[Community-Discuss] IANA Numbering Services Review Committee appointment

[Africhosting.com]

On 06.11.2015 11:23, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> My +1 to option A. I also agree with the CEO appointing the staff
> member.
> 
> Regards
> 
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Alan Barrett
> <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> wrote:
> 
>> Dear AFRINIC Community,
>> 
>> As part of the ongoing IANA oversight transition, the CRISP Team
>> proposed that the RIRs should set up a Review Committee to review
>> the performance of the IANA Numbering Services Operator.
>> 
>> See
>> 
> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Review-Committee-Charter_FINALclean.pdf
>> [1] for the charter of the IANA Numbering Services Review Committee.
>> 
>> Note that each of the five RIRs will need to appoint three members
>> of the Review Committee.  Here are some relevant sections from the
>> Charter:
>> 
>>> 4. The Review Committee will comprise 15 members, constituted by:
>>> 
>>> (a)  two community appointees from each RIR region (who must not
>> be RIR staff); and
>>> 
>>> (b)  one RIR staff from the region (who will be a non-voting
>> member).
>>> 
>>> 5. Each RIR shall appoint its Review Committee members by a
>> method of its own choosing.
>>> 
>>> 6. Each RIR shall determine the term of appointment for its
>> Review Committee members.
>> 
>> Now we need to figure out a procedure for AFRINIC to appoint the
>> two community members and one staff member.
>> 
>> For the RIR staff member appointed to the Review Committee:  I
>> propose that the CEO should appoint a staff member.
>> 
>> For the two community appointees, the following ideas come readily
>> to mind:
>> 
>> A: The same two community members who are already elected to the
>> NRO-NC/ASO-AC should automatically be appointed to the IANA
>> Numbering Services Review Committee, in such a way that the same
>> people always serve both roles.
>> 
>> B: We could have another election process, almost identical to the
>> election process for the community representatives on the
>> NRO-NC/ASO-AC, but with separate candidates and separate votes. 
>> (Representatives are elected to staggered three-year terms.)
>> 
>> C: We could do something different.
>> 
>> In the interests of simplicity, I suggest that we choose option A,
>> with the same people automatically serving on both the NRO-NC/ASO-AC
>> and the IANA Numbering Services Review Committee.
>> 
>> This should be a community decision, so I invite discussion.  Note
>> that any decision we make now can be changed in the future.
>> 
>> Alan Barrett
>> CEO, AFRINIC
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss [2]
> 
> --
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>> Seun Ojedeji,
>> Federal University Oye-Ekiti
>> web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng [3]
>> Mobile: +2348035233535
>> _alt email: [4]seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng_
>> 
>>> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your
>>> action!
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Review-Committee-Charter_FINALclean.pdf
> [2] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
> [3] http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
> [4] http://goog_1872880453
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
Hello,

I share your point of views, I suggest that we choose option A.

Best regards,


-- 
M. Ibra Sylla
CEO
Tel: +221 70 651 33 34
Tel: +221 77 161 38 76
Email: ibra at africhosting.com
Site web:www.africhosting.com
Facebook

Dakar SENEGAL