[Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Resolution requesting the boards resignation
Saul Stein
saul at enetworks.co.za
Mon Apr 23 07:37:51 UTC 2018
I think that this raises and answers other questions.
The board hides behind “redacted” minutes of meetings. Minutes should be
able to be published within a week. With nothing to hide, there should not
be a problem. The wonderful thing about a fact is that it is just that: the
truth and it will always be that and one doesn’t need to remember different
stories!
The way board members vote is important to know. They are representing us,
the voters, the community. They need to know that they are beholden to us. I
elect a board member based on what he stands for, if he no longer does that
after his election, he/she needs to know that I’ll be beating on his door
and he won’t be getting my vote again!
A vote of no confidence was tabled and accepted. It has now been rejected. I
am not going to repeat the words of others, I agree with all that has been
said, but to add, we deserve the right to know who voted how to remove this
item from the agenda.
I think that is why we don’t have a choice and sufficient candidates to
elect.
No-one worth voting for is prepared to tarnish their name by association
with the current board. (this is not hearsay, I have heard that there are
those that are prepared to stand on a clean board)
Saul
Saul
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com]
Sent: 22 April 2018 07:33 PM
To: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
Cc: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss at afrinic.net>; AFRINIC
Board of Directors' List <board at afrinic.net>; members-discuss at afrinic.net
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Resolution requesting the
boards resignation
+1
I must condemn this action by the AfriNIC board in the strongest possible
terms.
Choosing to sweep aside the community’s desire to hold a vote by resolution,
offering to discuss at open mic as if it were a viable alternative is as
insulting to the community as it is inappropriate for the board.
I urge the board to reconsider this action and restore the resolution to the
agenda.
The board has now placed itself in a lose-lose position with regard to this
matter.
If they refuse to restore the item to the agenda, both the AfriNIC community
and global observers can only assume that the board is cowering in fear
because they know such a vote would pass, thus the board has lost the
confidence of the membership and should resign.
If they restore the item to the agenda, this action will surely have
encouraged some who may have previously planned on voting against it to
change their minds, making the vote even more likely to pass.
Nonetheless, since the board has, in all likelihood lost the confidence of
the membership, the board should either permit the vote to proceed as
planned and act in accordance with the outcome, or, the board should begin
planning for a special election which will replace the entire board as soon
as practicable.
Cowering behind procedure in an effort to limit the ability of the
membership to manage the bottom up process within the organization is
contrary to the spirit and intent of virtually every document in existence
related to the creation, operation, and purpose of an RIR.
While documents such as ICP-2 did not consider the prospect of an RIR acting
in bad faith or the need to de-certify an RIR, and while as I understand it,
the NRO documents virtually all require the unanimity of all member RIRs in
order to act, I believe the following are true:
1. The current election cycle may well be tainted.
2. The next election cycle the membership will almost
certainly insist on each board
position having at least one candidate who is not
affiliated with the current board.
3. The following election cycle will likely be the same.
So the board can, by this action, effectively hang on to power for 2 more
years, but that’s about all it can accomplish.
Now, on the current path, perhaps the board can completely destroy the
organization within that time, but let’s all hope it doesn’t come to that.
Again, for the sake of the entire RIR system, I urge the board to either
allow this resolution to be noticed and considered by the AfriNIC members at
the AGMM, or, to put in place an orderly process for election of replacement
directors at the earliest practical time and immediately tender their
resignations to be effective upon the completion of such election.
While I’m not a member of AfriNIC, the potential consequences if the AfriNIC
board fails to allow this resolution to proceed stretch well beyond the
AfriNIC service region and therefore cannot be ignored by the global
community.
Owen
On Apr 22, 2018, at 09:50 , Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl
<mailto:sander at steffann.nl> > wrote:
Hello,
Dear Mark,
The Board at a special meeting held on the 18th of April 2018 had the
opportunity to reconsider your request to include a standard resolution in
the upcoming AGMM agenda. The Board has decided not to include it in the
agenda inline with section 12.14(ix) of the bylaw.
When I first read this my response was WTF. Since then my wording has only
gotten stronger so I will not write it on this list.
However, the Board suggests that the item can be discussed during the Open
Mic session should members be interested.
This is no substitution for a vote...
I am not a member of afrinic, so I have no vote in this. But as a member of
the global internet community I am appalled by the behaviour of our sister
RIR. A board that uses a top-down attitude to silence bottom-up complaints
from its constituency has no place in this community.
Cheers,
Sander
_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
<mailto:Community-Discuss at afrinic.net> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
<https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss>
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20180423/07ee04cb/attachment.html>
More information about the Community-Discuss
mailing list