<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><blockquote style="border: none; padding: 0px;"></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: rgb(69, 69, 69); font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">If you see the matter as I do, that ICANN has asked that governmental<br></span><span style="color: rgb(69, 69, 69); font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">and/or intergovernmental entities weigh in on new gTLDs that have a<br></span><span style="color: rgb(69, 69, 69); font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">geographic scope, it is perfectly reasonable to have the AU involved.</span></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: rgb(69, 69, 69); font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">in light of the above I see zero abuse of trust,
bad influencing, lies</span><div><span style="color: rgb(69, 69, 69); font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">or manipulations coming from any of your opponents.</span></div></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; padding: 0px;"></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; padding: 0px;"></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; padding: 0px;"></blockquote><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.600000381469727px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span style="color: rgb(69, 69, 69); font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br></span></div><div style="font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.600000381469727px; color: rgb(69, 69, 69); background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span style="color: rgb(69, 69, 69); font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;">That is what makes my point clear. The governments cannot impose their will
on a disqualified application, that is if your eyes can see beyond government approvals, or are you also going to call the winner before the ICANN evaluation is over!</span></div><div style="font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.600000381469727px; color: rgb(69, 69, 69); background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><br></div><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13.600000381469727px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"> --Lerato Ma</div><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><blockquote style="border-left-width: 2px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(16, 16, 255); padding-left: 5px;"> <div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> <div style="font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font size="2" face="Arial"> <hr size="1">
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Lerato <lerato.ma@yahoo.com>; africann@afrinic.net <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, November 30, 2012 4:33 PM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] The Google campaign – An ITU view<br> </font> </div> <br>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Lerato <<a ymailto="mailto:lerato.ma@yahoo.com" href="mailto:lerato.ma@yahoo.com">lerato.ma@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br>> My specific questions remain unanswered.<br>><br>> hmm your questions will be answered soon by results of the evaluation that<br>> will follow the guidebook,<br>> that is if the governments in Africa do not try to decide to influence ICANN<br>> again for an exception or I should say do a resolution and shove it down on<br>> ICANN's throat?<br><br>There is no shoving here.<br><br>The ICANN Board, when approving the guidebook, opened the door for the<br>involvement of "public authorities associated with the continent or<br>the region".<br><br>> by the same, I notice the questions that never gets answered such as ones<br>> raised by Dr . Yassin earlier on this list, say on matters of abuse of<br>> trust, bad influencing, lies and manipulations?<br><br>If you see the matter
as I do, that ICANN has asked that governmental<br>and/or intergovernmental entities weigh in on new gTLDs that have a<br>geographic scope, it is perfectly reasonable to have the AU involved.<br><br>in light of the above I see zero abuse of trust, bad influencing, lies<br>or manipulations coming from any of your opponents.<br><br><br>-- <br>Cheers,<br><br>McTim<br>"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A<br>route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel<br>_______________________________________________<br>AfrICANN mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:AfrICANN@afrinic.net" href="mailto:AfrICANN@afrinic.net">AfrICANN@afrinic.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann</a><br><br><br> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></body></html>