[Community-Discuss] Controversial anti-shutdown policy discussed at RIPE

[Noah]

Mmmm on the contrary seems like most folk on the floor disagreed with the
contraversial policy and its approach no matter how much the Arthors seek
for better ways to improve it.

Some suggested multistake holder engagement and in particular Leslie Daigle
comments on the floor are worth taking into serious considerations by the
way.

The best comment in my opinion was from the Alan Durand who reminded
everyone what the real core mission of the RIR community is,  and that
is....

"To allocate resources and maintain the accuracy of the database".PERIOD.
[1]

Noah

[1]I have had in the past folk state statements like "How some ome runs his
network is none of anyones business and in that matter policing the network
is none of AFRINICs business"

On 10 May 2017 10:39 a.m., "Andrew Alston" <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Marcus,
>
> Just some feedback for the community.
>
> It's been a great experience here at RIPE and some of the ideas given and
> the extensive discussions following the presentation referred to by Marcus
> have been both useful and informative.
>
> Draft 2 will be submitted shortly very much in line with what I presented
> in that presentation - and before the 7 day deadline as per the PDP so we
> can discuss on that basis.
>
> Following the meeting in Nairobi, I suspect we will then be gathering
> still further input and further drafts will follow, if there is no
> consensus found on the floor for the draft 2 that will be submitted.
>
> I think for myself, the most important thing I have seen at RIPE so far,
> is the huge willingness by people from every walk of life to engage in
> dialog and discussion over this, and it was heartening to see both my own
> positions and the positions of those I was discussing with shift as
> explanations were given and questions were asked and answered.  Since
> giving that presentation I have barely had a minute to think as people
> approached me to talk this through - and I really hope to see such
> engagement in Nairobi, because it truly showed the benefit of a multi
> stakeholder approach where open dialog and communication can happen, even
> in the absence of agreement and in the face of controversial material where
> people hold strong and emotive views.
>
> I look forward to the discussions on the floor of the PDP and engaging
> with all of you to hear your thoughts and views and finding the right
> solution to the issue.
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Marcus K. G. Adomey <madomey at hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 9, 2017 11:48:42 PM
> *To:* rpd at afrinic.net; community-discuss at afrinic.net
> *Subject:* [Community-Discuss] Controversial anti-shutdown policy
> discussed at RIPE
>
>
> Dear Colleagues.
>
> You might want to see the presentation of the controversial draft
> anti-shutdown policy (AFPUB-2017-GEN-001-DRAFT-01) at a recent RIPE
> meeting.  I found the questions/comments from the RIPE community similar to
> that shared by many on the RPD, mostly about the inappropriateness of such
> policy in our region… or any other for that matter.  Enjoy watching it.
>
> https://ripe74.ripe.net/archives/video/41/
> <https://ripe74.ripe.net/archives/video/41/>
> Archives – RIPE 74 <https://ripe74.ripe.net/archives/video/41/>
> ripe74.ripe.net
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Marcus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20170510/36f11630/attachment.html>