Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] The Google campaign – An ITU view
lerato.ma at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 30 22:30:54 SAST 2012
I would have to post the whole guidebook to show the number of violations McTim? ;)
I suggest you read both public comments submitted by the respective applicants, as your comments reflect comments by one applicant only?
But you have me worried now that the evaluators might do the same, maybe DCA should send a reminder?
Opps, hope we are not using this list to discuss "DCA issues", though, maybe we should rename it .africa issues. ;)
> From: McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com>
>To: Lerato <lerato.ma at yahoo.com>; africann at afrinic.net
>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 12:12 PM
>Subject: Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] The Google campaign – An ITU view
>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Lerato <lerato.ma at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> you write like DCA is not aware of that?
>> Did the others read the rest of the document outside of that? that is
>> precisely my point!
>Which specific points of the guidebook do you mean?
>> or are they expecting the governments of Africa to approve their application
>> based on government support only, then why even apply to ICANN?
>I don't speak for them, sorry.
>"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
>route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
>AfrICANN mailing list
>AfrICANN at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the AfrICANN