<div class="storyHead">
                                <h1><font size="2">Internet records to be stored for a year </font></h1>
                                <h2><font size="2">Details
of every email sent and website visited by people in Britain are to be
stored for use by the state from tomorrow as part of what campaigners
claim is a massive assault on privacy. </font></h2>
                                </div>
                        <div class="oneHalf gutter">
                                <div class="headerOne"><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/5105519/Internet-records-to-be-stored-for-a-year.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/5105519/Internet-records-to-be-stored-for-a-year.html</a><br>
<br>By David Barrett, Home Affairs Correspondent <br></div>
                                <div class="story"><div class="byline"><p>
                        
                        Last Updated: 3:20PM BST 05 Apr 2009</p>
        </div>
<div class="slideshow ssPortrait">
        </div>
<p>
A European Union directive, which Britain was instrumental in devising, comes
into force which will require all internet service providers to retain
information on email traffic, visits to web sites and telephone calls made
over the internet, for 12 months.
</p>
<p>
Police and the security services will be able to access the information to
combat crime and terrorism.
</p>
<p>
Hundreds of public bodies and quangos, including local councils, will also be
able to access the data to investigate flytipping and other less serious
crimes.
</p>
<p>
It was previously thought that only the large companies would be required to
take part, covering 95 per cent of Britain's internet usage, but a Home
Office spokesman has confirmed it will be applied "across the board"
to even the smallest company.
</p>
<p>
Privacy campaigners say the move to force telecoms companies to store the data
is the first step towards the controversial central database at the heart of
the Home Office's Intercept Modernisation Programme, which will gather far
more detailed information on Britain's online activities.
</p>
<p>
Simon Davies, director of Privacy International, said: "I don't think
people are aware of the implications of this move. It means that everything
we do online or on the phone will be known to the authorities.
</p>
<p>
"They are using this to produce probably the world's most comprehensive
surveillance system.
</p>
<p>
"This is a disgraceful example of the covert influence that Brussels has
across our freedoms and liberties. The entire episode has been marked by a
litany of secret dealings, vicious political games and a complete absence of
transparency."
</p>
<p>
Phil Noble of privacy group NO2ID, said: "This is the kind of technology
that the Stasi would have dreamed of.
</p>
<p>
"We are facing a co-ordinated strategy to track everyone's
communications, creating a dossier on every person's relationships and
transactions.
</p>
<p>
"It is clearly preparatory work for the as-yet un-revealed plans for
intercept modernisation."
</p>
<p>
Another EU directive which requires companies to hold details of telephone
records for a year has already come into force, and although internet data
is held on an ad hoc basis this is the first time the industry has faced a
statutory requirement to archive the material.
</p>
<p>
Information held includes the details of who contacted who, and when, but does
not involve the content of emails being stored.
</p>
<p>
The taxpayer will reimburse internet service providers and telecoms companies
for the costs associated with storing the billions of individual records.
</p>
<p>
Thierry Dieu of ETNO, the European telecoms networks operators association,
said: "We regret that the legislation has been put through without real
consultation with the players in the market.
</p>
<p>
"The UK is the only country which has decided to reimburse the cost of
retaining all the data. It remains to be seen whether this will cover all
the costs."
</p>
<p>
A Home Office spokesman said: "It is the Government's priority to protect
public safety and national security. That is why we are completing the
implementation of this directive, which will bring the UK in line with our
European counterparts.
</p>
<p>
"Letters will go out to communication service providers telling them that
it is coming into force. We are talking across the board, to all
communication providers."
</p>
<p>
He said communications data played a "vital part" in a wide range of
criminal investigations, such as the hunt for the killer of Rhys Jones, the
11-year-old schoolboy shot dead in Liverpool in 2007, and the prevention of
terrorists attacks.
</p>
<p>
"Without communications data, resolving crimes such as the Rhys Jones
murder would be very difficult if not impossible.
</p>
<p>
"Access to communications data is governed by Regulation of Investigatory
Powers Act which ensures that effective safeguards are in place and that the
data can only be accessed when it is necessary and proportionate to do so,"
he said.
</p>
<p>
A European deal on storing data was first pursued by Charles Clarke when he
was home secretary in 2005.
</p>
<p>
At the time, a Home Office spokesman confirmed that a major mobile phone
company which had previously stored its data for just two days had agreed to
retain the information for a year in exchange for £875,000 in taxpayers'
money.
</p>
<p>
A report compiled by ETNO in 2004 said that a large internet service provider
would need to store between 20,000 and 40,000 terabytes of data - of the
equivalent of 40 trillion emails - if it was required to keep all traffic
data for 12 months.
</p>
</div>
                        </div>