From bakajika at yahoo.fr Sun Feb 18 00:04:44 2018 From: bakajika at yahoo.fr (Laborde De) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 03:04:44 +0300 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?=E2=9C=88The_world=27s_travel_search_?= =?utf-8?q?engine_Skyscanner_compares_millions_of_flights_to_find_y?= =?utf-8?q?ou_the_cheapest_deal=2C_fast=2E?= Message-ID: <0010aae8afba$ea7858bf$87a9a166$@yahoo.fr> Whether you want to go to Tenerife or Tokyo, we'll find low cost flights to get you there. We also find the cheapest hotels and car hire deals.
Just dial: +1 888-369-2751. Skyscanner is free! When you find your flights and dial (888) 369-2751, we redirect your call through directly to the airline or travel agent.
We never charge you commission. Nor do we add hidden fees. See more ways we put you first. Acclaimed flight comparison Skyscanner is an award winning site recommended by: The Independent, The Guardian, Which? Travel, BBC Radio 1 and more!
Skyscanner has been consistently found to be comprehensive, fast, and the best way to find cheap flights.
Just dial: +1 888-369-2751. Let?s get social! Join us for hot deals, top tips and travel inspiration on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest. Find the perfect place to stay The Trip by Skyscanner community has reviewed tens of thousands of hotels around the world so you can always find the perfect place to stay, based on your tribe and your price range. Simply select your destination, dial +1 888-369-2751, and you are off! And now Trip by Skyscanner searches all the top booking sites to make sure to always find you the lowest price. Check out some of our most popular destinations:
Chicago-New York$175.47
Los Angeles-San Francisco$103.18
Los Angeles-New York$175.72
Chicago-Los Angeles$325.68
Miami-New York$96.11
Atlanta-Chicago$100.03
Boston-Miami$189.82
Los Angeles-Manila$654.41
San Francisco-Tokyo$690.72
New York City-Casablanca$825.54
Chicago-Minneapolis$95.45
Atlanta-Orlando$90.16
Chicago-Washington DC$195.37
New York City-Paris$545.95

Top Deal 55% Off: Skyscanner's Flight Deals. Primary: +1 888-369-2751. 24/7 Support. Enjoy Skyscanner's Hot Deals on American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, Air Canada, JetBlue, Alaska Airlines, WestJet, Aeromexico, Spirit Airlines, Frontier Airlines, Volaris, Hawaiian Airlines, Allegiant Air, Virgin America Don't Miss These Handpicked Fares! Primary +1 888-369-2751. 24/7 Support -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willy.manga at auf.org Mon Mar 5 11:38:38 2018 From: willy.manga at auf.org (Willy MANGA) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 12:38:38 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad Message-ID: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> Hello, just to let you know that, we, as an end-user, have requested from our ISP to provide us with an IPv6 prefix for our office in Chad. It took them 1 month to work on it and assign us a /56 (2a02:6600:8001:200::/56 ) . We would have been more than happy if a local provider was able to provide us a good connectivity and IPv6. However , it's not (yet) possible in Chad. -- Willy Ted MANGA Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ From nishal at controlfreak.co.za Mon Mar 5 11:51:05 2018 From: nishal at controlfreak.co.za (Nishal Goburdhan) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 13:51:05 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> Message-ID: On 5 Mar 2018, at 13:38, Willy MANGA wrote: > Hello, > just to let you know that, we, as an end-user, have requested from our > ISP to provide us with an IPv6 prefix for our office in Chad. > It took them 1 month to work on it and assign us a /56 > (2a02:6600:8001:200::/56 ) . > We would have been more than happy if a local provider was able to > provide us a good connectivity and IPv6. However , it's not (yet) > possible in Chad. hrm. what?s interesting, is that this isn?t out of the afrinic ipv6 pools .. not that this is a problem. but odd anyway, ?n. From willy.manga at auf.org Mon Mar 5 12:11:36 2018 From: willy.manga at auf.org (Willy MANGA) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:11:36 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> Message-ID: Hi Nishal, Le 05/03/2018 ? 12:51, Nishal Goburdhan a ?crit?: > On 5 Mar 2018, at 13:38, Willy MANGA wrote: > >> Hello, >> [...] > hrm. > what?s interesting, is that this isn?t out of the afrinic ipv6 pools .. > not that this is a problem. but odd anyway, Indeed, it grows v6 stats from ripe pool; same as v4 by the way. It's a VSAT provider who come from lots of merge and acquisition since 5 years at least. Again ... If SOTEL Chad or any other local company can provide us a reliable offer, we may change provider next year :) -- Willy Ted MANGA Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ From amreesh at afrinic.net Mon Mar 5 12:13:01 2018 From: amreesh at afrinic.net (Amreesh Phokeer) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:13:01 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> Message-ID: <205A4051-3B66-4A6B-910C-7ED926726AC3@afrinic.net> On 5 Mar 2018, at 15:51, Nishal Goburdhan wrote: > > not that this is a problem. but odd anyway, Space is announced by MARLINK - satellite provider I suppose. From willy.manga at auf.org Mon Mar 5 13:21:41 2018 From: willy.manga at auf.org (Willy MANGA) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:21:41 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Le 05/03/2018 ? 14:07, Stephane Bortzmeyer a ?crit?: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:38:38PM +0100, > Willy MANGA wrote > a message of 12 lines which said: > >> We would have been more than happy if a local provider was able to >> provide us a good connectivity and IPv6. However , it's not (yet) >> possible in Chad. > > En attendant, un tunnel via Hurricane Electric ? Non. Ce sont des adresses IPv6 natives quand m?me. Ca vaut bien mieux qu'un tunnel. -- Willy Ted MANGA Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ From mhtguinassou at gmail.com Mon Mar 5 14:44:11 2018 From: mhtguinassou at gmail.com (TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 06:44:11 -0800 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Bonjour WILLY, C'est vraiment d?plorable cette situation, mais la SOTEL-TCHAD n'en est pas le seul responsable. Par ce que avant de parler d'IPV6, vous avez d'abord sollicit? la connectivit? de votre agence locale en Fibre Optique. Je me rappelle que nous avons fait une ?tude de vos locaux et avons soumis a vos administrateurs une offre qui n'a pas eu de retour jusqu?? nos jours. Bien que cela ne justifie pas notre indisponibilit? de vous fournir des adresses IPV6, mais explique qu'a m?me que, vous ne b?n?ficier d'aucun service de la part de SOTEL-TCHAD. Pour vous rassurer, nous n'avons pas encore la technicit? n?cessaire de vous fournir en IPV6, mais une bonne connexion Internet, oui! Tidjani MAHAMAT ADOUM Ing?nieur R?seaux T?l?coms Cellule Fibre Optique (SOTEL-TCHAD) Consultant en Gouvernance d'Internet Coordinateur Afrique Centrale pour ACSIS Ligne Direct: (00235) 66273348 ou 77306979 Ligne secourt: (00235) 62306979 ou 92306979 E-mail.P: tidjani -m.adoum at acsis-scasi.org 2018-03-05 5:21 GMT-08:00 Willy MANGA : > > > Le 05/03/2018 ? 14:07, Stephane Bortzmeyer a ?crit : > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:38:38PM +0100, > > Willy MANGA wrote > > a message of 12 lines which said: > > > >> We would have been more than happy if a local provider was able to > >> provide us a good connectivity and IPv6. However , it's not (yet) > >> possible in Chad. > > > > En attendant, un tunnel via Hurricane Electric ? > > Non. Ce sont des adresses IPv6 natives quand m?me. Ca vaut bien mieux > qu'un tunnel. > > -- > Willy Ted MANGA > Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL > https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephen.honlue at afrinic.net Mon Mar 5 14:51:13 2018 From: stephen.honlue at afrinic.net (Stephen Honlue) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 18:51:13 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Bonsoir Tidjani, J'espere que tu vas bien. Qu'est ce qui vous empeche d'offrir IPv6? Etes vous au moins rentr? en pocession de votre prefixe aupres d'AFRINIC? Si oui, avez vous besoin de soutien? Cordialement. On 05/03/2018 18:44, TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum wrote: > Bonjour WILLY, > C'est vraiment d?plorable cette situation, mais la SOTEL-TCHAD n'en > est pas le seul responsable. Par ce que avant de parler d'IPV6, vous > avez d'abord sollicit? la connectivit? de votre agence locale en Fibre > Optique. Je me rappelle que nous avons fait une ?tude de vos locaux et > avons soumis a vos administrateurs une offre qui n'a pas eu de retour > jusqu?? nos jours. Bien que cela ne justifie pas notre indisponibilit? > de vous fournir des adresses IPV6, mais explique qu'a m?me que, vous > ne b?n?ficier d'aucun service de la part de SOTEL-TCHAD. > Pour vous rassurer, nous n'avons pas encore la technicit? n?cessaire > de vous fournir en IPV6, mais une bonne connexion Internet, oui! > > Tidjani MAHAMAT ADOUM > Ing?nieur R?seaux T?l?coms > Cellule Fibre Optique (SOTEL-TCHAD) > Consultant en Gouvernance d'Internet > Coordinateur Afrique Centrale pour ACSIS > Ligne Direct: (00235) 66273348 ou 77306979 > Ligne secourt: (00235) 62306979 ou 92306979 > E-mail.P: tidjani > -m.adoum at acsis-scasi.org > > > > 2018-03-05 5:21 GMT-08:00 Willy MANGA >: > > > > Le 05/03/2018 ? 14:07, Stephane Bortzmeyer a ?crit?: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:38:38PM +0100, > >? Willy MANGA > > wrote > >? a message of 12 lines which said: > > > >> We would have been more than happy if a local provider was able to > >> provide us a good connectivity and IPv6. However , it's not (yet) > >> possible in Chad. > > > > En attendant, un tunnel via Hurricane Electric ? > > Non. Ce sont des adresses IPv6 natives quand m?me. Ca vaut bien mieux > qu'un tunnel. > > -- > Willy Ted MANGA > Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL > https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -- -- MSH Trainer t: +230 403 51 00 |f: +230 466 6758 |tt: @afrinic |w:www.afrinic.net facebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia ___________________________ Join us for the Africa Internet Summit AIS?18 in Dakar, Senegal from 29th April to 11th May 2018. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From willy.manga at auf.org Mon Mar 5 14:55:37 2018 From: willy.manga at auf.org (Willy MANGA) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:55:37 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: <44aada87-387b-f743-cb8d-6ff1124f0ee1@auf.org> Bonjour Tidjani Le 05/03/2018 ? 15:44, TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum a ?crit?: > Bonjour WILLY, > C'est vraiment d?plorable cette situation, mais la SOTEL-TCHAD n'en est pas > le seul responsable. Par ce que avant de parler d'IPV6, vous avez d'abord > sollicit? la connectivit? de votre agence locale en Fibre Optique. Je me > rappelle que nous avons fait une ?tude de vos locaux et avons soumis a vos > administrateurs une offre qui n'a pas eu de retour jusqu?? nos jours. Bien > que cela ne justifie pas notre indisponibilit? de vous fournir des adresses > IPV6, mais explique qu'a m?me que, vous ne b?n?ficier d'aucun service de la > part de SOTEL-TCHAD. Oui, nous avions bien re?u votre proposition et je t'en remercie. Disons qu'il vous manquait encore certains ?l?ments afin qu'on puisse effectivement retenir votre proposition. > Pour vous rassurer, nous n'avons pas encore la technicit? n?cessaire de > vous fournir en IPV6, mais une bonne connexion Internet, oui! N'est-ce pas le r?le entre autre d'AFRINIC et d'autres partenaires d'offrir des training? Le dernier au Tchad a eu lieu l'ann?e pass?e dans nos locaux ; organis? en collaboration avec ISOC Tchad justement. Ca serait bien que les personnes form?es puissent dynamiser les autres afin que ?a puisse effectivement d?marrer localement. De ma petite exp?rience personnelle, il faut commencer maintenant; m?me avec un tunnel mais il faut commencer quelque part. Sinon ce qu'on a appris dort dans un placard et on finit par laisser tomber. Dans tous les cas, je ne peux que vous encourager ? pouvoir monter en comp?tence; tout le monde y gagnera. C'est mon souhait. J'esp?re qu'au prochain renouvellement votre offre sera encore plus avantageuse ;) -- Willy Ted MANGA Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ From mhtguinassou at gmail.com Mon Mar 5 15:07:27 2018 From: mhtguinassou at gmail.com (TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 07:07:27 -0800 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Bonjour Stephen En 2013, au sommet d'Abidjan, je crois que nous avons pris un pr?fixe IPV6, par ce que ?a nous revenais de droit et gratuitement en tant que client IPV4. Cependant, vous connaissez aussi que moi comment sont g?r?es nos infrastructures ici au Tchad. Toutes les fois que vous ?tiez avec nous ici, les principaux gestionnaires de cette question ?taient avec nous et y a eu souvent des discussions a ce sujet. Personnellement je me suis investi pour accueillir la formation d'Afrinic en IPV6 plusieurs fois au Tchad. Mais jamais cela n'a int?ress? nos Managers. Pour eux pourvus que l'Internet marche .... il ne comprennent pas les enjeux techniques Tidjani MAHAMAT ADOUM Ing?nieur R?seaux T?l?coms Cellule Fibre Optique (SOTEL-TCHAD) Consultant en Gouvernance d'Internet Coordinateur Afrique Centrale pour ACSIS Ligne Direct: (00235) 66273348 ou 77306979 Ligne secourt: (00235) 62306979 ou 92306979 E-mail.P: tidjani -m.adoum at acsis-scasi.org Le 5 mars 2018 ? 06:51, Stephen Honlue a ?crit : > Bonsoir Tidjani, > > J'espere que tu vas bien. > > Qu'est ce qui vous empeche d'offrir IPv6? > > Etes vous au moins rentr? en pocession de votre prefixe aupres d'AFRINIC? > > Si oui, avez vous besoin de soutien? > > Cordialement. > > On 05/03/2018 18:44, TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum wrote: > > Bonjour WILLY, > C'est vraiment d?plorable cette situation, mais la SOTEL-TCHAD n'en est > pas le seul responsable. Par ce que avant de parler d'IPV6, vous avez > d'abord sollicit? la connectivit? de votre agence locale en Fibre Optique. > Je me rappelle que nous avons fait une ?tude de vos locaux et avons soumis > a vos administrateurs une offre qui n'a pas eu de retour jusqu?? nos jours. > Bien que cela ne justifie pas notre indisponibilit? de vous fournir des > adresses IPV6, mais explique qu'a m?me que, vous ne b?n?ficier d'aucun > service de la part de SOTEL-TCHAD. > Pour vous rassurer, nous n'avons pas encore la technicit? n?cessaire de > vous fournir en IPV6, mais une bonne connexion Internet, oui! > > Tidjani MAHAMAT ADOUM > Ing?nieur R?seaux T?l?coms > Cellule Fibre Optique (SOTEL-TCHAD) > Consultant en Gouvernance d'Internet > Coordinateur Afrique Centrale pour ACSIS > Ligne Direct: (00235) 66273348 ou 77306979 > Ligne secourt: (00235) 62306979 ou 92306979 > E-mail.P: tidjani -m.adoum at acsis-scasi.org > > > 2018-03-05 5:21 GMT-08:00 Willy MANGA : > >> >> >> Le 05/03/2018 ? 14:07, Stephane Bortzmeyer a ?crit : >> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:38:38PM +0100, >> > Willy MANGA wrote >> > a message of 12 lines which said: >> > >> >> We would have been more than happy if a local provider was able to >> >> provide us a good connectivity and IPv6. However , it's not (yet) >> >> possible in Chad. >> > >> > En attendant, un tunnel via Hurricane Electric ? >> >> Non. Ce sont des adresses IPv6 natives quand m?me. Ca vaut bien mieux >> qu'un tunnel. >> >> -- >> Willy Ted MANGA >> Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL >> https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing listAfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > > -- > -- > MSH > Trainer > t: +230 403 51 00 |f: +230 466 6758 <+230%20466%206758> |tt: @afrinic |w:www.afrinic.netfacebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia > ___________________________ > Join us for the Africa Internet Summit AIS?18 in Dakar, Senegal from 29th April to 11th May 2018. > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mhtguinassou at gmail.com Mon Mar 5 15:23:13 2018 From: mhtguinassou at gmail.com (TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 07:23:13 -0800 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Cher Willy nous avons accueilli la m?me formation 6 fois au Tchad (2 fois dans vos locaux). Le probl?me n'est pas seulement la ressource humaine capable, mais aussi le faite d'amener les managers des infrastructures a comprendre les enjeux. Nous avons plus de 100 Ing?nieurs des diff?rentes structures form?s, il faut maintenant que leurs responsables d?cident de l?impl?mentation. Et ce ci n?int?resse gu?re ici au Tchad. j?esp?re que vous allez m'accompagner dans ma nouvelle mission (Celui d'amener les d?cideurs de comprendre les enjeux) Tidjani MAHAMAT ADOUM Ing?nieur R?seaux T?l?coms Cellule Fibre Optique (SOTEL-TCHAD) Consultant en Gouvernance d'Internet Coordinateur Afrique Centrale pour ACSIS Ligne Direct: (00235) 66273348 ou 77306979 Ligne secourt: (00235) 62306979 ou 92306979 E-mail.P: tidjani -m.adoum at acsis-scasi.org Le 5 mars 2018 ? 07:07, TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum a ?crit : > Bonjour Stephen > En 2013, au sommet d'Abidjan, je crois que nous avons pris un pr?fixe > IPV6, par ce que ?a nous revenais de droit et gratuitement en tant que > client IPV4. Cependant, vous connaissez aussi que moi comment sont g?r?es > nos infrastructures ici au Tchad. Toutes les fois que vous ?tiez avec nous > ici, les principaux gestionnaires de cette question ?taient avec nous et y > a eu souvent des discussions a ce sujet. Personnellement je me suis investi > pour accueillir la formation d'Afrinic en IPV6 plusieurs fois au Tchad. > Mais jamais cela n'a int?ress? nos Managers. Pour eux pourvus que > l'Internet marche .... il ne comprennent pas les enjeux techniques > > Tidjani MAHAMAT ADOUM > Ing?nieur R?seaux T?l?coms > Cellule Fibre Optique (SOTEL-TCHAD) > Consultant en Gouvernance d'Internet > Coordinateur Afrique Centrale pour ACSIS > Ligne Direct: (00235) 66273348 ou 77306979 > Ligne secourt: (00235) 62306979 ou 92306979 > E-mail.P: tidjani -m.adoum at acsis-scasi.org > > > Le 5 mars 2018 ? 06:51, Stephen Honlue a > ?crit : > >> Bonsoir Tidjani, >> >> J'espere que tu vas bien. >> >> Qu'est ce qui vous empeche d'offrir IPv6? >> >> Etes vous au moins rentr? en pocession de votre prefixe aupres d'AFRINIC? >> >> Si oui, avez vous besoin de soutien? >> >> Cordialement. >> >> On 05/03/2018 18:44, TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum wrote: >> >> Bonjour WILLY, >> C'est vraiment d?plorable cette situation, mais la SOTEL-TCHAD n'en est >> pas le seul responsable. Par ce que avant de parler d'IPV6, vous avez >> d'abord sollicit? la connectivit? de votre agence locale en Fibre Optique. >> Je me rappelle que nous avons fait une ?tude de vos locaux et avons soumis >> a vos administrateurs une offre qui n'a pas eu de retour jusqu?? nos jours. >> Bien que cela ne justifie pas notre indisponibilit? de vous fournir des >> adresses IPV6, mais explique qu'a m?me que, vous ne b?n?ficier d'aucun >> service de la part de SOTEL-TCHAD. >> Pour vous rassurer, nous n'avons pas encore la technicit? n?cessaire de >> vous fournir en IPV6, mais une bonne connexion Internet, oui! >> >> Tidjani MAHAMAT ADOUM >> Ing?nieur R?seaux T?l?coms >> Cellule Fibre Optique (SOTEL-TCHAD) >> Consultant en Gouvernance d'Internet >> Coordinateur Afrique Centrale pour ACSIS >> Ligne Direct: (00235) 66273348 ou 77306979 >> Ligne secourt: (00235) 62306979 ou 92306979 >> E-mail.P: tidjani -m.adoum at acsis-scasi.org >> >> >> 2018-03-05 5:21 GMT-08:00 Willy MANGA : >> >>> >>> >>> Le 05/03/2018 ? 14:07, Stephane Bortzmeyer a ?crit : >>> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:38:38PM +0100, >>> > Willy MANGA wrote >>> > a message of 12 lines which said: >>> > >>> >> We would have been more than happy if a local provider was able to >>> >> provide us a good connectivity and IPv6. However , it's not (yet) >>> >> possible in Chad. >>> > >>> > En attendant, un tunnel via Hurricane Electric ? >>> >>> Non. Ce sont des adresses IPv6 natives quand m?me. Ca vaut bien mieux >>> qu'un tunnel. >>> >>> -- >>> Willy Ted MANGA >>> Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL >>> https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >>> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing listAfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> >> >> -- >> -- >> MSH >> Trainer >> t: +230 403 51 00 |f: +230 466 6758 <+230%20466%206758> |tt: @afrinic |w:www.afrinic.netfacebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia >> ___________________________ >> Join us for the Africa Internet Summit AIS?18 in Dakar, Senegal from 29th April to 11th May 2018. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From loganaden at gmail.com Tue Mar 6 06:10:25 2018 From: loganaden at gmail.com (Loganaden Velvindron) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:10:25 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: > > > [Speaking in my personal capacity] I met network engineers of an ISP. We had an informal chat about their IPv6 progress. It's not a business objective currently due to more "lucrative" projects such as TV over IP, and consumer Internet of Things. Engineering customer demand for IPv6 is not an easy task. However, with the emergence of IPv6 on cloud platforms, this is causing *some* local SMEs to ask for IPv6 from local ISPs as some of their global customers have v6 issues that they need to diagnose and fix. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daniel at afrinic.net Fri Mar 9 05:56:12 2018 From: daniel at afrinic.net (Daniel Shaw) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:56:12 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] A Simple BGP-based Mobile Routing System for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network References: <1a79879611ed4554aede521867b1a2a8@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> Message-ID: <205E55FA-BAF4-423D-8395-0134297000B5@afrinic.net> Some may find this interesting... > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Templin, Fred L" > Subject: [GROW] A Simple BGP-based Mobile Routing System for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network > Date: 9 March 2018 at 00:14:12 GMT+4 > To: "grow at ietf.org" > Cc: "Saccone, Gregory T" , Gaurav Dawra > > Hello, > > We have published a document that proposes BGP as the core of a mobile routing > service for worldwide civil aviation in the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network > with Internet Protocol Services (ATN/IPS). This would be an overlay network deployment > of standard BGP with ASes arranged in such a way as to mitigate the mobility-related > instability that was inherent in past approaches. The system also leverages an > adjunct route optimization service known as AERO. > > The ATN/IPS is planned to eventually replace existing air traffic management services > with an IPv6-based service as part of a long-term evolution. The choice of mobile > routing services is being made now, with this approach, LISP and Mobile IPv6 as > candidates. Although the decision is being considered in the International Civil > Aviation Organization (ICAO), we feel the time is right to socialize the effort > in the IETF. > > The draft announcement appears below, and we would like to initiate discussion and > seek feedback in this forum. Thanks in advance for your comments and questions. > > Fred Templin > > --- > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > > > Title : A Simple BGP-based Mobile Routing System for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network > Authors : Fred L. Templin > Greg Saccone > Gaurav Dawra > Acee Lindem > Filename : draft-templin-atn-bgp-06.txt > Pages : 17 > Date : 2018-03-03 > > Abstract: > The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is investigating > mobile routing solutions for a worldwide Aeronautical > Telecommunications Network with Internet Protocol Services (ATN/IPS). > The ATN/IPS will eventually replace existing communication services > with an IPv6-based service supporting pervasive Air Traffic > Management (ATM) for Air Traffic Controllers (ATC), Airline > Operations Controllers (AOC), and all commercial aircraft worldwide. > This informational document describes a simple and extensible mobile > routing service based on industry-standard BGP to address the ATN/IPS > requirements. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-atn-bgp/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mamadou.alassane at gmail.com Tue Mar 13 07:42:28 2018 From: mamadou.alassane at gmail.com (Alassane MAMADOU) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:42:28 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Bonjour ? tous , je me permet de faire une suggestion au groupe des formateurs sur la vulgarisation de l'importance de l'introduction de l'IPv6 dans nos impl?mentations . J'ai constat? que toutes les formations sont pour la plupart techniques . Nous avons peut ?tre omis la partie manag?riale de ce changement . je sugg?re donc un plan de formation sur la strat?gie de migration de l'IPv4 vers IPv6 mais vu d'un point de vue organisationnelle soit mis en place. J'ai l'impression que seuls les ing?nieurs comprennent cet enjeu et que les d?cideurs africains surtout pour la plupart de l'Afrique francophone attendent de se retrouver dos au mur avant d'agir. Bonne journ?e ? tous . Alassane MAMADOU Tel:+22995000296 2018-03-06 7:10 GMT+01:00 Loganaden Velvindron : > >> [Speaking in my personal capacity] > > > I met network engineers of an ISP. We had an informal chat about their > IPv6 progress. It's not a business objective currently due to more > "lucrative" projects such as TV over IP, and consumer Internet of Things. > > Engineering customer demand for IPv6 is not an easy task. However, with > the emergence of IPv6 on cloud platforms, this is causing *some* local > SMEs to ask for IPv6 from local ISPs as some of their global customers have > v6 issues that they need to diagnose and fix. > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruno.stevant at gmail.com Tue Mar 13 08:48:47 2018 From: bruno.stevant at gmail.com (Bruno Stevant) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:48:47 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Bonjour ? tous, Quelle est la situation d'IPv4 chez les op?rateurs au Tchad ? Est-ce qu'une date ? ?t? d?finie pour la p?nurie pr?visible d'adresse IPv4 ? Cette ?ch?ance marque souvent les esprits et il est important de la rappeler ? vos d?cideurs. Bien s?r l'argument contradictoire est qu'on trouvera bien des solutions pour s'en sortir une fois la p?nurie arriv?e, comme les CGN. C'est ? ce moment qu'il faut mentionner les probl?me de cybers?curit?, d'identification judiciaire ? partir d'une adresse IP, etc. Les d?cideurs ne vont pas soutenir IPv6 pour la beaut? du protocole, mais parce qu'il va permettre d'?viter d'impacter leur business, voir la s?curit? nationale. Le mar. 13 mars 2018 ? 08:44, Alassane MAMADOU a ?crit : > Bonjour ? tous , > > je me permet de faire une suggestion au groupe des formateurs sur la > vulgarisation de l'importance de l'introduction de l'IPv6 dans nos > impl?mentations . > J'ai constat? que toutes les formations sont pour la plupart techniques . > Nous avons peut ?tre omis la partie manag?riale de ce changement . > je sugg?re donc un plan de formation sur la strat?gie de migration de > l'IPv4 vers IPv6 mais vu d'un point de vue organisationnelle soit mis en > place. > > J'ai l'impression que seuls les ing?nieurs comprennent cet enjeu et que > les d?cideurs africains surtout pour la plupart de l'Afrique francophone > attendent de se retrouver dos au mur avant d'agir. > > Bonne journ?e ? tous . > > Alassane MAMADOU > > Tel:+22995000296 <+229%2095%2000%2002%2096> > > 2018-03-06 7:10 GMT+01:00 Loganaden Velvindron : > >> >>> [Speaking in my personal capacity] >> >> >> I met network engineers of an ISP. We had an informal chat about their >> IPv6 progress. It's not a business objective currently due to more >> "lucrative" projects such as TV over IP, and consumer Internet of Things. >> >> Engineering customer demand for IPv6 is not an easy task. However, with >> the emergence of IPv6 on cloud platforms, this is causing *some* local >> SMEs to ask for IPv6 from local ISPs as some of their global customers have >> v6 issues that they need to diagnose and fix. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> >> > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mayediop at gmail.com Tue Mar 13 09:29:59 2018 From: mayediop at gmail.com (Maye Diop) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:29:59 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Bonjour Alassane, Vous avez tout ? fait raison. Si on prend le cas du S?n?gal, nous avons d?marr? en 2008 et ? ce jour, on n'a pas beaucoup avanc? malgr? l'organisation d'une session de formation annuelle des ing?nieurs. Le Top management ?voque souvent des probl?mes de co?t et ne comprend pas les v?ritables enjeux sur le futur de l'Internet dans nos pays. C'est la raison pour laquelle, ISOC-SN a d?cid? d'organiser en collaboration avec Afrinic, un atelier d?di? aux managers intitul? "*Driving IPv6 in Senegal from Management", du 02 au 06 Mai 2018.* L'objectif est de sensibiliser les Managers des services de l'Etat, du R?gulateur, des Universit?s et surtout du Secteur priv? sur la n?cessit? de mener cette transition et de leur donner les outils n?cessaires pour la planification de la mise en oeuvre et son monitoring. Nous ne manquerons pas de partager sur notre site www.isoc.sn. En vous souhaitant une excellente journ?e, Bien cordialement -- --------------------- Mme Nd?ye Maimouna DIOP Pr?sidente ISOC-SN Le 13 mars 2018 ? 07:42, Alassane MAMADOU a ?crit : > Bonjour ? tous , > > je me permet de faire une suggestion au groupe des formateurs sur la > vulgarisation de l'importance de l'introduction de l'IPv6 dans nos > impl?mentations . > J'ai constat? que toutes les formations sont pour la plupart techniques . > Nous avons peut ?tre omis la partie manag?riale de ce changement . > je sugg?re donc un plan de formation sur la strat?gie de migration de > l'IPv4 vers IPv6 mais vu d'un point de vue organisationnelle soit mis en > place. > > J'ai l'impression que seuls les ing?nieurs comprennent cet enjeu et que > les d?cideurs africains surtout pour la plupart de l'Afrique francophone > attendent de se retrouver dos au mur avant d'agir. > > Bonne journ?e ? tous . > > Alassane MAMADOU > > Tel:+22995000296 <+229%2095%2000%2002%2096> > > 2018-03-06 7:10 GMT+01:00 Loganaden Velvindron : > >> >>> [Speaking in my personal capacity] >> >> >> I met network engineers of an ISP. We had an informal chat about their >> IPv6 progress. It's not a business objective currently due to more >> "lucrative" projects such as TV over IP, and consumer Internet of Things. >> >> Engineering customer demand for IPv6 is not an easy task. However, with >> the emergence of IPv6 on cloud platforms, this is causing *some* local >> SMEs to ask for IPv6 from local ISPs as some of their global customers have >> v6 issues that they need to diagnose and fix. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bortzmeyer at nic.fr Tue Mar 13 10:25:59 2018 From: bortzmeyer at nic.fr (Stephane Bortzmeyer) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:25:59 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: <20180313102559.zwgz43kq32mykcdd@nic.fr> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:29:59AM +0000, Maye Diop wrote a message of 231 lines which said: > C'est la raison pour laquelle, ISOC-SN a d?cid? d'organiser en > collaboration avec Afrinic, un atelier d?di? aux managers intitul? "*Driving > IPv6 in Senegal from Management", du 02 au 06 Mai 2018.* > > L'objectif est de sensibiliser les Managers des services de l'Etat, du > R?gulateur, des Universit?s et surtout du Secteur priv? D'un autre c?t?, les d?ploiements techniques n'ont pas forc?ment besoin de la participation des managers. Les techniciens peuvent activer IPv6 tout seuls. Si le manager est indiff?rent ? cette question, il ne faut pas le consid?rer comme un obstacle. From Lee.Howard at retevia.net Tue Mar 13 12:25:57 2018 From: Lee.Howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:25:57 -0500 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: Je suis en accord. J?ai entendu plusieurs fois que les ing?nieurs veulent d?ployer IPv6, mais leurs patrons ne les laisser pas. Il fault des heures de travails, et il y a toujours des autres priorit?s. Moi, je pense qu?il est pr?f?rable de former les ing?nieurs que d?essayer trouver les d?cideurs. J?ai formul? six questions pour assister les ing?nieurs faire l?argument aux executifs: 1. Combiens de temps avons-nous avant de manquer des adresses IPv4? 2. Est-ce qu?il y a un prix pour des adresses auquel nous devions faire quelque chose different qu?on fait maintenant? 3. Est-ce que la latence nous est importante? 4. A quelle date serait-il quelque chose ? IPv6 seulement, dont nous aurons besoin? 5. Voulons-nous ?viter CGN? 6. Int?ressons-nous aux architectures nouvelles activ?es par IPv6? En dix minutes, je pense, on peut faire un argument pour les d?cideurs qu?il faut savoir, au moins, combien de temp il prendrait ? d?ployer. Selon mon exp?rience, il n?est jamais moins que deux ans. Si on peut r?pondre qu?on n?a pas besoin de IPv6 au futur visible, la d?cision contre d?ploiement a raison. Meilleurs voeux, Lee PS Je vous demande pardon pour mes erreurs de langue. Ce n?est pas ma langue primaire, et je manque des opportunit?s ? pratiquer. From: Alassane MAMADOU Reply-To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 2:42 AM To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad > Bonjour ? tous , > > je me permet de faire une suggestion au groupe des formateurs sur la > vulgarisation de l'importance de l'introduction de l'IPv6 dans nos > impl?mentations . > J'ai constat? que toutes les formations sont pour la plupart techniques . Nous > avons peut ?tre omis la partie manag?riale de ce changement . > je sugg?re donc un plan de formation sur la strat?gie de migration de l'IPv4 > vers IPv6 mais vu d'un point de vue organisationnelle soit mis en place. > > J'ai l'impression que seuls les ing?nieurs comprennent cet enjeu et que les > d?cideurs africains surtout pour la plupart de l'Afrique francophone attendent > de se retrouver dos au mur avant d'agir. > > Bonne journ?e ? tous . > > Alassane MAMADOU > > Tel:+22995000296 > > 2018-03-06 7:10 GMT+01:00 Loganaden Velvindron : >>> >> [Speaking in my personal capacity] >> >> >> I met network engineers of an ISP. We had an informal chat about their IPv6 >> progress. It's not a business objective currently due to more "lucrative" >> projects such as TV over IP, and consumer Internet of Things. >> >> Engineering customer demand for IPv6 is not an easy task. However, with the >> emergence of IPv6 on cloud platforms, this is causing *some* local SMEs to >> ask for IPv6 from local ISPs as some of their global customers have v6 issues >> that they need to diagnose and fix. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willy.manga at auf.org Tue Mar 13 15:41:53 2018 From: willy.manga at auf.org (Willy MANGA) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:41:53 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> Message-ID: <56020cec-5bff-e8c1-74c1-79911a7f6bae@auf.org> Bonjour Le 13/03/2018 ? 08:42, Alassane MAMADOU a ?crit?: > Bonjour ? tous , > > [...] > J'ai constat? que toutes les formations sont pour la plupart techniques . > Nous avons peut ?tre omis la partie manag?riale de ce changement . Normal; je pense que le dernier sondage effectu? par le staff d'AFRINIC a du le faire ressortir et ils ont bien pris note. > [...] > J'ai l'impression que seuls les ing?nieurs comprennent cet enjeu et que les > d?cideurs africains surtout pour la plupart de l'Afrique francophone > attendent de se retrouver dos au mur avant d'agir. Il me semble que parmi les ing?nieurs qui ont d?j? particip? ? ces formations, sont ceux qui sont tr?s souvent ? la t?te des d?partements et qui discutent g?n?ralement avec le top management. Ils peuvent aussi ?tre force de persuasion. Et comme l'a soulign? St?phane B. au fond si les ing?nieurs ont compris comment ?a marche et en attendant que ?a soit un argument commercial pour les autres d?partements, l'activation peut se faire dans certaines couches de leurs r?seaux sans probl?me ? mon humble avis. A mon avis au fond il y a d'abord un souci de ?motivation?. Beaucoup de personnes dans la cha?ne vont donner mille et une raisons pour ne jamais commencer; indiquant parfois qu'il revient ? l'autre de faire tel ou telle chose et au final personne ne fait rien. Je me permets d'expliquer un peu plus une des slides de cette pr?sentation (Fran?ais https://nda.manbene.net/index.php/s/j5himX7Bfjk7OaV , Anglais https://nda.manbene.net/index.php/s/JJPCt8OVzoxNXCv ) . Mon employeur n'est qu'un end-user ici mais il m'a suffit d'expliquer en 20 minutes ? notre directeur r?gional (Afrique centrale et grands lacs) qui est un juriste ? la base : * qu'en utilisant IPv6 c'est lui qui communique directement avec l'autre . Ce qui n'est pas le cas actuellement (en IPv4) dans NOTRE r?seau. * nous travaillons dans le secteur universitaire et de ce fait nous devons ?tre au faite des avanc?es dans le domaine des technologies qui peuvent ?tre employ?es * cela rentre dans certains axes de notre nouvelle programmation qui vise entre autre ? promouvoir l'innovation * la migration proprement dite n'a rien chang? aux habitudes de travail des coll?gues (d'ailleurs quand je lui expliquais tout ceci, j'avais d?j? mis en place ? l'?poque un tunnel IPv6 et qui marchait et en dehors de la technique, personne ne savait qu'on utilisait d?j? IPv6). * au niveau des ressources humaines et financi?res cela allait nous co?ter : 0 XAF en investissement mais quelques heures de travail en plus pour l'unique personnel technique du bureau r?gional. J'ai utilis? tr?s peu de termes techniques et j'ai essay? de coller mon argumentaire aux orientations de notre organisation. Voil? ce qui a convaincu ma direction d'aller de l'avant et m'a aid? ? mettre par la suite la pression ? notre FAI qui mettait en avant que ?personne ne demande IPv6?. Et comme par hasard, d?s que nous avons demand? un pr?fixe IPv6 au FAI; cela ne leur a m?me pas pris 2 mois pour nous en octroyer un et le mettre en marche. Ils ont eu des difficult?s ? stabiliser la liaison mais au final, nous utilisons IPv6 de mani?re native et ?a fonctionne tr?s bien. Mon premier post sur ce sujet vous montre aussi que notre objectif est de le d?ployer dans tous nos bureaux. Et pour le moment on y est aussi arriv? avec notre site de Ndjamena. Voil? concr?tement un r?sum? de ma modeste exp?rience. J'aimerais que les NREN et notamment WACREN, UBUNTUNET contribuent un peu plus ? pousser le d?veloppement d'IPv6 dans les milieux universitaires. De mon point de vue c'est ?normal? que nos universit?s exploitent et travaillent sur ce protocole et son d?veloppement. Tout comme au passage DNSSEC, DANE et tout qui est fait au niveau de l'IETF... -- Willy Ted MANGA Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ From mukom.tamon at gmail.com Tue Mar 13 19:06:38 2018 From: mukom.tamon at gmail.com (Mukom Akong T.) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:06:38 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: <20180313102559.zwgz43kq32mykcdd@nic.fr> References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> <20180313102559.zwgz43kq32mykcdd@nic.fr> Message-ID: 2018-03-13 14:25 GMT+04:00 Stephane Bortzmeyer : > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:29:59AM +0000, > Maye Diop wrote > a message of 231 lines which said: > > > C'est la raison pour laquelle, ISOC-SN a d?cid? d'organiser en > > collaboration avec Afrinic, un atelier d?di? aux managers intitul? > "*Driving > > IPv6 in Senegal from Management", du 02 au 06 Mai 2018.* > > > > L'objectif est de sensibiliser les Managers des services de l'Etat, du > > R?gulateur, des Universit?s et surtout du Secteur priv? > > D'un autre c?t?, les d?ploiements techniques n'ont pas forc?ment > besoin de la participation des managers. Les techniciens peuvent > activer IPv6 tout seuls. Si le manager est indiff?rent ? cette > question, il ne faut pas le consid?rer comme un obstacle. > In some cases, the manager doesn't care and the engineers can go ahead and start some kind of IPv6 deployment. In my experience, the only kind of engineers who tend to do this are IT manager types. And in almost all cases, their 'deployments' are never company-wide (i.e. down to the customer but rather pieces like "get a block", "announce it", "enable the core" and they generally stop there. When an engineer isn't at that level, they still need authorisation to - effect changes on the network - change a piece of equipment - liaise with other teams or departments it's not just money (to buy things, to get trained), it's also the time and other priorities. The survey we did last year ... "lack of management support" was by far the number 1 challenge (or 'excuse' ) engineers identified. I am yet to see any significant kind of deploymen that was a) Led by an engineer who isn't 'mangement' type b) Didn't get the full support of management Sure we'll be tackling management training ...and we'll see if that's indeed a challenge or an excuse. -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mayediop at gmail.com Wed Mar 14 16:47:49 2018 From: mayediop at gmail.com (Maye Diop) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:47:49 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> <20180313102559.zwgz43kq32mykcdd@nic.fr> Message-ID: +1 2018-03-13 19:06 GMT+00:00 Mukom Akong T. : > > > 2018-03-13 14:25 GMT+04:00 Stephane Bortzmeyer : > >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:29:59AM +0000, >> Maye Diop wrote >> a message of 231 lines which said: >> >> > C'est la raison pour laquelle, ISOC-SN a d?cid? d'organiser en >> > collaboration avec Afrinic, un atelier d?di? aux managers intitul? >> "*Driving >> > IPv6 in Senegal from Management", du 02 au 06 Mai 2018.* >> > >> > L'objectif est de sensibiliser les Managers des services de l'Etat, du >> > R?gulateur, des Universit?s et surtout du Secteur priv? >> >> D'un autre c?t?, les d?ploiements techniques n'ont pas forc?ment >> besoin de la participation des managers. Les techniciens peuvent >> activer IPv6 tout seuls. Si le manager est indiff?rent ? cette >> question, il ne faut pas le consid?rer comme un obstacle. >> > > > In some cases, the manager doesn't care and the engineers can go ahead and > start some kind of IPv6 deployment. In my experience, the only kind of > engineers who tend to do this are IT manager types. And in almost all > cases, their 'deployments' are never company-wide (i.e. down to the > customer but rather pieces like "get a block", "announce it", "enable the > core" and they generally stop there. > > > When an engineer isn't at that level, they still need authorisation to > > - effect changes on the network > - change a piece of equipment > - liaise with other teams or departments > > it's not just money (to buy things, to get trained), it's also the time > and other priorities. > > The survey we did last year ... "lack of management support" was by far > the number 1 challenge (or 'excuse' ) engineers identified. > > I am yet to see any significant kind of deploymen that was > > a) Led by an engineer who isn't 'mangement' type > b) Didn't get the full support of management > > Sure we'll be tackling management training ...and we'll see if that's > indeed a challenge or an excuse. > > -- > > Mukom Akong T. > > LinkedIn:Mukom | twitter: > @perfexcellent > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of > the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------- > -- --------------------- Mme Nd?ye Maimouna DIOP Sp?cialiste ICT4D -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lee.howard at retevia.net Wed Mar 14 17:15:22 2018 From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:15:22 -0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 packets from Chad In-Reply-To: References: <2d63c2f7-2899-9b80-458c-73daabac0402@auf.org> <20180305130711.yik7k2vw4e2ub3at@nic.fr> <20180313102559.zwgz43kq32mykcdd@nic.fr> Message-ID: <5062aee1-d2ff-e04f-6886-c4f12107e713@retevia.net> > 2018-03-13 19:06 GMT+00:00 Mukom Akong T. >: > > > > 2018-03-13 14:25 GMT+04:00 Stephane Bortzmeyer >: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:29:59AM +0000, > ?Maye Diop > wrote > ?a message of 231 lines which said: > > > C'est la raison pour laquelle, ISOC-SN a d?cid? d'organiser en > > collaboration avec Afrinic, un atelier d?di? aux managers > intitul? "*Driving > > IPv6 in Senegal from Management", du 02 au 06 Mai 2018.* > > > > L'objectif est de sensibiliser les Managers des services de > l'Etat, du > > R?gulateur, des Universit?s et surtout du Secteur priv? > > D'un autre c?t?, les d?ploiements techniques n'ont pas forc?ment > besoin de la participation des managers. Les techniciens peuvent > activer IPv6 tout seuls. Si le manager est indiff?rent ? cette > question, il ne faut pas le consid?rer comme un obstacle. > > > > In some cases, the manager doesn't care and the engineers can go > ahead and start some kind of IPv6 deployment. In my experience, > the only kind of engineers who tend to do this are IT manager > types. And in almost all cases, their 'deployments' are never > company-wide (i.e. down to the customer but rather pieces like > "get a block", "announce it", "enable the core" and they generally > stop there. > Yes, I've spoken to a number of ISPs who have deployed IPv6 in the core, and keep asking for deployment to the edge devices, and for updates to the provisioning systems. > > > Sure we'll be tackling management training ...and we'll see if > that's indeed a challenge or an excuse. > Feels like a valid challenge to me. If you make changes to a production edge router, and something goes wrong, you can be fired. If you ignore what your manager tells you to work on, and work on IPv6 instead, you can be fired. If you spend some hours working on IPv6, and don't complete another project on time. . .? you see what I mean? No project can succeed without management support. Good managers are aware of their limited resources, including money and hours of work, so they have to prioritize. In my experience, it's cheaper to have a two-year (or five-year !?!) plan that is "add IPv6 whenever you touch something" rather than a six month plan to get everything done all at once. If every manager would figure out how long they can last before running out of IPv4 addresses, and how long before there's something they want that requires IPv6, I would be happy. If they would figure out how long it will take them to deploy IPv6, I would be happier. If they would figure out when they need to start before they need to start, I would be in bliss. Lee > -- > > Mukom Akong T. > > LinkedIn:Mukom ?| ?twitter: > @perfexcellent > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the > whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- > --------------------- > Mme Nd?ye Maimouna DIOP > Sp?cialiste ICT4D > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brice at afrinic.net Wed Mar 21 14:56:52 2018 From: brice at afrinic.net (Brice ABBA) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:56:52 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_Unannounced?= =?utf-8?q?=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= Message-ID: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> **Fran?ai**s en bas**** Hi colleagues, While not every IPv6 prefix (even the legacy IPv4 ones for that matter) need to be globally announced, most need to be. There?s a significant number of IPv6 prefixes from our region that is currently unannounced. If you have IPv6 space and don?t announce it design|choice, then this mail isn?t for you. This message is also NOT for you if you * don?t already have IPv6 knowledge * don?t already have IPv6 address space for your network * are not responsible for configuring BGP sessions for your network * need proof (at alpha = 0.05) that IPv6 isn?t a buzzword that will go away if you bury our head deeper in the sands of IPv4 However, if you haven?t announced it due challenges in one or more of * skill and knowledge * confidence to push something ?new? without pro guidance * time to just sit down and get it done without the distraction of other key projects (social media not being one of them :-) Then we have a solution for you IF you will be at AIS in Dakar. We?ll be doing a hackathon-style (see that buzzword right there? :-) event with the following objectives: 1. Securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with industry best practice 2. Enable IPv6 over your core network to be able to connect a native IPv6 customer in the future This is our response to a recurring challenge from our last IPv6 deployment challenges survey: ?Lack of Confidence? Just to be clear * This is not a training workshop (you?ll be DOing 90% of the time in a group). If you don?t have IPv6 training, this is NOT for you. * This is not a session for arguing ad-infinitum about why some $specific_software doesn?t work on IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) So if you want to securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with industry best practice, and get ready to natively connect a native IPv6 customer. If you?d value a having a group of like-minded engineers with the same mission along with the guidance of experienced trainers and seasoned IPv6 deployers, then click https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-en to indicate your interest. Only 20 seats available. Selection is strict based on how well you meet the pre-requisites within the registration form. See you in Dakar? Brice for the AFRINIC IPv6 Deployment Support Team **Fran?ai**s ici**** Chers coll?gues, Bien que tous les pr?fixes IPv6 (et ceci est aussi valable pour IPv4) n'aient pas tous besoin d'?tre annonc?s globalement, la plupart doivent l'?tre. Il y a un nombre important de pr?fixes IPv6 de notre r?gion qui n'est actuellement pas annonc?. Si vous avez un espace IPv6 et ne l'annoncez pas par choix de design, alors ce mail n'est pas pour vous. Ce mail n'est non plus pas pour vous si vous * n?avez pas d?j? des connaissances d?IPv6 * ne disposez pas d?j? d'un bloc d'adresses IPv6 pour votre r?seau * n??tes pas responsables de la configuration des sessions BGP de votre r?seau * avez besoin de preuve (? alpha = 0,05) que IPv6 n'est pas un mot ? la mode qui dispara?tra si vous enterrez notre t?te profond?ment dans ?le sable? d?IPv4 Cependant, si vous ne l?avez pas encore annonc? ? cause de l?un ou plusieurs de ces d?fis suivant: * la comp?tence et la connaissance * la confiance d?executer un projet ?NOUVEAU? sans l?appui dun expert * le temps de simplement s'asseoir et de le faire sans la distraction d'autres projets cl?s; (les r?seaux sociaux n?en font pas partir :-) ) Alors nous avons une solution pour vous SI vous serez ? l'AIS de Dakar. Nous allons faire un hackathon avec les objectifs suivants: 1. Annoncez en toute s?curit? votre pr?fixe IPv6 d'une mani?re conforme aux meilleures pratiques en la mati?re 2. Activer IPv6 sur votre r?seau principal pour pouvoir connecter un client IPv6 natif dans un futur proche Ceci est notre r?ponse ? un d?fi r?current qui est ressorti au terme de notre derni?re enqu?te sur les d?fis de d?ploiement IPv6: "Manque de confiance" Pour ?tre clair, * Ce n'est pas un atelier de formation (vous allez passer 90% du temps dans un groupe). Si vous n'avez pas de connaissances sur IPv6, cet ?v?nement n'est pas le v?tre. * Ce n'est pas une session pour argumenter ? l?infinie sur les raisons pour lesquelles une application sp?cifique ne fonctionne pas sur IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) Donc, si vous souhaitez annoncer notre pr?fixe IPv6 de mani?re s?curis?e avec les meilleures pratiques en la mati?re, si vous souhaitez ?tre pr?t ? connecter nativement un client IPv6 natif. Si vous tenez ? avoir un groupe d'ing?nieurs partageant les m?mes id?es avec la m?me mission avec les conseils de formateurs exp?riment?s et d?experts dans le d?ploiement d?IPv6, cliquez sur https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-fr pour indiquer votre int?r?t. Seulement 20 places seront disponibles. La s?lection est faite en fonction des r?ponses que vous donnez aux questions pos?s dans le formulaire d'inscription. On se voit ? Dakar? Brice repr?sentant l'?quipe de support au d?ploiement IPv6 d'AFRINIC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mhtguinassou at gmail.com Wed Mar 21 16:42:45 2018 From: mhtguinassou at gmail.com (TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:42:45 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_Unannounced?= =?utf-8?q?=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= In-Reply-To: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> References: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> Message-ID: Merci et f?licitation pour l'initiative. ?a serait un bon d?part pour beaucoup d'entre nous Le mer. 21 mars 2018 15:58, Brice ABBA a ?crit : > **Fran?ai**s en bas**** > Hi colleagues, > > While not every IPv6 prefix (even the legacy IPv4 ones for that matter) need to be globally announced, most need to be. There?s a significant number of IPv6 prefixes from our region that is currently unannounced. > > If you have IPv6 space and don?t announce it design|choice, then this mail isn?t for you. This message is also NOT for you if you > > > - don?t already have IPv6 knowledge > - don?t already have IPv6 address space for your network > - are not responsible for configuring BGP sessions for your network > - need proof (at alpha = 0.05) that IPv6 isn?t a buzzword that will go > away if you bury our head deeper in the sands of IPv4 > > However, if you haven?t announced it due challenges in one or more of > > > - skill and knowledge > - confidence to push something ?new? without pro guidance > - time to just sit down and get it done without the distraction of > other key projects (social media not being one of them :-) > > > Then we have a solution for you IF you will be at AIS in Dakar. We?ll be doing a hackathon-style (see that buzzword right there? :-) event with the following objectives: > > > 1. Securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with > industry best practice > 2. Enable IPv6 over your core network to be able to connect a native > IPv6 customer in the future > > This is our response to a recurring challenge from our last IPv6 deployment challenges survey: ?Lack of Confidence? > > > Just to be clear > > > - This is not a training workshop (you?ll be DOing 90% of the time in > a group). If you don?t have IPv6 training, this is NOT for you. > - This is not a session for arguing ad-infinitum about why some > $specific_software doesn?t work on IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) > > So if you want to securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with industry best practice, and get ready to natively connect a native IPv6 customer. If you?d value a having a group of like-minded engineers with the same mission along with the guidance of experienced trainers and seasoned IPv6 deployers, then click > https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-en > > to indicate your interest. Only 20 seats available. Selection is strict based on how well you meet the pre-requisites within the registration form. > > > See you in Dakar? > > Brice for the AFRINIC IPv6 Deployment Support Team > > > **Fran?ai**s ici**** > > Chers coll?gues, > > Bien que tous les pr?fixes IPv6 (et ceci est aussi valable pour IPv4) n'aient pas tous besoin d'?tre annonc?s globalement, la plupart doivent l'?tre. Il y a un nombre important de pr?fixes IPv6 de notre r?gion qui n'est actuellement pas annonc?. > > Si vous avez un espace IPv6 et ne l'annoncez pas par choix de design, alors ce mail n'est pas pour vous. Ce mail n'est non plus pas pour vous si vous > > > - n?avez pas d?j? des connaissances d?IPv6 > - ne disposez pas d?j? d'un bloc d'adresses IPv6 pour votre r?seau > - n??tes pas responsables de la configuration des sessions BGP de > votre r?seau > - avez besoin de preuve (? alpha = 0,05) que IPv6 n'est pas un mot ? > la mode qui dispara?tra si vous enterrez notre t?te profond?ment dans ?le > sable? d?IPv4 > > > Cependant, si vous ne l?avez pas encore annonc? ? cause de l?un ou plusieurs de ces d?fis suivant: > > > - la comp?tence et la connaissance > - la confiance d?executer un projet ?NOUVEAU? sans l?appui dun expert > - le temps de simplement s'asseoir et de le faire sans la distraction > d'autres projets cl?s; (les r?seaux sociaux n?en font pas partir :-) ) > > Alors nous avons une solution pour vous SI vous serez ? l'AIS de Dakar. Nous allons faire un hackathon avec les objectifs suivants: > > > 1. Annoncez en toute s?curit? votre pr?fixe IPv6 d'une mani?re > conforme aux meilleures pratiques en la mati?re > 2. Activer IPv6 sur votre r?seau principal pour pouvoir connecter un > client IPv6 natif dans un futur proche > > > Ceci est notre r?ponse ? un d?fi r?current qui est ressorti au terme de notre derni?re enqu?te sur les d?fis de d?ploiement IPv6: "Manque de confiance" > > > Pour ?tre clair, > > > - Ce n'est pas un atelier de formation (vous allez passer 90% du temps > dans un groupe). Si vous n'avez pas de connaissances sur IPv6, cet > ?v?nement n'est pas le v?tre. > - Ce n'est pas une session pour argumenter ? l?infinie sur les raisons > pour lesquelles une application sp?cifique ne fonctionne pas sur IPv6. (aka > #6ExcuseCon) > > Donc, si vous souhaitez annoncer notre pr?fixe IPv6 de mani?re s?curis?e avec les meilleures pratiques en la mati?re, si vous souhaitez ?tre pr?t ? connecter nativement un client IPv6 natif. Si vous tenez ? avoir un groupe d'ing?nieurs partageant les m?mes id?es avec la m?me mission avec les conseils de formateurs exp?riment?s et d?experts dans le d?ploiement d?IPv6, cliquez sur > https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-fr > > pour indiquer votre int?r?t. Seulement 20 places seront disponibles. La s?lection est faite en fonction des r?ponses que vous donnez aux questions pos?s dans le formulaire d'inscription. > > > On se voit ? Dakar? > > Brice repr?sentant l'?quipe de support au d?ploiement IPv6 d'AFRINIC > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daddytalasi at gmail.com Thu Mar 22 06:26:32 2018 From: daddytalasi at gmail.com (Daddy TALASI KAZIAMA) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 07:26:32 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_Unannounced?= =?utf-8?q?=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= In-Reply-To: References: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> Message-ID: Brice Merci et f?licitation c'est une bonne id?e, et m?thodologie je pense. Daddy TALASI Le 21 mars 2018 ? 17:42, TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum a ?crit : > Merci et f?licitation pour l'initiative. ?a serait un bon d?part pour > beaucoup d'entre nous > > Le mer. 21 mars 2018 15:58, Brice ABBA a ?crit : > >> **Fran?ai**s en bas**** >> Hi colleagues, >> >> While not every IPv6 prefix (even the legacy IPv4 ones for that matter) need to be globally announced, most need to be. There?s a significant number of IPv6 prefixes from our region that is currently unannounced. >> >> If you have IPv6 space and don?t announce it design|choice, then this mail isn?t for you. This message is also NOT for you if you >> >> >> - don?t already have IPv6 knowledge >> - don?t already have IPv6 address space for your network >> - are not responsible for configuring BGP sessions for your network >> - need proof (at alpha = 0.05) that IPv6 isn?t a buzzword that will >> go away if you bury our head deeper in the sands of IPv4 >> >> However, if you haven?t announced it due challenges in one or more of >> >> >> - skill and knowledge >> - confidence to push something ?new? without pro guidance >> - time to just sit down and get it done without the distraction of >> other key projects (social media not being one of them :-) >> >> >> Then we have a solution for you IF you will be at AIS in Dakar. We?ll be doing a hackathon-style (see that buzzword right there? :-) event with the following objectives: >> >> >> 1. Securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with >> industry best practice >> 2. Enable IPv6 over your core network to be able to connect a native >> IPv6 customer in the future >> >> This is our response to a recurring challenge from our last IPv6 deployment challenges survey: ?Lack of Confidence? >> >> >> Just to be clear >> >> >> - This is not a training workshop (you?ll be DOing 90% of the time in >> a group). If you don?t have IPv6 training, this is NOT for you. >> - This is not a session for arguing ad-infinitum about why some >> $specific_software doesn?t work on IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) >> >> So if you want to securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with industry best practice, and get ready to natively connect a native IPv6 customer. If you?d value a having a group of like-minded engineers with the same mission along with the guidance of experienced trainers and seasoned IPv6 deployers, then click >> https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-en >> >> to indicate your interest. Only 20 seats available. Selection is strict based on how well you meet the pre-requisites within the registration form. >> >> >> See you in Dakar? >> >> Brice for the AFRINIC IPv6 Deployment Support Team >> >> >> **Fran?ai**s ici**** >> >> Chers coll?gues, >> >> Bien que tous les pr?fixes IPv6 (et ceci est aussi valable pour IPv4) n'aient pas tous besoin d'?tre annonc?s globalement, la plupart doivent l'?tre. Il y a un nombre important de pr?fixes IPv6 de notre r?gion qui n'est actuellement pas annonc?. >> >> Si vous avez un espace IPv6 et ne l'annoncez pas par choix de design, alors ce mail n'est pas pour vous. Ce mail n'est non plus pas pour vous si vous >> >> >> - n?avez pas d?j? des connaissances d?IPv6 >> - ne disposez pas d?j? d'un bloc d'adresses IPv6 pour votre r?seau >> - n??tes pas responsables de la configuration des sessions BGP de >> votre r?seau >> - avez besoin de preuve (? alpha = 0,05) que IPv6 n'est pas un mot ? >> la mode qui dispara?tra si vous enterrez notre t?te profond?ment dans ?le >> sable? d?IPv4 >> >> >> Cependant, si vous ne l?avez pas encore annonc? ? cause de l?un ou plusieurs de ces d?fis suivant: >> >> >> - la comp?tence et la connaissance >> - la confiance d?executer un projet ?NOUVEAU? sans l?appui dun expert >> - le temps de simplement s'asseoir et de le faire sans la distraction >> d'autres projets cl?s; (les r?seaux sociaux n?en font pas partir :-) ) >> >> Alors nous avons une solution pour vous SI vous serez ? l'AIS de Dakar. Nous allons faire un hackathon avec les objectifs suivants: >> >> >> 1. Annoncez en toute s?curit? votre pr?fixe IPv6 d'une mani?re >> conforme aux meilleures pratiques en la mati?re >> 2. Activer IPv6 sur votre r?seau principal pour pouvoir connecter un >> client IPv6 natif dans un futur proche >> >> >> Ceci est notre r?ponse ? un d?fi r?current qui est ressorti au terme de notre derni?re enqu?te sur les d?fis de d?ploiement IPv6: "Manque de confiance" >> >> >> Pour ?tre clair, >> >> >> - Ce n'est pas un atelier de formation (vous allez passer 90% du >> temps dans un groupe). Si vous n'avez pas de connaissances sur IPv6, cet >> ?v?nement n'est pas le v?tre. >> - Ce n'est pas une session pour argumenter ? l?infinie sur les >> raisons pour lesquelles une application sp?cifique ne fonctionne pas sur >> IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) >> >> Donc, si vous souhaitez annoncer notre pr?fixe IPv6 de mani?re s?curis?e avec les meilleures pratiques en la mati?re, si vous souhaitez ?tre pr?t ? connecter nativement un client IPv6 natif. Si vous tenez ? avoir un groupe d'ing?nieurs partageant les m?mes id?es avec la m?me mission avec les conseils de formateurs exp?riment?s et d?experts dans le d?ploiement d?IPv6, cliquez sur >> https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-fr >> >> pour indiquer votre int?r?t. Seulement 20 places seront disponibles. La s?lection est faite en fonction des r?ponses que vous donnez aux questions pos?s dans le formulaire d'inscription. >> >> >> On se voit ? Dakar? >> >> Brice repr?sentant l'?quipe de support au d?ploiement IPv6 d'AFRINIC >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > -- Daddy TALASI KAZIAMA, Gestionnaire des bases des donn?es EUP-PBF Bandundu Projet PDSS-Financement Banque Mondiale T?l: +243 099 394 653/ 0829640003 E-mail: daddytalasi at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From seeburn.k at gmail.com Thu Mar 22 12:03:16 2018 From: seeburn.k at gmail.com (Kris Seeburn) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:03:16 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] AfrIPv6-Discuss Digest, Vol 137, Issue 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <72717D29-D718-4EC0-BE8E-4DC71D3B14A4@gmail.com> People, whether using or not using the space. It?s still good to advertise your space. We must make sure Afrinic has clear view of those space. Although not a policy but it is being done to ensure all resources are accounted for. Kris > On Mar 22, 2018, at 16:00, afripv6-discuss-request at afrinic.net wrote: > > Send AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list submissions to > afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > afripv6-discuss-request at afrinic.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > afripv6-discuss-owner at afrinic.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of AfrIPv6-Discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Is Your IPv6 Space Still Unannounced? Here?s your chance > to fix it! (Daddy TALASI KAZIAMA) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 07:26:32 +0100 > From: Daddy TALASI KAZIAMA > To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions > Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Is Your IPv6 Space Still Unannounced? > Here?s your chance to fix it! > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Brice Merci et f?licitation c'est une bonne id?e, et m?thodologie je pense. > > Daddy TALASI > > Le 21 mars 2018 ? 17:42, TIDJANI Mahamat Adoum a > ?crit : > >> Merci et f?licitation pour l'initiative. ?a serait un bon d?part pour >> beaucoup d'entre nous >> >> Le mer. 21 mars 2018 15:58, Brice ABBA a ?crit : >> >>> **Fran?ai**s en bas**** >>> Hi colleagues, >>> >>> While not every IPv6 prefix (even the legacy IPv4 ones for that matter) need to be globally announced, most need to be. There?s a significant number of IPv6 prefixes from our region that is currently unannounced. >>> >>> If you have IPv6 space and don?t announce it design|choice, then this mail isn?t for you. This message is also NOT for you if you >>> >>> >>> - don?t already have IPv6 knowledge >>> - don?t already have IPv6 address space for your network >>> - are not responsible for configuring BGP sessions for your network >>> - need proof (at alpha = 0.05) that IPv6 isn?t a buzzword that will >>> go away if you bury our head deeper in the sands of IPv4 >>> >>> However, if you haven?t announced it due challenges in one or more of >>> >>> >>> - skill and knowledge >>> - confidence to push something ?new? without pro guidance >>> - time to just sit down and get it done without the distraction of >>> other key projects (social media not being one of them :-) >>> >>> >>> Then we have a solution for you IF you will be at AIS in Dakar. We?ll be doing a hackathon-style (see that buzzword right there? :-) event with the following objectives: >>> >>> >>> 1. Securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with >>> industry best practice >>> 2. Enable IPv6 over your core network to be able to connect a native >>> IPv6 customer in the future >>> >>> This is our response to a recurring challenge from our last IPv6 deployment challenges survey: ?Lack of Confidence? >>> >>> >>> Just to be clear >>> >>> >>> - This is not a training workshop (you?ll be DOing 90% of the time in >>> a group). If you don?t have IPv6 training, this is NOT for you. >>> - This is not a session for arguing ad-infinitum about why some >>> $specific_software doesn?t work on IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) >>> >>> So if you want to securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with industry best practice, and get ready to natively connect a native IPv6 customer. If you?d value a having a group of like-minded engineers with the same mission along with the guidance of experienced trainers and seasoned IPv6 deployers, then click >>> https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-en >>> >>> to indicate your interest. Only 20 seats available. Selection is strict based on how well you meet the pre-requisites within the registration form. >>> >>> >>> See you in Dakar? >>> >>> Brice for the AFRINIC IPv6 Deployment Support Team >>> >>> >>> **Fran?ai**s ici**** >>> >>> Chers coll?gues, >>> >>> Bien que tous les pr?fixes IPv6 (et ceci est aussi valable pour IPv4) n'aient pas tous besoin d'?tre annonc?s globalement, la plupart doivent l'?tre. Il y a un nombre important de pr?fixes IPv6 de notre r?gion qui n'est actuellement pas annonc?. >>> >>> Si vous avez un espace IPv6 et ne l'annoncez pas par choix de design, alors ce mail n'est pas pour vous. Ce mail n'est non plus pas pour vous si vous >>> >>> >>> - n?avez pas d?j? des connaissances d?IPv6 >>> - ne disposez pas d?j? d'un bloc d'adresses IPv6 pour votre r?seau >>> - n??tes pas responsables de la configuration des sessions BGP de >>> votre r?seau >>> - avez besoin de preuve (? alpha = 0,05) que IPv6 n'est pas un mot ? >>> la mode qui dispara?tra si vous enterrez notre t?te profond?ment dans ?le >>> sable? d?IPv4 >>> >>> >>> Cependant, si vous ne l?avez pas encore annonc? ? cause de l?un ou plusieurs de ces d?fis suivant: >>> >>> >>> - la comp?tence et la connaissance >>> - la confiance d?executer un projet ?NOUVEAU? sans l?appui dun expert >>> - le temps de simplement s'asseoir et de le faire sans la distraction >>> d'autres projets cl?s; (les r?seaux sociaux n?en font pas partir :-) ) >>> >>> Alors nous avons une solution pour vous SI vous serez ? l'AIS de Dakar. Nous allons faire un hackathon avec les objectifs suivants: >>> >>> >>> 1. Annoncez en toute s?curit? votre pr?fixe IPv6 d'une mani?re >>> conforme aux meilleures pratiques en la mati?re >>> 2. Activer IPv6 sur votre r?seau principal pour pouvoir connecter un >>> client IPv6 natif dans un futur proche >>> >>> >>> Ceci est notre r?ponse ? un d?fi r?current qui est ressorti au terme de notre derni?re enqu?te sur les d?fis de d?ploiement IPv6: "Manque de confiance" >>> >>> >>> Pour ?tre clair, >>> >>> >>> - Ce n'est pas un atelier de formation (vous allez passer 90% du >>> temps dans un groupe). Si vous n'avez pas de connaissances sur IPv6, cet >>> ?v?nement n'est pas le v?tre. >>> - Ce n'est pas une session pour argumenter ? l?infinie sur les >>> raisons pour lesquelles une application sp?cifique ne fonctionne pas sur >>> IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) >>> >>> Donc, si vous souhaitez annoncer notre pr?fixe IPv6 de mani?re s?curis?e avec les meilleures pratiques en la mati?re, si vous souhaitez ?tre pr?t ? connecter nativement un client IPv6 natif. Si vous tenez ? avoir un groupe d'ing?nieurs partageant les m?mes id?es avec la m?me mission avec les conseils de formateurs exp?riment?s et d?experts dans le d?ploiement d?IPv6, cliquez sur >>> https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-fr >>> >>> pour indiquer votre int?r?t. Seulement 20 places seront disponibles. La s?lection est faite en fonction des r?ponses que vous donnez aux questions pos?s dans le formulaire d'inscription. >>> >>> >>> On se voit ? Dakar? >>> >>> Brice repr?sentant l'?quipe de support au d?ploiement IPv6 d'AFRINIC >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >>> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> >> > > > -- > Daddy TALASI KAZIAMA, > Gestionnaire des bases des donn?es > EUP-PBF Bandundu > Projet PDSS-Financement Banque Mondiale > T?l: +243 099 394 653/ 0829640003 > E-mail: daddytalasi at gmail.com > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > > ------------------------------ > > End of AfrIPv6-Discuss Digest, Vol 137, Issue 11 > ************************************************ Kris Seeburn seeburn.k at gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ "Life is a Beach, it all depends at how you look at it" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: KeepItOn_Social_animated.gif Type: image/gif Size: 51490 bytes Desc: not available URL: From abscoco at gmail.com Fri Mar 23 12:18:54 2018 From: abscoco at gmail.com (Sylvain BAYA) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:18:54 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?_Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_Unannounced?= =?utf-8?q?=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= In-Reply-To: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> References: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> Message-ID: <26f63b34-0581-2044-1ec5-3af5d0f57e62@gmail.com> Salut Brice, Merci, ? l'?quipe, d'AFRINIC, en charge du Renforcement des Capacit?s de la Communaut? Technique Africaine, pour l'initiative de ce projet qui m'apparait comme une innovation pour plusieurs raisons : * Voil? un moyen de partage d'exp?riences entre utilisateurs de la pile TCP/IPv6, d'une part et qui servira comme Cas d'Etude concret pour ceux qui sont encore sur la ligne de d?part; * C'est un HackAton, de type "NetHAton", entre des profils d'exp?riment?s du d?ploiement IPv6; * C'est une opportunit? pour les participants distants de suivre pas ? pas l'?quipe de leur choix, dans ses configurations ; * C'est aussi un moyen d'?tablir un mod?le de TP (Travaux Pratiques) qui pourrait aider les acad?mies d'Ing?nierie R?seaux ? mieux pr?parer des techniciens et ing?nieurs orient?s IPv6; * ... Ces observations faites, je souhaiterais solliciter de la part de l'?quipe du projet, les quelques id?es suivantes : * Ce projet est une bonne exp?rience qui reste perfectible; * Si vous pr?voyez un Looking Glass, pour nous qui ne seront pas avec vous, ce sera merveilleux (voir NLNOG RING | https://ring.nlnog.net/); * Penser ? cr?er un Wiki, sur lequel vous pourrez inviter vos premiers participants ? collaborer pour b?tir ensemble un bon mod?le de "NetHAton" pour les Acad?mies, les NOGs locaux et autres Communaut?s int?ress?es par l'Ing?nierie R?seaux; * Encourager chaque candidat ? pr?senter un cas d'?tude, de d?ploiement au sein de son infrastructure et de s'engager ? r?diger, chacun, un article de type partage d'exp?rience au terme du "NetHAton"; qui pourront ?tre post?s sur un blog pr?par? pour pr?senter l'?volution de l'adoption et du d?ploiement d'IPv6 en Afrique, genre : "IPv6DeployTimeLine"; * Si l'on veut marquer plus d'impact sur nos r?seaux, nous devons nous orienter FLOSS. Dans ce cas, c'est de pr?parer le mat?riels de travail (mod?les de fichiers de configuration ? personnaliser) avec la d?marche proc?durale, et rendre le travail disponible, via un d?p?t Git, sous une licence libre, d?s que tout est pr?t; * L'automatisation du d?ploiement devrait aussi ?tre pris en compte et encore, le modelage et la transportation de mod?le personnalisable. Ainsi, Ansible et Docker avec VirtualBox et peut-?tre GNS3, sans chercher ? influencer quoi que ce soit sur la structure de vos bancs d'essai actuels (Banc d'essai IPv6 - AFRINIC Training | learn.afrinic.net/fr/evenements/book-ipv6-testbed ). Courage, nous vous suivons avec attention. Cordialement, --sb. <#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Philippiens3:8"/Et m?me je regarde toutes choses comme une perte, ? cause de l'excellence de la connaissance de J?sus-Christ mon Seigneur, pour lequel j'ai renonc? ? tout, et je les regarde comme de la boue, afin de gagner Christ,/"> Le 3/21/2018 ? 3:56 PM, Brice ABBA a ?crit : > **Fran?ai**s en bas**** > Hi colleagues, [...] > Donc, si vous souhaitez annoncer notre pr?fixe IPv6 de mani?re > s?curis?e avec les meilleures pratiques en la mati?re, si vous > souhaitez ?tre pr?t ? connecter nativement un client IPv6 natif. Si > vous tenez ? avoir un groupe d'ing?nieurs partageant les m?mes id?es > avec la m?me mission avec les conseils de formateurs exp?riment?s et > d?experts dans le d?ploiement d?IPv6, cliquez sur > https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-fr pour indiquer > votre int?r?t. Seulement 20 places seront disponibles. La s?lection > est faite en fonction des r?ponses que vous donnez aux questions pos?s > dans le formulaire d'inscription. On se voit ? Dakar? Brice > repr?sentant l'?quipe de support au d?ploiement IPv6 d'AFRINIC > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ____ cmNOG's Local Surveys https://survey.cmnog.cm/index.php/538471?lang=en https://survey.cmnog.cm/index.php/538471?lang=fr ____ Global IPv6 Deployment Survey 2018 ... _____ Web Site : https://www.cmnog.cm News : https://www.cmnog.cm/news Mailing List : https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog Wiki : https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki Twitter : https://twitter.com/cmN0G Hashtags : #cmNOG #REBOOTcmNOG Facebook : https://facebook.com/cmNOG Ancient Blog : https://cmnog.wordpress.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0x65AC8594.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 3105 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0x65AC8594.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 3104 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From bruno.stevant at gmail.com Mon Mar 26 08:07:55 2018 From: bruno.stevant at gmail.com (Bruno Stevant) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:07:55 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_Unannounced?= =?utf-8?q?=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= In-Reply-To: <26f63b34-0581-2044-1ec5-3af5d0f57e62@gmail.com> References: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> <26f63b34-0581-2044-1ec5-3af5d0f57e62@gmail.com> Message-ID: > > * L'automatisation du d?ploiement devrait aussi ?tre pris en compte et > encore, le modelage et la transportation de mod?le personnalisable. Ainsi, > Ansible et Docker avec VirtualBox et peut-?tre GNS3, sans chercher ? > influencer quoi que ce soit sur la structure de vos bancs d'essai actuels (Banc > d'essai IPv6 - AFRINIC Training > > | learn.afrinic.net/fr/evenements/book-ipv6-testbed ). > Bonjour, Sur ce point, je tiens ? vous informer de la disponibilit? d'un projet initi? lors d'un hackathon RIPE-NCC : https://github.com/inognet/pocketinternet Ce projet a notamment ?t? pr?vu pour faire un mini-lab IPv6/BGP o? les h?tes et routeurs sont virtualis?s sous forme de container. > > Courage, nous vous suivons avec attention. > Cordialement, > --sb. > > <#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Philippiens3:8"*Et m?me je regarde toutes choses comme une perte, ? cause de l'excellence de la connaissance de J?sus-Christ mon Seigneur, pour lequel j'ai renonc? ? tout, et je les regarde comme de la boue, afin de gagner Christ,*"> > > > Le 3/21/2018 ? 3:56 PM, Brice ABBA a ?crit : > > **Fran?ai**s en bas**** > Hi colleagues, > > [...] > > Donc, si vous souhaitez annoncer notre pr?fixe IPv6 de mani?re s?curis?e avec les meilleures pratiques en la mati?re, si vous souhaitez ?tre pr?t ? connecter nativement un client IPv6 natif. Si vous tenez ? avoir un groupe d'ing?nieurs partageant les m?mes id?es avec la m?me mission avec les conseils de formateurs exp?riment?s et d?experts dans le d?ploiement d?IPv6, cliquez sur > https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-fr > > pour indiquer votre int?r?t. Seulement 20 places seront disponibles. La s?lection est faite en fonction des r?ponses que vous donnez aux questions pos?s dans le formulaire d'inscription. > > > On se voit ? Dakar? > > Brice repr?sentant l'?quipe de support au d?ploiement IPv6 d'AFRINIC > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing listAfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > > ____ > cmNOG's Local Surveys https://survey.cmnog.cm/index.php/538471?lang=en https://survey.cmnog.cm/index.php/538471?lang=fr > ____ > Global IPv6 Deployment Survey 2018 > ... > _____ > Web Site : https://www.cmnog.cm > News : https://www.cmnog.cm/news > Mailing List : https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog > Wiki : https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki > Twitter : https://twitter.com/cmN0G > Hashtags : #cmNOG #REBOOTcmNOG > Facebook : https://facebook.com/cmNOG > Ancient Blog : https://cmnog.wordpress.com > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nishal at controlfreak.co.za Mon Mar 26 10:00:59 2018 From: nishal at controlfreak.co.za (Nishal Goburdhan) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:00:59 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_Unannounced?= =?utf-8?q?=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= In-Reply-To: References: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> <26f63b34-0581-2044-1ec5-3af5d0f57e62@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1A6CBE74-AA29-46BD-A631-88592C04A00F@controlfreak.co.za> On 26 Mar 2018, at 10:07, Bruno Stevant wrote: >> * L'automatisation du d?ploiement devrait aussi ?tre pris en compte >> et >> encore, le modelage et la transportation de mod?le personnalisable. >> Ainsi, >> Ansible et Docker avec VirtualBox et peut-?tre GNS3, sans chercher >> ? >> influencer quoi que ce soit sur la structure de vos bancs d'essai >> actuels (Banc >> d'essai IPv6 - AFRINIC Training >> >> | learn.afrinic.net/fr/evenements/book-ipv6-testbed ). >> > > Bonjour, > > Sur ce point, je tiens ? vous informer de la disponibilit? d'un > projet > initi? lors d'un hackathon RIPE-NCC : > https://github.com/inognet/pocketinternet > Ce projet a notamment ?t? pr?vu pour faire un mini-lab IPv6/BGP o? > les > h?tes et routeurs sont virtualis?s sous forme de container. mukom is on a plane somewhere, and he will likely feedback in more detail when he is on the ground, but the idea is not so much to have this work in a *lab*, but to make it work on your actual network. lab sims are great; if you want to get that done, go ahead :-) but from what he explained to me, the idea behind this ?deployathon? is to have network operators take that final step to actually get their network space announced, and to turn up, at least one live service on ipv6. that?s why the entry criteria for this this workshop, are different from the regular IPv6 workshops that afrinic runs. ?n. From tamon at afrinic.net Mon Mar 26 14:18:42 2018 From: tamon at afrinic.net (Mukom Akong T) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:18:42 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Is Your IPv6 Space Still Unannounced? =?utf-8?Q?Here=E2=80=99s_?=your chance to fix it! In-Reply-To: <1A6CBE74-AA29-46BD-A631-88592C04A00F@controlfreak.co.za> References: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> <26f63b34-0581-2044-1ec5-3af5d0f57e62@gmail.com> <1A6CBE74-AA29-46BD-A631-88592C04A00F@controlfreak.co.za> Message-ID: <06e02e36-9283-41c0-94b7-29664010a7bb@Spark> Thank you Nishal for the clarification. Indeed, this is NOT going to be a training session. The objective is ? your unannounced IPv6 prefix announced from your real network. Any labs (GNS3, Docker, EVE-ng, ?etc or even?AFRINIC?s extensive testbed) will only serve for PROTOYPING as step towards making changes to the production network. We assume (and it?s a pre-requisite) that anyone who qualifies already has a testing environment to use before deploying things into production (that?s if your network change policy requires that). For those that have been selected, they?ll get personalised instructions about what to do to make it possible to implement the objective .. live on the network. And for that reason, we are only looking for the people who are responsible for making network changes in their real networks. On 26 Mar 2018, 11:04 +0100, Nishal Goburdhan , wrote: > On 26 Mar 2018, at 10:07, Bruno Stevant wrote: > > > > * L'automatisation du d?ploiement devrait aussi ?tre pris en compte > > > et > > > encore, le modelage et la transportation de mod?le personnalisable. > > > Ainsi, > > > Ansible et Docker avec VirtualBox et peut-?tre GNS3, sans chercher > > > ? > > > influencer quoi que ce soit sur la structure de vos bancs d'essai > > > actuels (Banc > > > d'essai IPv6 - AFRINIC Training > > > > > | learn.afrinic.net/fr/evenements/book-ipv6-testbed ). > > > > > > > Bonjour, > > > > Sur ce point, je tiens ? vous informer de la disponibilit? d'un > > projet > > initi? lors d'un hackathon RIPE-NCC : > > https://github.com/inognet/pocketinternet > > Ce projet a notamment ?t? pr?vu pour faire un mini-lab IPv6/BGP o? > > les > > h?tes et routeurs sont virtualis?s sous forme de container. > > > mukom is on a plane somewhere, and he will likely feedback in more > detail when he is on the ground, but the idea is not so much to have > this work in a *lab*, but to make it work on your actual network. > > lab sims are great; if you want to get that done, go ahead :-) > but from what he explained to me, the idea behind this ?deployathon? > is to have network operators take that final step to actually get their > network space announced, and to turn up, at least one live service on > ipv6. > > that?s why the entry criteria for this this workshop, are different > from the regular IPv6 workshops that afrinic runs. > > ?n. > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abscoco at gmail.com Mon Mar 26 21:58:05 2018 From: abscoco at gmail.com (Sylvain BAYA) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:58:05 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_Unannounced?= =?utf-8?q?=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= In-Reply-To: References: <18a18659-ca2b-7da3-6054-e42a3e14e847@afrinic.net> <26f63b34-0581-2044-1ec5-3af5d0f57e62@gmail.com> Message-ID: <55efb93e-f78e-28cc-79e9-8cffd8fef817@gmail.com> Cher Bruno, Le 3/26/2018 ? 9:07 AM, Bruno Stevant a ?crit : > > * L'automatisation du d?ploiement devrait aussi ?tre pris en > compte et encore, le modelage et la transportation de mod?le > personnalisable. Ainsi, Ansible et Docker avec VirtualBox et > peut-?tre GNS3, sans chercher ? influencer quoi que ce soit sur la > structure de vos bancs d'essai actuels (Banc d'essai IPv6 - > AFRINIC Training > | > learn.afrinic.net/fr/evenements/book-ipv6-testbed > ). > > > Bonjour, > > Sur ce point, je tiens ? vous informer de la disponibilit? d'un projet > initi? lors d'un hackathon RIPE-NCC : > https://github.com/inognet/pocketinternet > Ce projet a notamment ?t? pr?vu pour faire un mini-lab IPv6/BGP o? les > h?tes et routeurs sont virtualis?s sous forme de container. > > Merci pour cette pr?cieuse information, je n'ai pas vu passer cet int?ressant projet de iNOG :-) Je suis toujours int?ress? par des solutions alternatives, mais suffisamment intelligentes et innovantes pour actionner des avanc?es m?me ? petits pas. En effet, ? mon sens, ce qui compte finalement c'est d'avoir un cadre/outillage technique d'expression transportable ou reproductible. Et encore, si c'est libre et ouvert c'est parfait. Pour revenir ? l'initiative r?gionale, annonc?e en entame de ce fil de discussion, Je ne doute pas que tout aie ?t? aussi fait suivant de bonnes pratiques d'optimisation; mais aussi de minimalisation en entame. Donc, on va commencer par savourer cette nouvelle formule prometteuse, en encourageant l'?quipe du Capacity Building, puis on reviendra, en parler, ? l'?valuation si DIEU nous l'accorde. Cordialement, --sb. <#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Philippiens3:8"/Et m?me je regarde toutes choses comme une perte, ? cause de l'excellence de la connaissance de J?sus-Christ mon Seigneur, pour lequel j'ai renonc? ? tout, et je les regarde comme de la boue, afin de gagner Christ,/"> > [...] ____ cmNOG's Local Surveys https://survey.cmnog.cm/index.php/538471?lang=en https://survey.cmnog.cm/index.php/538471?lang=fr ____ Global IPv6 Deployment Survey 2018 ... _____ Web Site : https://www.cmnog.cm News : https://www.cmnog.cm/news Mailing List : https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog Wiki : https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki Twitter : https://twitter.com/cmN0G Hashtags : #cmNOG #REBOOTcmNOG Facebook : https://facebook.com/cmNOG Ancient Blog : https://cmnog.wordpress.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0x65AC8594.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 3104 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From latif at ladid.lu Wed Mar 28 20:41:03 2018 From: latif at ladid.lu (Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet]) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 22:41:03 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 Roadmap for Algeria Message-ID: <04d901d3c6d5$180b8c20$4822a460$@ladid.lu> Bruno, I just came back from Alegria invited by the Armed Forces to consult them on IPv6 and Cybersecurity. I would like to send me some text to enable them to issue a call for a proposal for the IPv6 deployment in Algeria and hopefully to get the project and work together on it. Cheers Latif -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From latif at ladid.lu Wed Mar 28 21:31:47 2018 From: latif at ladid.lu (Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet]) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:31:47 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 Roadmap for Algeria In-Reply-To: <04d901d3c6d5$180b8c20$4822a460$@ladid.lu> References: <04d901d3c6d5$180b8c20$4822a460$@ladid.lu> Message-ID: <04f101d3c6dc$2db99c40$892cd4c0$@ladid.lu> Folks, This was not meant for this list. My apologies. Cheers Latif From: Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet] Sent: 28 March 2018 22:41 To: 'IPv6 in Africa Discussions' Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 Roadmap for Algeria Bruno, I just came back from Alegria invited by the Armed Forces to consult them on IPv6 and Cybersecurity. I would like to send me some text to enable them to issue a call for a proposal for the IPv6 deployment in Algeria and hopefully to get the project and work together on it. Cheers Latif -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brice at afrinic.net Mon Apr 2 16:14:44 2018 From: brice at afrinic.net (Brice ABBA) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 20:14:44 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?REMINDER=3A_Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_?= =?utf-8?q?Unannounced=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= Message-ID: **Fran?ai**s en bas**** Hi colleagues, While not every IPv6 prefix (even the legacy IPv4 ones for that matter) need to be globally announced, most need to be. There?s a significant number of IPv6 prefixes from our region that is currently unannounced. If you have IPv6 space and don?t announce it design|choice, then this mail isn?t for you. This message is also NOT for you if you * don?t already have IPv6 knowledge * don?t already have IPv6 address space for your network * are not responsible for configuring BGP sessions for your network * need proof (at alpha = 0.05) that IPv6 isn?t a buzzword that will go away if you bury our head deeper in the sands of IPv4 However, if you haven?t announced it due challenges in one or more of * skill and knowledge * confidence to push something ?new? without pro guidance * time to just sit down and get it done without the distraction of other key projects (social media not being one of them :-) Then we have a solution for you IF you will be at AIS in Dakar. We?ll be doing a hackathon-style (see that buzzword right there? :-) event with the following objectives: 1. Securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with industry best practice 2. Enable IPv6 over your core network to be able to connect a native IPv6 customer in the future This is our response to a recurring challenge from our last IPv6 deployment challenges survey: ?Lack of Confidence? Just to be clear * This is not a training workshop (you?ll be DOing 90% of the time in a group). If you don?t have IPv6 training, this is NOT for you. * This is not a session for arguing ad-infinitum about why some $specific_software doesn?t work on IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) So if you want to securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with industry best practice, and get ready to natively connect a native IPv6 customer. If you?d value a having a group of like-minded engineers with the same mission along with the guidance of experienced trainers and seasoned IPv6 deployers, then click https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-en **PS:Registration will be closed**Wednesday 14 April 2018** to indicate your interest. Only 20 seats available. Selection is strict based on how well you meet the pre-requisites within the registration form. See you in Dakar? Brice for the AFRINIC IPv6 Deployment Support Team **Fran?ai**s ici**** Chers coll?gues, Bien que tous les pr?fixes IPv6 (et ceci est aussi valable pour IPv4) n'aient pas tous besoin d'?tre annonc?s globalement, la plupart doivent l'?tre. Il y a un nombre important de pr?fixes IPv6 de notre r?gion qui n'est actuellement pas annonc?. Si vous avez un espace IPv6 et ne l'annoncez pas par choix de design, alors ce mail n'est pas pour vous. Ce mail n'est non plus pas pour vous si vous * n?avez pas d?j? des connaissances d?IPv6 * ne disposez pas d?j? d'un bloc d'adresses IPv6 pour votre r?seau * n??tes pas responsables de la configuration des sessions BGP de votre r?seau * avez besoin de preuve (? alpha = 0,05) que IPv6 n'est pas un mot ? la mode qui dispara?tra si vous enterrez notre t?te profond?ment dans ?le sable? d?IPv4 Cependant, si vous ne l?avez pas encore annonc? ? cause de l?un ou plusieurs de ces d?fis suivant: * la comp?tence et la connaissance * la confiance d?executer un projet ?NOUVEAU? sans l?appui dun expert * le temps de simplement s'asseoir et de le faire sans la distraction d'autres projets cl?s; (les r?seaux sociaux n?en font pas partir :-) ) Alors nous avons une solution pour vous SI vous serez ? l'AIS de Dakar. Nous allons faire un hackathon avec les objectifs suivants: 1. Annoncez en toute s?curit? votre pr?fixe IPv6 d'une mani?re conforme aux meilleures pratiques en la mati?re 2. Activer IPv6 sur votre r?seau principal pour pouvoir connecter un client IPv6 natif dans un futur proche Ceci est notre r?ponse ? un d?fi r?current qui est ressorti au terme de notre derni?re enqu?te sur les d?fis de d?ploiement IPv6: "Manque de confiance" Pour ?tre clair, * Ce n'est pas un atelier de formation (vous allez passer 90% du temps dans un groupe). Si vous n'avez pas de connaissances sur IPv6, cet ?v?nement n'est pas le v?tre. * Ce n'est pas une session pour argumenter ? l?infinie sur les raisons pour lesquelles une application sp?cifique ne fonctionne pas sur IPv6. (aka #6ExcuseCon) Donc, si vous souhaitez annoncer notre pr?fixe IPv6 de mani?re s?curis?e avec les meilleures pratiques en la mati?re, si vous souhaitez ?tre pr?t ? connecter nativement un client IPv6 natif. Si vous tenez ? avoir un groupe d'ing?nieurs partageant les m?mes id?es avec la m?me mission avec les conseils de formateurs exp?riment?s et d?experts dans le d?ploiement d?IPv6, cliquez sur https://survey.afrinic.net/index.php/744712/lang-fr **PS: Les **inscriptions**fermeront ce Mercredi 04 Avril 2018** pour indiquer votre int?r?t. Seulement 20 places seront disponibles. La s?lection est faite en fonction des r?ponses que vous donnez aux questions pos?s dans le formulaire d'inscription. On se voit ? Dakar? Brice repr?sentant l'?quipe de support au d?ploiement IPv6 d'AFRINIC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brice at afrinic.net Mon Apr 2 16:16:14 2018 From: brice at afrinic.net (Brice ABBA) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 20:16:14 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Errata=3A_Is_Your_IPv6_Space_Still_Un?= =?utf-8?q?announced=3F_Here=E2=80=99s_your_chance_to_fix_it!?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <712ecafe-6bc5-8e75-c157-a35a72ad0972@afrinic.net> > **PS:Registration will be closed**Wednesday 04 April 2018** -- Mr Brice B. ABBA t: +230 403 51 00 | f: +230 466 6758 | tt: @afrinic | w:www.afrinic.net facebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join us for the Africa Internet Summit AIS?18 in Dakar, Senegal from 29th April to 11th May 2018 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willy.manga at auf.org Tue Apr 3 07:42:14 2018 From: willy.manga at auf.org (Willy MANGA) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 08:42:14 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Another ISP providing IPv6 in Cameroon Message-ID: <22d098a7-976b-6219-05b6-4a0056d6f44a@auf.org> Hi, For your information, our third site in Cameroon can use v6 prefix (a /48) since yesterday . Kudos to INFOGENIE (AS327741) . I may be wrong but it would be the second ISP providing IPv6 in Cameroon. I know they made some workaround to provide us IPv6 but I'm confident they will attend the 'deployathon' in Dakar and enhance their architecture ;) Hopefully more sites in our region will use v6 soon; we keep asking it to our ISP. -- Willy Ted MANGA Responsable Technique R?gional | DRACGL https://www.auf.org/afrique-centrale-grands-lacs/ From bruno.stevant at gmail.com Wed Apr 4 10:22:00 2018 From: bruno.stevant at gmail.com (Bruno Stevant) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 10:22:00 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 Message-ID: Apr?s 3 sessions et plus de 15.000 inscrits, le MOOC Objectif IPv6 revient pour une 4?me session ! Toute l??quipe p?dagogique esp?re vous accompagner ? la d?couverte d'IPv6 et vous donner les cl?s pour devenir op?rationnel. Le MOOC Objectif IPv6, c?est : - Plus de 3h de cours en vid?os, par les intervenants du G6 - Un support de cours complet et mis ? jour ! - Des interviews d?acteurs du d?ploiement d?IPv6 : Thierry Ernst et St?phane Bortzmeyer - Une plate-forme pour r?aliser des activit?s pratiques et manipuler un r?seau IPv6 Pour vous inscrire ? cette nouvelle session, suivez ce lien https://www.fun-mooc.fr/courses/course-v1:MinesTelecom+04012+session04/about Rendez vous au 4 mai pour l?ouverture de la premi?re semaine de cours ! N?h?sitez pas ? relayer cette information dans votre entourage, votre entreprise et vos communaut?s ! IPv6-ment v?tre, -- Bruno STEVANT Secr?taire de l'association G6 - http://g6.asso.fr Responsable Groupe de Travail Formation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matoa at vayu.net Wed Apr 4 13:06:54 2018 From: matoa at vayu.net (Mathieu Paonessa) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 15:06:54 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Bonjour, Pourriez vous confirmer que cette formation est gratuite pour les membres d'Afrinic int?ress?s? En fouillant dans l'URL donn?e (le site est (volontairement?) mal fait et pas clair ? ce sujet), on voit une info donnant la modique somme de 1550? / participant. Tr?s franchement, ? 1550? par participant + billet d'avion vers la France + frais + cout du visa + ..., je pense que n'importe quel membre ayant du bon sens et voulant former ses ?quipes ? IPv6 ferait mieux de donner cet argent ? AfriNIC pour qu'ils envoient un de leur (excellent) formateurs directement former les personnes en local... My 2 cts, Mathieu On 04/04/2018 12:22, Bruno Stevant wrote: > Apr?s 3 sessions et plus de 15.000 inscrits, le MOOC Objectif IPv6 > revient pour une 4?me session ! > Toute l??quipe p?dagogique esp?re vous accompagner ? la d?couverte > d'IPv6 et vous donner les cl?s pour devenir op?rationnel. > Le MOOC Objectif IPv6, c?est : > - Plus de 3h de cours en vid?os, par les intervenants du G6 > - Un support de cours complet et mis ? jour ! > - Des interviews d?acteurs du d?ploiement d?IPv6 : Thierry Ernst et > St?phane Bortzmeyer > - Une plate-forme pour r?aliser des activit?s pratiques et manipuler un > r?seau IPv6 > Pour vous inscrire ? cette nouvelle session, suivez ce lien? > https://www.fun-mooc.fr/courses/course-v1:MinesTelecom+04012+session04/about > Rendez vous au 4 mai pour l?ouverture de la premi?re semaine de cours ! > N?h?sitez pas ? relayer cette information dans votre entourage, votre > entreprise et vos communaut?s ! > IPv6-ment v?tre, > -- > Bruno STEVANT > Secr?taire de l'association G6 - http://g6.asso.fr > Responsable Groupe de Travail Formation > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > From bortzmeyer at nic.fr Wed Apr 4 13:18:27 2018 From: bortzmeyer at nic.fr (Stephane Bortzmeyer) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 15:18:27 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20180404131827.u2i3bauzgxdp2awe@nic.fr> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 03:06:54PM +0200, Mathieu Paonessa wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > Tr?s franchement, ? 1550? par participant + billet d'avion vers la > France + frais + cout du visa C'est un MOOC, il n'y a pas de d?placement et l'Internet ne connait pas les visas :-) From bortzmeyer at nic.fr Wed Apr 4 13:33:25 2018 From: bortzmeyer at nic.fr (Stephane Bortzmeyer) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 15:33:25 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 In-Reply-To: <5e4cb3d6-f385-0284-dc28-4d43f7e54d43@vayu.net> References: <20180404131827.u2i3bauzgxdp2awe@nic.fr> <5e4cb3d6-f385-0284-dc28-4d43f7e54d43@vayu.net> Message-ID: <20180404133325.7rmjuwolrunte3tq@nic.fr> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Mathieu Paonessa wrote a message of 100 lines which said: > En allant b?tement sur le site je vois: > > Prix : 1550 ? Je crois que vous avez confondu avec ?a , qui n'a rien ? voir. From bruno.stevant at gmail.com Wed Apr 4 14:10:30 2018 From: bruno.stevant at gmail.com (Bruno Stevant) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 14:10:30 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 In-Reply-To: <20180404133325.7rmjuwolrunte3tq@nic.fr> References: <20180404131827.u2i3bauzgxdp2awe@nic.fr> <5e4cb3d6-f385-0284-dc28-4d43f7e54d43@vayu.net> <20180404133325.7rmjuwolrunte3tq@nic.fr> Message-ID: Bonjour Mathieu et St?phane, En effet, sur la page de pr?sentation du MOOC nous avons inclus un lien vers l'organisme de formation de l'Institut Mines Telecom (Telecom Evolution) avec lequel nous organisons un parcours hybride : suivi du MOOC avec accompagnement personnalis? et 2 jours de formation en pr?sentiel. Cette offre (payante) est bien s?r optionnelle et s'adresse principalement aux apprenants d?sirant un suivi et un approfondissement particulier. La participation au MOOC en lui-m?me reste gratuite et l'?quipe p?dagogique sera ? vos c?t?s pour vous accompagner jusqu'? la d?livrance de l'attestation ! Le mer. 4 avr. 2018 ? 15:34, Stephane Bortzmeyer a ?crit : > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 03:26:44PM +0200, > Mathieu Paonessa wrote > a message of 100 lines which said: > > > En allant b?tement sur le site je vois: > > > > Prix : 1550 ? > > Je crois que vous avez confondu avec ?a > < > http://www.telecom-evolution.fr/fr/formations-courtes/ipv6-theorie-et-pratique > >, > qui n'a rien ? voir. > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matoa at vayu.net Wed Apr 4 14:37:00 2018 From: matoa at vayu.net (Mathieu Paonessa) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:37:00 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 In-Reply-To: References: <20180404131827.u2i3bauzgxdp2awe@nic.fr> <5e4cb3d6-f385-0284-dc28-4d43f7e54d43@vayu.net> <20180404133325.7rmjuwolrunte3tq@nic.fr> Message-ID: <4101b4d2-d97d-ab65-f8d7-35393689fdd7@vayu.net> Bonjour Bruno, Merci pour la clarification et la confirmation que ce MOOC est gratuit. Plus aucune excuse donc pour ceux qui n'ont pas de training AfriNIC pr?vu dans leur ville dans les prochains mois de ne pas y participer! Mathieu On 04/04/2018 16:10, Bruno Stevant wrote: > Bonjour Mathieu et St?phane, > En effet, sur la page de pr?sentation du MOOC nous avons inclus un > lien vers l'organisme de formation de l'Institut Mines Telecom > (Telecom Evolution) avec lequel nous organisons un parcours hybride : > suivi du MOOC avec accompagnement personnalis? et 2 jours de formation > en pr?sentiel. > Cette offre (payante) est bien s?r optionnelle et s'adresse > principalement aux apprenants d?sirant un suivi et un > approfondissement particulier. > La participation au MOOC en lui-m?me reste gratuite et l'?quipe > p?dagogique sera ? vos c?t?s pour vous accompagner jusqu'? la > d?livrance de l'attestation ! > > Le?mer. 4 avr. 2018 ??15:34, Stephane Bortzmeyer > a ?crit?: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 03:26:44PM +0200, > ?Mathieu Paonessa > wrote > ?a message of 100 lines which said: > > > En allant b?tement sur le site je vois: > > > > Prix : 1550 ? > > Je crois que vous avez confondu avec ?a > , > qui n'a rien ? voir. > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brice at afrinic.net Wed Apr 11 11:48:54 2018 From: brice at afrinic.net (Brice ABBA) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:48:54 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Webinar_Francophone=3A_R=C3=A9ussir_S?= =?utf-8?q?on_Plan_D=E2=80=99Adressage_IPv6_=7C_JEUDI_19_AVRIL_13h_GMT?= Message-ID: <850b6ec4-0f6c-8b89-417d-40816da7873c@afrinic.net> ** *R?ussir Son Plan D?Adressage IPv6* * JEUDI 19 AVRIL 13h GMT, 17h MUT Webinar | AFRINIC * L?une des activit?s les plus importantes dans la mise en place de son r?seau informatique est le plan d?adressage, ceci ?tait vrai pour IPv4 et cela l?est encore pour ?IPv6. IPv6 repr?sente aujourd'hui pr?s de 20% du trafic Internet et son usage se g?n?ralise de plus en plus. Ainsi, faire en sorte que son r?seau informatique supporte IPv6 devient aujourd?hui un imp?ratif. Entant qu?ing?nieurs et/ou professionnels de syst?me d?informations savoir faire un plan d?adressage IPv6 avec les meilleurs pratiques en la mati?re repr?sente un avantage consid?rable dans ce monde r?solument tourn? vers IPv6. ** * Ce w Ce webinar de 2h vous donnera les bonne pratiques et un outil pour vous aider ? cr?er votre plan d?adressage en 24 heures. * * Nous choisirons ensuite 10 personnes chanceuses pour analyser leurs plan d'adressage et les aider ? obtenir leur bloc d?adresses IPv6 dans dans un d?lais express aupr?s d'AFRINIC! * * Ce webinar vous permettra de: 1. Erreurs ? ?viter lors dans la cr?ation de son plan d?adressage IPv6 2. D?couper un pr?fixe IPv6 en fonction de ses besoins 3. Estimer la taille du pr?fixe IPv6 utile pour votre syst?me d?information 4. Demander votre bloc d?adresses IPv6 ? AFRINIC * * Les pr?requis: 1. G?rer un r?seau IPv4 et avoir les connaissances suivantes: 1. Savoir faire un plan d?adressage IPv4 et VLSM 2. Les Vlans 2. Avoir d?j? suivie une formation en pr?sentielle ou en ligne sur: 1. Les bases d?IPv6 2. Les diff?rents types d?adresses IPv6 [Pour vous inscrire cliquez ici: http://bit.ly/Adressage_Ipv6] * -- Mr Brice B. ABBA t: +230 403 51 00 | f: +230 466 6758 | tt: @afrinic | w:www.afrinic.net facebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join us for the Africa Internet Summit AIS?18 in Dakar, Senegal from 29th April to 11th May 2018 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brice at afrinic.net Mon Apr 16 08:54:50 2018 From: brice at afrinic.net (Brice ABBA) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:54:50 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Webinar_Francophone=3A_R=C3=A9ussir_S?= =?utf-8?q?on_Plan_D=E2=80=99Adressage_IPv6_=7C_JEUDI_19_AVRIL_13h_GMT?= Message-ID: <97e08faf-bf0f-942a-50c3-a77b64e957cc@afrinic.net> ** *R?ussir Son Plan D?Adressage IPv6* * JEUDI 19 AVRIL 13h GMT, 17h MUT Webinar | AFRINIC * L?une des activit?s les plus importantes dans la mise en place de son r?seau informatique est le plan d?adressage, ceci ?tait vrai pour IPv4 et cela l?est encore pour ?IPv6. IPv6 repr?sente aujourd'hui pr?s de 20% du trafic Internet et son usage se g?n?ralise de plus en plus. Ainsi, faire en sorte que son r?seau informatique supporte IPv6 devient aujourd?hui un imp?ratif. Entant qu?ing?nieurs et/ou professionnels de syst?me d?informations savoir faire un plan d?adressage IPv6 avec les meilleurs pratiques en la mati?re repr?sente un avantage consid?rable dans ce monde r?solument tourn? vers IPv6. ** * Ce w Ce webinar de 2h vous donnera les bonne pratiques et un outil pour vous aider ? cr?er votre plan d?adressage en 24 heures. * * Nous choisirons ensuite 10 personnes chanceuses pour analyser leurs plan d'adressage et les aider ? obtenir leur bloc d?adresses IPv6 dans dans un d?lais express aupr?s d'AFRINIC! * * Ce webinar vous permettra de: 1. Erreurs ? ?viter lors dans la cr?ation de son plan d?adressage IPv6 2. D?couper un pr?fixe IPv6 en fonction de ses besoins 3. Estimer la taille du pr?fixe IPv6 utile pour votre syst?me d?information 4. Demander votre bloc d?adresses IPv6 ? AFRINIC * * Les pr?requis: 1. G?rer un r?seau IPv4 et avoir les connaissances suivantes: 1. Savoir faire un plan d?adressage IPv4 et VLSM 2. Les Vlans 2. Avoir d?j? suivie une formation en pr?sentielle ou en ligne sur: 1. Les bases d?IPv6 2. Les diff?rents types d?adresses IPv6 [Pour vous inscrire cliquez ici: http://bit.ly/Adressage_Ipv6] * -- Mr Brice B. ABBA t: +230 403 51 00 | f: +230 466 6758 | tt: @afrinic | w:www.afrinic.net facebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join us for the Africa Internet Summit AIS?18 in Dakar, Senegal from 29th April to 11th May 2018 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matoa at vayu.net Wed Apr 4 13:27:05 2018 From: matoa at vayu.net (Mathieu Paonessa) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 13:27:05 -0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 In-Reply-To: <20180404131827.u2i3bauzgxdp2awe@nic.fr> References: <20180404131827.u2i3bauzgxdp2awe@nic.fr> Message-ID: <5e4cb3d6-f385-0284-dc28-4d43f7e54d43@vayu.net> On 04/04/2018 15:18, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 03:06:54PM +0200, > Mathieu Paonessa wrote > a message of 37 lines which said: > >> Tr?s franchement, ? 1550? par participant + billet d'avion vers la >> France + frais + cout du visa > C'est un MOOC, il n'y a pas de d?placement et l'Internet ne connait > pas les visas :-) Aucune id?e de ce qu'est un MOOC. C'est peut ?tre ?vident pour toi et les personnes qui organisent ca mais je doute que ca le soit pour 100% de la liste. En allant b?tement sur le site je vois: Prix : 1550 ? Dur?e : 6 semaines dont 2 jours en atelier pr?sentiel jour(s) Sessions 30 avril au 11 juin 2018 ? Paris Avec plus bas ?crit: Le parcours en blended learning "IPv6 : th?orie et pratique" s?articule autour d?un cours en ligne (Massive Open Online Course) et de 2 journ?es cons?cutives de travail en pr?sentiel. C'est aussi du MOOC le "pr?sentiel"? :-) Mathieu PS: MOOC = Massive Open Online Course.. c'est vrai que ca fait beaucoup plus "aware" que "cours en ligne"... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From christian.nkoumou at camtel.cm Thu Apr 26 14:20:37 2018 From: christian.nkoumou at camtel.cm (Christian NKOUMOU) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:20:37 +0100 (WAT) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 In-Reply-To: <5e4cb3d6-f385-0284-dc28-4d43f7e54d43@vayu.net> References: <20180404131827.u2i3bauzgxdp2awe@nic.fr> <5e4cb3d6-f385-0284-dc28-4d43f7e54d43@vayu.net> Message-ID: <1393789646.6039941.1524752437347.JavaMail.zimbra@camtel.cm> Quels sont les commodit?s sur place ? J. Christian NKOUMOU Computer & Telecommunications Design Eng ineer MBA Executive on Telecommunications Administration Cisco & Microsoft Certified of Achievment Head of the Center of Specialized Services (CSTE-Y) Tel: (+237) 222 22 23 83 / 242 01 45 54 / 620 00 56 39 De: "Mathieu Paonessa" ?: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" Cc: "IPv6 in Africa Discussions" Envoy?: Mercredi 4 Avril 2018 14:26:44 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] MOOC Objectif IPv6 Session 4 On 04/04/2018 15:18, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 03:06:54PM +0200, Mathieu Paonessa [ mailto:matoa at vayu.net | ] wrote a message of 37 lines which said: BQ_BEGIN Tr?s franchement, ? 1550? par participant + billet d'avion vers la France + frais + cout du visa C'est un MOOC, il n'y a pas de d?placement et l'Internet ne connait pas les visas :-) BQ_END Aucune id?e de ce qu'est un MOOC. C'est peut ?tre ?vident pour toi et les personnes qui organisent ca mais je doute que ca le soit pour 100% de la liste. En allant b?tement sur le site je vois: Prix : 1550 ? Dur?e : 6 semaines dont 2 jours en atelier pr?sentiel jour(s) Sessions 30 avril au 11 juin 2018 ? Paris Avec plus bas ?crit: Le parcours en blended learning "IPv6 : th?orie et pratique" s?articule autour d?un cours en ligne (Massive Open Online Course) et de 2 journ?es cons?cutives de travail en pr?sentiel. C'est aussi du MOOC le "pr?sentiel"? :-) Mathieu PS: MOOC = Massive Open Online Course.. c'est vrai que ca fait beaucoup plus "aware" que "cours en ligne"... _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From latif at ladid.lu Fri May 25 13:33:46 2018 From: latif at ladid.lu (Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet]) Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 15:33:46 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] FW: Nominate Africa's Leading Workplace eLearning Professionals! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <032e01d3f42d$033113d0$09933b70$@ladid.lu> Pls nominate some deserving people. From: Rebecca Stromeyer Sent: 25 May 2018 15:28 To: latif.ladid at uni.lu Subject: Nominate Africa's Leading Workplace eLearning Professionals! Dear Mr Ladid, I would like to take this opportunity to invite you to nominate candidates for the Top 50 most influential Africans in workplace eLearning. This list of Africa?s leading thought leaders, opinion formers and practitioners in eLearning in the workplace in both the corporate and public sectors is scheduled to be published shortly before this year?s eLearning Africa conference, which will be held in Kigali, Rwanda, from 26th to 28th September. This list, which will be published under the ?Bob Little? brand, should draw worldwide attention to the eLearning activities going on throughout Africa. If there is anybody you think should be considered to be on this list, please feel free to nominate them using the form at the end this message which you can send by return email. Eligibility/ Judging Criteria The selection/ eligibility criteria for names on the African Workplace eLearning Movers and Shakers List will be the same as for the ?main? List. That is: People named on the List will be influential within the workplace e-learning sector both within their country and the continent. Those who are influential on a wider geographic scale will tend to rank higher than those who are influential ?only? on a national level. Although academics can be named on this list, they should be considered only in so far as their work influences those in the corporate world in Africa. The list is compiled on the basis of a person?s perceived current influence on the workplace online learning industry ? as a practitioner, commentator, facilitator and/or thought leader. In today?s social media influenced age, this tends to give social media users, especially bloggers, a greater ?international profile? and ?thought leader influence? than, say, practitioners. Nonetheless, the judges will try to take account of the work and influence of ?pure? industry practitioners, including those who are active ?behind the scenes?. These people have a significant, if often unseen, influence over the industry. When considering who you will nominate for this List, please consider which online learning practitioners, commentators, facilitators and/or thought leaders most inspire and influence you ? and your colleagues. If you need further guidance, please view the main Corporate eLearning Movers and Shakers? List . For the sake of continuity ? and credibility for both lists ? it would be good to reflect this in the Africa List. However, the Africa List should focus on those who?re influential in eLearning across the continent of Africa, rather than those from Africa who?re influential on the world stage. What?s Involved To produce the List, please complete the template ?entry form? below. Please supply the required details of as many people as you feel meet the criteria to be included on the List. Please note that you cannot nominate yourself. However, your name could be on the List if another ?nominator? includes you on their list. The Nomination Form is attached and please copy ? and complete - this template for each person you want to nominate. You can nominate as many (different) people as you wish ? but, please, only submit one nomination per individual nominee. Please return these nomination forms to me, via email, by June 30. I will forward them to Bob Little. Then he and his team will validate the nominations, carry out further research and then produce the Movers and Shakers? List for Africa. I am very grateful for your help with compiling this List of the Movers and Shakers for Workplace eLearning in Africa, which I believe will help highlight these people on the world stage of eLearning. A Workplace eLearning Movers and Shakers? List for Africa Nomination Form I would like to nominate ? for inclusion in the Workplace eLearning Movers and Shakers? List for Africa, 2018: Name of nominee: Country of origin Country in which they currently work (if different) Nominee?s Job Role: Nominee?s Organisation: Nominee?s LinkedIn profile reference: Nominee?s other social media outlets: Why do you believe that this person should be on the List? Any other relevant information: I look forward to hearing from you. With kind regards, Rebecca Stromeyer _________________________________ Rebecca Stromeyer Founder and Director eLearning Africa Leibnizstrasse 32 10625 Berlin Germany Tel.: +49 (0)30 310 18 18-0 Fax: +49 (0)30 324 98 33 E-Mail : rebecca.stromeyer at icwe.net Skype: rebeccastromeyer www.elearning-africa.com www.icwe.net Register court: Berlin-Charlottenburg Commercial Register: HRB 189296 VAT: DE 313 977 631 Do you know friends or colleagues who might be interested in information about OEB or eLearning Africa? Feel free to direct them to the subscription forms: OEB News Portal and eLA News Portal Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use, distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also notify the sender by e-mail and/or delete this e-mail. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and do not necessarily coincide with those of the organisation. unsubscribe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mangawilly at gmail.com Wed Jun 6 08:34:48 2018 From: mangawilly at gmail.com (Willy MANGA) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:34:48 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Fwd: [rpd] Migrating quickly to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <8f919c9b-04aa-f72d-806d-c664ec398273@gmail.com> References: <8f919c9b-04aa-f72d-806d-c664ec398273@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8bae5059-c957-672f-e6e8-a4bc200621c1@gmail.com> Hello over there, I thought it might be useful to forward this discussion here. P.S : I know we are talking to v6 aware people on this list but ... it's #v6launch today :) http://www.worldipv6launch.org/ -------- Message transf?r? -------- Sujet?: Re: [rpd] Migrating quickly to IPv6 Date?: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:21:51 +0100 De?: Willy MANGA Pour?: rpd at afrinic.net Hi, Le 06/06/2018 ? 01:31, S Moonesamy a ?crit?: > Hi Owen, > At 02:15 PM 05-06-2018, Owen DeLong wrote: >> OK, there's a difference in perspective about IPv6 being a replacement >> for IPv4 depending on the timeframe of your focus. > > There was a presentation at RIPE in which it was stated that the pace of > adoption of IPv6 in the Internet appears to have slowed down over the > past 9 months.? Was that taken into consideration for the timeframe? Maybe it can be useful to readers to know which presentation you are talking about [1] . I have appreciated Geoff's study but from my point of view the way people in africa may use/manage IPv6 in 2 or 5 years is yet unknown because you don't have enough data (kudos to projects like WIDER) . Generally you don't have unfortunately enough data coming from our continent; thus it's difficult to forecast exactly what can be the trend especially here. I believe in Africa, a major player here is governements on contrary of other regions. You may like it or not in many countries, you can't organise a meeting without their agreement, you can't use freely the internet without their agreement,etc... (I'm not a fan of that issue by the way) If some african countries find in IPv6 a real need to go forward, the curve of adoption may jump drastically. In addition, the second most important actor (again from my point of view) is the universities. I really really hope those here working within this area will understand me. We [2] are doing our best here but it's a combination of people/organisation. Of course I may be wrong but it's just a point of view :) By the way, it's #v6launch today :) . Announce your v6 prefixes; it will not hurt you ;) 1. https://ripe76.ripe.net/presentations/9-2018-05-17-ipv6-reasons.pdf 2. AUF - DRACGL https://nda.manbene.net/index.php/s/kWfs21HEHWzIP3t -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From jordi.palet at consulintel.es Wed Jun 6 08:50:33 2018 From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ) Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 10:50:33 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] [rpd] TRANSITIONING quickly to IPv6 Message-ID: <794D673D-D5DA-471C-8A45-8D2968D14CC3@consulintel.es> One thing I strongly suggest: Do not use migration for IPv6, it confuses people. Migration is when you move (as an example) from Windows XP to Windows Vista. You install a new operating system but the previous one is gone. You don't run them simultaneously. The IETF has defined transition and coexistence mechanisms, NOT migration. So, comparing with my previous OS example, migrating to IPv6 means removing ALL IPv4 (end-to-end) and installing only IPv6. In general, we don't do that, we deploy IPv6, but we keep (at least in most of the "client" devices today), IPv4. Either we use dual-stack or any transition mechanism. So, there is a coexistence between both, IPv4 and IPv6. In the future, yes, maybe we, at some point, start removing IPv4. But this is not a wise recommendation for end-users/end-networks. This is very evident when you train people. They get confused, and also because in many languages, both words are not exactly equivalent (as in English seems to be, which actually is not ...). Regards, Jordi ?-----Mensaje original----- De: Willy MANGA Fecha: mi?rcoles, 6 de junio de 2018, 10:25 Para: Asunto: Re: [rpd] Migrating quickly to IPv6 Hi, Le 06/06/2018 ? 01:31, S Moonesamy a ?crit : > Hi Owen, > At 02:15 PM 05-06-2018, Owen DeLong wrote: >> OK, there's a difference in perspective about IPv6 being a replacement >> for IPv4 depending on the timeframe of your focus. > > There was a presentation at RIPE in which it was stated that the pace of > adoption of IPv6 in the Internet appears to have slowed down over the > past 9 months. Was that taken into consideration for the timeframe? Maybe it can be useful to readers to know which presentation you are talking about [1] . I have appreciated Geoff's study but from my point of view the way people in africa may use/manage IPv6 in 2 or 5 years is yet unknown because you don't have enough data (kudos to projects like WIDER) . Generally you don't have unfortunately enough data coming from our continent; thus it's difficult to forecast exactly what can be the trend especially here. I believe in Africa, a major player here is governements on contrary of other regions. You may like it or not in many countries, you can't organise a meeting without their agreement, you can't use freely the internet without their agreement,etc... (I'm not a fan of that issue by the way) If some african countries find in IPv6 a real need to go forward, the curve of adoption may jump drastically. In addition, the second most important actor (again from my point of view) is the universities. I really really hope those here working within this area will understand me. We [2] are doing our best here but it's a combination of people/organisation. Of course I may be wrong but it's just a point of view :) By the way, it's #v6launch today :) . Announce your v6 prefixes; it will not hurt you ;) 1. https://ripe76.ripe.net/presentations/9-2018-05-17-ipv6-reasons.pdf 2. AUF - DRACGL https://nda.manbene.net/index.php/s/kWfs21HEHWzIP3t -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. From jmangwana at buse.ac.zw Wed Jun 6 08:56:02 2018 From: jmangwana at buse.ac.zw (Jasper Mangwana) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 10:56:02 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Fwd: [rpd] Migrating quickly to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <8bae5059-c957-672f-e6e8-a4bc200621c1@gmail.com> References: <8f919c9b-04aa-f72d-806d-c664ec398273@gmail.com> <8bae5059-c957-672f-e6e8-a4bc200621c1@gmail.com> Message-ID: <000601d3fd74$33f4a0e0$9bdde2a0$@buse.ac.zw> I agree with you Willy, On issues of research and development in universities we seem to be lobbying a lot but the people in the organisation do not really understand and would not want to invest in it. I suggest we also provide a lot of research papers in this area so that we can be complemented by government efforts. Ever since Zimbabwe provided the IPv6 roadmap, we have an estimate of 5/6 universities working on IPv6 now. http://www.potraz.gov.zw/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Zimbabwe-Draft-IPv6-Implementation-Strategy.pdf Kind Regards Jasper -----Original Message----- From: Willy MANGA [mailto:mangawilly at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 06 June 2018 10:35 To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Fwd: [rpd] Migrating quickly to IPv6 Hello over there, I thought it might be useful to forward this discussion here. P.S : I know we are talking to v6 aware people on this list but ... it's #v6launch today :) http://www.worldipv6launch.org/ -------- Message transf?r? -------- Sujet : Re: [rpd] Migrating quickly to IPv6 Date : Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:21:51 +0100 De : Willy MANGA Pour : rpd at afrinic.net Hi, Le 06/06/2018 ? 01:31, S Moonesamy a ?crit : > Hi Owen, > At 02:15 PM 05-06-2018, Owen DeLong wrote: >> OK, there's a difference in perspective about IPv6 being a >> replacement for IPv4 depending on the timeframe of your focus. > > There was a presentation at RIPE in which it was stated that the pace > of adoption of IPv6 in the Internet appears to have slowed down over > the past 9 months. Was that taken into consideration for the timeframe? Maybe it can be useful to readers to know which presentation you are talking about [1] . I have appreciated Geoff's study but from my point of view the way people in africa may use/manage IPv6 in 2 or 5 years is yet unknown because you don't have enough data (kudos to projects like WIDER) . Generally you don't have unfortunately enough data coming from our continent; thus it's difficult to forecast exactly what can be the trend especially here. I believe in Africa, a major player here is governements on contrary of other regions. You may like it or not in many countries, you can't organise a meeting without their agreement, you can't use freely the internet without their agreement,etc... (I'm not a fan of that issue by the way) If some african countries find in IPv6 a real need to go forward, the curve of adoption may jump drastically. In addition, the second most important actor (again from my point of view) is the universities. I really really hope those here working within this area will understand me. We [2] are doing our best here but it's a combination of people/organisation. Of course I may be wrong but it's just a point of view :) By the way, it's #v6launch today :) . Announce your v6 prefixes; it will not hurt you ;) 1. https://ripe76.ripe.net/presentations/9-2018-05-17-ipv6-reasons.pdf 2. AUF - DRACGL https://nda.manbene.net/index.php/s/kWfs21HEHWzIP3t -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ From tamon at afrinic.net Wed Jun 6 09:23:45 2018 From: tamon at afrinic.net (Mukom Akong T) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 13:23:45 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Get Step-by-Step Help from AFRINIC with Your IPv6 Deployment Message-ID: **Fran?aise en bas** Hello colleagues, Someone reminded me today that it?s IPv6 Launch anniversary - the 6th one. Well, there ?will be no cake. There won?t be any festivities from our side (since we are still so far behind). But we do have something for the truly serious ones. One of the challenges we got from our Deployment Challenges survey last year was engineers who said ?I just don?t have the confidence to do it on my own? As a result we have two solutions to assist with that challenge a) IPv6 Deployathons - the first of which took place in Dakar. A closed event to small number of carefully selected engineers that puts them in a room with guides and expert deployers to help them *actually* configure IPv6 on their production networks. b) An IPv6 Deployment Support Help Desk - where we guide you step by step accomplish the deployment on some part of your network over a period of time. None of these is about just more training. In fact having undergone some hands-on training is a pre-requisite to being selected for both of these. If you are ready to stop bowing to excuses and want to start being part of the solution i.e. IPv6, if you would like the combined guidance of AFRINIC?s trainers working one on one with you on your team to deploy IPv6, then request an invitation by at bit.ly/help6EN And distinguish yourself from those who talk talk talk and look for excuses. Warm Regards Mukom, Brice, Stephen & Bashir ***************************************** Bonjour mes coll?gues, Quelqu'un m'a rappel? aujourd'hui que c'est l'anniversaire du lancement IPv6 - le 6?me. Eh bien, il n'y aura pas de g?teau. Il n'y aura pas de festivit?s de notre c?t? (puisque nous sommes encore si loin derri?re). Mais nous avons quelque chose pour les plus s?rieux. L'un des d?fis que nous avons relev?s l'an dernier lors de notre sondage sur les d?fis li?s au d?ploiement ?tait que les ing?nieurs disaient: ?Je n'ai pas la confiance n?cessaire pour le faire moi-m?me?. En cons?quence, nous avons deux solutions pour aider ? relever ce d?fi a) IPv6 Deployathons - dont le premier a eu lieu ? Dakar. Un ?v?nement ferm? ? un petit nombre d'ing?nieurs soigneusement s?lectionn?s qui les met dans une pi?ce avec des guides et des d?ployeurs experts pour les aider ? configurer r?ellement leur IPv6 sur leurs r?seaux de production. b) Un centre d'assistance de d?ploiement IPv6 - o? nous vous guidons ?tape par ?tape pour accomplir le d?ploiement sur une partie de votre r?seau sur une p?riode de temps. Rien de tout cela ne concerne juste plus de formation. En fait, avoir suivi une formation pratique est une condition pr?alable ? la s?lection de ces deux personnes. Si vous ?tes pr?t ? cesser de c?der aux excuses et que vous voulez commencer ? faire partie de la solution, par exemple IPv6, si vous souhaitez que les formateurs d'AFRINIC travaillent en t?te-?-t?te avec votre ?quipe pour d?ployer IPv6, demandez une invitation en cliquant bit.ly/help6/FR Et distinguez-vous de ceux qui parlent de parler et de chercher des excuses! Cordialement Mukom, Brice, Stephen & Bashir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From landry.lingombe at aninf.ga Wed Jun 6 12:24:05 2018 From: landry.lingombe at aninf.ga (Landry Mexent NDOUMBOU LINGOMBE) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:24:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Get Step-by-Step Help from AFRINIC with Your IPv6 Deployment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <19957658.384.1528287841581.JavaMail.centos23@DESKTOP-EHOIL5C> Bonjour Tamon, Je te remercie pour ton mail qui vient encore une fois de plus nous encourager ? d?ployer IPv6. J'avais ?galement pris part aux atelier IPv6 ? Dakar et cela avait ?t? tr?s b?n?fique. Comme te le disais, nous devions comencer le d?ploiement IPv6 ? l'ANINF et au niveau du point d'?change. Depuis les ateliers de Dakar, nous avons effectivement commenc? au niveau de ces 2 entit?s. Pour ce que nous avons d?j? fait : 1. D?coupage des plages d'adresses selon les environnements ; 2. Peering avec nos 2 transitaires (Orange et Cogent) et annonce des prefixes IPv6 aux peers ; 3. Peering ?tabli entre l'ANINF et (GVA) au niveau du point d'?change. La deuxi?me phase que nous souhaitons commencer consiste ? d?ployer IPv6 dans notre infrastructure de l'ANINF. Pour cela, nous sollicitons un support d'AFRINIC. Pour ce que nous avons d?j? fait ou ce qui reste ? faire, auriez-vous de bonnes pratiques (filtrage, politiques BGP, etc.) pour nous accompagner ? Encore merci pour votre soutien Cordialement, Landry ----- Mail original ----- De: "Mukom Akong T" ?: "IPv6 in Africa Discussions" Envoy?: Mercredi 6 Juin 2018 10:23:45 Objet?: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Get Step-by-Step Help from AFRINIC with Your IPv6 Deployment **Fran?aise en bas** Hello colleagues, Someone reminded me today that it?s IPv6 Launch anniversary - the 6th one. Well, there will be no cake. There won?t be any festivities from our side (since we are still so far behind). But we do have something for the truly serious ones. One of the challenges we got from our Deployment Challenges survey last year was engineers who said ?I just don?t have the confidence to do it on my own? As a result we have two solutions to assist with that challenge a) IPv6 Deployathons - the first of which took place in Dakar. A closed event to small number of carefully selected engineers that puts them in a room with guides and expert deployers to help them *actually* configure IPv6 on their production networks. b) An IPv6 Deployment Support Help Desk - where we guide you step by step accomplish the deployment on some part of your network over a period of time. None of these is about just more training. In fact having undergone some hands-on training is a pre-requisite to being selected for both of these. If you are ready to stop bowing to excuses and want to start being part of the solution i.e. IPv6, if you would like the combined guidance of AFRINIC?s trainers working one on one with you on your team to deploy IPv6, then request an invitation by at bit.ly/help6EN And distinguish yourself from those who talk talk talk and look for excuses. Warm Regards Mukom, Brice, Stephen & Bashir ***************************************** Bonjour mes coll?gues, Quelqu'un m'a rappel? aujourd'hui que c'est l'anniversaire du lancement IPv6 - le 6?me. Eh bien, il n'y aura pas de g?teau. Il n'y aura pas de festivit?s de notre c?t? (puisque nous sommes encore si loin derri?re). Mais nous avons quelque chose pour les plus s?rieux. L'un des d?fis que nous avons relev?s l'an dernier lors de notre sondage sur les d?fis li?s au d?ploiement ?tait que les ing?nieurs disaient: ?Je n'ai pas la confiance n?cessaire pour le faire moi-m?me?. En cons?quence, nous avons deux solutions pour aider ? relever ce d?fi a) IPv6 Deployathons - dont le premier a eu lieu ? Dakar. Un ?v?nement ferm? ? un petit nombre d'ing?nieurs soigneusement s?lectionn?s qui les met dans une pi?ce avec des guides et des d?ployeurs experts pour les aider ? configurer r?ellement leur IPv6 sur leurs r?seaux de production. b) Un centre d'assistance de d?ploiement IPv6 - o? nous vous guidons ?tape par ?tape pour accomplir le d?ploiement sur une partie de votre r?seau sur une p?riode de temps. Rien de tout cela ne concerne juste plus de formation. En fait, avoir suivi une formation pratique est une condition pr?alable ? la s?lection de ces deux personnes. Si vous ?tes pr?t ? cesser de c?der aux excuses et que vous voulez commencer ? faire partie de la solution, par exemple IPv6, si vous souhaitez que les formateurs d'AFRINIC travaillent en t?te-?-t?te avec votre ?quipe pour d?ployer IPv6, demandez une invitation en cliquant bit.ly/help6/FR Et distinguez-vous de ceux qui parlent de parler et de chercher des excuses! Cordialement Mukom, Brice, Stephen & Bashir _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -- From lee.howard at retevia.net Wed Jun 6 14:56:51 2018 From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 10:56:51 -0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Get Step-by-Step Help from AFRINIC with Your IPv6 Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 06/06/2018 05:23 AM, Mukom Akong T wrote: > **Fran?aise en bas** > > Hello colleagues, > > > Someone reminded me today that it?s IPv6 Launch anniversary - the 6th > one. > > > Well, there ?will be no cake If anyone gets IPv6 running from customers to Internet, I will get you a cake. Lee > . There won?t be any festivities from our side (since we are still so > far behind). But we do have something for the truly serious ones. > > > One of the challenges we got from our Deployment Challenges survey > last year was engineers who said ?I just don?t have the confidence to > do it on my own? > > > As a result we have two solutions to assist with that challenge > > > a) IPv6 Deployathons - the first of which took place in Dakar. A > closed event to small number of carefully selected engineers that puts > them in a room with guides and expert deployers to help them > *actually* configure IPv6 on their production networks. > > > b) An IPv6 Deployment Support Help Desk - where we guide you step by > step accomplish the deployment on some part of your network over a > period of time. > > > None of these is about just more training. In fact having undergone > some hands-on training is a pre-requisite to being selected for both > of these. > > > If you are ready to stop bowing to excuses and want to start being > part of the solution i.e. IPv6, if you would like the combined > guidance of AFRINIC?s trainers working one on one with you on your > team to deploy IPv6, then request an invitation by at > > bit.ly/help6EN > > And distinguish yourself from those who talk talk talk and look for > excuses. > > > Warm Regards > > > Mukom, Brice, Stephen & Bashir > > > ***************************************** > > > Bonjour mes coll?gues, > > > Quelqu'un m'a rappel? aujourd'hui que c'est l'anniversaire du > lancement IPv6 - le 6?me. > > > Eh bien, il n'y aura pas de g?teau. Il n'y aura pas de festivit?s de > notre c?t? (puisque nous sommes encore si loin derri?re). Mais nous > avons quelque chose pour les plus s?rieux. > > > L'un des d?fis que nous avons relev?s l'an dernier lors de notre > sondage sur les d?fis li?s au d?ploiement ?tait que les ing?nieurs > disaient: ?Je n'ai pas la confiance n?cessaire pour le faire moi-m?me?. > > > En cons?quence, nous avons deux solutions pour aider ? relever ce d?fi > > > a) IPv6 Deployathons - dont le premier a eu lieu ? Dakar. Un ?v?nement > ferm? ? un petit nombre d'ing?nieurs soigneusement s?lectionn?s qui > les met dans une pi?ce avec des guides et des d?ployeurs experts pour > les aider ? configurer r?ellement leur IPv6 sur leurs r?seaux de > production. > > > b) Un centre d'assistance de d?ploiement IPv6 - o? nous vous guidons > ?tape par ?tape pour accomplir le d?ploiement sur une partie de votre > r?seau sur une p?riode de temps. > > > Rien de tout cela ne concerne juste plus de formation. En fait, avoir > suivi une formation pratique est une condition pr?alable ? la > s?lection de ces deux personnes. > > > Si vous ?tes pr?t ? cesser de c?der aux excuses et que vous voulez > commencer ? faire partie de la solution, par exemple IPv6, si vous > souhaitez que les formateurs d'AFRINIC travaillent en t?te-?-t?te avec > votre ?quipe pour d?ployer IPv6, demandez une invitation en cliquant > > > bit.ly/help6/FR > > > Et distinguez-vous de ceux qui parlent de parler et de chercher des > excuses! > > > Cordialement > > > Mukom, Brice, Stephen & Bashir > > > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Wed Jun 6 18:15:04 2018 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 21:15:04 +0300 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Get Step-by-Step Help from AFRINIC with Your IPv6 Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, 6:09 p.m. Lee Howard, wrote: > > > On 06/06/2018 05:23 AM, Mukom Akong T wrote: > > **Fran?aise en bas** > > Hello colleagues, > > > Someone reminded me today that it?s IPv6 Launch anniversary - the 6th > one. > > > Well, there will be no cake > > > If anyone gets IPv6 running from customers to Internet, I will get you a > cake. > Lol... I will add a bottle of wine.. I beg ... what really made people delpoy IPv4 in the first place...??? Anyone with the historical account of the transition then save for the fact that the internet was still a small inter-network by 1993 making it easier to go IPv4. Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tamon at afrinic.net Thu Jun 7 04:10:52 2018 From: tamon at afrinic.net (Mukom Akong T) Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 08:10:52 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Get Step-by-Step Help from AFRINIC with Your IPv6 Deployment In-Reply-To: <19957658.384.1528287841581.JavaMail.centos23@DESKTOP-EHOIL5C> References: <19957658.384.1528287841581.JavaMail.centos23@DESKTOP-EHOIL5C> Message-ID: <40e85537-f210-4e41-966a-8c7636167aa9@Spark> Bonjour Landry On 6 Jun 2018, 16:25 +0400, IPv6 in Africa Discussions , wrote: > > Je te remercie pour ton mail qui vient encore une fois de plus nous encourager ? d?ployer IPv6. > J'avais ?galement pris part aux atelier IPv6 ? Dakar et cela avait ?t? tr?s b?n?fique. Comme te le disais, nous devions comencer le d?ploiement IPv6 ? l'ANINF et au niveau du point d'?change. > Depuis les ateliers de Dakar, nous avons effectivement commenc? au niveau de ces 2 entit?s. > > Pour ce que nous avons d?j? fait : > 1. D?coupage des plages d'adresses selon les environnements ; > 2. Peering avec nos 2 transitaires (Orange et Cogent) et annonce des prefixes IPv6 aux peers ; > 3. Peering ?tabli entre l'ANINF et (GVA) au niveau du point d??change. Felicitations, je vois votre prefix?2c0f:f948::/48 > La deuxi?me phase que nous souhaitons commencer consiste ? d?ployer IPv6 dans notre infrastructure de l'ANINF. > > Pour cela, nous sollicitons un support d'AFRINIC. Pour ce que nous avons d?j? fait ou ce qui reste ? faire, auriez-vous de bonnes pratiques (filtrage, politiques BGP, etc.) pour nous accompagner ? Nous sommes pr?ts a vous guider ? toute commence par ici bit.ly/help6FR et quelqu?un de l??quipe sera en contact. > > Encore merci pour votre soutien -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From landry.lingombe at aninf.ga Thu Jun 7 07:21:16 2018 From: landry.lingombe at aninf.ga (Landry Mexent NDOUMBOU LINGOMBE) Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:21:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Get Step-by-Step Help from AFRINIC with Your IPv6 Deployment In-Reply-To: <40e85537-f210-4e41-966a-8c7636167aa9@Spark> Message-ID: <1709102396.138.1528356075189.JavaMail.centos@centos-PC> Bien re?u, merci ! ----- Mail original ----- De: "Mukom Akong T" ?: "IPv6 in Africa Discussions" Envoy?: Jeudi 7 Juin 2018 05:10:52 Objet?: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Get Step-by-Step Help from AFRINIC with Your IPv6 Deployment Bonjour Landry On 6 Jun 2018, 16:25 +0400, IPv6 in Africa Discussions , wrote: Je te remercie pour ton mail qui vient encore une fois de plus nous encourager ? d?ployer IPv6. J'avais ?galement pris part aux atelier IPv6 ? Dakar et cela avait ?t? tr?s b?n?fique. Comme te le disais, nous devions comencer le d?ploiement IPv6 ? l'ANINF et au niveau du point d'?change. Depuis les ateliers de Dakar, nous avons effectivement commenc? au niveau de ces 2 entit?s. Pour ce que nous avons d?j? fait : 1. D?coupage des plages d'adresses selon les environnements ; 2. Peering avec nos 2 transitaires (Orange et Cogent) et annonce des prefixes IPv6 aux peers ; 3. Peering ?tabli entre l'ANINF et (GVA) au niveau du point d??change. Felicitations, je vois votre prefix 2c0f:f948::/48 La deuxi?me phase que nous souhaitons commencer consiste ? d?ployer IPv6 dans notre infrastructure de l'ANINF. Pour cela, nous sollicitons un support d'AFRINIC. Pour ce que nous avons d?j? fait ou ce qui reste ? faire, auriez-vous de bonnes pratiques (filtrage, politiques BGP, etc.) pour nous accompagner ? Nous sommes pr?ts a vous guider ? toute commence par ici bit.ly/help6FR et quelqu?un de l??quipe sera en contact. Encore merci pour votre soutien _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -- From mangawilly at gmail.com Sat Jun 9 10:29:53 2018 From: mangawilly at gmail.com (Willy MANGA) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 11:29:53 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] ICANN IPv6 initiative Message-ID: <1f01e58b-1570-d45f-be09-9ca87efce05b@gmail.com> Hello, is there someone who know how to request ICANN to update this page [1]? 1. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/ipv6-initiative-2017-02-28-en -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From mje at posix.co.za Sat Jun 9 11:20:59 2018 From: mje at posix.co.za (Mark Elkins) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 13:20:59 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] ICANN IPv6 initiative In-Reply-To: <1f01e58b-1570-d45f-be09-9ca87efce05b@gmail.com> References: <1f01e58b-1570-d45f-be09-9ca87efce05b@gmail.com> Message-ID: Copy it to Pierre Dandjinou ? On 09/06/2018 12:29, Willy MANGA wrote: > Hello, > is there someone who know how to request ICANN to update this page [1]? > > > 1. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/ipv6-initiative-2017-02-28-en -- Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496 For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za From khansa060 at gmail.com Mon Jun 11 11:32:37 2018 From: khansa060 at gmail.com (Khansa Abdalla) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 13:32:37 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SdNOG-5 - Call for Presentations /Papers Message-ID: Dear All SdNOG is a non-profit group that provides an open forum to be used by any interested member from the Internet Community in Sudan, to exchange technical information and expertise in inter-networking. It is managed and organized by group of volunteers with the aim of capacity building and technology development. [https://sdnog.sd] The SdNOG Program ================== Committee announces the opening of SdNOG-5 CFP,which will take place on 3rd ? 4th of October 2018 in Khartoum,Sudan. and is now seeking contributions for Presentations. We are looking for presenters who would: - Offer a technical tutorial on an appropriate topic; - Participate in the technical conference sessions as a speaker; - Convene and chair panel sessions of relevant topics. CONFERENCE MILESTONES ===================== - Call for Papers Opens [31/May/2018] - Final Deadline for Submissions [15/Sep/2018] PROGRAMME MATERIAL ==================== The SdNOG program is organized in two parts; tutorials and conference. To pics for tutorials and the conference must be relevant to networks and Internet Operations and Technologies. All papers are welcomed except for the ones that have promotional objectives orcopyrights infringement. The list below gives example of some topics but it is not comprehensive: - Routing and operations - IPv6 deployment and transition technologies - IXPs and Peering - Virtualization and Cloud Computing - Internet ecosystem - Network security issues (NSP-SEC, DDoS, Anti-Spam,Anti-Malware) - DNS / DNSSEC - Internet governance and policies (Security, Regulation, Content Management, Addressing, etc) - Any other topics CfP SUBMISSION ============== Draft slides for both tutorials and conference sessions MUST be provided with CfP submissions Otherwise, the Program Committee will be unable to review the submission. All draft and complete slides must be submitted in PDF format only. Final slides are to be provided by the specified deadline for publication on the SdNOG website. Please submit on-line at :https://papers.apia.org/user/login.php?event=75 Any questions or concerns should be addressed to the: info at sdnog.sd We look forward to receiving your presentation proposals. SdNOG program Committee. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fgont at si6networks.com Mon Jun 11 14:31:10 2018 From: fgont at si6networks.com (Fernando Gont) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:31:10 +0300 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network Reconnaissance Message-ID: <1e7cfb36-2df6-f44b-f56d-bd4f802f2380@si6networks.com> Folks, APNIC folks asked me to summarize some of my recent presentations on "IPv6 network reconnaissance". Due to the limited space for the article/post, I just tried to introduce some new tools in the SI6 IPv6 toolkit (https://www.si6networks.com/tools/ipv6tookit) with some practical examples. Link: Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From daniel at afrinic.net Tue Jun 12 06:17:58 2018 From: daniel at afrinic.net (Daniel Shaw) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:17:58 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network Reconnaissance In-Reply-To: <1e7cfb36-2df6-f44b-f56d-bd4f802f2380@si6networks.com> References: <1e7cfb36-2df6-f44b-f56d-bd4f802f2380@si6networks.com> Message-ID: <20F9ED3E-509B-4084-BB3E-ED265DECF488@afrinic.net> On 11/06/2018, 18:31, Fernando Gont typed: > > Folks, > > APNIC folks asked me to summarize some of my recent presentations on > "IPv6 network reconnaissance". Thanks for sharing! - Daniel From keopunana at yahoo.com Tue Jun 12 14:09:15 2018 From: keopunana at yahoo.com (Punana Lebo) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] AfrIPv6-Discuss Digest, Vol 140, Issue 7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1652085997.4199597.1528812555881@mail.yahoo.com> Thanks for sharing On Tuesday, June 12, 2018, 2:00:53 PM GMT+2, afripv6-discuss-request at afrinic.net wrote: Send AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list submissions to ??? afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? afripv6-discuss-request at afrinic.net You can reach the person managing the list at ??? afripv6-discuss-owner at afrinic.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AfrIPv6-Discuss digest..." Today's Topics: ? 1. Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network Reconnaissance (Fernando Gont) ? 2. Re: Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network Reconnaissance ? ? ? (Daniel Shaw) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:31:10 +0300 From: Fernando Gont To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network ??? Reconnaissance Message-ID: <1e7cfb36-2df6-f44b-f56d-bd4f802f2380 at si6networks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Folks, APNIC folks asked me to summarize some of my recent presentations on "IPv6 network reconnaissance". Due to the limited space for the article/post, I just tried to introduce some new tools in the SI6 IPv6 toolkit (https://www.si6networks.com/tools/ipv6tookit) with some practical examples. Link: Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:17:58 +0400 From: Daniel Shaw To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network ??? Reconnaissance Message-ID: <20F9ED3E-509B-4084-BB3E-ED265DECF488 at afrinic.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 11/06/2018, 18:31, Fernando Gont??? typed: > > Folks, > > APNIC folks asked me to summarize some of my recent presentations on > "IPv6 network reconnaissance". Thanks for sharing! - Daniel ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ------------------------------ End of AfrIPv6-Discuss Digest, Vol 140, Issue 7 *********************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Mohamed.Farouk-Elsayed at vodafone.com Sun Jun 10 09:50:11 2018 From: Mohamed.Farouk-Elsayed at vodafone.com (Mohamed Farouk-Elsayed, Vodafone Egypt) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 09:50:11 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] ICANN IPv6 initiative In-Reply-To: References: <1f01e58b-1570-d45f-be09-9ca87efce05b@gmail.com> Message-ID: <6D521372A98F864D90BDC95F72E7108901513C7364@SVLMCHA1.clickgsm.Misrfone.com> Dear Team, Kindly I need to stop receiving such mails. I didn't register to any forums. I stopped working with Afrinic 12 years ago. I accessed https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss and I unsubscribed but nothing sent to my mail as mentioned. Plz support to stop such series of mails. Thanks/Regards, Mohamed Farouk? Sr. TE Account Manager Vodafone Egypt +2 01001828653 mohamed.farouk-elsayed at vodafone.com The future is exciting.? Ready? -----Original Message----- From: Mark Elkins [mailto:mje at posix.co.za] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2018 1:21 PM To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions; Pierre Dandjinou Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] ICANN IPv6 initiative Copy it to Pierre Dandjinou ? On 09/06/2018 12:29, Willy MANGA wrote: > Hello, > is there someone who know how to request ICANN to update this page [1]? > > > 1. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/ipv6-initiative-2017-02-28-en -- Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496 For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ************************************************************************************************************************* The content of this document is classified as Vodafone Egypt S.A.E. Confidential and Proprietary Information. The recipient hereby is committed to hold in strict confidence the contents of this (e-mail, document, information) and not to disclose to any third party without the prior written consent of Vodafone Egypt S.A.E. Recipient will be held liable for any unauthorized disclosure. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the message in its entirety, including any attachments. http://www.vodafone.com.eg ************************************************************************************************************************* From mathias at houngbo.net Mon Jun 18 07:42:54 2018 From: mathias at houngbo.net (Mathias HOUNGBO) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:42:54 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] ICANN IPv6 initiative In-Reply-To: <6D521372A98F864D90BDC95F72E7108901513C7364@SVLMCHA1.clickgsm.Misrfone.com> References: <1f01e58b-1570-d45f-be09-9ca87efce05b@gmail.com> <6D521372A98F864D90BDC95F72E7108901513C7364@SVLMCHA1.clickgsm.Misrfone.com> Message-ID: <930ca4ad-38b8-d50e-24a9-eeea5d53f440@houngbo.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Wed Jun 20 15:14:39 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:14:39 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4 + EANOG, tzNOG & TISPA Meeting Announcement Message-ID: Hello all. It gives me great pleasure to announce that SAFNOG-4, in collaboration with EANOG (East Africa Network Operators Group) and tzNOG (Tanzania Network Operators Group), and hosted by TISPA (Tanzania Internet Service Providers Association) will be held between the 24th - 29th September, 2018, in the warm and sunny city of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. What is exciting about this year's SAFNOG meeting is that it will be partnering with EANOG and tzNOG, to include both plenary and workshop sessions during the week, as part of the agenda. The main plenary meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency Dar Es Salaam hotel between 24th - 26th September, while the the workshop will be held at the Bank of Tanzania building between 26th - 29th September, 2018. Details about the event registration and agenda will be made available at these locations: ??? - www.safnog.org ??? - www.tznog.or.tz ??? - www.eanog.org Please mark your calendars. SAFNOG, EANOG, tzNOG and TISPA look forward to seeing you in Dar Es Salaam. Cheers, Mark Tinka On Behalf of the SAFNOG/EANOG/tzNOG Organizing Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Wed Jul 4 12:43:46 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:43:46 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4 + EANOG, tzNOG & TISPA Call for Papers! Message-ID: Hello all. The SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Programme Committee are now seeking contributions for Presentations and Tutorials for the SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG 2018 Conference. We are looking for presenters who would: ??? - Offer a technical tutorial on an appropriate topic; ??? - Participate in the technical conference sessions as a speaker; ??? - Convene and chair panel sessions of relevant topics. ??????????????????????????????????????? *Conference Milestones* ??????????????????? Call for Papers Opens???????????????? Now ??????????????????? Draft Program Published???????????? As papers are confirmed ??????????????????? Final Deadline for Submissions??? 10 September, 2018?? ??????????????????? Final Program Published???????????? 17 September, 2018 ??????????????????? Final Slides Received????????????????? 21 September, 2018 NOTE THAT REGARDLESS OF DEADLINES, SLOTS ARE FILLED ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS *Program Material* The SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Conference Programme consists of two parts, these being the Tutorials and Conference Tracks. Topics proposed must be relevant to Internet Operations and Technologies: ??? - IPv4 / IPv6 Routing and Operations ??? - IPv6 deployment and transition technologies ??? - Internet backbone operations ??? - ISP and Carrier services ??? - IXPs and Peering ??? - Research on Internet Operations and Deployment ??? - Software Defined Networking / Network Function Virtualisaton ??? - Network security issues (NSP-SEC, DDoS, Anti-Spam, Anti-Malware) ??? - DNS / DNSSEC ??? - Internet policy (Security, Regulation, Content Management, Addressing, etc) ??? - Access and Transport Technologies, including Cable/DSL, LTE/5G, wireless, metro ethernet, fibre, segment routing ??? - Content & Service Delivery (Multicast, Voice, Video, "telepresence", Gaming) and Cloud Computing *CfP Submissions* Draft slides for both tutorials and conference sessions MUST be provided with CfP submissions otherwise the Programme Committee will be unable to review the submission. For avoidance of doubt this means that submissions which do not include slides will be rejected immediately. For work in progress, the most current information available at time of submission is acceptable. All draft and complete slides must be submitted in PDF format only Final slides are to be provided by the specified deadline for publication on the SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG websites. Prospective presenters should note that the majority of speaking slots will be filled well before the final submission deadline. The PC may, at their discretion, retain a limited number of slots up to the final submission deadline for presentations that are exceptionally timely, important, or of critical operational importance. Every year we turn away submissions, due to filling up all available programme slots before the deadline. Presenters should endeavour to get material into the PC sooner rather than later. Any questions or concerns should be addressed to the Programme Committee by e-mail at: ??????????????????????????????????????????? *pc-chairs at safnog.org* We look forward to receiving your presentation proposals. Cheers, Mark Tinka On Behalf of the SAFNOG/EANOG/tzNOG Organizing Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Wed Jul 4 17:29:46 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 19:29:46 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4 + EANOG, tzNOG & TISPA Call for Papers! - Update! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1b9762c9-ed11-8c59-57c2-14d498832c11@seacom.mu> As an update: Please note you can submit your papers at the URL below: ??? https://papers.safnog.org/user/login.php?event=76 Mark. On 4/Jul/18 14:43, Mark Tinka wrote: > Hello all. > > The SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Programme Committee are now seeking > contributions for Presentations and Tutorials for the > SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG 2018 Conference. > > We are looking for presenters who would: > > ??? - Offer a technical tutorial on an appropriate topic; > ??? - Participate in the technical conference sessions as a speaker; > ??? - Convene and chair panel sessions of relevant topics. > > ??????????????????????????????????????? *Conference Milestones* > ??????????????????? Call for Papers Opens???????????????? Now > ??????????????????? Draft Program Published???????????? As papers are > confirmed > ??????????????????? Final Deadline for Submissions??? 10 September, > 2018?? > ??????????????????? Final Program Published???????????? 17 September, 2018 > ??????????????????? Final Slides Received????????????????? 21 > September, 2018 > > NOTE THAT REGARDLESS OF DEADLINES, SLOTS ARE FILLED ON A FIRST COME, > FIRST SERVED BASIS > > *Program Material* > > The SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Conference Programme consists of two parts, > these being the Tutorials and Conference Tracks. > > Topics proposed must be relevant to Internet Operations and Technologies: > > ??? - IPv4 / IPv6 Routing and Operations > ??? - IPv6 deployment and transition technologies > ??? - Internet backbone operations > ??? - ISP and Carrier services > ??? - IXPs and Peering > ??? - Research on Internet Operations and Deployment > ??? - Software Defined Networking / Network Function Virtualisaton > ??? - Network security issues (NSP-SEC, DDoS, Anti-Spam, Anti-Malware) > ??? - DNS / DNSSEC > ??? - Internet policy (Security, Regulation, Content Management, > Addressing, etc) > ??? - Access and Transport Technologies, including Cable/DSL, LTE/5G, > wireless, metro ethernet, fibre, segment routing > ??? - Content & Service Delivery (Multicast, Voice, Video, > "telepresence", Gaming) and Cloud Computing > > *CfP Submissions* > > Draft slides for both tutorials and conference sessions MUST be > provided with CfP submissions otherwise the Programme Committee will > be unable to review the submission. For avoidance of doubt this means > that submissions which do not include slides will be rejected > immediately. For work in progress, the most current information > available at time of submission is acceptable. > > All draft and complete slides must be submitted in PDF format only > > Final slides are to be provided by the specified deadline for > publication on the SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG websites. > > Prospective presenters should note that the majority of speaking slots > will be filled well before the final submission deadline. The PC may, > at their discretion, retain a limited number of slots up to the final > submission deadline for presentations that are exceptionally timely, > important, or of critical operational importance. Every year we turn > away submissions, due to filling up all available programme slots > before the deadline. Presenters should endeavour to get material into > the PC sooner rather than later. > > Any questions or concerns should be addressed to the Programme > Committee by e-mail at: > > ??????????????????????????????????????????? *pc-chairs at safnog.org* > > We look forward to receiving your presentation proposals. > > Cheers, > > Mark Tinka > On Behalf of the SAFNOG/EANOG/tzNOG Organizing Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From s.dechi at telecom.gouv.ci Wed Jul 18 11:05:54 2018 From: s.dechi at telecom.gouv.ci (Serge Dechi) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 11:05:54 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] info Message-ID: Nous sommes bloquee comment relancer la migration d IPV6 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tamon at afrinic.net Mon Jul 23 08:56:30 2018 From: tamon at afrinic.net (Mukom Akong T) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:56:30 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 23 Jul 2018, 12:07 +0400, Serge Dechi , wrote: > Nous sommes bloquee comment relancer la migration d IPV6 Salut Serge Faite une demande du support at bit.ly/help6FR et preciser votre souci et on va vous accompagner. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Thu Aug 2 06:13:33 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 08:13:33 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Registration Now Open! Message-ID: <649fc881-ad27-f9ba-9ec1-5b319d794a24@seacom.mu> Hi all. Pleased to inform you that registration for the upcoming SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG meeting in Dar Es Salaam, 24th - 29th September, is now open. You may register at the URL below: ??? http://www.safnog.org/ We look forward to seeing you there. Mark. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From compsoftnet at gmail.com Thu Aug 2 12:17:14 2018 From: compsoftnet at gmail.com (Akinremi Peter Taiwo) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 13:17:14 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Registration Now Open! In-Reply-To: <649fc881-ad27-f9ba-9ec1-5b319d794a24@seacom.mu> References: <649fc881-ad27-f9ba-9ec1-5b319d794a24@seacom.mu> Message-ID: Thanks Mar for sharing. Is there any form of fellowship available to attend this conference? Regards Peter On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:13 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > Hi all. > > Pleased to inform you that registration for the upcoming > SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG meeting in Dar Es Salaam, 24th - 29th September, is > now open. > > You may register at the URL below: > > http://www.safnog.org/ > > We look forward to seeing you there. > > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > -- *Akinremi Peter Taiwo* [ West Africa Coordinator ] African Civil Society on Information Society (*ACSIS*) *Website: *www.acsis-scasi.org *Chief E*xecutive Consultant. [ Compsoftnet Enterprise ] www.compsoftnet.com.ng Nigeria *T*echnical Consultant [ RetailPoint ] Lagos Website: www.retailpos.com.ng *Phone:* +2347-0638-30177, +2348-1874-76292 *twitter:* @compsoftnet *Skype:* akinremi.peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ahgod at yahoo.fr Wed Aug 8 11:02:57 2018 From: ahgod at yahoo.fr (Ah God) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 11:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] AfrIPv6-Discuss Digest, Vol 140, Issue 7 References: <1336296220.5891885.1533726177986.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1336296220.5891885.1533726177986@mail.yahoo.com> Thanks for Sharing Folks. Do you know How to leverage a Certificate Transparency? Certificate Transparency (CT) helps to address some structural problems in the certificate system. Regards Godefroy AHOUMENOU On Tuesday, June 12, 2018, 2:00:53 PM GMT+2, afripv6-discuss-request at afrinic.net wrote: Send AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list submissions to afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to afripv6-discuss-request at afrinic.net You can reach the person managing the list at afripv6-discuss-owner at afrinic.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AfrIPv6-Discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network Reconnaissance (Fernando Gont) 2. Re: Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network Reconnaissance (Daniel Shaw) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:31:10 +0300 From: Fernando Gont To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Blog post: Advances in IPv6 Network Reconnaissance Message-ID: <1e7cfb36-2df6-f44b-f56d-bd4f802f2380 at si6networks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Folks, APNIC folks asked me to summarize some of my recent presentations on "IPv6 network reconnaissance". Due to the limited space for the article/post, I just tried to introduce some new tools in the SI6 IPv6 toolkit (https://www.si6networks.com/tools/ipv6tookit) with some practical examples. Link: Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From fgont at si6networks.com Wed Aug 8 12:48:47 2018 From: fgont at si6networks.com (Fernando Gont) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 14:48:47 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Article: Mismatches in IPv6/IPv4 security policies Message-ID: <809b7d1b-4277-b537-b61c-317663e0b120@si6networks.com> Folks, FYI, here's a pointer to an article I wrote for Techtarget about mismatches in IPv6/IPv4 security policies: P.S.: Scroll down the page... the whole article is available for free. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From ahgod at yahoo.fr Thu Aug 9 15:38:47 2018 From: ahgod at yahoo.fr (Ah God) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Article: Mismatches in IPv6/IPv4 security policies In-Reply-To: <809b7d1b-4277-b537-b61c-317663e0b120@si6networks.com> References: <809b7d1b-4277-b537-b61c-317663e0b120@si6networks.com> Message-ID: <618167737.7071648.1533829127753@mail.yahoo.com> Hello Fernando Gont, This is a good article.It is with great interest that i have read it . Here is my concern :will we get ?a shift in cyber attacks, viruses? Thanks! Best regards, Godefroy AHOUMENOU Le mercredi 8 ao?t 2018 ? 14:09:55 UTC+1, Fernando Gont a ?crit : Folks, FYI, here's a pointer to an article I wrote for Techtarget about mismatches in IPv6/IPv4 security policies: P.S.: Scroll down the page... the whole article is available for free. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From adisabolutifeo at gmail.com Thu Aug 16 16:44:39 2018 From: adisabolutifeo at gmail.com (Bolutife Adisa) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:44:39 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Update_on_=E2=80=9CIPv6_deployment_in?= =?utf-8?b?IE5pZ2VyaWHigJ0=?= Message-ID: <4CAEB4FC-F6FD-469E-B73C-C283D67A8800@gmail.com> Hi folks, FYI ?There are fifty networks in Nigeria that have acquired IPV6 out of which only five networks are active. Also, five networks out of 134 Autonomous Systems in the country are currently using IPv6.? Check out ?Communique of Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum series 2018 - Nigeria IPv6 Roundtable? https://www.itrealms.com.ng/2018/06/communique-of-nigeria-digitalsense.html?m=1 Kind regards ???- Adisa Bolutife. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tamon at afrinic.net Fri Aug 17 07:05:50 2018 From: tamon at afrinic.net (Mukom Akong T) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 11:05:50 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Update on =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=9CIPv6_?=deployment in =?utf-8?Q?Nigeria=E2=80=9D?= In-Reply-To: <4CAEB4FC-F6FD-469E-B73C-C283D67A8800@gmail.com> References: <4CAEB4FC-F6FD-469E-B73C-C283D67A8800@gmail.com> Message-ID: <330ed5d9-40c1-41c3-bd5b-d37637288d36@Spark> On 16 Aug 2018, 20:45 +0400, IPv6 in Africa Discussions , wrote: > > FYI??There are fifty networks in Nigeria that have acquired IPV6 out of which only five networks are active. Also,?five networks out of 134 Autonomous Systems in the country are currently using IPv6.? Any organisation that is ready to actually DO IPv6, and is committed to doing it will get 100% free step by step guidance from AFRINIC. Make a request at English ? bit.ly/6deployEN French ? bit.ly/6deployFR -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng Sat Aug 18 12:31:28 2018 From: oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng (ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:31:28 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Update_on_=E2=80=9CIPv6_deployment_in?= =?utf-8?b?IE5pZ2VyaWHigJ0=?= In-Reply-To: <4CAEB4FC-F6FD-469E-B73C-C283D67A8800@gmail.com> References: <4CAEB4FC-F6FD-469E-B73C-C283D67A8800@gmail.com> Message-ID: HI, Thank for sending the communique and I hope you would be able to achieve what you have set out in the way forward. I would just like to add that it would be good if you can also talk to organisations like Ng REN to encourage them to use IPV6 as Universities are major players when it comes to usage in Nigeria. Thanks Abdulkarim On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote: > Hi folks, > > FYI ?There are fifty networks in Nigeria that have acquired IPV6 out of > which only five networks are active. Also, five networks out of 134 > Autonomous Systems in the country are currently using IPv6.? > > Check out ?Communique of Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum series 2018 - Nigeria > IPv6 Roundtable? > https://www.itrealms.com.ng/2018/06/communique-of-nigeria- > digitalsense.html?m=1 > > Kind regards > ???- > Adisa Bolutife. > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > -- *Dr. Abdulkarim A.Oloyede*. *B. Eng (BUK), M.Sc (York), Ph.D. (York), R.Eng, A+* *Department of Telecommunications Science/Vice Chairman, Telecommunications Development Advisory Group(TDAG), **International Telecommunication Union (ITU).* *University of Ilorin.* *Ilorin, Nigeria* *Alternative Emails: olouss at yahoo.com OR aao500 at york.ac.uk * -- Website ,?Weekly Bulletin ?UGPortal PGPortal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From adisabolutifeo at gmail.com Sun Aug 19 15:05:06 2018 From: adisabolutifeo at gmail.com (Bolutife Adisa) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 16:05:06 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Update_on_=E2=80=9CIPv6_deployment_in?= =?utf-8?b?IE5pZ2VyaWHigJ0=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4CAEB4FC-F6FD-469E-B73C-C283D67A8800@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1B180574-8350-43C3-974F-D4CF13BF6931@gmail.com> Good day, I believe NgRen had a representative at the event as well, and I am certain, they are working actively to help their University clients to make the switch to IPV6. Hopefully, progress would be made soon. Regards Bolutife Adisa. > On 18 Aug 2018, at 1:31 PM, ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE wrote: > > HI, > Thank for sending the communique and I hope you would be able to achieve what you have set out in the way forward. > I would just like to add that it would be good if you can also talk to organisations like Ng REN to encourage them to use IPV6 as Universities are major players when it comes to usage in Nigeria. > Thanks > > Abdulkarim > >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> FYI ?There are fifty networks in Nigeria that have acquired IPV6 out of which only five networks are active. Also, five networks out of 134 Autonomous Systems in the country are currently using IPv6.? >> >> Check out ?Communique of Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum series 2018 - Nigeria IPv6 Roundtable? >> https://www.itrealms.com.ng/2018/06/communique-of-nigeria-digitalsense.html?m=1 >> >> Kind regards >> ???- >> Adisa Bolutife. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> > > > > -- > Dr. Abdulkarim A.Oloyede. B. Eng (BUK), M.Sc (York), Ph.D. (York), R.Eng, A+ > Department of Telecommunications Science/Vice Chairman, Telecommunications Development Advisory Group(TDAG), International Telecommunication Union (ITU). > University of Ilorin. > Ilorin, Nigeria > Alternative Emails: olouss at yahoo.com OR aao500 at york.ac.uk > > > Website, Weekly Bulletin UGPortal PGPortal > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From adisabolutifeo at gmail.com Sun Aug 19 15:07:58 2018 From: adisabolutifeo at gmail.com (Bolutife Adisa) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 16:07:58 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Update_on_=E2=80=9CIPv6_deployment_in?= =?utf-8?b?IE5pZ2VyaWHigJ0=?= In-Reply-To: <330ed5d9-40c1-41c3-bd5b-d37637288d36@Spark> References: <4CAEB4FC-F6FD-469E-B73C-C283D67A8800@gmail.com> <330ed5d9-40c1-41c3-bd5b-d37637288d36@Spark> Message-ID: <761869E3-23F2-4516-B9F1-40299DB5FD94@gmail.com> A big kudos to AFRINIC on this one, and thanks a lot for sharing. The links will come in handy in our advocacy programs. Regards Bolutife Adisa. > On 17 Aug 2018, at 8:05 AM, Mukom Akong T wrote: > >> On 16 Aug 2018, 20:45 +0400, IPv6 in Africa Discussions , wrote: >> >> FYI ?There are fifty networks in Nigeria that have acquired IPV6 out of which only five networks are active. Also, five networks out of 134 Autonomous Systems in the country are currently using IPv6.? > > > Any organisation that is ready to actually DO IPv6, and is committed to doing it will get 100% free step by step guidance from AFRINIC. Make a request at > > > English ? bit.ly/6deployEN > > French ? bit.ly/6deployFR > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From remmyn at gmail.com Sat Aug 18 15:02:51 2018 From: remmyn at gmail.com (Remmy Nweke) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 16:02:51 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] =?utf-8?q?Update_on_=E2=80=9CIPv6_deployment_in?= =?utf-8?b?IE5pZ2VyaWHigJ0=?= In-Reply-To: References: <4CAEB4FC-F6FD-469E-B73C-C283D67A8800@gmail.com> Message-ID: Comment Noted with thanks. Remmy On 18 Aug 2018 1:36 pm, "ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE" < oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng> wrote: HI, Thank for sending the communique and I hope you would be able to achieve what you have set out in the way forward. I would just like to add that it would be good if you can also talk to organisations like Ng REN to encourage them to use IPV6 as Universities are major players when it comes to usage in Nigeria. Thanks Abdulkarim On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Bolutife Adisa wrote: > Hi folks, > > FYI ?There are fifty networks in Nigeria that have acquired IPV6 out of > which only five networks are active. Also, five networks out of 134 > Autonomous Systems in the country are currently using IPv6.? > > Check out ?Communique of Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum series 2018 - Nigeria > IPv6 Roundtable? > > https://www.itrealms.com.ng/2018/06/communique-of-nigeria-digitalsense.html?m=1 > > Kind regards > ???- > Adisa Bolutife. > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > -- *Dr. Abdulkarim A.Oloyede*. *B. Eng (BUK), M.Sc (York), Ph.D. (York), R.Eng, A+* *Department of Telecommunications Science/Vice Chairman, Telecommunications Development Advisory Group(TDAG), **International Telecommunication Union (ITU).* *University of Ilorin.* *Ilorin, Nigeria* *Alternative Emails: olouss at yahoo.com OR aao500 at york.ac.uk * Website , Weekly Bulletin UGPortal PGPortal _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From elmoudden.ab at gmail.com Fri Aug 17 20:08:01 2018 From: elmoudden.ab at gmail.com (Abdellah EL MOUDDEN) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 21:08:01 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books Message-ID: Hello, I want references and books on fast moving to IPv6 cordially ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From elmoudden.ab at gmail.com Sat Aug 18 15:29:05 2018 From: elmoudden.ab at gmail.com (Abdellah EL MOUDDEN) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 16:29:05 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Post to this list Message-ID: Hello, I want to post to this list: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tamon at afrinic.net Tue Aug 21 10:33:29 2018 From: tamon at afrinic.net (Mukom Akong T) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:33:29 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Abdella Some more detail would have been useful. What?s the immediate problem you are trying to accomplish? - actually deploy IPv6? - just get knowledge? If you are just getting started? any recent (last 3 years) book on IPv6 will be a good start, then you can update that with RFCs from IPv6Ops working group On 21 Aug 2018, 12:32 +0400, IPv6 in Africa Discussions , wrote: > > I want references and books on fast moving to IPv6 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noah at neo.co.tz Tue Aug 21 10:29:20 2018 From: noah at neo.co.tz (Noah) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:29:20 +0300 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Abdellah EL MOUDDEN < elmoudden.ab at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I want references and books on fast moving to IPv6 > https://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ipv6/ https://www.internetsociety.org/tutorials/introduction-to-ipv6 > cordially > ? > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > -- *./noah* neo - network engineering and operations -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jordi.palet at consulintel.es Tue Aug 21 12:20:09 2018 From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:20:09 -0500 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7B62BBAC-C1CC-41DB-96C8-03762A731618@consulintel.es> http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=8281 http://theipv6company.com/ipv6/dissemination??????????? Regards, Jordi De: Abdellah EL MOUDDEN Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Fecha: martes, 21 de agosto de 2018, 3:36 Para: Asunto: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books Hello, I want references and books on fast moving to IPv6 cordially ? _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willy.konga at aninf.ga Tue Aug 21 13:01:58 2018 From: willy.konga at aninf.ga (Willy KONGA) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1894345880.40671625.1534856518315.JavaMail.root@aninf.ga> Hi, You can find many documentation about IPv6 on the RIPE, AFRINIC or APNIC web site. For exemple on apnic you can find this : https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/faqs/ipv6-documentation-prefix/ . Also you can find an excellent course about ipv6 on https://networklessons.com/ipv6/. Best regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Abdellah EL MOUDDEN" To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net Sent: Friday, 17 August, 2018 9:08:01 PM Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books Hello, I want references and books on fast moving to IPv6 cordially ? _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature-juin2015-willy3.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 148268 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lee.howard at retevia.net Tue Aug 21 15:17:05 2018 From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:17:05 -0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Good question. My answer last year was here: http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/IPv6reading.html With less than a day of reading, you will understand enough about IPv6 to get to work. The rest will be adapting your specific configurations and reading documentation. Updated links/notes below: 1. draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis , "IPv6 Address Architecture." Sure, you could read RFC4291, but this draft is pretty close to done, and contains all the current updates. 2. RFC4861 , "Neighbor Discovery." It's long, at almost 100 pages, but you can probably skip most of the packet format stuff. If you understand the stuff in this document, including ND, DAD, RS, RA, NS, NA, then you have a solid understanding of IPv6. 3. You need both of these in order to understand how magically hosts get provisioned: * RFC4862 , "IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration" or "SLAAC", and * RFC8106 , "The RDNSS Option in RA". 4. RFC3315 , "DHCPv6". You should know IA_NA and IA_PD. You should learn as much about DHCPv6 as you know about DHCP. One of the interesting parts is how DHCPv6 options can be used to provision transition mechanisms (but that's another post). 5. RFC8201 "Path MTU Discovery". Understanding this will let you troubleshoot the most common IPv6 problem. For extra credit:RFC8200 , "IPv6 Specification". I'm sure it sounds weird to say that the base spec is extra credit, but other than packet structure, the important stuff here is Extension Headers and flow labels, and there aren't many practical uses for those yet. If you want to think of creative uses for IPv6, then you should look into those. But if you've read the full list up to this point, you have enough information to design, build, and operate an IPv6 network. Advice is included in several deployment guidelines, but AfriNIC probably has the best direct support anywhere, and you can't beat the price. Lee On 08/17/2018 04:08 PM, Abdellah EL MOUDDEN wrote: > > Hello, > > I want references and books on fast moving to IPv6 > > cordially > ? > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From greg.antic at stc.za.com Tue Sep 4 18:39:45 2018 From: greg.antic at stc.za.com (Greg Antic) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:39:45 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: <196e01a735b24d66bb1a09ffe45a9d37@stc.za.com> Thanks all. Can anyone suggest a netflow tool for v6? ________________________________ From: Lee Howard Sent: 21 August 2018 17:17 To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books Good question. My answer last year was here: http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/IPv6reading.html With less than a day of reading, you will understand enough about IPv6 to get to work. The rest will be adapting your specific configurations and reading documentation. Updated links/notes below: 1. draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis, "IPv6 Address Architecture." Sure, you could read RFC4291, but this draft is pretty close to done, and contains all the current updates. 2. RFC4861, "Neighbor Discovery." It's long, at almost 100 pages, but you can probably skip most of the packet format stuff. If you understand the stuff in this document, including ND, DAD, RS, RA, NS, NA, then you have a solid understanding of IPv6. 3. You need both of these in order to understand how magically hosts get provisioned: * RFC4862, "IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration" or "SLAAC", and * RFC8106, "The RDNSS Option in RA". 4. RFC3315, "DHCPv6". You should know IA_NA and IA_PD. You should learn as much about DHCPv6 as you know about DHCP. One of the interesting parts is how DHCPv6 options can be used to provision transition mechanisms (but that's another post). 5. RFC8201 "Path MTU Discovery". Understanding this will let you troubleshoot the most common IPv6 problem. For extra credit: RFC8200, "IPv6 Specification". I'm sure it sounds weird to say that the base spec is extra credit, but other than packet structure, the important stuff here is Extension Headers and flow labels, and there aren't many practical uses for those yet. If you want to think of creative uses for IPv6, then you should look into those. But if you've read the full list up to this point, you have enough information to design, build, and operate an IPv6 network. Advice is included in several deployment guidelines, but AfriNIC probably has the best direct support anywhere, and you can't beat the price. Lee On 08/17/2018 04:08 PM, Abdellah EL MOUDDEN wrote: Hello, I want references and books on fast moving to IPv6 cordially [https://mailfoogae.appspot.com/t?sender=aZWxtb3VkZGVuLmFiQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ%3D%3D&type=zerocontent&guid=112593ed-890e-48c7-ba6c-5cfac1fd4dd9]? _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From greg.antic at stc.za.com Wed Sep 5 08:16:33 2018 From: greg.antic at stc.za.com (Greg Antic) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 08:16:33 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <78c8f787d04b4adc8472f5730e4d47a3@stc.za.com> Thanks all, can anyone suggest a netflow tool for v6? From: Lee Howard Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 5:17 PM To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] references and books Good question. My answer last year was here: http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/IPv6reading.html With less than a day of reading, you will understand enough about IPv6 to get to work. The rest will be adapting your specific configurations and reading documentation. Updated links/notes below: 1. draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis, "IPv6 Address Architecture." Sure, you could read RFC4291, but this draft is pretty close to done, and contains all the current updates. 2. RFC4861, "Neighbor Discovery." It's long, at almost 100 pages, but you can probably skip most of the packet format stuff. If you understand the stuff in this document, including ND, DAD, RS, RA, NS, NA, then you have a solid understanding of IPv6. 3. You need both of these in order to understand how magically hosts get provisioned: ? RFC4862, "IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration" or "SLAAC", and ? RFC8106, "The RDNSS Option in RA". 4. RFC3315, "DHCPv6". You should know IA_NA and IA_PD. You should learn as much about DHCPv6 as you know about DHCP. One of the interesting parts is how DHCPv6 options can be used to provision transition mechanisms (but that's another post). 5. RFC8201 "Path MTU Discovery". Understanding this will let you troubleshoot the most common IPv6 problem. For extra credit: RFC8200, "IPv6 Specification". I'm sure it sounds weird to say that the base spec is extra credit, but other than packet structure, the important stuff here is Extension Headers and flow labels, and there aren't many practical uses for those yet. If you want to think of creative uses for IPv6, then you should look into those. But if you've read the full list up to this point, you have enough information to design, build, and operate an IPv6 network. Advice is included in several deployment guidelines, but AfriNIC probably has the best direct support anywhere, and you can't beat the price. Lee On 08/17/2018 04:08 PM, Abdellah EL MOUDDEN wrote: Hello, I want references and books on fast moving to IPv6 cordially [Image removed by sender.]? _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ~WRD247.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 823 bytes Desc: ~WRD247.jpg URL: From tamon at afrinic.net Fri Sep 7 14:04:53 2018 From: tamon at afrinic.net (Mukom Akong T) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 18:04:53 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] [Webinar] Take Your IPv6 Deployment to the Next Level Message-ID: <0061af67-2e15-47b1-99b6-66f422a7935e@Spark> Hello folks When we did our IPv6 Deployment Challenges survey in 2016, one of the main findings was that some folks even after training still wanted more guidance. As a result, we created two initiatives as part of our IPv6 Program 1. The IPv6 Deployment Hackathon (aka Deployathons): - invite-only events where we help you prototype, test and deploy some IPv6 feature within 16 hours 2. The IPv6 Deployment Help Desk where we work with teams one-on-one to implement IPv6 on their networks We find ourselves dealing with certain recurrent themes during these help desk sessions. As a result, we?re launching a series of webinars to address very specific deployment issues. The first webinar is open for registration at?https://vox.afrinic.net/281636?lang=en?and?will take place as follows ? ?19th September ? ?13:00 UTC ? 30 seats only Request an invite to this webinar at?https://vox.afrinic.net/281636?lang=en Warm Regards P/S If you?ll be attending SAFNOG-4 (24th - 29th September) in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, we?ll be running our second deployathon at the event. Request an invite at?https://vox.afrinic.net/728558?lang=en For anyone else who cannot make it to Dar but needs free guidance on their IPv6 project, make a request at ?bit.ly/6deployEN??(English) or?bit.ly/6deployFR?(French). Those who register and get an invite to our webinar?https://vox.afrinic.net/281636?lang=en?will get priority access to the help desk. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Thu Sep 13 05:51:14 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 07:51:14 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG - Just Under 2 Weeks To Go! Message-ID: <887f16d2-c96a-c41f-3bb2-b12f7df891db@seacom.mu> Hi all. This is just a reminder that with a little under 2 weeks to go the upcoming SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG meeting to be held in Dar Es Salaam, 24th - 29th September, please remember to register your attendance at http://www.safnog.org/ so you don't miss the meeting. The agenda is now up on the web site at http://www.safnog.org/#agenda with just a few slots left which are filling fast. In case you feel like you have an interesting technical and operational talk that you'd like to share with the community at this meeting, please feel free to submit it for the program committee to review as soon as possible, at: ??? https://papers.safnog.org/user/login.php?event=76 Key talks that you would be looking forward include: * Ben Roberts (Liquid Telecom), talking about the latency realities of intra-African Internet communication. * The 3 major data centre projects that are happening in South Africa, Kenya and Uganda. * The DNSSEC key rollover due on 11th October, and what to look forward to, as explained by Amreesh Phokeer. * An IPv6 Deployathon 2-day workshop headed by Mukom Akong Tamon. * ... and so many more. There will be 2 social events where delegates can network, share a drink, some good food, and stand a chance to win either an iPhone X or AppleTV 4K. We have secured a special discount rate at the hotel venue for all SAFNOG/EANOG/tzNOG participants. More details are available at http://www.safnog.org/#venue . We look forward to seeing you in Dar Es Salaam. Mark Tinka On Behalf of the SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Organising Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bashir.angode at afrinic.net Tue Sep 18 12:45:35 2018 From: bashir.angode at afrinic.net (Bashir) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:45:35 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Reserve Your Spot for "Create & Implement the Perfect IPv6 Address Plan" Webinar | 19th Sept Message-ID: <42cc2927-7f86-5678-01a1-6d369793f052@afrinic.net> Click this link to confirm: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_n4--DQ-ZQfKe6xH9uHCF8g And here's what is in store for you tomorrow 19th September. Imagine this: The project manager of your company's IPv6 deployment project has assigned the following task to you. 1. Find out exactly how much IPv6 space we need for our network 2. Get that space from AFRINIC 3. Create a detailed IPv6 Addressing Plan that we'll use in deployment Your mind flashes back to your CCNA days and the sweat-inducing binary mathematics required to subnet and variable length subnetting. The thought of having to do that for IPv6 fills makes you break out in a cold sweat. You know there's hundreds of blogs out there and a couple of RFCs that seem to give conflicting recommendations about what prefix lengths to use where. You remember hearing some IPv6 guru saying that you'll get your IPv6 address plan wrong and redo it at least 3 times. You are about to have a very bad couple of days!! Worry not, by popular demand (66% of those who responded to our webinar survey last week) requested help with exactly this task as their #1 challenge.? And we're happy to oblige ?? Webinar: "Create & Implement the Perfect IPv6 Address Plan ?? 19th September 2018 ? 17:00 GST (Mauritius, Seychelles, Madagascar) ??????? -? 13:00 UTC? (Ghana, Cote D'Ivoire) ??????? -? 14:00? WAT (Nigeria, Cameroon) ??????? -? 16:00 EAT (Kenya, Uganda) ?? Confirm spot: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_n4--DQ-ZQfKe6xH9uHCF8g By the end of this 2 hour webinar, you will be hero and delivered the perfect IPv6 address plan for your deployment team, - without migraine-inducing math - consistent with best current operational practice - ready to roll in an IP Address Management System (IPAM) Confirm your spot: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_n4--DQ-ZQfKe6xH9uHCF8g Warm regards AFRINIC Training Team From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Thu Sep 20 02:17:04 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 04:17:04 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG: 4 Days To Go! Message-ID: <7de8ccb6-7f78-751c-d2e2-164929bfd827@seacom.mu> Hi all. With just about 4 days to go until the 4th edition of the SAFNOG meeting, in collaboration with EANOG and tzNOG, we are geared for an exciting week in warm & sunny Dar Es Salaam. The agenda will cover key topics for the region, such as: * Is Africa's continued telecommunications investment into Europe wise for the continent? * Data centre infrastructure development in the region. * What the recent IRR changes at RIPE mean for Africa. * The advances of IPv4 brokers into Africa, using AFRINIC very own resources in doing so. * e.t.c. More details about the meeting, registration, venue and agenda at: ??? http://www.safnog.org/ If you haven't yet, please register your attendance to join us next week. We look forward to seeing you all there. Cheers, Mark Tinka On Behalf of the SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Organizing Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From honlue at gmail.com Thu Sep 20 07:14:01 2018 From: honlue at gmail.com (Stephen Honlue) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:14:01 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG: 4 Days To Go! In-Reply-To: <7de8ccb6-7f78-751c-d2e2-164929bfd827@seacom.mu> References: <7de8ccb6-7f78-751c-d2e2-164929bfd827@seacom.mu> Message-ID: <47f39062-64ab-83df-690d-8ad9e52a92ca@gmail.com> Check the link, it's not responding for me. On 20/09/2018 06:17, Mark Tinka wrote: > > More details about the meeting, registration, venue and agenda at: > > ??? http://www.safnog.org/ > -- -- MSH Trainer IT and security, Self development enthusiast, Internet FAN t: +230 57444041 | tt: @mhonlue |w:www.honluemusa.org facebook.com/mhonlue | http://bit.ly/2EXbT45 ___________________________ Meet you at the top From afabbie at hotmail.com Thu Sep 20 07:17:53 2018 From: afabbie at hotmail.com (Fabian Jr) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 07:17:53 +0000 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG: 4 Days To Go! In-Reply-To: <47f39062-64ab-83df-690d-8ad9e52a92ca@gmail.com> References: <7de8ccb6-7f78-751c-d2e2-164929bfd827@seacom.mu>, <47f39062-64ab-83df-690d-8ad9e52a92ca@gmail.com> Message-ID: the link is working Stephen check your connections ! Arbogast Fabian, cell:+255-78-447-8387 ________________________________ From: Stephen Honlue Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 10:14 AM To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG: 4 Days To Go! Check the link, it's not responding for me. On 20/09/2018 06:17, Mark Tinka wrote: > > More details about the meeting, registration, venue and agenda at: > > http://www.safnog.org/ SAFNOG 4 Conference www.safnog.org Hello all. It gives me great pleasure to announce that SAFNOG-4, in collaboration with EANOG (East Africa Network Operators Group) and tzNOG (Tanzania Network Operators Group), and hosted by TISPA (Tanzania Internet Service Providers Association) will be held between the 24th - 29th September, 2018, in the warm and sunny city of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.. > -- -- MSH Trainer IT and security, Self development enthusiast, Internet FAN t: +230 57444041 | tt: @mhonlue |w:www.honluemusa.org facebook.com/mhonlue | http://bit.ly/2EXbT45 ___________________________ Meet you at the top _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nishal at controlfreak.co.za Thu Sep 20 07:24:37 2018 From: nishal at controlfreak.co.za (Nishal Goburdhan) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:24:37 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG: 4 Days To Go! In-Reply-To: <47f39062-64ab-83df-690d-8ad9e52a92ca@gmail.com> References: <7de8ccb6-7f78-751c-d2e2-164929bfd827@seacom.mu> <47f39062-64ab-83df-690d-8ad9e52a92ca@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4C090C02-42FD-4AFD-B1FF-0C08302649AB@controlfreak.co.za> On 20 Sep 2018, at 9:14, Stephen Honlue wrote: > Check the link, it's not responding for me. https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/safnog.org it?s you. :-) ?n. From abscoco at gmail.com Thu Sep 20 08:26:48 2018 From: abscoco at gmail.com (Sylvain BAYA) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:26:48 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG: 4 Days To Go! In-Reply-To: <4C090C02-42FD-4AFD-B1FF-0C08302649AB@controlfreak.co.za> References: <7de8ccb6-7f78-751c-d2e2-164929bfd827@seacom.mu> <47f39062-64ab-83df-690d-8ad9e52a92ca@gmail.com> <4C090C02-42FD-4AFD-B1FF-0C08302649AB@controlfreak.co.za> Message-ID: <8201fc1b-3453-2c0e-be16-255f9d439a72@gmail.com> Hi @ll, Le jeu. 20 sept. 2018 8:25 AM, Nishal Goburdhan > a ?crit?: On 20 Sep 2018, at 9:14, Stephen Honlue wrote: > Check the link, it's not responding for me. https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/safnog.org it?s you. :-) Ok for me too Stephen. Has Nishal said :-) Regards, --sb. ?n. [...] --? Regards, Sylvain B. __ Website :?https://www.cmnog.cm ? Wiki :?https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki Surveys :?https://survey.cmnog.cm ? Subscribe to Mailing List :?https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/ Mailing List's Archives :?https://lists.cmnog.cm/pipermail/cmnog/ Last Event's Feed :?https://twitter.com/#cmNOGlab3 https://twitter.com/cmN0G?| https://facebook.com/cmNOG https://twitter.com/#REBOOTcmNOG https://twitter.com/#cmNOG https://cmnog.wordpress.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0x0387408365AC8594.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 4826 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Mon Sep 24 05:33:29 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:33:29 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG: Live Stream The Conference Now! Message-ID: <4c224c85-22f5-1580-e020-c27c6f8a73f4@seacom.mu> Hello all. For those who would like to attend the meeting remotely, the live stream for the conference is now available on our web site: ??? http://www.safnog.org/ We look forward to you joining us online. Cheers, Mark Tinka On Behalf of the SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG Organizing Committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Mon Oct 15 06:15:12 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:15:12 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Fwd: [apops] APRICOT 2019 PC call for volunteers In-Reply-To: <13509111-9a18-966a-a461-292c6b67fe88@gmail.com> References: <13509111-9a18-966a-a461-292c6b67fe88@gmail.com> Message-ID: <607c1c69-e229-5f21-4163-a7bb476d0f51@seacom.mu> FYI. Mark. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [apops] APRICOT 2019 PC call for volunteers Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:26:42 +1000 From: Philip Smith To: apops at apops.net Hi everyone, The APRICOT 2019 Programme Committee is responsible for the solicitation and selection of suitable presentation and tutorial content for the APRICOT 2019 conference (https://2019.apricot.net/). The APRICOT PC Chairs are now seeking nominations from the community to join the APRICOT 2019 PC to assist with the development of the programme for APRICOT 2019. Eligible PC candidates are those who have attended APRICOT conferences in the recent past, have broad technical knowledge of Internet operations, and have reasonable familiarity with the format of APRICOT conferences. Having constructive opinions and ideas about how the programme content might be improved is of high value too. PC members are expected to work actively to solicit content and review submissions for technical merit. The PC meets by conference call, weekly in frequency during the three months prior to APRICOT. If you are interested in joining the PC and meet the above eligibility criteria, please send a brief note to "pc-chairs at apricot.net". The note should include affiliation (if any) and contact details (including e-mail address), and a brief description of why you would make a good addition to the PC. PC members who are active, successfully solicit content, contribute to regular PC meetings and submit reviews receive complimentary registration for APRICOT 2019. The PC Chairs will accept nominations received by 17:00 UTC+8 on Monday 22nd October, 2018, and will announce the new PC shortly thereafter. Many thanks! Mark Tinka, Marijana Novakovic & Philip Smith APRICOT 2019 PC Chairs -- _______________________________________________ apops mailing list apops at apops.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apops Website: www.apops.net . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Mon Oct 15 06:44:26 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:44:26 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Fwd: [apops] APRICOT 2019 Call for Presentations In-Reply-To: <4410edb7-97b3-286b-671a-51b605b0442f@gmail.com> References: <4410edb7-97b3-286b-671a-51b605b0442f@gmail.com> Message-ID: <9274e560-032d-159f-c14d-28b22d61a0e9@seacom.mu> FYI - APRICOT 2019 Call for Presentations. Thanks. Mark. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [apops] APRICOT 2019 Call for Presentations Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:43:08 +1000 From: Philip Smith To: apops at apops.net Hi everyone, The call for presentations for APRICOT 2019 has been published - we are all looking forward to receiving your presentation and tutorial proposals and welcoming you to APRICOT 2019 in Daejeon, Korea, in February. Thanks! Mark, Marijana, Philip APRICOT 2019 PC Chairs -- Asia Pacific Regional Internet Conference on Operational Technologies (APRICOT) 25th - 28th February 2019, Daejeon, Korea https://2019.apricot.net CALL FOR PAPERS =============== The APRICOT 2019 Programme Committee is now seeking contributions for Presentations and Tutorials for the APRICOT 2019 Conference. We are looking for presenters who would: - Offer a technical tutorial on an appropriate topic; - Participate in the technical conference sessions as a speaker; - Convene and chair panel sessions of relevant topics; - Lead informal Birds of Feather break out sessions. Please submit on-line at: http://papers.apricot.net/user/login.php?event=79 CONFERENCE MILESTONES --------------------- Call for Papers Opens: Now Draft Program Published: As Papers Confirmed Final Deadline for Submissions: 25 January 2019 Final Program Published: 1 February 2019 Final Slides Received: 15 February 2019 *NOTE THAT REGARDLESS OF DEADLINES, SLOTS ARE FILLED ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS* PROGRAMME CONTENT ----------------- The APRICOT Conference Programme consists of three parts, these being the Peering Forum, Tutorials, and Conference Tracks. Topics proposed must be relevant to Internet Operations and Technologies: - IPv4 / IPv6 Routing and Operations - Internet backbone operations - Peering, Interconnects and IXPs - Content Distribution Network technology & operations - Research on Internet Operations and Deployment - Network security (NSP-SEC, DDoS, Anti-Spam, Anti-Malware) - IPv6 deployment on fixed and Wireless/Cellular networks - DNS / DNSSEC - Access and Transport Technologies, including Cable/DSL, LTE/5G, wireless, metro ethernet, fibre, segment routing - Software Defined Networking / Network Function Virtualisaton - Content & Service Delivery (Multicast, Voice, Video, "telepresence", Gaming) and Cloud Computing CfP SUBMISSION -------------- Draft slides for both tutorials and conference sessions MUST be provided with CfP submissions otherwise the submission will be rejected immediately. For work in progress, the most current information available at time of submission is acceptable. All draft and complete slides must be submitted in PDF format only. Slides must be of original work, with all company confidential marks removed. Final slides are to be provided by the specified deadline for publication on the APRICOT website. Prospective presenters should note that the majority of speaking slots will be filled well before the final submission deadline. The PC may, at their discretion, retain a limited number of slots up to the final submission deadline for presentations that are exceptionally timely, important, or of critical operational importance. Every year we turn away submissions, due to filling up all available programme slots before the deadline. Presenters should endeavour to get material into the PC sooner rather than later. Any questions or concerns should be addressed to the Programme Committee by e-mail at: pc-chairs at apricot.net We look forward to receiving your presentation proposals. Mark Tinka, Marijana Novakovic & Philip Smith Co-Chairs, APRICOT 2019 Programme Committee -- _______________________________________________ apops mailing list apops at apops.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apops Website: www.apops.net . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.tinka at seacom.mu Tue Oct 16 12:00:54 2018 From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:00:54 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] SAFNOG-4/EANOG/tzNOG: Thank You & Survey Message-ID: <22fd8d73-0835-5604-de12-bd086c1595f5@seacom.mu> Hello all. On behalf of the SAFNOG Management Committee, EANOG and tzNOG, I'd like to extend my sincere thanks to all of you that attended this year's meeting in Dar Es Salaam, physically and remotely. To our host (TISPA), our sponsors, our speakers and of course, you, our delegates, that supported this year's meeting... we would not have been able to do it without you. We look forward to seeing you again in 2019, details of which will be communicated in the coming months. I would like to ask you to take a few minutes and complete the 10-question survey at the link below, so that we know where to improve for future meetings: ??? https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JQTKVVF Thank you all, and see you in 2019. Mark Tinka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brice at afrinic.net Wed Nov 14 14:31:50 2018 From: brice at afrinic.net (Brice ABBA) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:31:50 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Register for the IPv6 Deployathon at AFRINIC-29 in Tunisia Message-ID: ** Fran?**ais en bas ** Dear all, So if you want to securely announce our IPv6 prefix in a manner consistent with industry best practice, and get ready to natively connect a native IPv6 customer. If you?d value a having a group of like-minded engineers with the same mission along with the guidance of experienced trainers and seasoned IPv6 deployers, then; AFRINIC invites you to register for the IPv6 deployathon session taking place on 27 and 28 November 2018? at the Medina Conference and Expo Center, Yasmine Hammamet in Tunisia. Register here: http://bit.ly/IPv6_Deploy_En Seats for this session are limited to 20. --- Inscrivez-vous au deployathon IPv6 ? AFRINIC-29 en Tunisie? Si vous souhaitez annoncer notre pr?fixe IPv6 de mani?re s?curis?e avec les meilleures pratiques en la mati?re,? si vous souhaitez ?tre pr?t ? connecter nativement un client IPv6 natif. Si vous tenez ? avoir un groupe d'ing?nieurs partageant les m?mes id?es avec la m?me mission avec les conseils de formateurs exp?riment?s et d?experts dans le d?ploiement d?IPv6, alors; AFRINIC vous invite ? vous inscrire ? la session de deployathon IPv6 qui se tiendra les 27 et 28 novembre 2018 au centre de conf?rences et d'expositions Medina, ? Yasmine Hammamet, en Tunisie.? Inscrivez-vous ici: http://bit.ly/IPv6_Deploy_Fr Les places pour cette session sont limit?es ? 20. -- Mr Brice B. ABBA t: +230 403 51 00 | f: +230 466 6758 | tt: @afrinic | w:www.afrinic.net facebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join us for AFRINIC 29 in Tunis, Tunisia from 26th to 30th November 2018 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 528 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From mangawilly at gmail.com Sat Dec 1 11:35:38 2018 From: mangawilly at gmail.com (Willy MANGA) Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 12:35:38 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] IPv6 transition mechanism used by ISP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5ae1a35a-d449-11bb-5aab-bfb58a6874e2@gmail.com> May be useful here --- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:04:10 +0200 From: Yannis Nikolopoulos To: ipv6-wg at ripe.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Hello all, this probably hasn't been posted here so for everyone's info, there's a google spreadsheet created by IETF's Lee Howard, with information about transition mechanisms used by ISPs around the world. Obviously, anyone can edit and the more people add info, the more meaningful and useful it can become https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksOoWOaRdRyjZnjLSikHf4O5L1OUTNOO_7NK9vcVApc/edit?usp=sharing cheers, Yannis -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From mangawilly at gmail.com Sat Dec 1 11:48:17 2018 From: mangawilly at gmail.com (Willy MANGA) Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 12:48:17 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4636b82c-c836-2980-ebf0-9c775bb59ea4@gmail.com> Hi, I pick it from rpd list [1] because I do not think it's the right place to discuss it ... I'll appreciate if people can express share their opinions on points below and eventually share their experiences. 1. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2018/008662.html Le 01/12/2018 ? 07:16, Andrew Alston a ?crit?: > You know, > [...] > Now let me talk about IPv6 ? something I happen to know a fair bit about ? particularly in terms of ISP deployments. Let us be completely honest, IPv6 is necessary ? and we all have to get there ? it?s not an option ? v4 simply doesn?t scale to global needs. But ? instead of these meaningless platitudes about how everyone should go to IPv6 ? how about we start openly and honestly talking about the challenges with IPv6 and how we address them ? so that we can promote its deployment through proper understanding ? and instead of everyone going ?lets all move to ipv6? ? let?s start finding solutions to some of the things that STOP people moving to IPv6. > > > 1. Lack of legacy support in a fair ton of hardware ? how do we deal with it > 2. Vastly inconsistent support for transition mechanisms and chronically bad support for most of these transition mechanisms in CPE?s > 3. The complete *mess* that MPLS support as concerns IPv6 (to this day you cannot do vpnv6 without a v4 underlay, martini is entirely bound to LDP and LDPv6 support is near non-existent, and I?ve yet to see Kompella working entirely without v4 in some form either) > 4. The security challenges around IPv6 and the bad implementations that create issues here ? issues which over the years we have learnt to deal with in IPv4 ? Happy to expound on these off list ? and no ? they have nothing to do with NAT or the lack thereof ? because NAT as a security mechanism was the biggest lie ever sold to an industry. > > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter > > Andrew -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From jordi.palet at consulintel.es Sat Dec 1 13:29:09 2018 From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ) Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 14:29:09 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <4636b82c-c836-2980-ebf0-9c775bb59ea4@gmail.com> References: <4636b82c-c836-2980-ebf0-9c775bb59ea4@gmail.com> Message-ID: For the CPEs you may want to ask your vendors to support this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas/ Yesterday night was sent to the IESG for the final review, and hopefully will be an RFC in the coming weeks. In terms of transition, if you have a cellular network, or want to make sure to be "compatible" with it in the future, I will suggest using 464XLAT. You have also this document as guidelines for deploying it: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/ Regards, Jordi ?-----Mensaje original----- De: Willy MANGA Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Fecha: s?bado, 1 de diciembre de 2018, 12:52 Para: "afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net" Asunto: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Hi, I pick it from rpd list [1] because I do not think it's the right place to discuss it ... I'll appreciate if people can express share their opinions on points below and eventually share their experiences. 1. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2018/008662.html Le 01/12/2018 ? 07:16, Andrew Alston a ?crit : > You know, > [...] > Now let me talk about IPv6 ? something I happen to know a fair bit about ? particularly in terms of ISP deployments. Let us be completely honest, IPv6 is necessary ? and we all have to get there ? it?s not an option ? v4 simply doesn?t scale to global needs. But ? instead of these meaningless platitudes about how everyone should go to IPv6 ? how about we start openly and honestly talking about the challenges with IPv6 and how we address them ? so that we can promote its deployment through proper understanding ? and instead of everyone going ?lets all move to ipv6? ? let?s start finding solutions to some of the things that STOP people moving to IPv6. > > > 1. Lack of legacy support in a fair ton of hardware ? how do we deal with it > 2. Vastly inconsistent support for transition mechanisms and chronically bad support for most of these transition mechanisms in CPE?s > 3. The complete *mess* that MPLS support as concerns IPv6 (to this day you cannot do vpnv6 without a v4 underlay, martini is entirely bound to LDP and LDPv6 support is near non-existent, and I?ve yet to see Kompella working entirely without v4 in some form either) > 4. The security challenges around IPv6 and the bad implementations that create issues here ? issues which over the years we have learnt to deal with in IPv4 ? Happy to expound on these off list ? and no ? they have nothing to do with NAT or the lack thereof ? because NAT as a security mechanism was the biggest lie ever sold to an industry. > > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter > > Andrew -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. From lee.howard at retevia.net Wed Dec 5 15:27:07 2018 From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:27:07 -0500 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <4636b82c-c836-2980-ebf0-9c775bb59ea4@gmail.com> References: <4636b82c-c836-2980-ebf0-9c775bb59ea4@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7bcb60c8-7a32-6962-f580-c7a39f5ad9d2@retevia.net> On 12/1/18 6:48 AM, Willy MANGA wrote: > Hi, > I pick it from rpd list [1] because I do not think it's the right place > to discuss it ... I'll appreciate if people can express share their > opinions on points below and eventually share their experiences. > > 1. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2018/008662.html I did reply there, and agree this is the better place to discuss. > Le 01/12/2018 ? 07:16, Andrew Alston a ?crit?: >> You know, >> [...] >> Now let me talk about IPv6 ? something I happen to know a fair bit about ? particularly in terms of ISP deployments. Let us be completely honest, IPv6 is necessary ? and we all have to get there ? it?s not an option ? v4 simply doesn?t scale to global needs. But ? instead of these meaningless platitudes about how everyone should go to IPv6 ? how about we start openly and honestly talking about the challenges with IPv6 and how we address them ? so that we can promote its deployment through proper understanding ? and instead of everyone going ?lets all move to ipv6? ? let?s start finding solutions to some of the things that STOP people moving to IPv6. >> >> >> 1. Lack of legacy support in a fair ton of hardware ? how do we deal with it Have to go through the hardware line by line. I haven't encountered a router, switch, load balancer, or firewall made in the last ten years that wasn't capable of basic IPv6 functions in hardware. Some of the oldest required upgrades to line cards or controller cards, but those were available by 2012. And many devices even older than 2008 had good IPv6 support. Some advanced features haven't been available for long (like some of the MPLS issues you note below), so they may not be implemented widely or well. That's just new technology, and it's significantly helped by the network effect, as more people work with it. The exception might be CPE; see below. >> 2. Vastly inconsistent support for transition mechanisms and chronically bad support for most of these transition mechanisms in CPE?s Yes, this is bad. IPv6 support might exist (but isn't always great), but without a transition mechanism, you haven't saved any IPv4 addresses. The only options you have without CPE support are NAT44 and NAT64, and both are slow and expensive and not great for things like inbound communication. A few things contribute to this problem: 1. Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. 2. ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. 3. Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. Something else that works is for the ISP to provide CPE, and include the cost in the monthly fee. Then the ISP may choose only to buy CPE that meets its requirements. It might be possible for a group of ISPs with common requirements to form a buying pool, where they had a single requirements document they could send to several vendors, and agree to buy all CPE from the vendor with the best bid. That way, 20 ISPs who would normally buy 5,000 devices per year get the buying influence of one buying 100,000 per year. I don't know if there are laws against collusion that might interfere, but I would imagine that ISPs that don't compete wouldn't have that problem. This might also be a business opportunity. This problem is also helped by the network effect, as more ISPs deploy IPv6 and realize most transition mechanisms require CPE support. Then CPE vendor hear the same requirements from more and more ISP customers. >> 3. The complete *mess* that MPLS support as concerns IPv6 (to this day you cannot do vpnv6 without a v4 underlay, martini is entirely bound to LDP and LDPv6 support is near non-existent, and I?ve yet to see Kompella working entirely without v4 in some form either) I'm not strong in MPLS. 6PE works, but current implementations do still require IPv4 underlay. The protocol work is done, now it's just waiting for router vendors to update code. >> 4. The security challenges around IPv6 and the bad implementations that create issues here ? issues which over the years we have learnt to deal with in IPv4 ? Happy to expound on these off list ? and no ? they have nothing to do with NAT or the lack thereof ? because NAT as a security mechanism was the biggest lie ever sold to an industry. Well, bad implementations are bad, and I don't know what to do about that. Test and file bugs. The only inherent security risks I know of that are specific to IPv6 are link-local, where a host might send RAs or NAs, but there are several known mitigations for those risks. Someone recently argued to me that a router that only populated its neighbor table based on DHCPv6 responses would be inherently more secure than an IPv4 network. Security best practices are still best practices. >> >> For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. I don't know of any issues with those steps, and for most networks that really is just a few hours' work. From that point, as people deploy IPv6 in their data centers, to enable web sites, provisioning and OSS systems, they might have common experiences to discuss. Lee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mukom.tamon at gmail.com Thu Dec 6 03:41:29 2018 From: mukom.tamon at gmail.com (Mukom Akong T.) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:41:29 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <7bcb60c8-7a32-6962-f580-c7a39f5ad9d2@retevia.net> References: <4636b82c-c836-2980-ebf0-9c775bb59ea4@gmail.com> <7bcb60c8-7a32-6962-f580-c7a39f5ad9d2@retevia.net> Message-ID: > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en FRENCH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM. For those interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at bit.ly/6deployEN (english) bit.ly/6deployFR (french) As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. We're also realising that that argument from big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their response :( If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country - 5% teaching, 95% DOing - using our Prototype ? Validate ? Develop ? Deploy framework - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours you can apply at: https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en (or https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en (or https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) The results might provide pointers where to start the process. Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal at irenala.edu.mg Thu Dec 6 09:41:26 2018 From: pascal at irenala.edu.mg (Pascal ANDRIANISA) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:41:26 +0300 (EAT) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: References: <4636b82c-c836-2980-ebf0-9c775bb59ea4@gmail.com> <7bcb60c8-7a32-6962-f580-c7a39f5ad9d2@retevia.net> Message-ID: <207341745.296097.1544089286108.JavaMail.zimbra@irenala.edu.mg> Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the situation. Best regard, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA R esearch and E ducation N etwork for A cademic and L earning A ctivities - [ http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ | http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ ] Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 | +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 De: "Mukom Akong T." ?: "IPv6 in Africa" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? [ https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en | https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en ] FRENCH ? [ https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr | https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr ] > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM. For those interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s ] Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at [ http://bit.ly/6deployEN | bit.ly/6deployEN ] (english) [ http://bit.ly/6deployFR | bit.ly/6deployFR ] (french) As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. We're also realising that that argument from big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their response :( If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country - 5% teaching, 95% DOing - using our Prototype ? Validate ? Develop ? Deploy framework - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours you can apply at: [ https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en | https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en ] (or [ https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr | https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr ] in french) And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at [ https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en | https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en ] (or [ https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr | https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr ] in French) The results might provide pointers where to start the process. Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jordi.palet at consulintel.es Thu Dec 6 09:55:48 2018 From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 10:55:48 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Message-ID: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> Operators are informed, if you speak about ?engineers?, the problem is to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have relevant web sites, etc.). I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago. Regards, Jordi De: Pascal ANDRIANISA Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47 Para: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the situation. Best regard, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA Research and Education Network for Academic and Learning Activities - http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 |? +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 De: "Mukom Akong T." ?: "IPv6 in Africa" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en FRENCH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM. For those interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at bit.ly/6deployEN (english) bit.ly/6deployFR (french) As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. We're also realising that that argument from big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their response :( If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country - 5% teaching, 95% DOing - using our Prototype ? Validate ? Develop ? Deploy framework - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours you can apply at: https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en (or https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en (or https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) The results might provide pointers where to start the process. Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal at irenala.edu.mg Thu Dec 6 10:17:42 2018 From: pascal at irenala.edu.mg (Pascal ANDRIANISA) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:17:42 +0300 (EAT) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> References: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> Message-ID: <521759752.296694.1544091462330.JavaMail.zimbra@irenala.edu.mg> Thank you Jordi, I think we need to go in this direction for operators to switch to IPv6 as soon as possible . Best regards, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA R esearch and E ducation N etwork for A cademic and L earning A ctivities - [ http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ | http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ ] Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 | +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 De: "IPv6 in Africa Discussions" ?: "IPv6 in Africa Discussions" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 12:55:48 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Operators are informed, if you speak about ?engineers?, the problem is to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have relevant web sites, etc.). I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago. Regards, Jordi De: Pascal ANDRIANISA Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47 Para: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the situation. Best regard, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA R esearch and E ducation N etwork for A cademic and L earning A ctivities - [ http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ | http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ ] Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 |? +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 De: "Mukom Akong T." ?: "IPv6 in Africa" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? [ https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en | https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en ] FRENCH ? [ https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr | https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr ] > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. ? Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM.? For those interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s ] Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at [ http://bit.ly/6deployEN | bit.ly/6deployEN ] (english) [ http://bit.ly/6deployFR | bit.ly/6deployFR ] (french) As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. We're also realising that that argument from big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their response :( If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country - 5% teaching, 95% DOing -?using our Prototype?? Validate ? Develop?? Deploy framework - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours you can apply at: [ https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en | https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en ] (or [ https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr | https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr ] in french) And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at [ https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en | https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en ] (or [ https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr | https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr ] in French) The results might provide pointers where to start the process. Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom ?| ?twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n_idboufker at yahoo.fr Thu Dec 6 10:22:57 2018 From: n_idboufker at yahoo.fr (Noureddine IDBOUFKER) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> References: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> Message-ID: <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> I think that Top management is not enough aware of business opportunities behind IPv6 migration.?Sure IPv6 will give them the opportunity to address a high number of objects, equipements, services,....? but it is not limited to that. Top management has to encourage their people to be express their innovation capabilities in a such a way to contribute to the developpement of Value Added Services.?Providers who will not propose new competitive service catalogue will simply die in globalized world. Top management has to know hat IPv6 is a real pillar of IT governance.?Regards? ----------------------------------------------- Noureddine IDBOUFKER Le jeudi 6 d?cembre 2018 ? 10:57:24 UTC+1, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via AfrIPv6-Discuss a ?crit : Operators are informed, if you speak about ?engineers?, the problem is to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have relevant web sites, etc.). ? I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago. Regards, Jordi ? ? ? De: Pascal ANDRIANISA Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47 Para: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 ? Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the situation. Best regard, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA Research and Education Network for Academic and Learning Activities - http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 |? +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 ?De: "Mukom Akong T." ?: "IPv6 in Africa" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 ? > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ? ENGLISH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en FRENCH ? ?https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. ? Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM.? For those interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at?? bit.ly/6deployEN? ?(english) bit.ly/6deployFR? ? (french) As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible equipment is not in the top 5.?We're also realising that that argument from big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their response :( ?If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country? ?- 5% teaching, 95% DOing-?using our Prototype?? Validate ? Develop?? Deploy framework- enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours ?you can apply at:??https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en?(or?https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) ?And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at??https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en? (or?https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) The results might provide pointers where to start the process. ?Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom ?| ?twitter: @perfexcellent ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ? _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ? _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jordi.palet at consulintel.es Thu Dec 6 10:49:26 2018 From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 11:49:26 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Message-ID: <77DEEF24-24E5-4BD1-AB96-7CE85C4FCAAB@consulintel.es> I also agree somehow what Mukom said before, but not 100% agreement I guess. Let me explain. Governments need to setup rules to mandate IPv6 in the public sector. This is easy to say, but believe me, there is not a generic ?law? for every country. I?ve worked for several governments on this. Each country is a different case, different way to work, different circumstances, different existing laws. You need to invest several months to make this kind of law, understanding the specific country situation. Copying those laws from another country doesn?t work at all. I?ve seen other countries that tried to do that, and didn?t worked, they make big mistakes. By mandating the government to make sure that any public acquisition needs to mandatorily support IPv6 (software, hardware, services, links, etc.), means the private sector accommodate to that if they want to participate in public tenders, and usually they will not offer a different kind of service/product for the government vs end-users. I typically invested for doing this around 3-4 months (1-person full time) in other countries. There are tons of existing regulations to read and to understand how the country public sector work and the relations with the providers. I?m not fan of over-regulation in the private sector. I think market should do that, but the government has the obligation to protect consumers, so for example, if providers are using CGN, just to extend the life of IPv4, this is bad, and should not be allowed. Now if you allow CGN for a certain period of time (for example 2-years), while you actively deploy IPv6, then it may be good. Nevertheless, I don?t think CGN is the solution. It is actually cheaper to buy IPv4 addresses if you can?t get them from AfriNIC, because when you buy CGN, your addresses will become black-listed (example Sony Play Station Network) forever, so at the end you invest twice (CGN first, new addresses later). Of course, this only works if you actively deploy IPv6! Similar as the previous point. Because the government needs to protect consumers, as we did in many countries for the deployment of Digital Terrestrial TV, there is a need to enforce a limit of period of time for importing any IP product that doesn?t support IPv6, for example, 1 year from now, or so. Then one additional period of 1.5 years for sell the old stocks. After that, you can?t sale anymore those products to consumers. Otherwise consumers will buy IPv4-only products, that most of the time can?t be updated (not because a hardware limitation, but because the vendor doesn?t have interest in providing new firmware, their interests is that you buy a new product). Examples IP cameras, IoT, smartTVs, CPEs, etc. Those countries that regulate the use of IoT, they must mandate that it is done with IPv6. It doesn?t make sense at all doing IoT and not supporting IPv6 on that network! This is also related to the previous point, of course. Governments need to define plans for broadband deployment. In some countries they subsidize private operators to do that. If this is the case, need to be done with IPv6 support. If governments want to save money, when connecting the public administration (at all levels, municipalities, ministries, even schools and health centers), they need to invest in country-wide government networks. This can be done in several ways, own-network (probably not the best idea), tenders to cover the country with several competing operators (each one may bid for different lots), or even with regular Internet connections for the smaller sites that don?t need high-availability (and then using IPv6-only, IPv4 as a Service and SD-WAN or other technologies). I?ve talked about a recent example with a government that just by connecting 2.000 municipalities can save 300.000.000 USD. Just scale that if you have 5.000 schools + health centers + police stations + etc. etc. IPv6 deployment for governments and enterprises is NOT the same as with IPv4. There is no NAT, you need to rethink your network. If you want to read more about that, I?ve recently published an article (two parts): https://teamarin.net/2018/11/28/ipv6-for-governments-and-enterprises-impact-and-implementation-in-12-steps-part-one/ https://teamarin.net/2018/11/29/ipv6-for-governments-and-enterprises-impact-and-implementation-in-12-steps-part-2/ I?ve also sent the article to be published by AfriNIC, but not yet seen links to that. It was right before the meeting, so I guess the communication team was very busy to be able to do that by the meeting. And by the way, when I talk about IPv6 support it must be clear that the end-goal is IPv6-only, so even if we need to support today dual-stack (so old apps and devices in the LANs still work), they must be able to work also with IPv6-only WAN links and IPv4aaS (IPv4 as a Service). Again a couple of references: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/ Regards, Jordi De: Pascal ANDRIANISA Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 11:18 Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ , IPv6 in Africa Discussions CC: Pascal ANDRIANISA Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Thank you Jordi, I think we need to go in this direction for operators to switch to IPv6 as soon as possible. Best regards, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA Research and Education Network for Academic and Learning Activities - http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 |? +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 De: "IPv6 in Africa Discussions" ?: "IPv6 in Africa Discussions" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 12:55:48 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Operators are informed, if you speak about ?engineers?, the problem is to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have relevant web sites, etc.). I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago. Regards, Jordi De: Pascal ANDRIANISA Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47 Para: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the situation. Best regard, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA Research and Education Network for Academic and Learning Activities - http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 | +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 De: "Mukom Akong T." ?: "IPv6 in Africa" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en FRENCH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM. For those interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at bit.ly/6deployEN (english) bit.ly/6deployFR (french) As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. We're also realising that that argument from big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their response :( If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country - 5% teaching, 95% DOing - using our Prototype ? Validate ? Develop ? Deploy framework - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours you can apply at: https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en (or https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en (or https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) The results might provide pointers where to start the process. Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jordi.palet at consulintel.es Thu Dec 6 10:56:36 2018 From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 11:56:36 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Note that is not a migration, this is one of the first mistakes. It is a transition and coexistence. We really need to talk with the proper terminology or we will confuse others. The IETF never did any ?migration? protocol, all them are ?transition and coexistence?. You don?t ?disable? IPv4 in the complete network overnight, otherwise you break many apps and services that don?t yet support IPv6. And yes, agree with you, is not just being aware of the IPv4-exhaustion, but also that the business opportunities of deploying IPv6. And the first one is ?keep your business working!?, but IoT, new services, new apps, etc., as well. My experience shows that usually engineers are aware (they may have the complete knowledge or not, but they know that they need to do IPv6), but in most organizations, executive management don?t pay attention to what their own engineers are saying. We like it or not, but that's why consultants exist ? (they devote time/money across many years, to learn about those topics, get experience, and then resell the expertise to customers). Experienced trainers, which are actively deploying IPv6 and do consultancy to customers may look expensive (which is not always the case), but if you compare that to how much ?internal? investment in own resources and time you save, it is very cheap. Regards, Jordi De: Noureddine IDBOUFKER Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 11:23 Para: IPv6 in Africa Discussions , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 I think that Top management is not enough aware of business opportunities behind IPv6 migration. Sure IPv6 will give them the opportunity to address a high number of objects, equipements, services,.... but it is not limited to that. Top management has to encourage their people to be express their innovation capabilities in a such a way to contribute to the developpement of Value Added Services. Providers who will not propose new competitive service catalogue will simply die in globalized world. Top management has to know hat IPv6 is a real pillar of IT governance. Regards ----------------------------------------------- Noureddine IDBOUFKER Le jeudi 6 d?cembre 2018 ? 10:57:24 UTC+1, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via AfrIPv6-Discuss a ?crit : Operators are informed, if you speak about ?engineers?, the problem is to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have relevant web sites, etc.). I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago. Regards, Jordi De: Pascal ANDRIANISA Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47 Para: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the situation. Best regard, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA Research and Education Network for Academic and Learning Activities - http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 | +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 De: "Mukom Akong T." ?: "IPv6 in Africa" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en FRENCH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM. For those interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at bit.ly/6deployEN (english) bit.ly/6deployFR (french) As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. We're also realising that that argument from big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their response :( If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country - 5% teaching, 95% DOing - using our Prototype ? Validate ? Develop ? Deploy framework - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours you can apply at: https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en (or https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en (or https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) The results might provide pointers where to start the process. Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tamon at afrinic.net Thu Dec 6 11:11:33 2018 From: tamon at afrinic.net (Mukom Akong T) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:11:33 +0400 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: References: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <690b4c40-f842-4155-8f6c-2d89da767b8e@Spark> On 6 Dec 2018, 14:57 +0400, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ , wrote: > > My experience shows that usually engineers are aware (they may have the complete knowledge or not, but they know that they need to do IPv6), but in most organizations, executive management don?t pay attention to what their own engineers are saying. True. Anyone with remote experience how organisations work will know that: if management doesn?t support it, it?s never going to happen. Our revamped ?IPv6 Strategy & Planning for Executives? workshop is designed to help managers with exactly this problem. If you are interested in hosting it in your country, express interest at https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mje at posix.co.za Thu Dec 6 12:08:47 2018 From: mje at posix.co.za (Mark Elkins) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:08:47 +0200 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <690b4c40-f842-4155-8f6c-2d89da767b8e@Spark> References: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> <690b4c40-f842-4155-8f6c-2d89da767b8e@Spark> Message-ID: Hi, I would like to see people NOT deploy IPv6 - rather use the more costly CGN method of keeping your IPv4 address space going. Services you supply will cost more but no worries - just pass your costs on to your customers. In time, your customers may find they can't get to every Web Site because those sites no longer have any IPv4 access. This will make your life easier as there will be less to go wrong. Of course, the clever customers will leave you (to go to me) but that's good for you as the fewer customers you have, the less complaints you have. I received my current IPv6 address space in January 2007. I think everything I had was dual-stacked by February 2007 - that is, if a customer has a web or e-mail service with me - that service is accessible both by IPv4 and IPv6 connections. I've also given various presentations at AFRINIC on IPv6 and ended up as the Chair of the IPV6 Government Working Group for the South African Government. A number of years ago, whilst doing work for an organisation in Zambia, I "persuaded" a little company called Liquid Telecom to give IPv6 connectivity to my customer or I wouldn't buy from them. Recently - that same company, Liquid Telecom, received International Awards for their IPv6 network and Liquid Telecom isn't really that small either - from an African prospective, they stretch from Cape Town to Cairo. If you seriously want to run IPv6 on your network and don't know how (or why) - then you are welcome to contact me, pay me consulting fees (far cheaper than CGN) and I'll happily help you. ps - I also do DNSSEC, DANE and other cool security things. On 12/6/18 1:11 PM, Mukom Akong T wrote: > On 6 Dec 2018, 14:57 +0400, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > , wrote: >> >> My experience shows that usually engineers are aware (they may have >> the complete knowledge or not, but they know that they need to do >> IPv6), but in most organizations, executive management don?t pay >> attention to what their own engineers are saying. > > > True. Anyone with remote experience how organisations work will know > that: if management doesn?t support it, it?s never going to happen. > Our revamped ?IPv6 Strategy & Planning for Executives? workshop is > designed to help managers with exactly this problem. If you are > interested in hosting it in your country, express interest at > > > https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en > > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -- Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496 For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lee.howard at retevia.net Thu Dec 6 14:35:02 2018 From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:35:02 -0500 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <207341745.296097.1544089286108.JavaMail.zimbra@irenala.edu.mg> References: <4636b82c-c836-2980-ebf0-9c775bb59ea4@gmail.com> <7bcb60c8-7a32-6962-f580-c7a39f5ad9d2@retevia.net> <207341745.296097.1544089286108.JavaMail.zimbra@irenala.edu.mg> Message-ID: This is a good point. IPv6, like the Internet itself, benefits from the "network effect," where it is more valuable as more people use it. A telecom regulator can call a meeting of ISPs, mobile carriers, web hosts, IXP,? the NREN or university, and maybe a few large companies, kick off with a presentation about why IPv6 is important, and ask everyone what their plan is to provide IPv6 to their customers. Anyone who does not have a current plan can say when they'll have a plan, and the group can get together in six months to track progress. In some countries, this kind of meeting has been called by someone other than the telecom regulator. Probably everyone on this list can write the guest list, and work with others to convene the meeting. I imagine Afrinic would help, too. If the meeting opens with, "In 6-12 months, nobody else in country will be able to get Internet access, because we will be unable to get more IPv4 addresses," you will have their attention. Source: http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html Lee On 12/6/18 4:41 AM, Pascal ANDRIANISA wrote: > Dear All, > > I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it optimally. > I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the situation. > > Best regard, > *Pascal* Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA *R*esearch and > *E*ducation *N*etwork for *A*cademic and *L*earning *A*ctivities - > http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement > Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana_GSM _:+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 | +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *De: *"Mukom Akong T." *?: *"IPv6 in Africa" > *Envoy?: *Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 > *Objet: *Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop > people moving to IPv6 > > > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying > decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't > do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. > Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or > v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible > (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the > role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban > importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already > done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying > cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get > upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold > at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even > worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet > aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" > sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of > testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which > might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to > put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with > $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set > up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their > testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days > of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate > infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type > approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach > out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness > Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en > FRENCH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have > been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed > and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple > percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a > result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and > thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest > about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off > that everyone should just move to it. ? Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is > critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major > problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment > continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just > another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any > kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of > equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems > they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion > at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with > IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC > issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this > mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There > are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, > someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my > answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in > solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three > things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several > revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. > These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our > deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's > surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. > Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space > they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM.? For those > interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can > be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by > step walk-through of address planning best practices and > implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and > IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is > this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying > IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them > from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with > incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes > is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a > request at bit.ly/6deployEN ? ?(english) > bit.ly/6deployFR ? ? (french) As we do this, > we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually > HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it > and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that > incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. > We're also realising that that argument from big operators about > "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large > operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written > requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want > to see their response :( > If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country > - 5% teaching, 95% DOing > -?using our Prototype?? Validate ? Develop?? Deploy framework > - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours > you can apply at: https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en?(or > https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) > And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their > organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness > Assessment at https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en? (or > https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) > The results might provide pointers where to start the process. > Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom ?| > ?twitter: @perfexcellent > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering > of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss > mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lee.howard at retevia.net Thu Dec 6 14:49:42 2018 From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:49:42 -0500 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1c25ca37-8f48-1c9a-a562-392505470228@retevia.net> On 12/6/18 5:22 AM, Noureddine IDBOUFKER via AfrIPv6-Discuss wrote: > I think that Top management is not enough *aware *of business > opportunities behind IPv6 migration. > Sure IPv6 will give them the opportunity to address a high number of > objects, equipements, services,....? but it is not limited to that. > Top management has to encourage their people to be express their > innovation capabilities in a such a way to contribute to the > developpement of Value Added Services. > Providers who will not propose new competitive service catalogue will > simply die in globalized world. Top management has to know hat IPv6 is > a real pillar of IT governance. I agree with that. I have several presentations on business reasons for IPv6, which I imagine overlap with AFRINIC's IPv6 for Executives training: * Not running out of addresses, so you can keep adding customers * Faster [1] * Because it's faster, Google page rank is higher; more customers see your web site * Because it's faster, users spend more time on the page; more ad revenue * IPv6 is on by default; may present security risks if not secured * Use addresses to identify services; easier policy routing, ACLs, security, troubleshooting, etc. * New diagnostic tools PDM [rfc8250] and maybe M-PDM [draft-fear-ippm-mpdm] * Simpler container networking [2] * Segment Routing with IPv6: no MPLS/LDP/RSVP-TE/NSH, it's all just IP. [3] The last few are cutting-edge developments that are not widely available yet, but are examples of innovations enabled by IPv6. I didn't even list "It's not NAT" because you're likely to use some kind of address sharing to reach legacy IPv4 sites, but that need declines as others deploy, and it may be cheaper than NAT44. IPv6 is cool. Lee [1] https://stats.labs.apnic.net/v6perf/XB [2] *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF50OxZ5u4o* *[3] ***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUN68P6UAn0** ** > Regards > ----------------------------------------------- > Noureddine IDBOUFKER > > > Le jeudi 6 d?cembre 2018 ? 10:57:24 UTC+1, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via > AfrIPv6-Discuss a ?crit : > > > Operators are informed, if you speak about ?engineers?, the problem is > to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in > each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have > relevant web sites, etc.). > > I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago. > > > Regards, > > Jordi > > *De: *Pascal ANDRIANISA > *Responder a: *IPv6 in Africa Discussions > *Fecha: *jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47 > *Para: *IPv6 in Africa Discussions > *Asunto: *Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop > people moving to IPv6 > > Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform > the operators in each country of the situation because if only the > members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it > optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already > been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the > situation. Best regard, > *Pascal*Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA *R*esearch and *E*ducation > *N*etwork for *A*cademic and *L*earning *A*ctivities - > http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement > Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana_GSM _:+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 |? +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *De: *"Mukom Akong T." *?: *"IPv6 in Africa" > *Envoy?: *Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 > *Objet: *Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop > people moving to IPv6 > > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying > decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't > do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. > Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or > v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible > (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the > role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban > importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already > done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying > cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get > upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold > at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even > worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet > aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" > sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of > testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which > might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to > put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with > $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set > up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their > testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days > of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate > infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type > approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach > out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness > Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en > FRENCH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have > been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed > and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple > percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a > result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and > thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest > about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off > that everyone should just move to it. ? Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is > critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major > problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment > continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just > another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any > kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of > equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems > they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion > at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with > IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC > issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this > mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There > are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, > someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my > answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in > solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three > things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several > revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. > These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our > deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's > surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. > Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space > they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM.? For those > interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can > be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by > step walk-through of address planning best practices and > implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and > IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is > this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying > IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them > from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with > incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes > is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a > request at bit.ly/6deployEN ? ?(english) > bit.ly/6deployFR ? ? (french) As we do this, > we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually > HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it > and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that > incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. > We're also realising that that argument from big operators about > "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large > operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written > requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want > to see their response :( > If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country > - 5% teaching, 95% DOing > -?using our Prototype?? Validate ? Develop?? Deploy framework > - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours > you can apply at: https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en?(or > https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) > And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their > organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness > Assessment at https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en? (or > https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) > The results might provide pointers where to start the process. > Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom ?| > ?twitter: @perfexcellent > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering > of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss > mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss > mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged > or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive > use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty > authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of > this information, even if partially, including attached files, is > strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you > are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be > considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original > sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From n_idboufker at yahoo.fr Thu Dec 6 18:47:25 2018 From: n_idboufker at yahoo.fr (Noureddine IDBOUFKER) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <1c25ca37-8f48-1c9a-a562-392505470228@retevia.net> References: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> <1c25ca37-8f48-1c9a-a562-392505470228@retevia.net> Message-ID: <152027882.5323643.1544122045102@mail.yahoo.com> Sure there are many opportunities behind Transition to IPv6 but unfortunately, for African Operators in each country, there is also a risk. Every day elapsed before this transition moves them towards a very risky situation. I talk about Business and also technical risks. Unfortunately, the majority of operators has an urgency mindset.??I am really convinced that in order to encourage them to transit to IPv6, African Communities has to focus on risks and the urgency aspect of the transition. For example leading studies in order to produce a kind of SWOT Matrix, adapted to the African context, establishing Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats and Opportunities. Regards----------------------------------------------- Noureddine IDBOUFKERhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/idboufkernoureddine/ Le jeudi 6 d?cembre 2018 ? 15:51:06 UTC+1, Lee Howard a ?crit : On 12/6/18 5:22 AM, Noureddine IDBOUFKER via AfrIPv6-Discuss wrote: I think that Top management is not enough aware of business opportunities behind IPv6 migration.? Sure IPv6 will give them the opportunity to address a high number of objects, equipements, services,....? but it is not limited to that. Top management has to encourage their people to be express their innovation capabilities in a such a way to contribute to the developpement of Value Added Services.? Providers who will not propose new competitive service catalogue will simply die in globalized world. Top management has to know hat IPv6 is a real pillar of IT governance. I agree with that. I have several presentations on business reasons for IPv6, which I imagine overlap with AFRINIC's IPv6 for Executives training: - Not running out of addresses, so you can keep adding customers - Faster [1] - Because it's faster, Google page rank is higher; more customers see your web site - Because it's faster, users spend more time on the page; more ad revenue - IPv6 is on by default; may present security risks if not secured - Use addresses to identify services; easier policy routing, ACLs, security, troubleshooting, etc. - New diagnostic tools PDM [rfc8250] and maybe M-PDM [draft-fear-ippm-mpdm] - Simpler container networking [2] - Segment Routing with IPv6: no MPLS/LDP/RSVP-TE/NSH, it's all just IP. [3] The last few are cutting-edge developments that are not widely available yet, but are examples of innovations enabled by IPv6. I didn't even list "It's not NAT" because you're likely to use some kind of address sharing to reach legacy IPv4 sites, but that need declines as others deploy, and it may be cheaper than NAT44. IPv6 is cool. Lee [1] https://stats.labs.apnic.net/v6perf/XB [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF50OxZ5u4o [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUN68P6UAn0 Regards? ----------------------------------------------- Noureddine IDBOUFKER Le jeudi 6 d?cembre 2018 ? 10:57:24 UTC+1, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via AfrIPv6-Discuss a ?crit : Operators are informed, if you speak about ?engineers?, the problem is to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies in each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have relevant web sites, etc.). ? I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years ago. Regards, Jordi ? ? ? De: Pascal ANDRIANISA Responder a: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Fecha: jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47 Para: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Asunto: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 ? Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform the operators in each country of the situation because if only the members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the situation. Best regard, Pascal Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA Research and Education Network for Academic and Learning Activities - http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 |? +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 ? De: "Mukom Akong T." ?: "IPv6 in Africa" Envoy?: Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 Objet: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 ? > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the role of governments. In the interest of national development, just ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ? ENGLISH ? https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en FRENCH ? ?https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have been an IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off that everyone should just move to it. ? Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, but also how to implement them in an IPAM.? For those interested, a video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by step walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at?? bit.ly/6deployEN? ?(english) bit.ly/6deployFR? ? (french) As we do this, we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that incompatible equipment is not in the top 5.? We're also realising that that argument from big operators about "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't want to see their response :( ? If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country? ? - 5% teaching, 95% DOing -?using our Prototype?? Validate ? Develop?? Deploy framework - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours ? you can apply at:??https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en?(or?https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) ? And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness Assessment at??https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en? (or?https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) The results might provide pointers where to start the process. ? Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom ?| ?twitter: @perfexcellent ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ? _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ? _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lee.howard at retevia.net Thu Dec 6 19:25:52 2018 From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:25:52 -0500 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving to IPv6 In-Reply-To: <152027882.5323643.1544122045102@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2524A288-9B5A-4EB0-8C4A-BEF52F24D303@consulintel.es> <720858220.4762984.1544091777769@mail.yahoo.com> <1c25ca37-8f48-1c9a-a562-392505470228@retevia.net> <152027882.5323643.1544122045102@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: On 12/6/18 1:47 PM, Noureddine IDBOUFKER via AfrIPv6-Discuss wrote: > Sure there are many opportunities behind Transition to IPv6 but > unfortunately, for African Operators in each country, there is also a > risk. Every day elapsed before this transition moves them towards a > very risky situation. I talk about Business and also technical risks. > Unfortunately, the majority of operators has an urgency mindset. > ?I am really convinced that in order to encourage them to transit to > IPv6, African Communities has to focus on risks and the urgency aspect > of the transition. For example leading studies in order to produce a > kind of SWOT Matrix, adapted to the African context, establishing > Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats and Opportunities. Yes, I see your point. I wonder, how urgent does IPv4 runout have to be for the urgency to be a major risk? (Short version: if you haven't started IPv6 already, you will not be able to add new users by mid-2020). Using http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html I think we will reach Exhaustion Phase 2 in 6-8 months. Let's say July 2019. That means that everyone who has received IPv4 addresses since this past July has received their last Phase 1 allocation. Under current policy as I understand it, starting next July, networks will only get up to a /22 per application (or less, if a /23 or /24 will last them 8 months). If they use that /22, they can get another, and another, but whoever does the IP management work will be busy submitting applications. The Phase 2 policy might slow down consumption a little bit. Say the last /11 will run out a year later, in June 2020. As I see it, every wireline ISP in Africa that is not already using IPv6 will turn on their last new customer in 18 months. It is too late to avoid this: it will take at least two years to adopt IPv6. The only options they will have left are CGN or buying addresses; those will add conservatively US$10-40 cost per user. Mobile networks may be able to last a few months longer, depending on their rate of growth and the ratio of users to IPv4 addresses. The network with a two-year plan will be the only network left in two years. Please, convince me I'm wrong. Lee > > Regards > ----------------------------------------------- > Noureddine IDBOUFKER > https://www.linkedin.com/in/idboufkernoureddine/ > > > Le jeudi 6 d?cembre 2018 ? 15:51:06 UTC+1, Lee Howard > a ?crit : > > > > On 12/6/18 5:22 AM, Noureddine IDBOUFKER via AfrIPv6-Discuss wrote: > I think that Top management is not enough *aware *of business > opportunities behind IPv6 migration. > Sure IPv6 will give them the opportunity to address a high number of > objects, equipements, services,....? but it is not limited to that. > Top management has to encourage their people to be express their > innovation capabilities in a such a way to contribute to the > developpement of Value Added Services. > Providers who will not propose new competitive service catalogue will > simply die in globalized world. Top management has to know hat IPv6 is > a real pillar of IT governance. > > I agree with that. I have several presentations on business reasons > for IPv6, which I imagine overlap with AFRINIC's IPv6 for Executives > training: > > * Not running out of addresses, so you can keep adding customers > * Faster [1] > * Because it's faster, Google page rank is higher; more customers > see your web site > * Because it's faster, users spend more time on the page; more ad > revenue > * IPv6 is on by default; may present security risks if not secured > * Use addresses to identify services; easier policy routing, ACLs, > security, troubleshooting, etc. > * New diagnostic tools PDM [rfc8250] and maybe M-PDM > [draft-fear-ippm-mpdm] > * Simpler container networking [2] > * Segment Routing with IPv6: no MPLS/LDP/RSVP-TE/NSH, it's all just > IP. [3] > > The last few are cutting-edge developments that are not widely > available yet, but are examples of innovations enabled by IPv6. I > didn't even list "It's not NAT" because you're likely to use some kind > of address sharing to reach legacy IPv4 sites, but that need declines > as others deploy, and it may be cheaper than NAT44. > > IPv6 is cool. > > Lee > > [1] https://stats.labs.apnic.net/v6perf/XB > > [2] *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF50OxZ5u4o* > > *[3] ***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUN68P6UAn0** > > ** > >> Regards >> ----------------------------------------------- >> Noureddine IDBOUFKER >> >> >> Le jeudi 6 d?cembre 2018 ? 10:57:24 UTC+1, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via >> AfrIPv6-Discuss >> a ?crit : >> >> >> Operators are informed, if you speak about ?engineers?, the problem >> is to inform the CEOs of operator AND the CEOs of important companies >> in each country (financial sectors, companies that export or have >> relevant web sites, etc.). >> >> I recall ARIN did sent a letter to them (in their region) a few years >> ago. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Jordi >> >> *De: *Pascal ANDRIANISA >> >> *Responder a: *IPv6 in Africa Discussions >> >> *Fecha: *jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2018, 10:47 >> *Para: *IPv6 in Africa Discussions >> >> *Asunto: *Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop >> people moving to IPv6 >> >> Dear All, I think there is also another solution which is to inform >> the operators in each country of the situation because if only the >> members who will apply IPv6 it will not be possible to use it >> optimally. I do not know if a provision to that effect has already >> been taken but I think that all the members are aware of the >> situation. Best regard, >> *Pascal*Heriliva ANDRIANISA Webmaster i RENALA *R*esearch and *E*ducation >> *N*etwork for *A*cademic and *L*earning *A*ctivities - >> http://www.irenala.edu.mg/ Porte 201 - Minist?re de l'Enseignement >> Sup?rieur et de la Recherche Scientifique - Fiadanana_GSM _:+261 (0) 32 46 680 29 |? +261 (0) 34 30 680 29 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *De: *"Mukom Akong T." >> *?: *"IPv6 in Africa" >> >> *Envoy?: *Jeudi 6 D?cembre 2018 06:41:29 *Objet: *Re: >> [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Finding solutions to things that stop people moving >> to IPv6 >> > > Consumers are unaware of IPv6, so it's not part of their buying >> decision. If something doesn't make consumer buy boxes, vendors don't >> do it. I do not think consumer education about IP is a good idea. >> Neither do I. Consumers don't DIRECTLY care about IP (whether v4 or >> v6). But they do care about other features that may be only possible >> (or easier, or cheaper) with v6. This is one place where I see the >> role of governments. In the interest of national development, just >> ban importation and sale of legacy equipment. Similar to what is >> already done with type approval in telecommunications today. > ISPs >> buying cheap boxes and not paying anything for support, so they can't >> get upgrades. > Foreign ISPs dumping volumes of used CPE, which get >> resold at deep discounts. I've been screaming about this for years. >> Even worse, some of it is going to be "sold" as "next generation >> Internet aid or technical corporation") which further cripples IPv6 >> deployment. > > Something that has worked for some companies is an >> "ISP Certified" sticker. CPE vendors could apply to an ISP, and pay >> the costs of testing. If the tests complied with the ISP's >> requirements, which might include MAP, lw4o6, or 464xlat support, the >> vendor is allowed to put a sticker on their box saying, "This device >> certified for use with $ISP." There might be a business opportunity >> for someone who can set up a really good CPE testing lab, so ISPs >> could outsource their testing and certification. In addition, I >> believe that with two days of training (regulators and customs) and >> the appropriate infrastructure and a PROCESS, we can help a >> government implement type approval for IPv6. Any regulator that >> wishes to do this should reach out and join the waiting list by >> taking the Government IPv6 Readiness Self Assessment at ENGLISH ? >> https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=en FRENCH ? >> https://vox.afrinic.net/465923?lang=fr > For years I have been an >> IPv6 advocate ? and I still am ? and I?ve actively deployed and run >> IPv6 in production supplying it to the end user, with multiple >> percentage point changes in country IPv6 penetration statistics as a >> result, but I am fast realizing that if we want IPv6 to grow and >> thrive ? it?s time we started being a little more open and honest >> about the challenges and problems with it ? instead of sprouting off >> that everyone should just move to it. ? Let?s acknowledge that IPv6 >> is critical, we have no option, but it is also deeply flawed, has >> major problems, and until start dealing with those ? we will see >> deployment continue to stutter I agree with the above. The solution >> is not just another open "discussion" where people who have not even >> started any kind of deployment, or even have a fair idea of what >> percentage of equipment might or might not be v6 ready go on an on >> about problems they've only heard about. > > Should we have a round >> table discussion at AIS? How can we identify and make progress on >> resolving issues with IPv6? > Perhaps we can start with a mailing >> list thread of SPECIFIC issues people have encountered while >> attempting a deployment on this mailing list, then build up to a >> webinar or discussion at AIS. There are probably about 400million >> users using IPv6 today and growing, someone somewhere has solved >> those problems. > The common theme in my answers above is that more >> people running IPv6 provides more weight in solving problems. If >> everyone would take a couple of hours to do three things, we'd have a >> very broad base of common experience to draw from: > > 1. Write an >> address plan. Don't worry if it takes several revisions, that's >> normal. > > 2. Apply to Afrinic for IPv6 addresses. > > 3. Announce >> the IPv6 addresses and route them on your backbone. These are things >> that we've helped operators implement in 1 day at our deployathons >> (or 6 two hour sessions during helpdesk calls). It's surprising how >> many operators need help with their address planning. Which is why >> not only do we teach them how to determine how much space they get, >> but also how to implement them in an IPAM.? For those interested, a >> video of a highly attended and rated AFRINIC webinar can be found at >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFIVQ_Z9je8&t=542s Step by step >> walk-through of address planning best practices and implementation in >> an IPAM ---- no maths! > > AFRINIC's training and IPv6 Helpdesk are >> great resources. The premise behind the helpdesk is this: We can find >> ONE operator a month that's committed to deploying IPv6, we keep >> providing targeted training and coaching to move them from one >> deployment milestone to another until we get stuck with incompatible >> equipment or internal collaboration issues. All it takes is about 4 >> hours investment per week. If you are interested, make a request at >> bit.ly/6deployEN ? ?(english) >> bit.ly/6deployFR ? ? (french) As we do this, >> we're also building an tremendous amount of intel on what actually >> HOLDS IPv6 deployment back from real operators attempting to deploy >> it and so far with over 45 tickets, the evidence indicates that >> incompatible equipment is not in the top 5. >> We're also realising that that argument from big operators about >> "customers aren't asking for it" is not true. We know of large >> operators that within 2 months have received explicitly written >> requests to enable IPv6 from large corporate customers. You don't >> want to see their response :( >> If you want to host one of our DEPLOYATHON sessions in your country >> - 5% teaching, 95% DOing >> -?using our Prototype?? Validate ? Develop?? Deploy framework >> - enables you hit a measurable deployment milestone within 8 hours >> you can apply at: https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=en?(or >> https://vox.afrinic.net/189828?lang=fr in french) >> And for those who are still wondering how ready or not their >> organisations are, take our free Organisational IPv6 Readiness >> Assessment at https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=en? (or >> https://vox.afrinic.net/651525?lang=fr in French) >> The results might provide pointers where to start the process. >> Until next time ..... be EXCELLENT -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom >> ?| ?twitter: @perfexcellent >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering >> of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss >> mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss >> mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> >> >> ********************************************** >> IPv4 is over >> Are you ready for the new Internet ? >> http://www.theipv6company.com >> The IPv6 Company >> >> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged >> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive >> use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty >> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents >> of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is >> strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you >> are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if >> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be >> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original >> sender to inform about this communication and delete it. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zied.bouziri at gmail.com Mon Dec 17 14:54:49 2018 From: zied.bouziri at gmail.com (Zied BOUZIRI) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:54:49 +0100 Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Afrinic 29 slides Message-ID: Hi Can you please share with us links to Afrinic-29 workshops slides and presentation slides Thank you -- *cordially*, *?? ??????* *Zied BOUZIRI*? *???? ??????* ISET Charguia, Tunisie www.bouziri.tn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: