[Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Nov 14 14:47:07 UTC 2016


I disagree. If a conflicted member has fully disclosed the conflict to the board, I believe they are capable of weighing this properly in considering his argument. Let us respect the board that we have elected and not treat them like children here. 

Owen


> On Nov 12, 2016, at 21:50, Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alan 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> My main goal in the current round of Bylaws changes is to make it very difficult for AFRINIC to be captured by a minority interest.  The proposed limits of two Directors per organisation and two Directors per sub-region are more than sufficient to ensure that no one organisation or one sub-region has the majority of votes in the Board.
> 
> Definitions are very important and I think definition of “minority interest” is very important.  Capture is not only organizational or even regional, we have seen other sorts of capture around a number of entities our entity not excluded, so its vital that we find a solution that cuts across.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Alan Barrett
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss




More information about the Community-Discuss mailing list