[Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

[Arnaud AMELINA]

It appears to me that such a committee requires certain expertise and
skills just like board. For the board, the bylaws has some criteria and
allow nomcom to add others.
And if there is no requirement, on what basis will nomcom  evaluate the
candidates? How will community comment on candidates during the public
comment?
Or if there is no evaluation and  members decide by mere vote,  what is the
role  of nomcom?

Regards

Arnaud

2016-10-04 3:56 GMT+00:00 Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net>:

>
> > On 3 Oct 2016, at 22:48, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi CEO, nomcom chair,
> >
> > We are reading the GC call for nominations and see a procedure for
> elections. There is however no requirements, criteria or experience stated
> which is surprising as this is to do with a governance committee. Any
> reason for this?
>
> I’ll let NomCom answer that, if they choose to, but let me ask you: Why do
> you think that NomCom should impose criteria?  Do you think that the
> membership is not capable of making their own decisions about how to vote?
>
> > Furthermore  and once again, why are COE members not allowed to join GC,
> why COE could not appoint a nominee to GC or for that matter why COE not
> used for the GC.
>
> COE members are eligible to be elected to the Governance Committee by the
> AFRINIC Membership.  They are not eligible to be appointed to the
> Governance Committee by the Board.
>
> Alan Barrett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20161004/81a599e7/attachment.html>