[Community-Discuss] Resolution 201604.274 about Set-Up fees

Jackson Muthili jacksonmuthi at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 07:16:42 UTC 2016


On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Marcus K. G. Adomey
<madomey at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear CEO,
>
> Why have you singled me out

If he has singled you out then its indeed selective persecution...

> when some are notoriously impolite on this list?

... you need to guide him and point him to those others with specific
references. Especially the notorious ones.

> This is unfair to me.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>> From: alan.barrett at afrinic.net
>> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:38:17 +0400
>> To: community-discuss at afrinic.net
>> CC: members-discuss at afrinic.net
>> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] Resolution 201604.274 about Set-Up fees
>>
>> Marcus,
>>
>> Please conduct yourself politely. Messages such as the one quoted below
>> have no place on AFRINIC mailing lists.
>>
>> Alan Barrett
>>
>> > On 14 Jul 2016, at 21:08, Marcus K. G. Adomey <madomey at hotmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Owen,
>> >
>> > I am happy to know that you are the PR or/and the lawyer of the board.
>> > Based on your sentence <"I will provide you the answers that I have seen on
>> > this list and in the AFS which I think are quite adequate:">, the following
>> > points are in order for your meditation.
>> >
>> > A series of questions has been asked in a coherent manner. You are
>> > claiming that the questions have been answered in this mailing list. What
>> > you have attempted to do is to put together the piecemeal statements made by
>> > the chair in his various emails, extracting sense out of them to answer the
>> > questions I asked. A very good exercise of the "new PR/lawyer" of the chair
>> > of the board (LOL). Do you want to tell me that it is coherent,
>> > professional, pedagogically and andragogically, and responsible (name them)
>> > from our chair to answer specific set questions in piecemeal?
>> >
>> > I have read and analyze thoroughly your email. In fact, the best I can
>> > say about it is it is a very good piece to show empty verbiage case. The
>> > questions I asked were straight forward questions which answers should be
>> > factual and in case there is not fact, with humility acknowledge it. Again
>> > you are turned yourself into the "new PR/lawyer" of the chair of the board
>> > shielding him to be accountable. Your empty verbiage has not answered the
>> > questions. We want to hear from the horse's mouth.
>> >
>> > Cheers!!!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Marcus
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>



More information about the Community-Discuss mailing list