<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><br>NAT64 is one way of gradually deploy IPv6 alongside with the traditional IPv4 <br><br>at least as per Cisco work arounds...<br> <br>
<br>
<em><font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#1f497d">Arbogast Fabian,</font></em><br>
<em><font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#1f497d">cell:+255-78-447-8387</font></em><br><br><br><div>> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:02:28 +0400<br>> From: daniel@afrinic.net<br>> To: afripv6-discuss@afrinic.net<br>> Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!<br>> <br>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:05:44AM +0300, Fabian Jr wrote:<br>> > Hi Mussa,<br>> > <br>> > thanks for your quick responce on this...<br>> > <br>> > im not sure if my upstream providers are dual Stacked... i will check with them..<br>> <br>> If not, you can tunnel out. This is not ideal and does have some<br>> downsides, but it's workable as a transition phase.<br>> <br>> > <br>> > we have two links talking via BGP.......<br>> <br>> > we also have our own IP subnets both IPv4 and IPv6 ..... so we<br>> > provider independent on IP resources ... we would love to continue to<br>> > be independent ..... may be we may need to acquire a new<br>> > hardware........<br>> <br>> I doubt it. You really want to avoid NAT64 - and so far you have not<br>> given any good reason you would need it :)<br>> <br>> <br>> - Daniel<br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list<br>> AfrIPv6-Discuss@afrinic.net<br>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss<br></div> </div></body>
</html>