[Community-Discuss] Table of changes: AFRINIC Bylaw review
Noah
noah at neo.co.tz
Wed Aug 19 21:53:04 UTC 2020
Hi Ubah
Before I could read further, I ran into the below statement in quotes.
"AFRINIC is just a book-keeper and shall not be involved in policy-related
matters by requiring Resource Members to justify their needs to AFRINIC.
Also, this shall not appear in Bylaws - how resources are distributed shall
be decided by Policy approved by community discussion.".
I disagree categorically with the above rationale and it's not new because
we as a community have in the past had similar arguments of how AfriNIC is
somehow a book keeper from a certain member of the community which goes to
undermine AfriNICs role in the Internet ecosystem.
Noah
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, 23:06 Anthony Ubah, <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> These few days I have discussed with some of my professors and colleagues,
> who are also members of this community regarding the Bylaw review. I
> pondered how the ByLaw could be edited in a manner that allows community
> opinion to be presented in an even better way.
>
> Thus, I have a few inputs;
>
>
>
>
>
> *Existing Provisions*
>
>
>
>
>
> *Proposed Amendments*
>
>
>
> *Rationale for Amendments*
>
>
>
> *6.1*
>
> Membership shall be open to:
>
>
>
> (i) any Person who is geographically based within, and providing services
> in the African region, and who is engaged in the use of, or business of
> providing, open system protocol network services; or
>
>
>
> (ii) any other Person who is approved by the Board or the members.
>
>
>
>
>
> To amend *Article 6.1*
>
> *(i)* so that it may be read as follows:
>
>
>
> Membership shall be open to *any corporate which complies with Internet
> Resources Policy approved by AFRINIC community*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The term “person” shall be amended into “corporate” because most of the
> current membership holders are corporate instead of “persons”.
>
>
>
> Membership shall be open to any corporate which comply with Internet
> Resources Policy approved by AFRINIC community instead of setting
> geographical criteria as community discussion is what matters the most here.
>
> *6.4*
>
> Resource Member - A legal entity (local Internet registry or end-site)
> shall be deemed to be a Resource Member of AFRINIC after it has completed
> the following formalities cumulatively:
>
> (i) justified its need for the right to use Internet Number Resources to
> AFRINIC
>
> (ii) signed AFRINIC’s Registration Service Agreement; and
>
> (iii) paid the relevant setup membership fees related to Internet Number
> Resources allocated/assigned to it by AFRINIC Registration Service.
>
>
>
>
> To amend *Article 6.4 *by deleting the provisions under (i), so that
> Article 6.4 reads as follows:
>
>
>
> *Resource Member – A legal entity (local internet registry or end-site)
> shall be deemed to be a Resource Member of AFRINIC after it has completed
> the following formalities cumulatively:*
>
> *(i) signed AFRINIC’s Registration Service Agreement*
>
> *(ii) paid the relevant setup and membership fees related to Internet
> Number Resources allocated/assigned to it by AFRINIC Registration Service.*
>
>
>
>
>
> AFRINIC is just a book-keeper and shall not be involved in policy-related
> matters by requiring Resource Members to justify their needs to AFRINIC.
> Also, this shall not appear in Bylaws - how resources are distributed shall
> be decided by Policy approved by community discussion.
>
> *Existing Provisions*
>
> *Proposed Amendments*
>
> *Rationale for Amendments*
>
>
>
> *8.2** (ii)*
>
> The membership of a Resource Member shall terminate upon:
>
>
>
> (ii) the Board, acting reasonably and in good faith, determining that the
> Resource Member has ceased to satisfy criteria for admission to membership
> of the Company or ceased to comply with Number Resources Management
> Policies;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be amended to read as follows:
>
>
>
> (ii) *the Internet Resources Policy as approved by the AFRINIC community*,
> determining that the Resource Members has ceased to satisfy criteria for
> admission to membership of the Company or ceased to comply with Number
> Resources Management Policies;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This shall be decided by Internet Resources Policy approved by AFRINIC
> community instead of the Board. The Board shall not be involved in Internet
> Resources Policy-related matters.
>
>
>
> *8.2**(iii)*
>
> (iii) the Board, acting reasonably and in good faith, determining that the
> Resource Member has refused or failed to comply with the provisions of this
> Constitution or any applicable rule made by the Board;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Propose to be deleted.
>
>
>
>
>
> This is against the spirit of the community because it leaves a
> possibility of the Board abusing its power. There is no general test or
> safeguard to determine whether the Board is “acting reasonably and in good
> faith” and it allows the Board to make such determination on an arbitrary
> basis.
>
>
>
> *Existing Provisions*
>
> *Proposed Amendments*
>
> *Rationale for Amendments*
>
>
>
> *8.2**(v)*
>
> such other event or such other grounds as the Board, acting reasonably and
> in good faith, shall determine from time to time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be deleted.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The original wordings of “such other event or such other grounds” is too
> vague and can technically be exercised on an arbitrary basis by the Board
> and may thus lead to the Board abusing its power.
>
>
>
> Moreover, There is no general test or safeguard to determine whether the
> Board is “acting reasonably and in good faith”.
>
>
>
> Worst of all, the Board is allowed to make such determination at any time
> it desires.
>
>
>
>
>
> *8.3**(iii)*
>
> the Board, acting reasonably and in good faith, determining that the
> Associate Member has ceased to satisfy criteria for admission to Associate
> membership of the Company;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To amend Article 8.3(iii) so that it may be read as follows:
>
>
>
> *the Internet Resources Policy as approved by the AFRINIC community*,
> determining that the Associate Member has ceased to satisfy criteria for
> admission to Associate membership of the Company;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is against the spirit of the community because it leaves a
> possibility of the Board abusing its power. There is no general test or
> safeguard to determine whether the Board is “acting reasonably and in good
> faith” and it allows the Board to make such determination on an arbitrary
> basis.
>
>
>
> *Existing Provisions*
>
> *Proposed Amendments*
>
> *Rationale for Amendments*
>
>
>
> *8.3**(iv)*
>
> the Board, acting reasonably and in good faith, determining that the
> Associate Member has refused or failed to comply with the provisions of
> this Constitution or any applicable rule made by the Board;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be deleted.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is against the spirit of the community because it leaves a
> possibility of the Board abusing its power. There is no general test or
> safeguard to determine whether the Board is “acting reasonably and in good
> faith” and it allows the Board to make such determination on an arbitrary
> basis.
>
>
>
> *8.3**(vi)*
>
> such other event or such other grounds as the Board, acting reasonably and
> in good faith, shall determine from time to time
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be deleted.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The original wordings of “such other event or such other grounds” is too
> vague and can technically be exercised on an arbitrary basis by the Board
> and may thus lead to the Board abusing its power.
>
>
>
> Moreover, There is no general test or safeguard to determine whether the
> Board is “acting reasonably and in good faith”.
>
>
>
> Worst of all, the Board is allowed to make such determination at any time
> it desires.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Existing Provisions*
>
> *Proposed Amendments*
>
> *Rationale for Amendments*
>
>
>
> *8.4*
>
> Termination shall not relieve a member from any obligation to pay any fees
> payable to the Company on or before the date of termination and shall not
> entitle the Resource and Associate Member to any refund of any fees,
> whether in whole or in part.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be amended so that it reads as follows:
>
>
>
> Termination shall not relieve a member from any obligation to pay any fees
> payable to the Company on or before the date of termination and shall not
> entitle the Resource and Associate Member to any refund of any fees,
> whether in whole or in part, *whilst subjected to the condition that
> unless the termination of membership is due to circumstances not caused by
> the Resource or Associate Member then the Resource or Associate Member
> shall be entitled to, without further challenge from the Company, refund,
> whether in whole or in part, in accordance to the circumstances of each
> case.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The circumstances for the termination of membership are very vague and
> unclear.
>
>
>
> It assumes that even if the incident which leads to the termination is not
> caused by the fault/role of the Resource/Associate Member, the innocent
> Resource/Associate Member will still not be entitled to any refunds. This
> is not addressed in the original wordings of the provision and is
> one-sidedly in favor of the Company only.
>
> *Existing Provisions*
>
> *Proposed Amendments*
>
> *Rationale for Amendments*
>
>
>
> *8.5*
>
> The Resource Member shall, on termination of its membership, return the
> resources allocated to it by the Company.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be amended as follows:
>
>
>
> The Resource Member shall, on termination of its membership, return the
> resources allocated to it by the Company, *unless such resources is
> already allocated or in usage then such resources need not be returned to
> the Company despite the termination of the Resource Member’s membership.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To avoid disruption to end-user.
>
>
>
> *11.4*
>
> Notwithstanding, the provisions of Article 11.3 the Board may adopt such
> policies regarding the management of internet number resources where it
> considers that the same is necessary and urgent, having regard to the
> proper and responsible usage of these resources.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be amended to read as follows:
>
>
>
> Notwithstanding, the provisions of Article 11.3* but subject to Article
> 11.5,* the Board may adopt such policies regarding the management of
> internet number resources where it considers that the same is necessary and
> urgent, having regard to the proper and responsible usage of these
> resources.
>
>
>
>
>
> To ensure that Article 11.4 is not read in isolation and instead to be
> read in conjunction of other provisions of Article 11. In other words, to
> ensure that Article 11 is read and construed in its entirety, i.e. as a
> whole.
>
> *Existing Provisions*
>
> *Proposed Amendments*
>
> *Rationale for Amendments*
>
>
>
> *11.5(ii)*
>
> Endorsement of policy adopted by the Board:
>
>
>
> (ii) In the event that such a policy submitted by the Board is not
> endorsed, the said policy shall not be enforced or implemented following
> its non-endorsement; however, any action taken in terms of the policy prior
> to such non-endorsement shall remain valid.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be amended so as to read as follows:
>
>
>
> (ii) In the event that such a policy submitted by the Board is not
> endorsed *or there is lack of response from the community*, the said
> policy shall not be enforced or implemented following its non-endorsement; *however,
> any action taken in terms of the policy prior to such non-endorsement shall
> remain valid.*
>
>
>
> **bold stroked words = to be deleted
>
>
>
>
>
> If the community does not endorse such policies made under Article 11.4
> then it shall not be further implemented even in the absence of any
> response from the community.
>
>
>
> For the Board to proceed endorsing policies before obtaining the
> community’s endorsement for the time being would be equivalent to the Board
> implementing policies arbitrarily until it is rejected otherwise by the
> community. This may potentially also lead to an abuse of power from the
> Board.
>
>
>
>
>
> *12.4*
>
> Any accidental omission to give notice of an Annual General Members’
> Meeting called under Article 11.1 to, or the failure to receive notice of
> an Annual General Members’ Meeting called under Article 11.1 by a Member or
> any other Person entitled to receive notice shall not invalidate the
> proceedings at that Meeting.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To be amended so as to read as follows:
>
>
>
> Any accidental omission to give notice of an Annual General Members’
> Meeting called under Article 11.1 to, or the failure to receive notice of
> an Annual General Members’ Meeting called under Article 11.1 by a Member or
> any other Person entitled to receive notice shall not invalidate the
> proceedings at that Meeting, *provided that such accidental omission to
> give notice or the failure to receive the notice shall not be due to the
> fault of the Board.*
>
>
>
> This is a very one-sided disclaimer from the Company.
>
>
>
> If the Board’s accidental omission to give notice or a Member’s failure to
> receive notice is due to the fault caused by the Board then the Board shall
> take responsibility for its own mistake by invalidating the Meeting.
>
>
>
> Moreover, such an accidental omission to give notice to the relevant
> Members can also be used as an excuse for the Board’s personal agenda
> whereby the Board may pick and choose which Members are to be notified with
> the Board not subjected to any consequences. This could potentially lead to
> abuse of power exercised in a subtle manner from the Board.
> <td width="1
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20200820/c9c628b2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Community-Discuss
mailing list