<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>The refreshing <span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">naïveté displayed here, is it more African or more Youth? Or both? </span></div><div><br></div><div>el<br>-- <div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13pt; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.294118); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.231373);">Sent from </span><span style="font-size: 13pt;">Dr Lisse's iPhone 6</span></div><div><br></div></div><div><br>On Jul 13, 2015, at 17:04, Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><p dir="ltr">Sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.<br>
On 13 Jul 2015 4:20 pm, "Mark Elkins" <<a href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za">mje@posix.co.za</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> Agreed.<br>
><br>
> The worse though, is the damage to ICANN's reputation, the GAC and<br>
> potentially the IANA Transition.<br>
><br>
SO:</p>
<p dir="ltr">+1 and this happening at a time when the ICANN accountability WG (CCWG) is at the peak of determining what accountability model to adopt is of great concern. Nevertheless, I hope the group would remain focused and not be overly moved by just an occurrence.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I think ICANN board may have applied common sense forgetting that "process is process" even if the outcome is obvious. A lesson I hope they must have learnt from the .Africa case.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards<br></p>
<p dir="ltr">> > Regards<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Mark James ELKINS</p></div></blockquote><div>[...]</div></body></html>