[AfrICANN-discuss] "The .ug debate: Is Redelegation Necessary?" / www.newvision.co.ug

[Seun Ojedeji]

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 15 Oct 2014 15:14, "Dr Eberhard W Lisse" <el at lisse.na> wrote:
>
> Interesting read, indeed.
>
> Should .UG be revoked and transferred to another entity?  OF COURSE
> NOT!
>
Perhaps you care to share why you have a different opinion

> But, why are we, who are not involved, waste our time on this
> debate?
>
Perhaps with the hope of educating the community. So they don't get
boxed-in, as it is the case.

>
Never mind that some of us don't even get the terminology
> right.
>
This will be more useful if you follow-up your statement by explaining the
"right" terminology.

> They have not committed Substantial >Misconduct.
> How gracious of you (who runs his business in the diaspora) to grant
> someone in a foreign country a role to play in expropriation of
> their property.
>
Yeah this may have happened due to "honest" ignorance and such should be
corrected through educating and awareness in names processes.

> Are you accredited with them?
>
Why does this matter

Cheers!
> el
>
> On 2014-10-15, 09:15 , Oluniyi D. Ajao [Web4Africa] wrote:
> > Interesting read.
> >
> > 1.  Should .ug be re-delegated from the current company to a more
> > national entity?  YES. A community-driven registry (examples:
> > ZACR, NiRA, KeNIC) is much better in every way.
> >
> > 2.  Should the current managers be demonized?  NO. They have a
> > strong role to play in the transition if moves were made to
> > re-delegate.  They can stay on as a leading registrar after
> > re-delegated.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AfrICANN mailing list
> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20141015/ad875c16/attachment.htm