<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 20 June 2012 20:47, SM <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sm@resistor.net" target="_blank">sm@resistor.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
At 08:49 20-06-2012, Mamadou LO wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Proposed New IETF Standard Would Create a Nationally Partitioned "Internet"<br>
<a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20120619_proposed_ietf_standard_creates_nationally_partitioned_internet/" target="_blank">http://www.circleid.com/posts/<u></u>20120619_proposed_ietf_<u></u>standard_creates_nationally_<u></u>partitioned_internet/</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
That article isn't well-written. Anyone can propose an idea. That doesn't mean that it is a proposed standard or that it represents the views of some country.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>And i am not surprised the AIP is proposed by folks from .cn '-) ... Well .cn have done a good job controlling their own....but decentralizing the DNS system to that level does not ring a bell to me personally...<br>
<br>The idea seems more layer9 driven....i mean each sovereign controlling its own root-servers???????<br><br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Regards,<br>
-sm <br></blockquote><div><br>./noah<br> <br></div></div>