira, 5 de Janeiro de 2021. No entanto, durante este tempo, as nossas equipas fizeram todos os poss?veis para assegurar que todos os servi?os sejam acess?veis e uma equipa estar? de preven??o em caso de emerg?ncias. Aproveito esta oportunidade para lhe desejar umas boas f?rias. 2020 tem sido um ano dif?cil mas desejamos-lhe um 2021 muito saud?vel e pr?spero. Agrade?o-lhe mais uma vez o seu empenho ao longo do ano e aguardo com expectativa a sua confian?a e apoio cont?nuos para 2021. Cordiais cumprimentos, Eddy Kayihura, Chefe do Executivo, AFRINIC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfg at tristatelogic.com Wed Dec 23 07:11:56 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 23:11:56 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <49385.1608707516@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message Noah wrote: >Please can you consolidate your very important and yet great research >around the individuals Cohen, Uerlings, Abizeid, Deepak Mehta and Lu Heng. I can only summarize the specific still-outstanding problems & issues that I am aware of. There could very well be much more, under the surface, that I am not aware of. I have repeatedly requested bulk access to AFRINIC WHOIS data which is both (a) unredacted and also (b) historical and also (c) unredacted AND historical. I have been denied this data at every turn. To add further insult to injury, Ashil Oogarah, posting here as "AFRINIC Communication", recently attempted to pretend that my data requests could be easily accomodated by simply filing out a form for "bulk access". But the reality is that even if I did that, I would still be given only redacted and -current- AFRINIC WHOIS data, *not* the unredacted and historical data that I would need to make further progress in unraveling all of the sordid mischief that has taken place with repsect to the AFRINIC WHOIS data base over the years. (Indeed it is a minor miracle that I have been able to puzzle out as much as I have done, given the extreme and pointless limits on WHOIS access that AFRINIC Management has imposed.) Given the limitations under which I still labor, here is what I can tell you. The following legacy blocks are still "stolen", according to my definition of that word in this context, and are still reaping profits, even as we speak, for Mr. Cohen, Mr. Uerlings, and possibly also Mr. Byaruhanga, who is still free to enjoy the fruits of his thefts from his comfortable upscale home in Uganda. ORG-TL1-AFRINIC - Trentyre (Pty) Ltd 160.122.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 256 137951 HK Clayer Limited ORG-AA79-AFRINIC - Agrihold 163.198.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 248 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC 4 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 2 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD 2 19969 US Joe's Datacenter, LLC (Note that the contact person for "Cooperative Investments LLC" these days is Elad Cohen.) ORG-AHL1-AFRINIC - Argus Holdings (Pty) Ltd WHOIS contacts now set to legacy-dbm at afrinic.net 164.88.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 252 137951 HK Clayer Limited 2 140733 HK HostUS Solutions LLC 1 138538 CN Ningbo Nanbian Tuoluo Xinxi Jishu Co., Ltd 1 18013 HK Asline Limited ORG-WA1-AFRINIC - Woolworths Holdings Limited WHOIS contacts now restored/remediated (?) 165.3.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 128 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 113 54600 US Peg Tech Inc 10 21859 US Zenlayer Inc 3 137951 HK Clayer Limited 1 38197 AU Sun Network (Hong Kong) Limited *** 1 133441 KR Cloud Information Technology (Intl) Telecom Group LIMITED ORG-AISL1-AFRINIC - AECI Information Services (Pty) Ltd 168.80.0.0/15 Current routing summary: 265 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC 135 19969 US Joe's Datacenter, LLC 26 132335 IN LeapSwitch Networks Pvt Ltd 16 23679 AU Media Antar Nusa PT. 9 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD 8 36351 US SoftLayer Technologies Inc. 8 45671 AU Servers Australia Pty. Ltd 8 63018 US Dedicated.com 8 56611 NL REBA Communications BV 8 24567 AU QT Inc. 6 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 4 57717 NL FiberXpress BV 4 262287 BR Maxihost LTDA 3 49335 RU LLC "Server v arendy" 2 11990 US Unlimited Net, LLC 2 13737 US INCX Global, LLC (See note above regarding "Cooperative Investments LLC".) ORG-IA41-AFRINIC - Network and Information Technology Limited 196.16.0.0/14 Current routing summary: 539 202425 SC IP Volume inc 360 19969 US Joe's Datacenter, LLC 47 63956 AU Colocation Australia Pty Ltd 12 56611 NL REBA Communications BV 6 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD 6 134451 ID NewMedia Express Pte Ltd 5 38001 AU NewMedia Express Pte Ltd 5 57717 NL FiberXpress BV 4 263812 AR TL Group SRL ( IPXON Networks ) 4 49367 IT Seflow S.N.C. Di Marco Brame' & C. 4 20860 GB Iomart Cloud Services Limited 4 204655 GB Novogara LTD 4 42831 GB UK Dedicated Servers Limited 4 49335 RU LLC "Server v arendy" 2 31122 IE Digiweb ltd 2 136782 JP Pingtan Hotline Co., Limited 2 44066 DE First Colo GmbH 2 17216 US Dc74 Llc 2 53999 CA Priority Colo Inc 2 45382 KR Ehostict 2 262287 BR Maxihost LTDA 2 63018 US Dedicated.com 1 23470 US ReliableSite.Net LLC 1 9009 GB M247 Ltd 1 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC 1 203833 DE First Colo GmbH ORG-AFNC1-AFRINIC - "ITC" - All blocks reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC 196.193.0.0/16 -- unrouted 196.63.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 255 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 1 54600 US Peg Tech Inc 196.246.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 252 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 4 133495 PK Vision telecom Private limited 196.45.112.0/20 Current routing summary: 5 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 4 30827 GB Extraordinary Managed Services Ltd 2 198381 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC 2 26754 ?? {{unknown organization}} ====> AS26754->"ITC" (see below) 2 198394 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC 1 36351 US SoftLayer Technologies Inc. ORG-SCS1-AFRINIC - Safren Computer Services 155.159.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 256 137951 HK Clayer Limited ORG-AA78-AFRINIC - Anglo American 163.197.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 128 140107 HK xiamen zhongheng Technology Ltd **** 64 54600 US Peg Tech Inc *** **** 48 139330 HK Sanren Data Limited **** 16 137443 HK Anchnet Asia Limited *** **** ORG-SL72-AFRINIC - Sentrachem Limited 164.155.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 96 54600 US Peg Tech Inc *** **** 77 139330 HK Sanren Data Limited **** 32 137951 HK Clayer Limited 32 136800 HK Xiaozhiyun L.L.C *** **** 17 132422 HK Hong Kong Business Telecom Limited *** 2 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE ORG-COCT1-AFRINIC - City of Cape Town 165.25.0.0/16 -- WHOIS reclaimed by rightful owner (currently unrouted) ORG-ZZ21-AFRINIC - Trafex (Pty) Ltd 196.15.64.0/18 Current routing summary: 40 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 24 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC (See note above regarding "Cooperative Investments LLC".) ORG-MPL1-AFRINIC - Mega Plastics (Pty) Ltd contacts now set to: legacy-dbm at afrinic.net 160.121.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 256 137951 HK Clayer Limited ORG-LTOL1-AFRINIC - Liquid Telecommunications Operations Limited 152.108.0.0/16 -- WHOIS & routing reclaimed by rightful owner ORG-AM1-AFRINIC - African Oxygen Limited 155.235.0.0/16 - WHOIS reclaimed by rightful owner Current routing summary: 97 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 64 140107 HK xiamen zhongheng Technology Ltd **** 59 209484 HK Asia Communications Co., Limited 24 140224 HK White-Sand Cloud Computing(HK) Co., LIMITED 12 140227 HK Hong Kong Communications International Co., Limited *** ORG-ZZ154-AFRINIC - Nampak Management Services WHOIS now set to legacy-dbm at afrinic.net 196.10.61.0/24 196.10.62.0/23 196.10.64.0/19 Current routing summary: 13 24567 AU QT Inc. 4 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 4 138527 HK Adc Group Co.,Limited 4 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD 4 58879 CN Beijing CNISP Technology Co., Ltd. *** 3 21859 US Zenlayer Inc *** 2 34985 HK Kirin Communication Limited 1 24373 AU Adc Group Co.,Limited *** **** ORG-ACSL2-AFRINIC - Affiliated Computing Services (Pty) Ltd 160.116.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 111 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC 110 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 16 199267 IL Netstyle A. Ltd 4 139640 HK Hk New Cloud Technology Limited *** 4 24567 AU QT Inc. ** 4 58879 CN Beijing CNISP Technology Co., Ltd. *** 3 19969 US Joe's Datacenter, LLC 2 262287 BR Maxihost LTDA 1 43945 IL Netstyle A. Ltd 1 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD ORG-ZZ8-AFRINIC - Columbus Stainless (Proprietary) Limited WHOIS reclaimed by rightful owner 160.115.0.0/16 -- no current routing ORG-TAEB1-AFRINIC - The Atomic Energy Board 168.206.0.0/16 Current routing summary: 256 137951 HK Clayer Limited ORG-AI2-AFRINIC - "ITC" -- Reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC 196.42.128.0/17 -- unrouted 196.194.0.0/15 Current routing summary: 403 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 62 136384 PK Optix Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited 24 131284 AF Etisalat Afghan 6 132116 IN Ani Network Pvt Ltd 5 198504 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC 4 26754 ?? {{unknown organization}} ====> AS26754 == "ITC" 3 198381 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC 2 198247 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC 2 198394 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC 1 139043 PK WellNetworks (Private) Limited Please note that Ernest Byaruhanga is still enjoying some of his stolen AFRINIC space, even as we speak, courtesy of SECOM and others, who ought to be ashamed of themselves: https://bgp.he.net/AS26754#_prefixes ORG-ZZ139-AFRINIC - "Link Data Group" 198.54.232.0/24 -- WHOIS now set to legacy-dbm at afrinic.net - unrouted 196.62.0.0/16 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC - unrouted 196.192.192.0/18 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC - unrouted 213.247.0.0/19 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC - unrouted 160.255.0.0/16 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC - unrouted 196.207.64.0/18 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC Current routing summary: 61 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 2 132116 IN Ani Network Pvt Ltd 1 137085 IN Nixi Note that the following route object still exists in the RIPE WHOIS DB: route: 213.247.0.0/21 origin: AS327991 mnt-by: MEGASURF-WIRELESS-MNT created: 2016-09-02T11:58:16Z last-modified: 2018-09-04T18:31:58Z source: RIPE-NONAUTH ORG-ZZ23-AFRINIC - Nedbank / Cape of Good Hope Bank (CGHB) - fradulent allocations reclaimed to free pool 192.96.146.0/24 -- reclaimed by Nedbank/CGHB - unrouted 137.171.0.0/16 -- unrouted 165.52.0.0/14 -- unrouted 168.211.0.0/16 -- unrouted +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_ In addition to all of the above AFRINIC issues, Elad Cohen, with the help and connivance of his friends at FDCServers and Cogent Communications was at one time also squatting on all of the following abandoned APNIC IPv4 legacy blocks: IRT-DOFD-AU - DOFD Department of Finance and Deregulation (AU) 168.198.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted PMANET - Port of Melbourne Authority (AU) 139.44.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted CROSFIELD (JP) 143.136.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted ATDCL - Net One Systems Company, Limited (JP) 143.253.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted CHIYODA-NET - Chiyoda Corporation (JP) 146.51.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted Additionally, I have reason to believe that Elad Cohen was also responsible for squatting on the following abandoned RIPE legacy IPv4 block, which he appears to have done with the help and connivance of his friends at Ecoband, Ltd. aka AS327814: TELEFUNKEN SYSTEMTECHNIK ULM (DE) 149.207.0.0/16 - unrouted +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_ In additional to all of the above, as I have recently pointed out, I have questions about how any of the following three organzations were able to qualify to become AFRINIC members and how each was able to further qualify to receive the sizable non-legacy AFRINIC IPv4 block assignments that they did receive and which they are -still- the listed registrants of, even now: ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC - LogicWeb Inc (US) 196.52.0.0/14 +++ ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC -- Fiber Grid, Inc. (Estonia/Seychelles) 165.231.0.0/16 +++ 196.48.0.0/16 196.56.0.0/16 196.57.0.0/16 196.58.0.0/16 196.59.0.0/16 196.196.0.0/16 196.197.0.0/16 196.198.0.0/16 196.199.0.0/16 196.240.0.0/15 196.242.0.0/15 196.244.0.0/16 196.245.0.0/16 196.247.0.0/16 ORG-INL3-AFRINIC - Inspiring Networks {B.V.,Ltd.,LLC} - NL/Seychelles 45.220.64.0/18 196.61.192.0/20 197.231.208.0/22 Note of the above three entities appears to either now have, or to have ever had any meaningful connection to the AFRINIC region, other than plundering the resources thereof, thus raising the question of how and why they were allowed to become AFRINIC members in the first place. I look forward to receiving an answer to that question for each of these three organizations. Furthermore and separately, the specific IPv4 blocks liste above with "+++" following their CIDRs are ones for which the historical WHOIS data clearly implicates "ITC" which was a fradulent fake company name used by Ernest Byaruhanga for many of his insider IP block thefts, thus also rasing the question of how these blocks were obtained and assigned, to LogicWeb, and also to Fiber Grid. Regards, rfg From sm+af at afrinic.net Wed Dec 23 10:07:55 2020 From: sm+af at afrinic.net (S. Moonesamy) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 02:07:55 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <36559.1598255350@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <36559.1598255350@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20201222223854.12349470@elandnews.com> Dear Stakeholders, Organizations generally put in place appropriate policies for the detection and prevention of frauds, corruptions, misappropriations, and other inappropriate conduct. You can find more information about an AFRINIC policy and its implementation at . The AFRINIC Members mailing list is open to all AFRINIC Resource Members. I suggest that Resource Members use it if they are interested in discussing AFRINIC business matters with other Resource Members. There was a complaint related to a request for access to "Whois data". It is more difficult to reach agreement when there isn't a common understanding of the regulatory constraints. Some of the data, which is categorized as "personal data" [1], is regulated through data protection laws. There is, for example, the Data Protection Act 2017 for Mauritius, which is applicable. Regards, S. Moonesamy 1. The term used in another jurisdiction is "PII". Board Chair, AFRINIC From libren at tuta.io Wed Dec 23 12:55:07 2020 From: libren at tuta.io (libren at tuta.io) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:55:07 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Too much spam is generated by couple of morons in this community list. How about only verified members allowed to use this mailing list? Those who are Afrinic member or Lir can link their main account and those who are not members or LIR can submit their id proof for verification. This is the only way to keep community clean. Dec 22, 2020, 14:42 by noah at neo.co.tz: > > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2020, 16:56 Libra via Community-Discuss, <> community-discuss at afrinic.net> > wrote: > >> >> >>> @Ronald F. Guilmette are you LIR or member of Afrinic? >> ?>>>No sir, I am neither. >> Ronald F Guilmette are you a real person or using some fake name?? You are like ghost on internet. > > How about you Libra? Are you a real person or a sock puppet? > > Noah > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dwizard65 at gmail.com Wed Dec 23 13:07:03 2020 From: dwizard65 at gmail.com (Emem William) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:07:03 +0100 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <47397.1608686490@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <47397.1608686490@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: Dear Ronald, Thanks for the information. In your comprehensive routing data, I noticed that the following name stands out quite often, PEG Tech Inc. It seems like they are providing a lot of route to those ranges. I am wondering if you have done any research about them? Also why is Seacom still routing stolen AFRINIC IP? As you have rightfully pointed out https://bgp.he.net/AS26754#_graph4 , they seem to be the only upstream provider that still routes Afrinic?s stolen IP. Cheers, Emem William On Wed, Dec 23, 2020, 02:23 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message , libren at tuta.io wrote: > > >Ronald F Guilmette are you a real person or using some fake name? > > I am a real person and this is my real name. > > Who are YOU? An what is YOUR real name? > > >You are like ghost on internet.Do you have any linkedin profile or > company? > > That is correct. I am indeed a "ghost" as regards to social media. And > that is certainly by intent. > > Unlike most people these days, I have always been concerned with my > personal privacy, and thus, unlike most people these days, I have > elected NOT to splatter out my entire life story onto the Internet > for people I don't know to snoop on. > > If anyone wants to know anything about me, they can ask me. > > >I am wondering if you are not LIR or member of Afrinic then why are you > even > >part of this community mailing list or why you are taking so much interest > >in community mailing list? > > I am so glad you asked. > > Here in the United States, there has been a long running TV ad campaign > that promotes tourism to the city of Las Vegas, Nevada. The tag line > contained in each of these TV commericals is well known here... "What > happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas." (The idea being sold is that people > can go to Las Vegas, act crazy, and tnen go back to their hometowns > without anyone there knowing about their crazy behavior in "Vegas".) > > Unfortunately, what happens in the African part of the Internet most > definitely DOES NOT stay just in the African part of the Internet. It > spills out and affects me here, 10,000+ miles and entire oceans away. > > Such is the nature of the Internet, in case you are not aware. > > It has REPEATEDLY been the case that stolen or squatted AFRINIC > administered > IPv4 address blocks have been used, both to spam me and to try to hack me, > and also and likewise, probably hundreds of millions more Internet users, > all around the world. > > I am not amused. And thus, whether I like it or not, I have been > effectively > -foerced- to pay attention to the crap coming out of "African" IP address > space. > > I sincerly wish it were otherwise. And I wish that AFRINIC would clean > up all of this crap, once and for all, and stop allowing crooks from > Israel, the Netherlands, India, and the U.S. to make Africans all appear > to be either corrupt or incompetent or both. (I know this is not the > case, but I am still looking for the Africans who will stand up for > principal and not allow non-African foreigners to effectively defecate > all over AFRINIC and its global reputation.) > > I started publicly reporting on the skulduggery taking place within the > AFRINIC region in the summer of 2016. I have now been waiting for nearly > four and half years for someone with guts to step forward, do the Right > Thing, and clean up this colossal mess. I am still waiting. > > >There are thousands of members in this list you are just spamming everyone > >with your findings. > > Others may disagree. > > >Who cares who is doing what? This is something between Afrinic and its > members. > > See above. It is *not* just between Afrinic and its members. What happens > in Africa DOES NOT stay within Africa. > > The incompetence and corruption within AFRINIC has allowed an entire > planet's > worth of Internet users... several billion people... to get repeatedly > hacked and spammed. And it is still doing so even as we speak. > > Who exactly has an interest in preserving that unfortnate status quo? > > You, apparently. > > Which brings me back to the question I raised above... Who are you really? > > > Regards, > rfg > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mika.levari at mailfence.com Wed Dec 23 14:12:50 2020 From: mika.levari at mailfence.com (Mika Levari) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:12:50 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. Message-ID: <1841775408.1944.1608732770454@ichabod.co-bxl> Shalom, I am enjoying this for sometime now. Looks like Afrinic community is infiltrated by Spamhaus goons like Ronald F. Guilmette Those who do not know what is spamhaus then read this https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/29055/spamhaus-tax-evasion-shell-companies-extortion-strategies-blackmail-and-much-much-more Spamhaus is a highly sophisticated money laundering, hacking and cyber extortion network. Spamhaus gang mebers like Ronald F. Guilmette are using social engineering and same old tactics. This time they are using Afrinic platform. One example is https://seclists.org/nanog/2019/Sep/255 Spamhaus goons started at Nanog and managed to get legal war started between Elad cohen and Afrinic. Case has reached Supreme court of Mauritius. All the legal fees are paid from Afrinic members fee. Afrinic management will be answerable for all the legal expenses. Afrinic should ban these goons or they will manage to destroy Afrinic by triggering series of legal events between Afrinic and its members to achieve their purpose. Read all replies from Ronald F. Guilmette and his associates and then evaluate purpose of their posts. Everything will be clear. Bye bye From comms at afrinic.net Wed Dec 23 14:19:13 2020 From: comms at afrinic.net (AFRINIC Communication) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:19:13 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: <47397.1608686490@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <0B954223-586F-4E3D-81F9-8457A8388717@afrinic.net> [Version en fran?ais au bas] Dear Colleagues, This community mailing list was designed with the purpose of conducting healthy discussions between AFRINIC members and non-members alike around AFRINIC and its related activities. The list is not subject to any moderation or censorship as we trust that the community at all times acts according to the guidelines agreed upon in the code of conduct. However any behavior deemed as offensive, discriminatory, intimidating or that includes personal attacks will not be tolerated and will be dealt with according to the process laid out in the code of conduct. You are all hereby reminded to abide by the AFRINIC Code of Conduct when interacting with the AFRINIC community at all times. I urge you all to read this to make sure you are up to date on our code of conduct and the processes that safeguard the discussion and community-driven policies at the heart of AFRINIC. https://www.afrinic.net/code Ashil Oogarah On behalf of the AFRINIC Communications and PR Team ?????????????????. Chers coll?gues, Cette liste de diffusion communautaire a ?t? con?ue dans le but de mener des discussions saines entre les membres et les non-membres de l'AFRINIC autour de l'AFRINIC et de ses activit?s connexes. La liste n'est soumise ? aucune mod?ration ou censure car nous sommes convaincus que la communaut? agit ? tout moment selon les directives convenues dans le code de conduite. Cependant, tout comportement jug? offensant, discriminatoire, intimidant ou qui inclut des attaques personnelles ne sera pas tol?r? et sera trait? selon le processus ?tabli dans le code de conduite. Il vous est rappel? ? tous de respecter le code de conduite AFRINIC dans vos interactions avec la communaut? AFRINIC ? tout moment. Je vous invite tous ? lire ceci pour vous assurer que vous ?tes ? jour sur notre code de conduite et les processus qui sauvegardent la discussion et les politiques communautaires au c?ur de l'AFRINIC. https://www.afrinic.net/code Ashil Oogarah Au nom de l'?quipe Communications et RP d'AFRINIC > On 23 Dec 2020, at 17:07, Emem William wrote: > > Dear Ronald, > > Thanks for the information. > > In your comprehensive routing data, I noticed that the following name stands out quite often, PEG Tech Inc. It seems like they are providing a lot of route to those ranges. I am wondering if you have done any research about them? > > Also why is Seacom still routing stolen AFRINIC IP? As you have rightfully pointed out https://bgp.he.net/AS26754#_graph4 , they seem to be the only upstream provider that still routes Afrinic?s stolen IP. > > Cheers, > Emem William > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020, 02:23 Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > In message >, libren at tuta.io wrote: > > >Ronald F Guilmette are you a real person or using some fake name? > > I am a real person and this is my real name. > > Who are YOU? An what is YOUR real name? > > >You are like ghost on internet.Do you have any linkedin profile or company? > > That is correct. I am indeed a "ghost" as regards to social media. And > that is certainly by intent. > > Unlike most people these days, I have always been concerned with my > personal privacy, and thus, unlike most people these days, I have > elected NOT to splatter out my entire life story onto the Internet > for people I don't know to snoop on. > > If anyone wants to know anything about me, they can ask me. > > >I am wondering if you are not LIR or member of Afrinic then why are you even > >part of this community mailing list or why you are taking so much interest > >in community mailing list? > > I am so glad you asked. > > Here in the United States, there has been a long running TV ad campaign > that promotes tourism to the city of Las Vegas, Nevada. The tag line > contained in each of these TV commericals is well known here... "What > happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas." (The idea being sold is that people > can go to Las Vegas, act crazy, and tnen go back to their hometowns > without anyone there knowing about their crazy behavior in "Vegas".) > > Unfortunately, what happens in the African part of the Internet most > definitely DOES NOT stay just in the African part of the Internet. It > spills out and affects me here, 10,000+ miles and entire oceans away. > > Such is the nature of the Internet, in case you are not aware. > > It has REPEATEDLY been the case that stolen or squatted AFRINIC administered > IPv4 address blocks have been used, both to spam me and to try to hack me, > and also and likewise, probably hundreds of millions more Internet users, > all around the world. > > I am not amused. And thus, whether I like it or not, I have been effectively > -foerced- to pay attention to the crap coming out of "African" IP address > space. > > I sincerly wish it were otherwise. And I wish that AFRINIC would clean > up all of this crap, once and for all, and stop allowing crooks from > Israel, the Netherlands, India, and the U.S. to make Africans all appear > to be either corrupt or incompetent or both. (I know this is not the > case, but I am still looking for the Africans who will stand up for > principal and not allow non-African foreigners to effectively defecate > all over AFRINIC and its global reputation.) > > I started publicly reporting on the skulduggery taking place within the > AFRINIC region in the summer of 2016. I have now been waiting for nearly > four and half years for someone with guts to step forward, do the Right > Thing, and clean up this colossal mess. I am still waiting. > > >There are thousands of members in this list you are just spamming everyone > >with your findings. > > Others may disagree. > > >Who cares who is doing what? This is something between Afrinic and its members. > > See above. It is *not* just between Afrinic and its members. What happens > in Africa DOES NOT stay within Africa. > > The incompetence and corruption within AFRINIC has allowed an entire planet's > worth of Internet users... several billion people... to get repeatedly > hacked and spammed. And it is still doing so even as we speak. > > Who exactly has an interest in preserving that unfortnate status quo? > > You, apparently. > > Which brings me back to the question I raised above... Who are you really? > > > Regards, > rfg > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mika.levari at mailfence.com Wed Dec 23 14:18:55 2020 From: mika.levari at mailfence.com (Mika Levari) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:18:55 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. Message-ID: <2034448016.2327.1608733135463@ichabod.co-bxl> Shalom, I am enjoying this for sometime now. Looks like Afrinic community is infiltrated by Spamhaus goons like Ronald F. Guilmette Those who do not know what is spamhaus then read this https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/29055/spamhaus-tax-evasion-shell-companies-extortion-strategies-blackmail-and-much-much-more Spamhaus is a highly sophisticated money laundering, hacking and cyber extortion network. Spamhaus gang mebers like Ronald F. Guilmette are using social engineering and same old tactics. This time they are using Afrinic platform. One example is https://seclists.org/nanog/2019/Sep/255 Spamhaus goons started at Nanog and managed to get legal war started between Elad cohen and Afrinic. Case has reached Supreme court of Mauritius. All the legal fees are paid from Afrinic members fee. Afrinic management will be answerable for all the legal expenses. Afrinic should ban these goons or they will manage to destroy Afrinic by triggering series of legal events between Afrinic and its members to achieve their purpose. Read all replies from Ronald F. Guilmette and his associates and then evaluate purpose of their posts. Everything will be clear. Bye bye From ish at lsl.digital Wed Dec 23 17:57:33 2020 From: ish at lsl.digital (Ish Sookun) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:57:33 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20201222223854.12349470@elandnews.com> References: <36559.1598255350@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20201222223854.12349470@elandnews.com> Message-ID: <5da05122-56e2-fd78-89cd-5616e49f7b82@lsl.digital> Hi SM, On 23/12/2020 14:07, S. Moonesamy wrote: > There was a complaint related to a request for access to "Whois > data". [...] Are you referring to a complaint made on the members mailing list? Regards, Ish Sookun From noah at neo.co.tz Wed Dec 23 18:02:37 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:02:37 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <49385.1608707516@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <49385.1608707516@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: Hi Ronald, I have taken note and please see my response inline below. On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:16 AM Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > ORG-TL1-AFRINIC - Trentyre (Pty) Ltd > 160.122.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 256 137951 HK Clayer Limited > > ORG-AA79-AFRINIC - Agrihold > 163.198.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 248 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC > 4 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 2 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD > 2 19969 US Joe's Datacenter, LLC > > (Note that the contact person for "Cooperative Investments LLC" these days > is Elad Cohen.) > > ORG-AHL1-AFRINIC - Argus Holdings (Pty) Ltd > WHOIS contacts now set to legacy-dbm at afrinic.net > 164.88.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 252 137951 HK Clayer Limited > 2 140733 HK HostUS Solutions LLC > 1 138538 CN Ningbo Nanbian Tuoluo Xinxi Jishu Co., Ltd > 1 18013 HK Asline Limited > > ORG-WA1-AFRINIC - Woolworths Holdings Limited > WHOIS contacts now restored/remediated (?) > 165.3.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 128 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 113 54600 US Peg Tech Inc > 10 21859 US Zenlayer Inc > 3 137951 HK Clayer Limited > 1 38197 AU Sun Network (Hong Kong) Limited *** > 1 133441 KR Cloud Information Technology (Intl) Telecom Group > LIMITED > > ORG-AISL1-AFRINIC - AECI Information Services (Pty) Ltd > 168.80.0.0/15 > Current routing summary: > 265 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC > 135 19969 US Joe's Datacenter, LLC > 26 132335 IN LeapSwitch Networks Pvt Ltd > 16 23679 AU Media Antar Nusa PT. > 9 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD > 8 36351 US SoftLayer Technologies Inc. > 8 45671 AU Servers Australia Pty. Ltd > 8 63018 US Dedicated.com > 8 56611 NL REBA Communications BV > 8 24567 AU QT Inc. > 6 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 4 57717 NL FiberXpress BV > 4 262287 BR Maxihost LTDA > 3 49335 RU LLC "Server v arendy" > 2 11990 US Unlimited Net, LLC > 2 13737 US INCX Global, LLC > > (See note above regarding "Cooperative Investments LLC".) > > ORG-IA41-AFRINIC - Network and Information Technology Limited > 196.16.0.0/14 > Current routing summary: > 539 202425 SC IP Volume inc > 360 19969 US Joe's Datacenter, LLC > 47 63956 AU Colocation Australia Pty Ltd > 12 56611 NL REBA Communications BV > 6 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD > 6 134451 ID NewMedia Express Pte Ltd > 5 38001 AU NewMedia Express Pte Ltd > 5 57717 NL FiberXpress BV > 4 263812 AR TL Group SRL ( IPXON Networks ) > 4 49367 IT Seflow S.N.C. Di Marco Brame' & C. > 4 20860 GB Iomart Cloud Services Limited > 4 204655 GB Novogara LTD > 4 42831 GB UK Dedicated Servers Limited > 4 49335 RU LLC "Server v arendy" > 2 31122 IE Digiweb ltd > 2 136782 JP Pingtan Hotline Co., Limited > 2 44066 DE First Colo GmbH > 2 17216 US Dc74 Llc > 2 53999 CA Priority Colo Inc > 2 45382 KR Ehostict > 2 262287 BR Maxihost LTDA > 2 63018 US Dedicated.com > 1 23470 US ReliableSite.Net LLC > 1 9009 GB M247 Ltd > 1 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC > 1 203833 DE First Colo GmbH > > ORG-AFNC1-AFRINIC - "ITC" - All blocks reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC > 196.193.0.0/16 -- unrouted > 196.63.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 255 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 1 54600 US Peg Tech Inc > 196.246.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 252 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 4 133495 PK Vision telecom Private limited > 196.45.112.0/20 > Current routing summary: > 5 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 4 30827 GB Extraordinary Managed Services Ltd > 2 198381 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC > 2 26754 ?? {{unknown organization}} ====> AS26754->"ITC" (see > below) > 2 198394 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC > 1 36351 US SoftLayer Technologies Inc. > > ORG-SCS1-AFRINIC - Safren Computer Services > 155.159.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 256 137951 HK Clayer Limited > > ORG-AA78-AFRINIC - Anglo American > 163.197.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 128 140107 HK xiamen zhongheng Technology Ltd **** > 64 54600 US Peg Tech Inc *** **** > 48 139330 HK Sanren Data Limited **** > 16 137443 HK Anchnet Asia Limited *** **** > > ORG-SL72-AFRINIC - Sentrachem Limited > 164.155.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 96 54600 US Peg Tech Inc *** **** > 77 139330 HK Sanren Data Limited **** > 32 137951 HK Clayer Limited > 32 136800 HK Xiaozhiyun L.L.C *** **** > 17 132422 HK Hong Kong Business Telecom Limited *** > 2 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > > ORG-COCT1-AFRINIC - City of Cape Town > 165.25.0.0/16 -- WHOIS reclaimed by rightful owner (currently unrouted) > > ORG-ZZ21-AFRINIC - Trafex (Pty) Ltd > 196.15.64.0/18 > Current routing summary: > 40 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 24 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC > > (See note above regarding "Cooperative Investments LLC".) > > ORG-MPL1-AFRINIC - Mega Plastics (Pty) Ltd > contacts now set to: legacy-dbm at afrinic.net > 160.121.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 256 137951 HK Clayer Limited > > ORG-LTOL1-AFRINIC - Liquid Telecommunications Operations Limited > 152.108.0.0/16 -- WHOIS & routing reclaimed by rightful owner > > ORG-AM1-AFRINIC - African Oxygen Limited > 155.235.0.0/16 - WHOIS reclaimed by rightful owner > Current routing summary: > 97 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 64 140107 HK xiamen zhongheng Technology Ltd **** > 59 209484 HK Asia Communications Co., Limited > 24 140224 HK White-Sand Cloud Computing(HK) Co., LIMITED > 12 140227 HK Hong Kong Communications International Co., Limited *** > > ORG-ZZ154-AFRINIC - Nampak Management Services > WHOIS now set to legacy-dbm at afrinic.net > 196.10.61.0/24 > 196.10.62.0/23 > 196.10.64.0/19 > Current routing summary: > 13 24567 AU QT Inc. > 4 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 4 138527 HK Adc Group Co.,Limited > 4 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD > 4 58879 CN Beijing CNISP Technology Co., Ltd. *** > 3 21859 US Zenlayer Inc *** > 2 34985 HK Kirin Communication Limited > 1 24373 AU Adc Group Co.,Limited *** **** > > ORG-ACSL2-AFRINIC - Affiliated Computing Services (Pty) Ltd > 160.116.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 111 202769 US Cooperative Investments LLC > 110 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 16 199267 IL Netstyle A. Ltd > 4 139640 HK Hk New Cloud Technology Limited *** > 4 24567 AU QT Inc. ** > 4 58879 CN Beijing CNISP Technology Co., Ltd. *** > 3 19969 US Joe's Datacenter, LLC > 2 262287 BR Maxihost LTDA > 1 43945 IL Netstyle A. Ltd > 1 43092 JP OSOA Corporation., LTD > > ORG-ZZ8-AFRINIC - Columbus Stainless (Proprietary) Limited > WHOIS reclaimed by rightful owner > 160.115.0.0/16 -- no current routing > > ORG-TAEB1-AFRINIC - The Atomic Energy Board > 168.206.0.0/16 > Current routing summary: > 256 137951 HK Clayer Limited > > ORG-AI2-AFRINIC - "ITC" -- Reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC > 196.42.128.0/17 -- unrouted > 196.194.0.0/15 > Current routing summary: > 403 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 62 136384 PK Optix Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited > 24 131284 AF Etisalat Afghan > 6 132116 IN Ani Network Pvt Ltd > 5 198504 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC > 4 26754 ?? {{unknown organization}} ====> AS26754 == "ITC" > 3 198381 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC > 2 198247 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC > 2 198394 AE Star Satellite Communications Company - PJSC > 1 139043 PK WellNetworks (Private) Limited > *Attention AFRINIC/Ashil,* *Please take note of all the above additional information as pertains to the potential number resources misappropriation and fraud and kindly pass this to the AFRINIC Board audit committee. * > > Please note that Ernest Byaruhanga is still enjoying some of his > stolen AFRINIC space, You have repeated the above quite a lot in all your emails and while I cant speak for my friend Ernest, I get your point. The investigation is ongoing as reported by AFRINIC from the work they embarked and we shall wait for the outcome because there will be an outcome at the end of the day and if mistakes were made, folks will be held responsible. > even as we speak, courtesy of SECOM and others, > who ought to be ashamed of themselves: > > https://bgp.he.net/AS26754#_prefixes I read SECOM which I assume you meant SEACOM and what I see is below IPv4 address space being originated by ITC AS26754 via two different transit providers including Spidd Africa Ltd an ISP. 196.45.120.0/23 AfriNIC - www.afrinic.net 196.45.120.0/24 AfriNIC - www.afrinic.net 196.45.121.0/24 AfriNIC - www.afrinic.net 196.195.228.0/22 AfriNIC - www.afrinic.net As a network engineer, this is a normal practise by ISP's who always run checks before any IPv4 + ASN announcements are made. The simplest check is always to look at the whois database in this case AFRINIC for the route objects records and also ask for an LoA before prefix announcements are made and if the above prefixes are being announced then rest assured there were compliance checks done. In anycase, AFRINIC should also take this up and check if the above prefixes were rightfully allocated/assigned or they were stolen and that is the goal IMHO. > > > ORG-ZZ139-AFRINIC - "Link Data Group" > 198.54.232.0/24 -- WHOIS now set to legacy-dbm at afrinic.net - unrouted > 196.62.0.0/16 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC - unrouted > 196.192.192.0/18 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC - unrouted > 213.247.0.0/19 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC - unrouted > 160.255.0.0/16 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC - unrouted > 196.207.64.0/18 - reclaimed to free pool by AFRINIC > Current routing summary: > 61 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE > 2 132116 IN Ani Network Pvt Ltd > 1 137085 IN Nixi > > Note that the following route object still exists in the RIPE WHOIS DB: > > route: 213.247.0.0/21 > origin: AS327991 > mnt-by: MEGASURF-WIRELESS-MNT > created: 2016-09-02T11:58:16Z > last-modified: 2018-09-04T18:31:58Z > source: RIPE-NONAUTH > > > ORG-ZZ23-AFRINIC - Nedbank / Cape of Good Hope Bank (CGHB) > - fradulent allocations reclaimed to free pool > 192.96.146.0/24 -- reclaimed by Nedbank/CGHB - unrouted > 137.171.0.0/16 -- unrouted > 165.52.0.0/14 -- unrouted > 168.211.0.0/16 -- unrouted > > +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_ > > In addition to all of the above AFRINIC issues, Elad Cohen, with the > help and connivance of his friends at FDCServers and Cogent Communications > was at one time also squatting on all of the following abandoned APNIC > IPv4 legacy blocks: > > IRT-DOFD-AU - DOFD Department of Finance and Deregulation (AU) > 168.198.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted > > PMANET - Port of Melbourne Authority (AU) > 139.44.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted > > CROSFIELD (JP) > 143.136.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted > > ATDCL - Net One Systems Company, Limited (JP) > 143.253.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted > > CHIYODA-NET - Chiyoda Corporation (JP) > 146.51.0.0/16 -- currently unrouted > > Additionally, I have reason to believe that Elad Cohen was also responsible > for squatting on the following abandoned RIPE legacy IPv4 block, which he > appears to have done with the help and connivance of his friends at > Ecoband, Ltd. aka AS327814: > > TELEFUNKEN SYSTEMTECHNIK ULM (DE) > 149.207.0.0/16 - unrouted > > +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_ > > In additional to all of the above, as I have recently pointed out, I have > questions about how any of the following three organzations were able to > qualify to become AFRINIC members and how each was able to further > qualify to receive the sizable non-legacy AFRINIC IPv4 block assignments > that they did receive and which they are -still- the listed registrants > of, even now: > > ORG-LWI1-AFRINIC - LogicWeb Inc (US) > 196.52.0.0/14 +++ > > ORG-FGI1-AFRINIC -- Fiber Grid, Inc. (Estonia/Seychelles) > 165.231.0.0/16 +++ > 196.48.0.0/16 > 196.56.0.0/16 > 196.57.0.0/16 > 196.58.0.0/16 > 196.59.0.0/16 > 196.196.0.0/16 > 196.197.0.0/16 > 196.198.0.0/16 > 196.199.0.0/16 > 196.240.0.0/15 > 196.242.0.0/15 > 196.244.0.0/16 > 196.245.0.0/16 > 196.247.0.0/16 > > ORG-INL3-AFRINIC - Inspiring Networks {B.V.,Ltd.,LLC} - NL/Seychelles > 45.220.64.0/18 > 196.61.192.0/20 > 197.231.208.0/22 > > Note of the above three entities appears to either now have, or to have > ever had any meaningful connection to the AFRINIC region, other than > plundering the resources thereof, thus raising the question of how and > why they were allowed to become AFRINIC members in the first place. > > I look forward to receiving an answer to that question for each of these > three organizations. * We all look forward to receiving answers. * *Attention AFRINIC/Ashil,* *Please take note of all the above additional information as pertains to the potential number resources misappropriation and fraud and kindly pass this to the AFRINIC Board audit committee. * *Also confirm if all the above needs to be published by a member on the members list or you will take this up and act according to the benefit of the community and all AFRINIC members.* Noah. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Wed Dec 23 18:27:49 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:27:49 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: <47397.1608686490@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: Emem, Since I wear many hats, allow me to respond to you inline. On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 4:10 PM Emem William wrote: > > Also why is Seacom still routing stolen AFRINIC IP? > A lot of stolen or misappropriated IPv4 number resources are being routed everyday by ISP and transit providers globally. The reasons vary from, misinformation, hijacks, misappropriated IPv4 addresses. All this is perfectly recorded on the RIR database. Until recently, Ronald started shading light to the fact that a huge number of AFRINIC IPv4 space, both legacy and non-legacy has been fraudulently obtained while others misappropriated and perfectly recorded in the whois database. I am assuming that you are not a network engineer and as such, you are ignorant of how the internet works and to enlighten you, SEACOM is largest transit provider in AFRICA and does run prefix/asn checks before prefixes from downstream customers are announced. This checks involves AFRINIC whois database checks and even LoA letter requests. So to answer your question, this is a ticket worthy logging and chasing......but meanwhile...........to continue enlightening you..... > As you have rightfully pointed out https://bgp.he.net/AS26754#_graph4 , > they seem to be the only upstream provider that still routes Afrinic?s > stolen IP. > Actually those prefixes on the link above are being originated by ITC AS26754 and announced by two different upstream providers. The question then is, is AS26754 authorised to announce those prefixes and if so, are the records on the AFRINIC whois database. If the answer is yes, then the ISP is correct to route them after checking all those route objects to confirm compliance etc. Remember there was a case months ago where one AFRINIC member Cloud Innovation Ltd, sub-allocated AFRINIC based IPv4 addresses to a customer in HongKong who then sub-allocated to another customer in Manila Philippines who then hijacked SEACOM ASN in order to announced the Cloud Innovation Ltd prefix from Philippines in Manila. Crazy right, well the issue was immediately fixed and the outcome is in the archives of this mailing list. *Rest assured, if those prefixes are stolen and are being originated by ITC, then the AFRINIC team should take this up and I have copied Ashil from the communications team herein to pass this case to the Audit Committee as well.* Cheers, Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Wed Dec 23 18:54:00 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:54:00 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Libra via Community-Discuss < community-discuss at afrinic.net> wrote: > Too much spam is generated by couple of morons in this community list. > Take a chill pill and stop spamming the community list since they want to hear how well AFRINIC?S IPv4 resources are being used in serving Africa?s internet and advancing its network infrastructure. > How about only verified members allowed to use this mailing list? > Those who are Afrinic member or Lir can link their main account and those > who are not members or LIR can submit their id proof for verification. > While I am not a big fan of sock puppets, I don't believe in censorship the likes of which you are advocating on a public forum which welcomes everyone with interest. Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfg at tristatelogic.com Wed Dec 23 21:09:29 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:09:29 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20201222223854.12349470@elandnews.com> Message-ID: <52433.1608757769@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201222223854.12349470 at elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" wrote: >There was a complaint related to a request for access to "Whois >data". It is more difficult to reach agreement when there isn't a >common understanding of the regulatory constraints. Some of the >data, which is categorized as "personal data" [1], is regulated >through data protection laws. There is, for example, the Data >Protection Act 2017 for Mauritius, which is applicable. I thank "S. Moonesamy" for at least attempting to make some pretense of addressing this issue, which I have raised, however it is easy to demonstrate that this response is silly in the extreme. Apparently the "applicable" Mauritian law DOES NOT prevent AFRINIC from publishing, via its traditional port 43 WHOIS service, the names, addresses, and phone numbers (PII) associated with person: records that are currently present in the data base... a fact that anyone can easily verify just by querying the WHOIS for the handle associated with any person: record. Despite this obvious fact, the community is asked to believe that somehow, magically, Mauritian law DOES prevent AFRINIC from providing this same data to qualified and well-vetted researchers if the data from two or more person: records is provided at the same time (bulk) or if the data associated with a person: record that was removed fom the data base last week (historical) is provided. These alleged constraints, which allegedly spring from Mauritian law, are in fact just ridiculous double-talk, made up within the minds of S. Moonesamy and others within the current AFRINIC hierarchy, who are just simply searching for some vaguely plausible excuse to prevent any independent investigators, such as myself, from finding the whole truth of what has happened in the data base, over time. There is no basis in law for this. AFRINIC and S. Moonesamy are simply stonewalling. It is left as an exercise for the reader as to why they would wish to do that. Regards, rfg From sm+af at afrinic.net Wed Dec 23 20:57:46 2020 From: sm+af at afrinic.net (S. Moonesamy) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:57:46 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <5da05122-56e2-fd78-89cd-5616e49f7b82@lsl.digital> References: <36559.1598255350@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20201222223854.12349470@elandnews.com> <5da05122-56e2-fd78-89cd-5616e49f7b82@lsl.digital> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20201223122115.0b81ccb8@elandnews.com> Dear Ish, At 09:57 AM 23-12-2020, Ish Sookun wrote: >Are you referring to a complaint made on the members mailing list? No. It was in an email which I received. Regards, S. Moonesamy Board Chair, AFRINIC From rfg at tristatelogic.com Wed Dec 23 21:41:57 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:41:57 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <52562.1608759717@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message Emem William wrote: >In your comprehensive routing data, I noticed that the following name >stands out quite often, PEG Tech Inc. It seems like they are providing a >lot of route to those ranges. I am wondering if you have done any research >about them? I have, but only a limited amount. I believe that is a California (US) based company, and that its Chief Executive Officer, as per California state corporation records, is a person named Wei Zhang. >Also why is Seacom still routing stolen AFRINIC IP? I cannot provide any answer. This question is best directed to SEACOM. >As you have rightfully >pointed out https://bgp.he.net/AS26754#_graph4 , they seem to be the only >upstream provider that still routes Afrinic=E2=80=99s stolen IP. NOT SO! You seem to have grossely misinterpreted what I posted. There are *numerous* different ASN that are routing various parts of what I consider to be either (a) provably stolen AFRINIC legacy IPv4 space that AFRINIC has not yet acted to return to its rightful owners or else (b) IPv4 space that *was* stolen, but which AFRINIC *has* returned to its rightful owners (but which some unrelated network owners are still illicitly squatting on anyway) or (c) IPv4 address space that has been reclaimed into the free pool by AFRINIC, and which are thus now "bogons", but which some network operators are still routing anyway. In the specific case illustrated by the link I posted: https://bgp.he.net/AS2675 the IPv4 address blocks in question were parts of various IPv4 blocks that have already been reclaimed into the free pool by AFRINIC. And in this case, even the AS number, AS2675, has also been reclaimed into the ASN free pool by AFRINIC. (So *nobody* should even be using that ASN -at all- on the public internet.) The problem here is that AS2675, which is now a "bogon" ASN, *is* still being used to announce routes to multiple IPv4 address blocks which are themselves now "bogons". This is apparently only possible because *two* other ASNs are providing correctivity to the bogon ASN, AS2675, as shown on the page linked to above. These two other ASNs are: AS328616 Spidd Africa Ltd AS37100 SEACOM Limited Neither of these two should be peering with the bogon AS2675 -at all-. SEACOM, you already know about. That is a big provider in Africa that ought to know better. The other one, AS328616 Spidd Africa Ltd is a bit mysterious, but is apparently headquartered in Uganda, and it also is receiving connectivity from two other ASNs as shown here: https://bgp.he.net/AS328616 The two ASNs that are providing connectivity to Spidd Africa... which I believe is strongly linked to Ernest... are as follows: AS328015 Sombha Solutions Store Limited AS37100 SEACOM Limited Both of these appear to be essentially legitimate companies... and SEACOM surely is... but I do have to question why either of them should be providing connectivity to AS328616 Spidd Africa Ltd., which I believe to be a small-time operation which is most probably the property of good friends of Ernest in Uganda. I could provide even some more interesting information here about these various networking connections in Uganda, but I'll leave that for another time. Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Wed Dec 23 21:58:41 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:58:41 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <52687.1608760721@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message Noah wrote: rfg> Please note that Ernest Byaruhanga is still enjoying some of his rfg> stolen AFRINIC space, > > >You have repeated the above quite a lot in all your emails... I might be mistaken, but I don't believe so. In fact, I don't believe that I have previously mentioned these blocks... which appear to me to be in use by a party or parties who may or may not be Ernest Byaruhanga... to anyone at all, except for maybe Jan Vermeulen. You'll have to forgive me. There's quite a lot of sordid details that I know about, and I've only publicly disclosed a subset of those. And there are so many details that it's hard to remember which ones I have, and which ones I haven't already mentioned publicly. Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Wed Dec 23 22:10:59 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:10:59 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <52793.1608761459@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Let me begin by saying that I have only just been informed that there is some connection between Noah and SEACOM. My apologies to him. If I had known of that connection, I might have raised the issus of the Ugandan bogons with him privately. But since this is now a matter of public discussion, I will respond publicly. In message Noah wrote: >Actually those prefixes on the link above are being originated by >ITC AS26754 and announced by two different upstream providers. That is 100% correct. So SEACOM is certainly -not- the only network that is doing something wrong here. The real problem is that *nobody* should be peering with AS26754 which is a bogon ASN that was previously registered (or stolen) by Ernest Byaruhanga. Quite obviously, AFRINIC staff already realized that some time ago and they then appropriately de-registered AS26754 and returned that AS number to the free pool. Thus, AS26754 has been a "bogon" ASN for some time now. So the question must be asked: Why is AS37100 (or anybody else) still peering with the bogon AS26754? That should not be happening. Regards, rfg P.S. I am greatly looking forward to more widespread adoption of RPKI which may reduce some of these kinds of problems. From sm+af at afrinic.net Thu Dec 24 03:21:41 2020 From: sm+af at afrinic.net (S. Moonesamy) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 19:21:41 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <52433.1608757769@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20201222223854.12349470@elandnews.com> <52433.1608757769@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959fb0@elandnews.com> Dear Mr Guilmette, At 01:09 PM 23-12-2020, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >I thank "S. Moonesamy" for at least attempting >to make some pretense of addressing this issue, which I have raised, >however it is easy to demonstrate that this response is silly in the >extreme. It is hasty to conclude that I consider the issue as addressed. >Apparently the "applicable" Mauritian law DOES NOT prevent AFRINIC >from publishing, via its traditional port 43 WHOIS service, the names, >addresses, and phone numbers (PII) associated with person: records >that are currently present in the data base... a fact that anyone >can easily verify just by querying the WHOIS for the handle associated >with any person: record. The above description is simplistic. One of the purposes of Whois is to facilitate network operations. The "person" record for AS33764 is: person: CTO AFRINIC address: 11th Floor, Standard Chartered Tower address: Cybercity, Eb?ne address: Mauritius phone: tel:+230-403-5100 nic-hdl: CA15-AFRINIC mnt-by: CTO-MNT source: AFRINIC # Filtered I doubt that there is a person with that name. The "address" is a business address. The "phone" is not a personal phone number. >Despite this obvious fact, the community is asked to believe that somehow, >magically, Mauritian law DOES prevent AFRINIC from providing this same >data to qualified and well-vetted researchers if the data from two or >more person: records is provided at the same time (bulk) or if the >data associated with a person: record that was removed fom the data base >last week (historical) is provided. > >These alleged constraints, which allegedly spring from Mauritian law, >are in fact just ridiculous double-talk, made up within the minds of >S. Moonesamy and others within the current AFRINIC hierarchy, who are >just simply searching for some vaguely plausible excuse to prevent >any independent investigators, such as myself, from finding the whole >truth of what has happened in the data base, over time. > >There is no basis in law for this. AFRINIC and S. Moonesamy are simply >stonewalling. What is the basis in law which permits a researcher to access the date in bulk? Regards, S. Moonesamy Board Chair, AFRINIC From rfg at tristatelogic.com Thu Dec 24 08:12:27 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:12:27 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959fb0@elandnews.com> Message-ID: <54632.1608797547@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959fb0 at elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" wrote: >>There is no basis in law for this. AFRINIC and S. Moonesamy are simply >>stonewalling. > >What is the basis in law which permits a researcher to access the {data} in > bulk? This is the single most bizzare question I have been asked this entire year. And it has already been quite a strange year! Where are you located Mr. Moonesamy? Are you in a place where only things that are expressely allowed by law are permitted?? Where I am, in also in about 99.99% of all countries on earth, that isn't the way the law works. Rather, in every single place on earth that I am aware of, the law tells you what is NOT permitted... not what *IS* permitted. I might as well ask you where in law it is permitted for you to draw a breath. Can you show me the particular Mauritian law that permits you to do that? If not, then you should most certainly stop doing that immediately before someone calls the Mauritian police to report you for breathing. Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Thu Dec 24 09:35:32 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 01:35:32 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks Message-ID: <54941.1608802532@segfault.tristatelogic.com> My apologies to all. In my haste to respond to Noah last night, I neglected to include in my listing of known stolen AFRINIC-administered legacy IPv4 address blocks one particular /16 block. And in many ways, this is the single most egregious theft that has been perpetrated by some combination of Mr. Cohen, Mr. Uerlings, and Mr. Byaruhanga, because in this case they have stolen property from underprivledged school children in South Africa... a despicable deed if ever there was one! The block in question is as follows, and this should be appended to the extensive list of still-stolen AFRINIC-administered IPv4 blocks that I provided yesterday: ORG-FSED1-AFRINIC - Free State Education Department (ZA) 168.76.0.0/16 Current routing status: 252 0 ?? UNROUTED IP SPACE 4 137951 HK Clayer Limited Note that Clayer Limited (Hong Kong) appears to be a willing accomplice in many of these ongoing AFRINIC IP blocks thefts. Just as in all of the other cases where legacy IPv4 address blocks have been stolen by some combination of Mr. Cohen, Mr. Uerlings, and Mr. Byaruhanga, in this case also the contact person's email address was fiddled... somehow... so as to route any questions directly to an email address which is under the control of either Mr. Cohen or Mr. Uerlings, and *not* an email address that is under the control of the rightful owner of this block: person: Hannes Du Plooy address: Orange Free State Dept of Education address: PO Box 521 address: Bloemfontein 9300 address: ZA phone: tel:+27-51-407-4054 e-mail: hannesduplooy77 at gmail.com <===== FRADULENT! nic-hdl: PHD-AFRINIC mnt-by: GENERATED-JLUEGZNF4DVRRWEI0IAWQV2ZWKMFMGXH-MNT changed: hannesduplooy77 at gmail.com 20131123 <===== FRADULENT source: AFRINIC To make matters even more egregious, this particular stolen block also has an associated route: object in the AFRINIC WHOIS data base which was evidently installed there by either Mr. Cohen or Mr. Uerlings: route: 168.76.0.0/16 descr: Freenet origin: AS18013 mnt-by: TF-168-76-MNT changed: route at education.fs.gov.za 20200405 source: AFRINIC If one were to take the above at face value, then one would have to accept the premise that the legitimate owner of this block, i.e. the South African Free State Education Department, elected to have some obscure network located in Hong Kong (AS18013) route their entire /16 block for them. That is laughable on the face of it. Worse still, the above route object demonstrates that even though AFRINIC management and the board were fully aware of the criminal thefts of valuable IPv4 address space, both legacy and non-legacy, as early as September of 2019, neither management nor the board took -any- steps to constrain the free access of the fraudsters, Uerlings & Cohen, from making changes to the AFRINIC data base until at least April 5th, 2020 (20200405). And indeed, we have -no- official assurances, and thus no reason to believe that messers Cohen & Uerlings are not *still* being allowed to create whatever changes they want in the AFRINIC WHOIS data base, even as we speak. This would be funny if it were not so sad. Even five months after Jan Vermeulen's damning published report of December 1st, 2019, even months after AFRINIC had fired Ernest and had filed a formal police report about his criminal activities, AFRINIC was *still* allowing the fraudsters, Cohen & Uerlings, to fiddle things in the AFRINIC data base. This is not merely my opinion. The above route object and its date stamp are clear, and they are accessible to anyone who knows how to run a whois command. Based on the available evidence, as cited above, and also the CEO's ongoing inability and/or unwillingness to say anything at all about AFRINIC's supposed "investigation" of all these matters, it seems that AFRINIC is incapable of tying its own shoelaces unless given at least 13 months to do so. I grieve for the plight of Africa and Africans. I think you all deserve better leadership than this. But you certainly won't get it unless and until you demand it. This entire colossal mess could have been, and should have been cleaned up entirely twelve months ago. And I guess it would have been, if people in Mauritius were in the habit of working more than two days a week. I found all of this stuff, analyzed it, investigated it all, and documented all of it, all by myself, in less than four months in 2019. That was just me, working only part time on this little project. Eddy has a HUGE budget and about 25+ staff people to do his bidding, all day every day. And he even had *additional* help sent to him from APNIC! So what is the hold up? Why is this taking so long? He won't say. Nobody will say. TIA. Part of the problem is exactly what I already said it was... Secretly and behind the scenes, either the board or Eddy or both have made the decision that the legacy blocks are "not our problem man!" So they've decided to just let the theives keep what they stole in these cases, unless the real and legitimate blocks owners show up to complain. This is, quite simply both cowardly and crazy. It is the same as attaching a giant "Kick me!" sign on the back of AFRINIC. It only serves to encourage yet more fraudsters and scam artists to descend on AFRINIC, and maybe even to try to get jobs there. After all, that worked out rather well for Ernest, apparently. He got away scot free, and was able to keep 100% of the money he made from his thefts. The Board and/or Eddy could have had him arrested at the meeting in Luanda, Angola, but they just let him walk out, get on a plane, and fly back to Uganda. And now, because Uganda is so corrupt, Ernest effectively has full immunity from prosecution. (Everybody knows this, but apparently I am the only one with sufficiently poor taste to say it out loud.) Regards, rfg From sm+af at afrinic.net Thu Dec 24 10:21:18 2020 From: sm+af at afrinic.net (S. Moonesamy) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 02:21:18 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <54632.1608797547@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959fb0@elandnews.com> <54632.1608797547@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20201224011757.0ca37d80@elandnews.com> Dear Mr Guilmette, At 12:12 AM 24-12-2020, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >This is the single most bizzare question I have been asked this entire >year. And it has already been quite a strange year! Personalizing a discussion is a distraction from the gist of the matter. If I understood correctly, you would like to granted access to all the objects, including deleted objects [1]. You asserted that there isn't any basis in law which prevents such access from being granted. I suggest providing a rationale which is related to a data protection law. Regards, S. Moonesamy 1. There is a message at about querying previous versions of "objects" in Whois. Deleted objects are not queryable. Board Chair, AFRINIC From noah at neo.co.tz Thu Dec 24 11:28:10 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:28:10 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <52793.1608761459@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <52793.1608761459@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 01:14 Ronald F. Guilmette, wrote: > Let me begin by saying that I have only just been informed that there is > some connection between Noah and SEACOM. My apologies > to him. No need to apologize.... Some members of the AFRICAN Internet community besides myself tend to wear multiple hats :-). If I had known of that connection, I might have raised the > issus of the Ugandan bogons with him privately. It's best to address issues publicly because chances are that I personally will not respond privately as I find private convos dodgy. We run real networks and with that comes all sort of issues and this is one of those that will be fixed. > So the question must be asked: Why is AS37100 (or anybody else) still > peering with the bogon AS26754? > Ans dude since this was just brought into the Internet community attention yesterday and like I indicated this will be followed up even though we are now in a network freeze period but rest assured it's an issue being followed up. To this end, I see that AFRINIC has sort of reclaimed that ASN as you rightfully indicated in your post so something is in th works. > That should not be happening. 100% and FWIW while most might be aware, we rolled out RPKI [1] so that we can be able to deal with such incidents but similarly its good for us as the Internet community to keep each other informed as well. Cheers, Noah [1] https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/2019-April/002821.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Thu Dec 24 11:30:49 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:30:49 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <52687.1608760721@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <52687.1608760721@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 01:02 Ronald F. Guilmette, wrote: > In message WdDRAbazo4RX9qof1mcbKUG4m++8Q at mail.gmail.com> > Noah wrote: > > rfg> Please note that Ernest Byaruhanga is still enjoying some of his > rfg> stolen AFRINIC space, > > > > > >You have repeated the above quite a lot in all your emails... > > I might be mistaken, but I don't believe so. In fact, I don't believe > that I have previously mentioned these blocks... which appear to me to > be in use by a party or parties who may or may not be Ernest Byaruhanga... > Ok Ronald noted..... to anyone at all, except for maybe Jan Vermeulen. > And who the heck is Jan Vermeulen now? > There's quite a lot of sordid details that > I know about, and I've only publicly disclosed a subset of those. Please do this community a final favor and publish all details rather than just subsets of your research. This would help AFRINIC add to the pile of already misappropriated IPv4 space they are currently looking at. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Thu Dec 24 11:39:00 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:39:00 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks In-Reply-To: <54941.1608802532@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <54941.1608802532@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 12:41 Ronald F. Guilmette, wrote: > And now, because Uganda is so corrupt, > The one would also claim that the USA is equally corrupt but I will not go around claiming such even though I suspect that some American nationals are also involved in some of the corruption around IPv4 numbers. As such, I think let us keep countries out of this mess and generalizing mistakes made my individuals doesn't warranty bad mouthing an entire nation. I request that we keep the discourse civil dude. Noah > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ish at lsl.digital Thu Dec 24 12:25:22 2020 From: ish at lsl.digital (Ish Sookun) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:25:22 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <54632.1608797547@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <54632.1608797547@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: Hi Ronald, On 24/12/2020 12:12, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Where are you located Mr. Moonesamy? Are you in a place where only things > that are expressely allowed by law are permitted?? In Mauritius, the Data Protection Regulation is taken seriously. If you have a concern with the way your request if being entertained, where you believe you should be able to have access to personal data of individuals in possession of AFRINIC but the latter is refusing; then you may address your concern to the Data Protection Commissioner. Instead, I see you are arguing with a Board Director who is only telling you that AFRINIC has a regulatory constraint in giving you access to data it possesses. Regards, Ish Sookun From libren at tuta.io Thu Dec 24 12:29:40 2020 From: libren at tuta.io (libren at tuta.io) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 13:29:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Noah are you member or LIR? If you are real person then what is the problem in submitting our id proofs to Moderator ? Verification and censorship are two different things. Who knows maybe you and Ronald are are same person or maybe I am sock puppet :)? Your psychological warfare tactics are not working so try hard. We are the members of Afrinic and we have full faith in Afrinic management. Afrinic management is working as gatekeepers. Gatekeepers are protecting the resources and interest of its members. Resources are not allocated without justification and consent of the management so accusing misappropriate use of resources is direct attack on Afrinic management and accusing its management of crime. We do not know history and issue is between Afrinic and its members. Those who are not members please excuse us and leave Afrinic and its members alone. Moderator please verify and I can bet Ronald and Noah will disappear. [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Ronald F. Guilmette [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Ronald F. Guilmette [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? libren at tuta.io [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Sami Salih [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Ronald F. Guilmette [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Ronald F. Guilmette [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? libren at tuta.io [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Emem William [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? AFRINIC Communication [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Ronald F. Guilmette [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Ronald F. Guilmette [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Ronald F. Guilmette [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources ? Noah -- Dec 23, 2020, 18:54 by noah at neo.co.tz: > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Libra via Community-Discuss <> community-discuss at afrinic.net> > wrote: > >> Too much spam is generated by couple of morons in this community list. >> > > Take a chill pill and stop?> spamming the community list since they want?to hear how well AFRINIC?S IPv4 resources are being used in serving Africa?s internet and advancing its network infrastructure. > > >> >> How about only verified members allowed to use this mailing list?? >> >> Those who are Afrinic member or Lir can link their main account and those who are not members or LIR can submit their id proof for verification. >> > > While I am not a big fan of sock puppets, I don't believe in censorship?the likes of which you are advocating on a public forum which welcomes everyone with interest. > > Noah > ? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Thu Dec 24 13:06:41 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:06:41 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 15:33 Libra via Community-Discuss, < community-discuss at afrinic.net> wrote: > - Noah are you member or LIR? > Who is asking? - If you are real person then what is the problem in submitting our id > proofs to Moderator ? > Mr.Moderator I am at your disposal. - Verification and censorship are two different things. > - Who knows maybe you and Ronald are are same person or maybe I am sock > puppet :) > Ronald claims to be an American, never met him and not interested either in knowing him beyond the revelations he makes on this forum as relates to IPv4 number resources misappropriation. As for me, I am a breath gasping, heart pumping decaying body.... so go figure. - We are the members of Afrinic and we have full faith in Afrinic > management. > Then you have nothing to worry about. But the AFRINIC management has the obligation to do what is right and they are doing exactly that todate. - Afrinic management is working as gatekeepers. Gatekeepers are protecting > the resources and interest of its members. > You reminded me of Lu and his claim that AFRINIC is a book keeper. Actually AFRINIC does more than just registry services. Please do your homework. Resources are not allocated without justification and consent of the > management so accusing misappropriate use of resources is direct attack on > Afrinic management and accusing its management of crime. > You are correct but then what happens after resources have been allocated but instead a members decides to misappropriate them by leasing them outside the AFRINIC service region to entities in North America and Europe to use to advance the Internet Infrastructure there to the disadvantage of AFRICA. Do you think the AFRINIC management would be doing it's members and the community a service if they looked into such violations. There are some provisions in the AFRINIC, RSA that allows the management to investigate any violations of terms of RSA in order to enforce compliance by its resources members. Moderator please verify and I can bet Ronald and Noah will disappear. > Very funny dude. Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nishal at controlfreak.co.za Thu Dec 24 13:10:10 2020 From: nishal at controlfreak.co.za (Nishal Goburdhan) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:10:10 +0200 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: References: <54632.1608797547@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <53DCCFF8-FBD4-4684-A380-64A625EC0265@controlfreak.co.za> On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:25, Ish Sookun wrote: > Instead, I see you are arguing with a Board Director who is only > telling > you that AFRINIC has a regulatory constraint in giving you access to > data it possesses. this is not quite a regulatory constraint. this information is, or was, already in the public domain. and so this is not *private* per se. however, as SM pointed out, the current afrinic *whois-db policy* constraint, is not to make the history of deleted objects available. that?s an entirely different problem. the OP wanted historic information that _would not be available via any other means_, to [every|any]one else. supplying this to one party without a legal writ, would put afrinic in an indefensible position. however, making that historic information available, via something like a WHOWAS service [1], is not illegal. and if the historic data is made available, then a historic-bulk-whois-request-form can be created, satisfying the original request. or, y?know, script queries :-) making this historic data available, is not difficult [2]. it is just that the *current* db policy does not permit it. -n. [1] https://www.apnic.net/static/whowas-ui/ [2] https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/dbwg/2020-December/000286.html From nishal at controlfreak.co.za Thu Dec 24 13:12:31 2020 From: nishal at controlfreak.co.za (Nishal Goburdhan) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:12:31 +0200 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9967601E-6BED-4221-853A-EBAAAE5DD867@controlfreak.co.za> On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:29, Libra via Community-Discuss wrote: > Noah are you member or LIR? [snip nonsense] hey noah, (and other bona fide people) please don?t feed the trolls. it only makes them hungrier, and appear more often. ?n. From noah at neo.co.tz Thu Dec 24 13:25:27 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:25:27 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <9967601E-6BED-4221-853A-EBAAAE5DD867@controlfreak.co.za> References: <9967601E-6BED-4221-853A-EBAAAE5DD867@controlfreak.co.za> Message-ID: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, 16:15 Nishal Goburdhan, wrote: > On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:29, Libra via Community-Discuss wrote: > > > Noah are you member or LIR? > > [snip nonsense] > > hey noah, (and other bona fide people) > > please don?t feed the trolls. > it only makes them hungrier, and appear more often. > Noted Nishal. Noah > ?n. > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dc at darwincosta.com Thu Dec 24 13:34:19 2020 From: dc at darwincosta.com (dc at darwincosta.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:34:19 +0100 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <17D5BD18-8B6B-4821-BEE9-33C5632CE3D5@darwincosta.com> > On 24 Dec 2020, at 13:32, Libra via Community-Discuss wrote: > > ? > Noah are you member or LIR? If you are real person then what is the problem in submitting our id proofs to Moderator ? Verification and censorship are two different things. What are you talking about? > Who knows maybe you and Ronald are are same person or maybe I am sock puppet :) > Your psychological warfare tactics are not working so try hard. > We are the members of Afrinic and we have full faith in Afrinic management. If you really care about AFRINIC then you should care how things are being conducted to. > Afrinic management is working as gatekeepers. Gatekeepers are protecting the resources and interest of its members. Resources are not allocated without justification and consent of the management so accusing misappropriate use of resources is direct attack on Afrinic management and accusing its management of crime. > We do not know history and issue is between Afrinic and its members. Those who are not members please excuse us and leave Afrinic and its members alone. > Moderator please verify and I can bet Ronald and Noah will disappear. Oh oh oh, please enjoy your Xmas and don?t bother the ?moderator? with non sense. > > > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Ronald F. Guilmette > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Ronald F. Guilmette > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources libren at tuta.io > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Sami Salih > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Ronald F. Guilmette > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Ronald F. Guilmette > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources libren at tuta.io > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Emem William > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources AFRINIC Communication > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Ronald F. Guilmette > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Ronald F. Guilmette > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Ronald F. Guilmette > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Noah > > -- Darwin-. > > > Dec 23, 2020, 18:54 by noah at neo.co.tz: > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Libra via Community-Discuss wrote: > Too much spam is generated by couple of morons in this community list. > > Take a chill pill and stop spamming the community list since they want to hear how well AFRINIC?S IPv4 resources are being used in serving Africa?s internet and advancing its network infrastructure. > > > How about only verified members allowed to use this mailing list? > Those who are Afrinic member or Lir can link their main account and those who are not members or LIR can submit their id proof for verification. > > While I am not a big fan of sock puppets, I don't believe in censorship the likes of which you are advocating on a public forum which welcomes everyone with interest. > > Noah > > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dc at darwincosta.com Thu Dec 24 13:34:56 2020 From: dc at darwincosta.com (dc at darwincosta.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:34:56 +0100 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <9967601E-6BED-4221-853A-EBAAAE5DD867@controlfreak.co.za> References: <9967601E-6BED-4221-853A-EBAAAE5DD867@controlfreak.co.za> Message-ID: > On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:14, Nishal Goburdhan wrote: > > ?On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:29, Libra via Community-Discuss wrote: > >> Noah are you member or LIR? > > [snip nonsense] > > hey noah, (and other bona fide people) > > please don?t feed the trolls. > it only makes them hungrier, and appear more often. Indeed. > > ?n. Darwin-. > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss From rfg at tristatelogic.com Fri Dec 25 03:41:17 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:41:17 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] WHOIS data base access In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959fb0@elandnews.com> Message-ID: <58589.1608867677@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Merry Christmas to all! In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959fb0 at elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" wrote: >{... response snipped...} I am not sure that it would be productive for me to try, yet again, to make the points that I have tried to make on the topic of WHOIS data base access, both historical and, in bulk. For whatever reasons, I have not been entirely successful at getting across my fundamental points. Nishal Goburdhan has posted to support my view that these records *are* in fact already public... at least the present day versions thereof... and that it is thus self-evident that AFRINIC's publication of these records is *not* any kind of violation of Mauritian law. (If it were, then Mr. Moonesamy and he fellow board members would likely have been in jail long before now, because AFRINIC has been publishing these same records that I am requesting, not just for years, but indeed, ever since the beginning of AFRINIC, way back in 2004.) I have not asked for any information that was not, at some point in time, being published, by AFRINIC, and via its publicly-accessible port 43 WHOIS service. Neither have I asked for any information that AFRINIC legal counsel has not already agreed may be made public, under Mauritian law. My requests have been far more modest. I have only requested that the exact same unredacted records that are today accessible, albeit only bit-by-bit, from the AFRINIC WHOIS server, be provided to me in a more convenient and easy-to-process single large clump. My other request, which is exactly as Nishal Goburdhan has accurately described it, is just to have access also to those exact same public records, but including even the prior versions of those records, and including also even deleted records that *AFRINIC policy* and *only* AFRINIC policy has decided should not be made available. Nishal Goburdhan has quite rationally stated that the one and only impediment to the fulfillment of these modest requests is *not* Mauritian law, but only current AFRINIC policy... with emphasis on the "current" part. It is my hope that this current stumbling block, AFRINIC policy, will be removed, so that I may make further progress in researching issues relating to the misappropriation of valuable IP address space which is under the administration of AFRINIC. Given that my investigations have already resulted in the return, to the community, of millions upon millions of dollars worth of valuable property, I believe that it is, or at any rate should be, self-evident that it would be in the best interests of the AFRINIC community to allow me to inspect *all* current and historical public WHOIS records, and that any current AFRINIC policy or policies that prevent this should be revised, via a consensus of the membership, to instead permit it. Regards, rfg P.S. I cannot help but note also that Charman Moonesamy's opinions regarding the legality of allowing parties outside of AFRINIC staff to access both current and historical WHOIS records appear to depend on who, exactly, is either asking for or receiving that access. I, apparently, am unworthy of this information. By contrast the technical representatives of APNIC that have been assisting the CEO to perform the allegedly ongoing "audit" of these same records have been given full carte blanche access to all of those same records. If Charman Moonesamy is sincerly concerned about the possibility of violating Mauritian law by allowing "outsiders" access to this same data, then I suppose that he now has no choice but to file a police report and to arrange to have Eddy Kayihura arrested for his wanton and abundant violations of Mauritian privacy law, i.e. allowing the APNIC people to have a look see. Of course, that would be a perfectly silly and absurd result of Charman Moonesamy's interpretation of Mauritian law, and one that no one would either expect or want. But I feel compelled to throw this absurd hypothetical out onto the table, first to demonstrate just how absurd the results would be if in fact Charman Moonesamy's interpretation of Mauritian law were even remotely correct, but second and also, to ask the next obvious question: If Mauritian privacy law prohibits all except AFRINIC staff from seeing all of the WHOIS records, then how did it come to pass that technical representatives from APNIC were shown *all* of these same records? And where was Charman Moonesamy's highly restrictive interpretation of Mauritian law when THAT happened? Charman Moonesamy cannot have it both ways. He cannot on a Sunday condone the act of providing all of the WHOIS records, both past and present, to his helpful friends from APNIC, and then on the following Monday declare that it has somehow magically become illegal to give me the exact same WHOIS records. If the glaring inconsistancy here is not now obvious and apparent to all, then the English language has lost all of its meaning. From rfg at tristatelogic.com Fri Dec 25 03:52:04 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:52:04 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Questions In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20201224011757.0ca37d80@elandnews.com> Message-ID: <58633.1608868324@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201224011757.0ca37d80 at elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" wrote: >1. There is a message at > >about querying previous versions of "objects" in Whois. Deleted >objects are not queryable. Yes, that is one of several problems relating to WHOIS access that need to be addressed and fixed. Another problem is that unlike other object types in the WHOIS data base, the full history of person: objects is simply not available. No rationale and no explanation for this has been provided, even though I have asked about it several times now. Neither has it ever been clear on whose authority the decision was made to render the historical versions of person: objects inaccessible. Who decided that it should be so? Was that decision based on a vote or on community direction or community consensus? Or did AFRINIC staff make the decision, unilaterally and on their own, to effectively redact the histories of person: objects, without any input from the community? Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Fri Dec 25 04:33:00 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 20:33:00 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <58819.1608870780@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message Noah wrote: >> So the question must be asked: Why is AS37100 (or anybody else) still >> peering with the bogon AS26754? >> > >Ans dude since this was just brought into the Internet community attention >yesterday... My records indicate that AS26754 was de-registered by AFRINIC and became a "bogon" ASN on some date between December 17, 2019 and February 3rd, 2020. In short AS26754 has been a bogon for at least 10 months already. In all that time SEACOM never noticed that it was providing routing to a bogon?? >and like I indicated this will be followed up even though we are >now in a network freeze period but rest assured it's an issue being >followed up. Good. I look forward to that. Although I'm frankly not sure why you folks at SEACOM don't just simply pull the plug on this bogon. This isn't rocket science, after all. As regards to your "network freeze" I have no idea what that means. Here where I am, we are in the depths of winter. But I thought that it must be summer in Africa. No? >To this end, I see that AFRINIC has sort of reclaimed that ASN I don't believe that AFRINIC is capable of "sort of" reclaiming things. Neither do I believe that a woman can be "somewhat" pregnant. As noted above, AFRINIC *fully* reclaimed the AS number AS26754, thus making it into a bogon ASN more than ten months ago already. SEACOM, for its part, should immediately stop providing connectivity to this bogon AS26754, which appears to have been a stolen property of Ernest Byaruhanga, who, as I'm sure you know, is supposedly under criminal investigation, by the Mauritius police for massively ripping off AFRINIC. It is my sincere hope that SEACOM will stop providing aid and comfort to the criminal Ernest Byaruhanga at the earliest possible moment. The notion of some administrative "network freeze" is NOT a reasonable or even a believable excuse to avoid cutting off this criminal immediately. >as you rightfully indicated in your post so something is in th works. I'm sorry Noah, but you have misinterpreted. Nothing is "in the works" with respect to this bogon AS number AS26754. AFRINIC staff already figured out that this was yet one more thing that had been stolen by Ernest, and thus, quite apprpriately, they took it back over 10 months ago now. (I only wish that SEACOM has been equally as observant in the early part of this year, and that it had likewise taken appropriate action, in the first months of 2020, to disconnect from Ernest and his stolen properties.) So AFRINIC's work on this particular case is 100% done and completed, and was so already, more than 10 months ago. The only thing that now remains to be done is for SEACOM... and others... to stop peering with this bogon ASN, AS26754. I see no reason why that either cannot or should not happen immediately, and with the flip of a switch. Also, I would very much appreciate it if SEACOM could provide me, and AFRINIC, and the Mauritian police, with all relevant documentation showing exactly how Ernest has been paying SEACOM for his connectivity for the past 1+ year, including any information about the specific bank account number or numbers he has used to make these payments. I am quite sure that this type of information would be most helpful, when and if AFRINIC ever attempts to recoup even some of the cash that Ernest managed to milk out of AFRINIC for so many years, via his huge embezzlement scheme. Just out of curiosity, what was the most recent date on which SEACOM received a payment from Ernest to continue to maintain connectivity to AS26754? Has Ernest been making these payments monthly? If so, then quite obviously his most recent payment information will be most helpful in finding where he has stashed all of his ill-gotten embezzled cash. Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Fri Dec 25 04:39:42 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 20:39:42 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <58863.1608871182@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message Noah wrote: >And who the heck is Jan Vermeulen now? He is a South African journalist who has written extensively about the thefts of AFRINIC-administered IPv4 address blocks. Google is your friend. >There's quite a lot of sordid details that >> I know about, and I've only publicly disclosed a subset of those. > >Please do this community a final favor and publish all details rather than >just subsets of your research. > >This would help AFRINIC add to the pile of already misappropriated IPv4 >space they are currently looking at. I have already posted here -all- of the IPv4 CIDRs representing -all- of the AFRINIC-administered IPv4 address blocks that I have reason to believe have either been "stolen" or "squatted on", as I define those terms. I am aware of some other interesting facts relating to the overall context and history of these thefts, and I will make that additional information public at a time of my choosing. Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Fri Dec 25 05:36:14 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:36:14 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <59079.1608874574@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message Noah wrote: rfg> And now, because Uganda is so corrupt, >> > >The one would also claim that the USA is equally corrupt but I will not go >around claiming such even though I suspect that some American nationals are >also involved in some of the corruption around IPv4 numbers. > >As such, I think let us keep countries out of this mess and generalizing >mistakes made my individuals doesn't warranty bad mouthing an entire nation. > >I request that we keep the discourse civil dude. My apologies. I only know what I've read on the Internet... https://www.ganintegrity.com/portal/country-profiles/uganda/ https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/uganda# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_in_Uganda https://www.u4.no/publications/uganda-overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption-2018 https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/10/21/letting-big-fish-swim/failures-prosecute-high-level-corruption-uganda# https://afrobarometer.org/publications/ad77-fighting-corruption-in-uganda-citizens-pessimistic From ali at hussein.me.ke Fri Dec 25 06:42:35 2020 From: ali at hussein.me.ke (Ali Hussein) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 09:42:35 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks In-Reply-To: <59079.1608874574@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <59079.1608874574@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <54DDB5DD-CC06-4D2A-9C52-438DE1A0F049@hussein.me.ke> Ronald Noah has a point. Let?s stick to AfriNIC issues which you have articulated very well. I?m shocked by the things you?ve said and hope for more action from AfriNIC. As to your internet links about how corrupt Uganda is let me just respond to you with the link below. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2020/09/11/trumps-businesses-raked-in-19-billion-of-revenue-during-his-first-three-years-in-office/ Ali Hussein Digital Transformation +254 0713 601113 Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." ~ Aristotle Sent from my iPad > On 25 Dec 2020, at 8:38 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > ?In message > Noah wrote: > > rfg> And now, because Uganda is so corrupt, >> >> The one would also claim that the USA is equally corrupt but I will not go >> around claiming such even though I suspect that some American nationals are >> also involved in some of the corruption around IPv4 numbers. >> >> As such, I think let us keep countries out of this mess and generalizing >> mistakes made my individuals doesn't warranty bad mouthing an entire nation. >> >> I request that we keep the discourse civil dude. > > My apologies. I only know what I've read on the Internet... > > https://www.ganintegrity.com/portal/country-profiles/uganda/ > > https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/uganda# > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_in_Uganda > > https://www.u4.no/publications/uganda-overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption-2018 > > https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/10/21/letting-big-fish-swim/failures-prosecute-high-level-corruption-uganda# > > https://afrobarometer.org/publications/ad77-fighting-corruption-in-uganda-citizens-pessimistic > > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sm+af at afrinic.net Fri Dec 25 08:19:51 2020 From: sm+af at afrinic.net (S. Moonesamy) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 00:19:51 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] WHOIS data base access In-Reply-To: <58589.1608867677@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20201223180936.13959fb0@elandnews.com> <58589.1608867677@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20201224231825.0cdc6438@elandnews.com> Dear Mr Guilmette, At 07:41 PM 24-12-2020, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >Merry Christmas to all! Merry Christmas. >I have not asked for any information that was not, at some point in >time, being published, by AFRINIC, and via its publicly-accessible >port 43 WHOIS service. Neither have I asked for any information >that AFRINIC legal counsel has not already agreed may be made public, >under Mauritian law. > >My requests have been far more modest. I have only requested that the >exact same unredacted records that are today accessible, albeit only >bit-by-bit, from the AFRINIC WHOIS server, be provided to me in a >more convenient and easy-to-process single large clump. There is a request form at for 2020. I suggest filling in the new version of the request form and sending it to the hostmaster at afrinic.net email address. Regards, S. Moonesamy Board Chair, AFRINIC From rfg at tristatelogic.com Sat Dec 26 00:02:08 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 16:02:08 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks In-Reply-To: <54DDB5DD-CC06-4D2A-9C52-438DE1A0F049@hussein.me.ke> Message-ID: <62928.1608940928@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message <54DDB5DD-CC06-4D2A-9C52-438DE1A0F049 at hussein.me.ke>, Ali Hussein wrote: >Noah has a point. Let's stick to AfriNIC issues which you have articulated >very well. I'm shocked by the things you've said and >hope for more action from AfriNIC. > >As to your internet links about how corrupt Uganda is let me just respond to >you with the link below. I do apologize that I have gotten seriously off-topic for this mailing list by even mentioning conditions specific to Uganda. However I feel that the facts, as they now stand, do justify my digression somewhat. It has been a year since AFRINIC filed a report about Ernest with the Mauritian police. Has Ernest been apprehended by the Ugandan police yet? Has he even been detained or even interviewed by them? I think we would have all heard about it by now if any of those things had happened. As regards to the corrupution in my own country, USA, let me just say yes, we have an extremely grave and serious problem with that right now, but only at the very top of the national government. I assure you that here, it is *not* at all common to pay off judges or police, and it is *not* at all common to have to pay a bribe in order to get water service, or electrical service, or sanitation service, or garbage pickup, or telephone service, or any other common government-supplied services. As regards to our highly corrupt and despicable President, he has done many many things lately in his attempts to destroy our 244 year old democratic system, and to try to install himself as our new Dictator for Life. But he has utterly failed in all these attempts, and he lost the Presidency in our recent elections. Thus, in accordance with law, he shall be out of office on January 20th, and well more than half of us here in the U.S. will be very relieved and pleased when his era of corruption ends, as will the people of most nations all around the world, I think. Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Sat Dec 26 00:20:24 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 16:20:24 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] WHOIS data base access In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20201224231825.0cdc6438@elandnews.com> Message-ID: <62980.1608942024@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201224231825.0cdc6438 at elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" There is a request form at > >for 2020. I suggest filling in the new version of the request form >and sending it to the hostmaster at afrinic.net email address. Was this intended as a bad joke? I already did this!! I already filed out the form and send it back in to AFRINIC and received an acknowledgement that it was received, *and* I was then given a special password to access what I had hoped would be a full and *UNREDACTED* copy of the entire AFRINIC WHOIS data base. I did all this even before the pandemic began! After all of that fooling around, I was shocked, amazed, and angered when, at the end of the whole process, the only thing that I could actually get after all of this jumping through hoops was the exact same *redacted* copy of the AFRINIC WHOIS data base that I could already get even *before* I went through all of this bureaucratic nonsense, which is the same *redacted* copy of the data base that any fool can download, via FTP, from ftp.afrinic.net any day of the week. When I complained that I was still not getting the promised *unredacted* version of the WHOIS data base, both Madhvi and Eddy just told me that what I was given was all that was avaialble, and then basically just ignored me after that. Why did I have to fill out a form, send it back, and go through all of this silliness, only to end up with the exact same (redacted) data that I and everyone else on planet earth could already get, even before all of this BS?? I guess that the joke is on me for being stupid enough to believe that AFRINIC would at least be suffuciently competent and functional to *not* just create a whole convoluted bureaucratic mechanism just to give people absolutely nothing above and beyond what they already had or could already get. I say again, I have been stonewalled and I am *still* being stonealled. I can't get even *current* unredacted bulk WHOIS records, let alone any of the vital *historical* records. Why? I am asking you, Mr. Chairman, to PLEASE get this nonsense sorted out ON YOUR END. Regards, rfg From sm+af at afrinic.net Sat Dec 26 02:18:48 2020 From: sm+af at afrinic.net (S. Moonesamy) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 18:18:48 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] WHOIS data base access In-Reply-To: <62980.1608942024@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20201224231825.0cdc6438@elandnews.com> <62980.1608942024@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20201225180838.0cd24340@elandnews.com> At 04:20 PM 25-12-2020, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >Was this intended as a bad joke? No. >I already did this!! I already filed out the form and send it back in That form was published in March 2020. Could you please fill in the 2020 version of the form and email it to hostmaster at afrinic.net? Regards, S. Moonesamy Board Chair, AFRINIC From rfg at tristatelogic.com Sat Dec 26 02:54:02 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 18:54:02 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] WHOIS data base access In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20201225180838.0cd24340@elandnews.com> Message-ID: <63404.1608951242@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201225180838.0cd24340 at elandnews.com>, "S. Moonesamy" wrote: >At 04:20 PM 25-12-2020, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>Was this intended as a bad joke? > >No. > >>I already did this!! I already filed out the form and send it back in > >That form was published in March 2020. Could you please fill in the >2020 version of the form and email it to hostmaster at afrinic.net? Are you personally guaranteeing me that if I spend (waste?) my time doing this all over again, that I will get something back in return for my investment of time, more than the giant nothingburger that I got the last time I jumped through all of these hoops? Regards, rfg From rfg at tristatelogic.com Sat Dec 26 03:42:56 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 19:42:56 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] SEACOM & Ernest Message-ID: <63639.1608954176@segfault.tristatelogic.com> I am pleased to report to you all that according to the data currently being provided at the web site bgp.he.net, SEACOM is no longer providing connectivity sevices to the bogon AS number, AS26754, which is most probably being used by the thief, Ernest Byaruhanga. https://bgp.he.net/AS26754#_asinfo Unfortunately, as can be seen on the page above, that is not the end of the story. The bogon AS number, AS26754 is still being provided with connectivity by AS328616, also known as "Spidd Africa Ltd", and that ASN is itself still being provided transit services by SEACOM: https://bgp.he.net/AS328616#_asinfo I have looked at the web site of this somewhat mysterious Ugandan company: https://spiddafrica.com/ The company appears to want to claim that it is good at "cybersecurity" and yet it apparently doesn't even know enough to stop itself from providing services to bogon ASNs. More troubling, the entire company just seems to be some sort of a false front. Clicking on the "About Us" link on the company's home page brings up this page, which is filled with only classic boilerplate "Lorem ipsum" type text: https://spiddafrica.com/about-spiddafrica Apparently the company does not wish the world to know anything about it, including who the officers and/or beneficial owners are. (Many of the other clickable links at the bottom of the company's home page are also dysfunctional.) Remarkably, despite the company's inability or unwillingness to reveal anything at all about itself to the outside world, via its web site, the Dun & Bradstreet company in the U.S. estimates that the company is earning around $2.41 million dollars (USD) per year: https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.spidd_africa_limited.5ad26d64814c330260454b4821e4ac86.html One wonders how much of those earnings are coming from providing ongoing connectivity and transit services to Ernest. Although it is not entirely clear who really owns Spidd Africa Ltd, the following page suggests two names, i.e. "Gensi Michael John" and "Augustus Muncha Katende". https://www.ppdaproviders.ug/index.php?page=yprov&sl=4&tgt=5&aph=S&sn=all%20providers&sp=all%20sectors&st=&tp=v&id=3161 It is my hope that Noah, or at any rate, -someone- from SEACOM will reach out to this company, and to those two gentlemen... all of which, together, are evidently a SEACOM customer... and make appropriate inquiries so as to determine why the company is still providing connectivity to Ernest's (now bogon) ASN which is itself still announcing routes to Ernest's (now bogon) stolen IPv4 address blocks. https://bgp.he.net/AS26754#_prefixes I would like to also once again express my hope that SEACOM will provide any and all payment information relating to the services they have been providing to Ernest's AS26754 to both the Mauritius police and to Eddy and the Board so that they may attempt to recoup at least some of the financial proceeds that were obtained, by Ernest, as a result of his years-long embezzlement scheme. Of course, I also hope that -someone- will persuade the owners of AS328616, "Spidd Africa Ltd", to immediately cease provding connectivity to Ernest and his bogons. (Maybe some official of AFRINIC might also have a polite word with them about that, in addition to SEACOM, of course.) Regards, rfg P.S. I don not have a Facebook account, so I personally cannot do this, but any interested party who does have a Facebook account could probably contact this company via Facebook to ask them why they are helping Ernest to stay online. The company does seem to have an active Facebook account, which even now is showing a Christmas greeting: https://www.facebook.com/SPIDDAFRICA/ https://www.facebook.com/pg/SPIDDAFRICA/about/ From sm+af at afrinic.net Sat Dec 26 05:02:27 2020 From: sm+af at afrinic.net (S. Moonesamy) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 21:02:27 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] WHOIS data base access In-Reply-To: <63404.1608951242@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20201225180838.0cd24340@elandnews.com> <63404.1608951242@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20201225202548.0cf3bb08@elandnews.com> Dear Mr Guilmette, At 06:54 PM 25-12-2020, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >Are you personally guaranteeing me that if I spend (waste?) my time >doing this all over again, that I will get something back in return >for my investment of time, more than the giant nothingburger that >I got the last time I jumped through all of these hoops? I suggested a practical alternative. Regards, S. Moonesamy Board Chair, AFRINIC From rfg at tristatelogic.com Sat Dec 26 05:57:29 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 21:57:29 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] WHOIS data base access In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20201225202548.0cf3bb08@elandnews.com> Message-ID: <64394.1608962249@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In message <6.2.5.6.2.20201225202548.0cf3bb08 at elandnews.com>, you wrote: >Dear Mr Guilmette, >At 06:54 PM 25-12-2020, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>Are you personally guaranteeing me that if I spend (waste?) my time >>doing this all over again, that I will get something back in return >>for my investment of time, more than the giant nothingburger that >>I got the last time I jumped through all of these hoops? > >I suggested a practical alternative. Would it be too much to hope or expect that you would simply ask the AFRINIC staff whether filling out and returning that form is a total waste of time or not, and if it is... as it was earlier this year... what the bloody purpose is of even having this form on the web site? I confess that that is a mystery that still puzzles me to this day. It seems that the only purpose of the form is to mislead people into thinking they will get -unredacted- records, when in fact all one gets, even if one does fill out and return the bloody thing, is just the same old redacted records that are already freely available via FTP. You are the Chariman. Can't you just simply ask about this? I myself have already been around and around in circles with the staff on this, and I cannot get a straight answer from anybody. Do you not even care that the organization that you are the Chairman of is playing games in order to stonewall legitimate researchers? Regards, rfg From comms at afrinic.net Mon Dec 28 11:54:43 2020 From: comms at afrinic.net (AFRINIC Communication) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:54:43 +0400 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Clarifications on the Terms of Use - AFRINIC WHOIS Database Message-ID: [Version en fran?ais au bas] Dear community, There has been some discussion on the list related to the terms of use of the WHOIS Database. Allow me to try to clarify the terms that govern access to the database. Accessing, querying and using the AFRINIC WHOIS Database is governed by the ?Terms of Use? document available on the following page: https://afrinic.net/whois/terms . The ?Terms of Use? document describes the process for demonstrating legitimate need for high-volume queries or bulk access to the AFRINIC WHOIS Database. However, the document clearly states that such access will be subject to the relevant laws of the Republic of Mauritius. One of the relevant laws, in this context, is the Data Protection Act 2017 (?the DPA?) of the Republic of Mauritius which protects personal data of individuals. Hence, the need for a redacted AFRINIC WHOIS Database. We have taken note that the above clarification might need to be detailed more explicitly on the Bulk WHOIS request form page on the AFRINIC website ((https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data )) to better manage expectations in the future. Regards Ashil Oogarah On behalf of the Communications and PR Team ???????????????? Ch?re communaut?, Il y a eu des discussions sur la liste relative aux conditions d'utilisation de la base de donn?es WHOIS. Permettez-moi d'essayer de clarifier les conditions qui r?gissent l'acc?s ? la base de donn?es. L'acc?s, l'interrogation et l'utilisation de la base de donn?es AFRINIC WHOIS sont r?gis par le document ?Terms of Use" disponible sur la page suivante : https://afrinic.net/whois/terms. Le document ?Terms of Use" d?crit le processus permettant de d?montrer le besoin l?gitime d'effectuer des requ?tes ? grand volume ou d'acc?der ? la base de donn?es AFRINIC WHOIS pour des donn?es en 'bulk'. Toutefois, le document indique clairement que cet acc?s sera soumis aux lois pertinentes de la R?publique de Maurice. L'une des lois pertinentes, dans ce contexte, est la loi sur la protection des donn?es 2017 ("DPA") de la R?publique de Maurice qui prot?ge les donn?es personnelles des individus. D'o? la n?cessit? d'une base de donn?es AFRINIC WHOIS r?dig?e. Nous avons pris note qu'une clarification pourrait n?cessiter d'?tre d?taill?e plus explicitement sur la page du formulaire de demande 'bulk' WHOIS sur le site web AFRINIC ((https://afrinic.net/support/general-queries/how-can-i-request-for-bulk-whois-data)) afin de mieux g?rer les attentes ? l'avenir. Cordialement, Ashil Oogarah Au nom de l'?quipe de communication et de relations publiques -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amelnaud at gmail.com Mon Dec 28 17:21:39 2020 From: amelnaud at gmail.com (Arnaud AMELINA) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:21:39 +0000 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. In-Reply-To: <1841775408.1944.1608732770454@ichabod.co-bxl> References: <1841775408.1944.1608732770454@ichabod.co-bxl> Message-ID: Hi Mika Levari, you want scare Afrinic and its members that they are loosing money in attempting to recall fraudulent acquired ressources. You will be welcome if you could prove some of Ronald?s statements are false. Otherwise, the global community and Afrinic membership are concerned that AFRINIC not capable to stand in court to defend and recall ressources it is responsible for. -- Arnaud Le mer. 23 d?c. 2020 ? 14:20, Mika Levari via Community-Discuss < community-discuss at afrinic.net> a ?crit : > Shalom, > I am enjoying this for sometime now. Looks like Afrinic community is > infiltrated by Spamhaus goons like Ronald F. Guilmette > Those who do not know what is spamhaus then read this > https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/29055/spamhaus-tax-evasion-shell-companies-extortion-strategies-blackmail-and-much-much-more > Spamhaus is a highly sophisticated money laundering, hacking and cyber > extortion network. > Spamhaus gang mebers like Ronald F. Guilmette are using social engineering > and same old tactics. > This time they are using Afrinic platform. > One example is https://seclists.org/nanog/2019/Sep/255 > Spamhaus goons started at Nanog and managed to get legal war started > between Elad cohen and Afrinic. > Case has reached Supreme court of Mauritius. All the legal fees are paid > from Afrinic members fee. > Afrinic management will be answerable for all the legal expenses. > Afrinic should ban these goons or they will manage to destroy Afrinic by > triggering series of legal events between Afrinic and its members to > achieve their purpose. > Read all replies from Ronald F. Guilmette and his associates and then > evaluate purpose of their posts. > Everything will be clear. > Bye bye > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aftok at protonmail.com Tue Dec 29 17:33:39 2020 From: aftok at protonmail.com (Aftok) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:33:39 +0000 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Message-ID: Eddy, I was able to get some info about court case between Netstyle and Afrinic. Afrinic has hired most expensive law firm in Mauritius charging around USD750 to USD1300 per hour and this is how members fee is used. First Afrinic mismanaged resources and now mismanaging the funds. Eddy you have lot to answer so lets wait for the final court orders then files are available on public domain. Has Afrinic provided true info to court? No lies, No fabricated docs? Claims, counter claims, damages not meant for organization like Afrinic. Iana can be party in case because Afrinic is just administering it is not owner of IPv4 resources. Police is investigating the case so imagine a situation Afrinic bank account is frozen by police for corruption or on court order? What will be the future of Afrinic? Learn how litigation works and what are the consequences. Do not play game if you do not know the rules. Aftok -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aftok at protonmail.com Tue Dec 29 17:45:36 2020 From: aftok at protonmail.com (Aftok) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:45:36 +0000 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Message-ID: <2KqPGED_iRkfXPNMACOlIjSrftnARaAEkjT8phJpsk2tYkEZ-7C6FMRKLChLATNrvQ2fVpB0-_foKe1N-HADcly8NLnPdxOpq1cMLVCnMig=@protonmail.com> Eddy, I was able to get some info about court case between Netstyle and Afrinic. Afrinic has hired most expensive law firm in Mauritius charging around USD750 to USD1300 per hour and this is how members fee is used. First Afrinic mismanaged resources and now mismanaging the funds. Eddy you have lot to answer so lets wait for the final court orders when files are available on public domain. Has Afrinic provided true info to court? No lies, No fabricated docs? Claims, counter claims, damages not meant for organization like Afrinic. Iana can be party in case because Afrinic is just administering it is not owner of IPv4 resources. Police is investigating the case so imagine a situation Afrinic bank account is frozen by police for corruption or on court order? What will be the future of Afrinic? Learn how litigation works and what are the consequences. Do not play game if you do not know the rules. Aftok -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfg at tristatelogic.com Wed Dec 30 02:17:41 2020 From: rfg at tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:17:41 -0800 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Two more stolen/squatted blocks Message-ID: <84715.1609294661@segfault.tristatelogic.com> My apologies to all. I just noticed two more AFRINIC IPv4 address blocks that were previously stolen from the AFRINIC free pool, and that have already been reclaimed and returned to the AFRINIC free pool by AFRINIC staff. 1) 41.77.240.0/21 -- formerly registered to "Tropicalweb" (Mozambique) Historical records suggest that this block was first allocated/assigned on or about 2009-08-26. Thus, this block most certainly was *not* a "legacy" block. At the present time, this entire /21 block, which is now officially a "bogon" block, is curently being routed by AS22769, aka "Ddosing Network, Inc." More information about this US-based company is provided below. 2) 41.93.128.0/17 - formerly registered to "Expresso Telecom Ltd" (Ghana) Historical records suggest that this block was first allocated/assigned on or about 2010-03-30. Thus, this block most certainly was *not* a "legacy" block. In this case also, this entire /17 block, is now officially a "bogon" block, Nontheless, this entire /17 block is currently being routed by AS22769, aka "Ddosing Network, Inc.", which is apparently headquartered in the US State of Colorado: https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_co/20161112743 The Colorado-based company, Ddosing Network, Inc., is apparently doing quite a lot of business with Mr. Maikel Uerlings. I say that because Mr. Uerlings has apparently sub-assigned to this Colorado company his entire AFRINIC 197.231.208.0/22 address block as two /23 blocks. See current WHOIS records below. Mr. Uerlings has also and likewise sub-assigned his entire 196.61.192.0/20 AFRINIC address block to this same Colorado company, Ddosing Network, as a pair of consecutive /21 blocks. See current WHOIS records below. Lastly, Mr. Uerlings has sub-assigned the higher numbered half of his assigned 45.220.64.0/18 AFRINIC block, i.e. the 45.220.96.0/19 sub-block, also to Ddosing Network. See current WHOIS records below. (Note: Based on other route: objects in the AFRINIC data base, Mr. Uerling has apparently assigned most or all of the remainder of his 45.220.64.0/18 AFRINIC block to a purported Japanese company named "QT Inc." aka "qtcloud.co.jp", but that company's web site is hosted at 185.254.242.225, which is on a Hong Kong network, and it is using mx.yandex.net, a Russian company, as its inbound email MX server. Interestingly, traceroutes to these blocks appear to dead end in or around Los Angeles.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- % Information related to '197.231.208.0 - 197.231.211.255' % No abuse contact registered for 197.231.208.0 - 197.231.211.255 inetnum: 197.231.208.0 - 197.231.211.255 netname: InspiringNetworksLtd descr: InspiringNetworksLtd country: SC org: ORG-INL3-AFRINIC admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ALLOCATED PA notify: info at inspiringnetworks.com notify: abuse at inspiringnetworks.com mnt-by: AFRINIC-HM-MNT mnt-lower: InspiringNetworks-mnt mnt-domains: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20130205 source: AFRINIC parent: 197.0.0.0 - 197.255.255.255 organisation: ORG-INL3-AFRINIC org-name: Inspiring Networks LTD org-type: LIR country: SC address: SUITE 9, ANSUYA ESTATE address: REVOLUTION AVENUE address: Victoria e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC mnt-ref: AFRINIC-HM-MNT mnt-ref: InspiringNetworks-mnt mnt-by: AFRINIC-HM-MNT notify: ipipv4 at gmail.com changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20130131 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20130201 changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20130205 changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20170629 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200302 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.sc 20200414 source: AFRINIC person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC % Information related to '197.231.208.0 - 197.231.209.255' % No abuse contact registered for 197.231.208.0 - 197.231.209.255 inetnum: 197.231.208.0 - 197.231.209.255 netname: DDOSPROTECT descr: DDoSING Network Attack Protection country: SC admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20140310 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200311 source: AFRINIC parent: 197.231.208.0 - 197.231.211.255 person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC % Information related to '197.231.210.0 - 197.231.211.255' % No abuse contact registered for 197.231.210.0 - 197.231.211.255 inetnum: 197.231.210.0 - 197.231.211.255 netname: DDOSPROTECT descr: DDoSING Network Attack Protection country: SC admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20140310 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200311 source: AFRINIC parent: 197.231.208.0 - 197.231.211.255 person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- % Information related to '196.61.192.0 - 196.61.207.255' % No abuse contact registered for 196.61.192.0 - 196.61.207.255 inetnum: 196.61.192.0 - 196.61.207.255 netname: Inspiring-Networks-v4 descr: Inspiring Networks LTD country: SC org: ORG-INL3-AFRINIC admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ALLOCATED PA notify: info at inspiringnetworks.com notify: abuse at inspiringnetworks.com mnt-by: AFRINIC-HM-MNT mnt-lower: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20160927 source: AFRINIC parent: 196.0.0.0 - 196.255.255.255 organisation: ORG-INL3-AFRINIC org-name: Inspiring Networks LTD org-type: LIR country: SC address: SUITE 9, ANSUYA ESTATE address: REVOLUTION AVENUE address: Victoria e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC mnt-ref: AFRINIC-HM-MNT mnt-ref: InspiringNetworks-mnt mnt-by: AFRINIC-HM-MNT notify: ipipv4 at gmail.com changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20130131 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20130201 changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20130205 changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20170629 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200302 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.sc 20200414 source: AFRINIC person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC % Information related to '196.61.192.0 - 196.61.199.255' % No abuse contact registered for 196.61.192.0 - 196.61.199.255 inetnum: 196.61.192.0 - 196.61.199.255 netname: DDOSPROTECT descr: DDoSING Network Attack Protection country: US admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20160927 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20190206 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200311 source: AFRINIC parent: 196.61.192.0 - 196.61.207.255 person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC % Information related to '196.61.200.0 - 196.61.207.255' % No abuse contact registered for 196.61.200.0 - 196.61.207.255 inetnum: 196.61.200.0 - 196.61.207.255 netname: DDOSPROTECT descr: DDoSING Network Attack Protection country: SC admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20160927 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200311 source: AFRINIC parent: 196.61.192.0 - 196.61.207.255 person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- % Information related to '45.220.64.0 - 45.220.127.255' % No abuse contact registered for 45.220.64.0 - 45.220.127.255 inetnum: 45.220.64.0 - 45.220.127.255 netname: INSPIRINGNETWORKS-IPV4-3 descr: Inspiring Networks LTD country: SC org: ORG-INL3-AFRINIC admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ALLOCATED PA notify: info at inspiringnetworks.com notify: abuse at inspiringnetworks.com mnt-by: AFRINIC-HM-MNT mnt-lower: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20161213 source: AFRINIC parent: 45.192.0.0 - 45.222.255.255 organisation: ORG-INL3-AFRINIC org-name: Inspiring Networks LTD org-type: LIR country: SC address: SUITE 9, ANSUYA ESTATE address: REVOLUTION AVENUE address: Victoria e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC mnt-ref: AFRINIC-HM-MNT mnt-ref: InspiringNetworks-mnt mnt-by: AFRINIC-HM-MNT notify: ipipv4 at gmail.com changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20130131 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20130201 changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20130205 changed: hostmaster at afrinic.net 20170629 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200302 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.sc 20200414 source: AFRINIC person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC % Information related to '45.220.64.0 - 45.220.95.255' % No abuse contact registered for 45.220.64.0 - 45.220.95.255 inetnum: 45.220.64.0 - 45.220.95.255 netname: INSPIRINGNET descr: Inspiring Networks country: US admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ASSIGNED PA remarks: tommy at qtcloud.co.jp mnt-by: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20161215 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20190312 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200311 source: AFRINIC parent: 45.220.64.0 - 45.220.127.255 person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC % Information related to '45.220.96.0 - 45.220.127.255' % No abuse contact registered for 45.220.96.0 - 45.220.127.255 inetnum: 45.220.96.0 - 45.220.127.255 netname: DDOSPROTECT descr: DDoSING Network Attack Protection country: US admin-c: MU6-AFRINIC tech-c: MU6-AFRINIC status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: InspiringNetworks-mnt changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20161215 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20190312 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200311 source: AFRINIC parent: 45.220.64.0 - 45.220.127.255 person: Maikel Uerlings nic-hdl: MU6-AFRINIC address: Victoria address: SC address: Victoria address: Seychelles e-mail: info at inspiringnetworks.sc phone: tel:+27-87-550-1931 mnt-by: GENERATED-M2L8RTJWZRCSSQFMGDCA6Y8GIHZJIFVD-MNT changed: info at orbitdiensten.com 20130110 changed: info at inspiringnetworks.com 20200302 changed: ipipv4 at gmail.com 20200414 source: AFRINIC From amelnaud at gmail.com Wed Dec 30 09:04:01 2020 From: amelnaud at gmail.com (Arnaud AMELINA) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 09:04:01 +0000 Subject: [Community-Discuss] Current routing summaries for LiquidWeb, Inc. and Fiber Grid, Inc. In-Reply-To: <1841775408.1944.1608732770454@ichabod.co-bxl> References: <1841775408.1944.1608732770454@ichabod.co-bxl> Message-ID: Hello My mail to you bounced with the following error ====== Address not found Your message did not reach mika.levari at mailfence.com because the address could not be found or could not receive messages. Response from the remote server: 550 Mailbox unavailable ====== I wish we continue this conversation as you could be useful to this community .I did not know that your ?bye bye? means I disappear after... -- Arnaud Le mer. 23 d?c. 2020 ? 14:20, Mika Levari via Community-Discuss < community-discuss at afrinic.net> a ?crit : > Shalom, > I am enjoying this for sometime now. Looks like Afrinic community is > infiltrated by Spamhaus goons like Ronald F. Guilmette > Those who do not know what is spamhaus then read this > https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/29055/spamhaus-tax-evasion-shell-companies-extortion-strategies-blackmail-and-much-much-more > Spamhaus is a highly sophisticated money laundering, hacking and cyber > extortion network. > Spamhaus gang mebers like Ronald F. Guilmette are using social engineering > and same old tactics. > This time they are using Afrinic platform. > One example is https://seclists.org/nanog/2019/Sep/255 > Spamhaus goons started at Nanog and managed to get legal war started > between Elad cohen and Afrinic. > Case has reached Supreme court of Mauritius. All the legal fees are paid > from Afrinic members fee. > Afrinic management will be answerable for all the legal expenses. > Afrinic should ban these goons or they will manage to destroy Afrinic by > triggering series of legal events between Afrinic and its members to > achieve their purpose. > Read all replies from Ronald F. Guilmette and his associates and then > evaluate purpose of their posts. > Everything will be clear. > Bye bye > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nicknora at mailfence.com Wed Dec 30 12:25:26 2020 From: nicknora at mailfence.com (Nick Nora) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:25:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] Notice to all the legacy netblocks holders in AfriNIC Message-ID: <1797752872.186255.1609331126377@ichabod.co-bxl> Elad you are played by Ronald aka Steve Linford. Afrinic community is wisely social engineered and is under heavy influence of Spamhaus.org You need to keep your cool while dealing with Ronald aka Steve Linford. Afrinic has no clue what is going on its mailing lists. All the post of Ronald and his side kick Noah are to attack their enemies. Ronald = Spamhaus = Steve Linford. Steve Linford has picked this platform to attack and destroy his enemies because he has no other way to do it. Those who do not know what is spamhaus.org or Steve linford or Ronald then read further. Steve Linford and Elad Cohen have history and now their spat has reached Afrinic from Nanog. Court case between Netstyle vs Afrinic is result of social engineering and tactics used by Steve linford aka Ronald. Reason why Spamhaus.org or Stephen John Linford will not go to police against its enemies because police looking for him in few countries. Has anyone ever seen Mafia boss going to police station to file complaint? That is why Linford pick these platform to attack his enemies. If anyone think Spamhaus.org is legit then they are naive. Try to reach them and you will not be able to reach. Spamhaus has formed complex structure to launder money via offshore entities to Europe. Request to everyone if Spamhaus.org is attacking your business then find him in France and Spain and use legal ways. Do not do anything illegal or let them provoke you to do mistakes. Steve Linford has many properties in Europe all are bought by money laundering. Start with these two addresses and you will find more connections. Linford Peters Calle del Viol 31 07157 Andratx Illes Balears, Spain 85 Avenue du Rond Point 06480 La Colle-sur-Loup France File police complaint and report his crime to tax and revenue department in Spain and France. In complaint ask tax and revenue department to investigate the source of money Steve Linford used to buy these properties. Steve Linford and his long time partner Geraldine myra peters are compared to Bonnie and Clyde. https://www.companydirectorcheck.com/geraldine-myra-peters He has recently changed spamhaus.org address from Switzerland to Andorra for some reason. Warning: Do not forget that you are dealing with white collar criminal Steve Linford and he is doing this blackmailing and extortion for years so please be careful. Elad now let me address your concerns. Afrinic is not mafia like Spamhaus. Afrinic is answerable to its members and for its action. Question is how resources were given? If you have bought resources and you have proofs then you do not have to worry because without verification resources cannot be transferred. Resource allocation and once resources are allocated then it is very complex to claim them by RIR. Read court cases in Europe and USA for IPv4 resources. Immediately file police complaint and let police investigate if you have done anything illegal. Inform court that you have filed police complaint and let court summon police to submit their investigation report. Only valid agreement between you and Afrinic is signed RSA. Mailing list or spam generated by Steve Linford aka Ronald is of no use. Ask Afrinic to prove your resources bought by you were illegally allocated and if they were illegally allocated then who was responsible. In any case you own and should not be blamed for Afrinic internal issues. You can also demand court damages based on the future value of ipv4 say USD40 per ip in 4 years. Afrinic has around 6 million in their bank account and they have to declare bankrupt if you win case. Ask Afrinic how many people are involved in making decision for any resources allocation bigger than /19. Ipv4 resource allocation is not one person job in Afrinic. You have not robbed Afrinic and not stolen the resources and if they were allocated to you then they are yours. Don't know how many ipv4 resource you have but ask court to check Cloud Innovations Ltd resources and ask Afrinic to explain. I suspect after few years there will another court case between Afrinic and cloud innovations. Without approval from hostmaster to CEO no network bigger than /19 can be allocated. So prove the right thing and you are all set. Everyone thank you for reading and stay safe. From nicknora at mailfence.com Wed Dec 30 12:28:53 2020 From: nicknora at mailfence.com (Nick Nora) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:28:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] Two more stolen/squatted blocks Message-ID: <2035602932.186418.1609331333299@ichabod.co-bxl> Maikel Uerlings your another enemy which you are attacking. I just wrote about Elad have you read this? Elad you are played by Ronald aka Steve Linford. Afrinic community is wisely social engineered and is under influence of Spamhaus.org You need to keep your cool while dealing with Ronald aka Steve Linford. Afrinic has no clue what is going on its mailing lists. All the post of Ronald and his side kick Noah are to attack their enemies. Ronald = Spamhaus = Steve Linford. Steve Linford has picked this platform to attack and destroy his enemies because he has no other way to do it. Those who do not know what is spamhaus.org or steve linford or Ronald then read further. Steve Linford and Elad Cohen have history and now their spat has reached Afrinic from Nanog. Court case between Netstyle vs Afrinic is result of social engineering and tactics used by Steve linford aka Ronald. Reason why Spamhaus.org or Stephen John Linford will not go to police against its enemies because police looking for him in few countries. Has anyone ever seen Mafia boss going to police station to file complaint? That is why Linford pick these platform to attack his enemies. If anyone think Spamhaus.org is legit then they are naive. Try to reach them and you will not be able to reach. Spamhaus has formed complex structure to launder money via offshore entities to Europe. Request to everyone if Spamhaus.org is attacking your business then find him in France and Spain and use legal ways. Do not do anything illegal or let them provoke you to do mistakes. Steve Linford has many properties in Europe all are bought by money laundering. Start with these two addresses and you will find more connections. Linford Peters Calle del Viol 31 07157 Andratx Illes Balears, Spain 85 Avenue du Rond Point 06480 La Colle-sur-Loup France File police complaint and report his crime to tax and revenue department in Spain and France. In complaint ask tax and revenue department to investigate the source of money Steve Linford used to buy these properties. Linford and his long time partner Geraldine myra peters are compared to Bonnie and Clyde. https://www.companydirectorcheck.com/geraldine-myra-peters He has recently changed spamhaus.org address from Switzerland to Andorra for some reason. Warning: Do not forget that you are dealing with white collar criminal Steve Linford and he is doing this blackmailing and extortion for years so please be careful. Elad now let me address your concerns. Afrinic is not mafia like Spamhaus. Afrinic is answerable to its members and for its action. Question is how resources were given? If you have bought resources and you have proofs then you do not have to worry because without verification resources cannot be transferred. Resource allocation process is very complex and read court cases in Europe and USA for IPv4 resources. Immediately file police complaint and let police investigate if you have done anything illegal. Inform court that you have filed police complaint and let court summon police to submit their investigation report. If Afrinic furnish fake documents and if that happen then we will come to know and will intervene. Only valid agreement between you and Afrinic is signed RSA. Mailing list or spam generated by Steve Linford aka Ronald is of no use. Ask Afrinic to prove your resources bought by you were illegally allocated and if they were illegally allocated then who was responsible. In any case you own and should not be blamed for Afrinic internal issues. You can demand court damages based on the future value of ipv4 if you have say /16 you can ask USD40 per ip in 4 years. Afrinic has around 6 million in their bank account and they have to declare bankrupt if you win case. Ask Afrinic how many people are involved in making decision for any resources allocation bigger than /19. You have not robbed Afrinic and not stolen the resources and if they were allocated to you then they are yours. Don't know how many ipv4 resource you have but ask court to check Cloud Innovations Ltd resources and ask Afrinic to explain. I suspect after few years there will another court case between Afrinic and cloud innovations. Without approval from hostmaster to CEO no network bigger than /19 can be allocated. So prove the right thing and you are all set. Everyone thank you for reading and stay safe. From nicknora at mailfence.com Wed Dec 30 12:31:32 2020 From: nicknora at mailfence.com (Nick Nora) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:31:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources Message-ID: <1687260760.186559.1609331492405@ichabod.co-bxl> Afrinic community is used by Spamhaus.org aka Ronald to take down its enemies. Don't be fool by Ronald posts. Anyone has problem please go to police and court. In case if community has missed Elad you are played by Ronald aka Steve Linford. Afrinic community is wisely social engineered and is under influence of Spamhaus.org You need to keep your cool while dealing with Ronald aka Steve Linford. Afrinic has no clue what is going on its mailing lists. All the post of Ronald and his side kick Noah are to attack their enemies. Ronald = Spamhaus = Steve Linford. Steve Linford has picked this platform to attack and destroy his enemies because he has no other way to do it. Those who do not know what is spamhaus.org or steve linford or Ronald then read further. Steve Linford and Elad Cohen have history and now their spat has reached Afrinic from Nanog. Court case between Netstyle vs Afrinic is result of social engineering and tactics used by Steve linford aka Ronald. Reason why Spamhaus.org or Stephen John Linford will not go to police against its enemies because police looking for him in few countries. Has anyone ever seen Mafia boss going to police station to file complaint? That is why Linford pick these platform to attack his enemies. If anyone think Spamhaus.org is legit then they are naive. Try to reach them and you will not be able to reach. Spamhaus has formed complex structure to launder money via offshore entities to Europe. Request to everyone if Spamhaus.org is attacking your business then find him in France and Spain and use legal ways. Do not do anything illegal or let them provoke you to do mistakes. Steve Linford has many properties in Europe all are bought by money laundering. Start with these two addresses and you will find more connections. Linford Peters Calle del Viol 31 07157 Andratx Illes Balears, Spain 85 Avenue du Rond Point 06480 La Colle-sur-Loup France File police complaint and report his crime to tax and revenue department in Spain and France. In complaint ask tax and revenue department to investigate the source of money Steve Linford used to buy these properties. Linford and his long time partner Geraldine myra peters are compared to Bonnie and Clyde. https://www.companydirectorcheck.com/geraldine-myra-peters He has recently changed spamhaus.org address from Switzerland to Andorra for some reason. Warning: Do not forget that you are dealing with white collar criminal Steve Linford and he is doing this blackmailing and extortion for years so please be careful. Elad now let me address your concerns. Afrinic is not mafia like Spamhaus. Afrinic is answerable to its members and for its action. Question is how resources were given? If you have bought resources and you have proofs then you do not have to worry because without verification resources cannot be transferred. Resource allocation process is very complex and read court cases in Europe and USA for IPv4 resources. Immediately file police complaint and let police investigate if you have done anything illegal. Inform court that you have filed police complaint and let court summon police to submit their investigation report. If Afrinic furnish fake documents and if that happen then we will come to know and will intervene. Only valid agreement between you and Afrinic is signed RSA. Mailing list or spam generated by Steve Linford aka Ronald is of no use. Ask Afrinic to prove your resources bought by you were illegally allocated and if they were illegally allocated then who was responsible. In any case you own and should not be blamed for Afrinic internal issues. You can demand court damages based on the future value of ipv4 if you have say /16 you can ask USD40 per ip in 4 years. Afrinic has around 6 million in their bank account and they have to declare bankrupt if you win case. Ask Afrinic how many people are involved in making decision for any resources allocation bigger than /19. You have not robbed Afrinic and not stolen the resources and if they were allocated to you then they are yours. Don't know how many ipv4 resource you have but ask court to check Cloud Innovations Ltd resources and ask Afrinic to explain. I suspect after few years there will another court case between Afrinic and cloud innovations. Without approval from hostmaster to CEO no network bigger than /19 can be allocated. So prove the right thing and you are all set. Everyone thank you for reading and stay safe. From nicknora at mailfence.com Wed Dec 30 12:35:27 2020 From: nicknora at mailfence.com (Nick Nora) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:35:27 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Community-Discuss] More stolen AFRINIC legacy blocks Message-ID: <2034641377.186727.1609331727412@ichabod.co-bxl> Why don't you report this to police and hire lawyer to prove theft can be done in Afrinic? Noah and you are social engineering and trying to kill your competitors. But do not use public platform to attack your enemies and defame Afrinic. Have you read this Elad you are played by Ronald aka Steve Linford. Afrinic community is wisely social engineered and is under influence of Spamhaus.org You need to keep your cool while dealing with Ronald aka Steve Linford. Afrinic has no clue what is going on its mailing lists. All the post of Ronald and his side kick Noah are to attack their enemies. Ronald = Spamhaus = Steve Linford. Steve Linford has picked this platform to attack and destroy his enemies because he has no other way to do it. Those who do not know what is spamhaus.org or steve linford or Ronald then read further. Steve Linford and Elad Cohen have history and now their spat has reached Afrinic from Nanog. Court case between Netstyle vs Afrinic is result of social engineering and tactics used by Steve linford aka Ronald. Reason why Spamhaus.org or Stephen John Linford will not go to police against its enemies because police looking for him in few countries. Has anyone ever seen Mafia boss going to police station to file complaint? That is why Linford pick these platform to attack his enemies. If anyone think Spamhaus.org is legit then they are naive. Try to reach them and you will not be able to reach. Spamhaus has formed complex structure to launder money via offshore entities to Europe. Request to everyone if Spamhaus.org is attacking your business then find him in France and Spain and use legal ways. Do not do anything illegal or let them provoke you to do mistakes. Steve Linford has many properties in Europe all are bought by money laundering. Start with these two addresses and you will find more connections. Linford Peters Calle del Viol 31 07157 Andratx Illes Balears, Spain 85 Avenue du Rond Point 06480 La Colle-sur-Loup France File police complaint and report his crime to tax and revenue department in Spain and France. In complaint ask tax and revenue department to investigate the source of money Steve Linford used to buy these properties. Linford and his long time partner Geraldine myra peters are compared to Bonnie and Clyde. https://www.companydirectorcheck.com/geraldine-myra-peters He has recently changed spamhaus.org address from Switzerland to Andorra for some reason. Warning: Do not forget that you are dealing with white collar criminal Steve Linford and he is doing this blackmailing and extortion for years so please be careful. Elad now let me address your concerns. Afrinic is not mafia like Spamhaus. Afrinic is answerable to its members and for its action. Question is how resources were given? If you have bought resources and you have proofs then you do not have to worry because without verification resources cannot be transferred. Resource allocation process is very complex and read court cases in Europe and USA for IPv4 resources. Immediately file police complaint and let police investigate if you have done anything illegal. Inform court that you have filed police complaint and let court summon police to submit their investigation report. If Afrinic furnish fake documents and if that happen then we will come to know and will intervene. Only valid agreement between you and Afrinic is signed RSA. Mailing list or spam generated by Steve Linford aka Ronald is of no use. Ask Afrinic to prove your resources bought by you were illegally allocated and if they were illegally allocated then who was responsible. In any case you own and should not be blamed for Afrinic internal issues. You can demand court damages based on the future value of ipv4 if you have say /16 you can ask USD40 per ip in 4 years. Afrinic has around 6 million in their bank account and they have to declare bankrupt if you win case. Ask Afrinic how many people are involved in making decision for any resources allocation bigger than /19. You have not robbed Afrinic and not stolen the resources and if they were allocated to you then they are yours. Don't know how many ipv4 resource you have but ask court to check Cloud Innovations Ltd resources and ask Afrinic to explain. I suspect after few years there will another court case between Afrinic and cloud innovations. Without approval from hostmaster to CEO no network bigger than /19 can be allocated. So prove the right thing and you are all set. Everyone thank you for reading and stay safe. From noah at neo.co.tz Thu Dec 31 15:56:02 2020 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:56:02 +0300 Subject: [Community-Discuss] [afnog] Updates on the misappropriation of IPv4 resources In-Reply-To: <58819.1608870780@segfault.tristatelogic.com> References: <58819.1608870780@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Message-ID: Hey Ronald, On Fri, 25 Dec 2020, 07:38 Ronald F. Guilmette, wrote: > > (I only wish that SEACOM has been equally as observant in the early part > of this year, and that it had likewise taken appropriate action, in the > first months of 2020, to disconnect This has since been resolved from the AS37100 stand point dude. That bogon was cleared off any AS path related to AS37100. If that bogon ASN still continues to be routed by another AS then that is beyond the scope of our domain. The heck with 2020 already. Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ronrobarionet at protonmail.com Thu Dec 31 20:52:53 2020 From: ronrobarionet at protonmail.com (Ron) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 20:52:53 +0000 Subject: [Community-Discuss] How Afrinic, community and members can protect their business from Spamhaus.org ? Message-ID: Noticed Spamhaus is spreading like cancer in Afrinic. Spamhaus has done lot of damages to Afrinic members https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings/AFRINIC Over 99.9% content of this page is fake like Spamhaus.org All those who are suffering and have proofs of Spamhaus activities then you have these options available. 1. Register police complaint with your local police station with all the proofs. Ask police to forward this to France and Spain police department. Complaint will be sent via Interpol to French and Spanish police. You can learn process here https://www.interpol.int/en/What-you-can-do/If-you-need-help let local police arrest owners of Spamhaus. If there are multiple police complaints then owners will be on Interpol wanted list. 2. Spamhaus hosting its server in Amsterdam with Surfnet. As per EU directive (Article 14) Surfnet is responsible for all the content hosted by them. Under Dutch law Surfnet is obliged to shutdown the Spamhaus.org or they are violating the Dutch and EU directive. Surfnet can be sued for financial damages too. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32000L0031&rid=5 3. Start litigation against Spamhaus in USA. Demand financial damages from Spamhaus. You may demand financial damages in millions and request to confiscate the domain name spamhaus.org Refer other lawsuits in USA against Spamhaus.org in USA to the Judge. As owner of Spamhaus is under contempt of court so they will never visit USA and most likely case will not be contested by Spamhaus. If contested then Spamhaus owners are done for good. Option 3 is the best and most effective.