<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div>Hi..</div><div>Knowing how these processes are carried out, I like few others in this agree with the Content of thr letter albeit too late now. .</div><div>A shot has been fired...</div><div>Cheers. Yassin</div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:9px;color:#575757">Sent from Samsung Mobile</div></div><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack@gmail.com> <br>Date:30/08/2014 11:05 (GMT+02:00) <br>To: AfrICANN list <africann@afrinic.net>,el@lisse.na <br>Subject: Re: [AFRI-Discuss] [AfrICANN-discuss] Theme for a Joint Meeting AFRALO/AfrICANN at ICANN 51 <br><br><p>Noted with thanks , i don't mean to water down the efforts of the different stakeholders, i was looking at it from a different angle that was hypothetical, that said i think Africa has something to offer some aspects of the transition touch on the ccTLD community making us interested parties in the IANA/NTIA transition and the least we can do is exchange views and give our opinion.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Aug 30, 2014 9:44 AM, "Dr Eberhard W Lisse" <<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na">el@lisse.na</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This was written by parties that have or *ARE* invested in the ICANN<br>
process, ie who have sxomething to loose from this power grab<br>
attempt.<br>
<br>
Even if the only interest one has is being a PDP terms like<br>
"Analysis Paralysis" do not make sense, and there is ABSIOULTELY<br>
NOTHING Africa-specific in the transtion, this process at least<br>
should lend itself so well to our usual logorrhea.<br>
<br>
You should not even wait until October to endorse this. I do.<br>
And so does ALAC.<br>
<br>
el<br>
<br>
On 2014-08-30, 08:05 , Barrack Otieno wrote:<br>
> Many thanks Dr. Fuller,<br>
><br>
> I have looked at the text and there is a lot of sense in so far as<br>
> the issues raised by the stakeholders are concerned, they are well<br>
> thought out and articulated, i was just looking at it from another<br>
> perspective.<br>
><br>
> Thank you for the quick turnaround.<br>
><br>
> Regards<br>
><br>
> On 8/30/14, Ben Fuller <<a href="mailto:abutiben@gmail.com">abutiben@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Barrack,<br>
>><br>
>> Perhaps, but we should seriously consider joining all the other<br>
>> communities. Scroll down to the bottom of the article where the<br>
>> full text of the joint letter sent to ICANN is posted. We should<br>
>> focus on that text.<br>
>><br>
>> Ben<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Barrack Otieno<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:otieno.barrack@gmail.com">otieno.barrack@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Hi Dr Fuller,<br>
>>><br>
>>> You raise a very pertinent issue while i am in agreement with<br>
>>> you, i also think we have to be wary of decisions that will over<br>
>>> engineer decision making processes within ICANN since this could<br>
>>> result in some analysis paralysis sort of scenario, what is your<br>
>>> take?<br>
>>><br>
>>> Just a thought.<br>
>>>[...]<br>
--<br>
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)<br>
el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: <a href="tel:%2B264%2081%20124%206733" value="+264811246733">+264 81 124 6733</a> (cell)<br>
PO Box 8421 \ /<br>
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
AfrICANN mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AfrICANN@afrinic.net">AfrICANN@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</body>