<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na" target="_blank">el@lisse.na</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto"><div>We can not have an admitted not existing person subscribed. </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We probably should not, but I think we can, since we don't have an AUP in place.</div><div>
<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>And the person behind having admitted to this and by implication to lying will have to go.<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I would prefer she post as herself, certainly. If the list somehow came to a decision (and we are not a decision making group AFAIK), then Madame would be telling the truth (partially) when complaining that she has been excluded from the list. At the moment she is complaining that she has been excluded, when in fact that is not the case.</div>
<div><br></div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Cheers,<br><br>McTim<br>"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel<br>