[AfrICANN-discuss] What did Africa Get out of NetMundial
Internet Governance Discussions?
ymshana2003
ymshana2003 at gmail.com
Mon May 12 09:45:25 SAST 2014
Thank you Ephraim for this 'distilled' update. It is very useful to know about the depth of African involvement is this 'process' for the benefit of and promotion of such policy issues.
It is good to see how the quality of the outcomes can be affected by the level of the participation from Africa.
It is also important to note that there is a need for the regional IGF to involve their respective governments deeper and this should happen uniformly throught the continent ....the knowledge of the local Barriers should be an advantage?.
Kind regards.
Yassin
Sent from Samsung Mobile
-------- Original message --------
From: Ephraim Percy Kenyanito <ekenyanito at gmail.com>
Date:11/05/2014 23:07 (GMT+02:00)
To: kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke,isoc at orion.my.co.ke,africann at afrinic.net
Subject: [AfrICANN-discuss] What did Africa Get out of NetMundial Internet Governance Discussions?
https://www.accessnow.org/blog/2014/05/09/spotlight-on-african-contributions-to-internet-governance-discussions-part-
"Generally, the final NetMundial statement is in line with the priorities expressed in the African submissions in acknowledging the universality of human rights and taking into consideration internet governance priorities from developing countries’ perspectives. For example, the NetMundial outcome document recognizes that the internet is a global resource, which should be managed in the public interest."
Best Regards,
Ephraim Percy Kenyanito
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20140512/9deb10ff/attachment.htm
More information about the AfrICANN
mailing list