Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] The Google campaign – An ITU view
ymshana2003 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 1 15:03:10 SAST 2012
If you like McTim et all that there have been no Lies, Abuse of trust or negative influencing at different levels; then you are an obidient follower of what you hear or asked to do OR you are part of the game unless you have credible proof not based on what Loud Voiced somw brothers and sisters who shoot or shout you down? Sad.
Please let us be transparent for thebenefit of all.
From Yassin . Sent from samsung mobile. On O2.
McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Lerato <lerato.ma at yahoo.com> wrote:
> My specific questions remain unanswered.
> hmm your questions will be answered soon by results of the evaluation that
> will follow the guidebook,
> that is if the governments in Africa do not try to decide to influence ICANN
> again for an exception or I should say do a resolution and shove it down on
> ICANN's throat?
There is no shoving here.
The ICANN Board, when approving the guidebook, opened the door for the
involvement of "public authorities associated with the continent or
> by the same, I notice the questions that never gets answered such as ones
> raised by Dr . Yassin earlier on this list, say on matters of abuse of
> trust, bad influencing, lies and manipulations?
If you see the matter as I do, that ICANN has asked that governmental
and/or intergovernmental entities weigh in on new gTLDs that have a
geographic scope, it is perfectly reasonable to have the AU involved.
in light of the above I see zero abuse of trust, bad influencing, lies
or manipulations coming from any of your opponents.
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
AfrICANN mailing list
AfrICANN at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the AfrICANN