<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body>Oops.. This is now going into comparative inequalities ...since infrastructure is a wide and varied quantity. I think that We need to separate Infrastructure by categories before the debate moves on.... Please.<div>My opinion is that Africa has enjoyed what needs to be promoted and protected and should be proud of. It depends on what one means by Infrastructure...<br><br><br><font size="2">From Yassin . Sent from samsung mobile. On O2.</font> </div><br><br><br>Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> wrote:<br><br><br>And that infrastructure would be, what?<br><br>el<br><br>On 2012-10-22 23:18 , Claude Essomba wrote:<br>> Dear Dr Eberhard W Lisse ,<br>> <br>> Thanks for your reaction. The minimum for most of the countries<br>> to be protected is what we call critical infrastructure. A<br>> simulation could include the impact when the critical<br>> infrastructure is affected as it was the case for the Estonia<br>> again Russia.<br>> <br>> Regards<br>> <br>> *CLAUDE VINCENT DE PAUL ESSOMBA*<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>AfrICANN mailing list<br>AfrICANN@afrinic.net<br>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann<br> </body>