[AfrIPv6-Discuss] «Preparing for IPv6-only mobile networks : why and how»
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu Jun 2 07:27:15 UTC 2016
On 2/Jun/16 09:13, Willy MANGA wrote:
> Hi,
> I guess some of you have already read that article but let me give you
> the link:
>
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html
>
>
> So, can we really move forward guys ? :)
In my experience, the economic incentive to keep NAT444 in mobile
networks vs. going any kind of IPv6 is balanced more in favour of the
former.
I applaud folk like Apple using their market power to "force the issue".
How mobile operators will react to that will be interesting, but it
could make for a lot more impact of Android did the same.
This one will be hard to predict, especially when a good portion of the
capex budget of the typical large scale mobile operator goes to NAT444.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/afripv6-discuss/attachments/20160602/8bc1bddc/attachment.sig>
More information about the AfrIPv6-Discuss
mailing list