<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body>This is a long story but very short..<div>Look at how the Internet became a phenomenum.... How did it became a Public Good and now is a stronger life thing next to AirB-)</div><div>The US Govt invested in the Internet. Period. </div><div>There is question about it BUT it needs the whole world to make the Internet be the way it is today. One can not claim a rightful right to the evolution which one benefits from. </div><div>That raises a point for Negotiation not a point to Claim through any channels.</div><div>To me, That is what seems to be the universal position in order to respect the rights .</div><div>Kind regards<br><br><br><font size="2">From Yassin . Sent from samsung mobile. On O2.</font> </div><br><br><br>SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:<br><br><br>Hi Adamou,<br>At 01:59 08-08-2012, Adamou Nacer wrote:<br>>- I have even read an article a few days ago (than to our fellow <br>>Mamadou Lo) on the fact that US government can take control of <br>>Internet in case of emergency, as if Internet was like the US telephone system.<br><br>What is the meaning of "take control of Internet in case of emergency"?<br><br>>So now I am asking, how can we reject to China/Russia proposal of <br>>putting Internet under the UN's ITU management and break its present <br>>governance model while we are not<br><br>What is the meaning of "putting Internet under the UN's ITU management"?<br><br>Regards,<br>-sm <br><br>_______________________________________________<br>AfrICANN mailing list<br>AfrICANN@afrinic.net<br>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann<br> </body>