[Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - quorum

Frank Habicht geier at geier.ne.tz
Fri Sep 30 16:39:19 UTC 2016


On 9/30/2016 5:29 PM, Omo Oaiya wrote:
> As you have repeated but that is by the way.  What is clear is that
> electronic voting has solved the issue with proxies so we don’t need
> them. If the companies act is restrictive and does not support better
> accountability, proxies can be limited to one per member to balance
> things out.  

If you don't need them, the best would be that you don't use them.
That's not a good reason to take rights away from other (resource) members.

If 15 (resource) members want to assign the same person as a proxy, it
is a) their right and b) not your right to deny them this.

But I too am not a lawyer.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20160930/c90b1fd7/attachment.sig>

More information about the Community-Discuss mailing list